{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,18]],"date-time":"2026-06-18T15:37:24Z","timestamp":1781797044885,"version":"3.54.5"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Nature Switzerland","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783031529979","type":"print"},{"value":"9783031529986","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,1]],"date-time":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704067200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,1]],"date-time":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704067200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-52998-6_9","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,31]],"date-time":"2024-01-31T08:03:38Z","timestamp":1706688218000},"page":"107-118","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["What Shapes Our Trust in Scientific Information? A Review of Factors Influencing Perceived Scientificness and Credibility"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5000-104X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria","family":"Henkel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6758-6582","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Armin","family":"Jacob","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3281-8646","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lennart","family":"Perrey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"9_CR1","first-page":"301","volume":"4","author":"X Liu","year":"2009","unstructured":"Liu, X.: Beyond science literacy: science and the public. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ. 4, 301\u2013311 (2009)","journal-title":"Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ."},{"key":"9_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Committee on Science Learning, Duschl, R.A., Schweingruber, H.A., Shouse, A.W.: Taking Science to School. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. (2007). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17226\/11625","DOI":"10.17226\/11625"},{"key":"9_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-021-01056-1","volume":"5","author":"S Loomba","year":"2021","unstructured":"Loomba, S., de Figueiredo, A., Piatek, S.J., de Graaf, K., Larson, H.J.: Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 337\u2013348 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-021-01056-1","journal-title":"Nat. Hum. Behav."},{"key":"9_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1177\/0963662504044908","volume":"13","author":"JD Miller","year":"2004","unstructured":"Miller, J.D.: Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: what we know and what we need to know. Public Underst. Sci. 13, 273\u2013294 (2004). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963662504044908","journal-title":"Public Underst. Sci."},{"issue":"1","key":"9_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.33650\/pjp.v8i1.2167","volume":"8","author":"MRR Mujayapura","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mujayapura, M.R.R., Suryadi, K., Sardin, S.: COVID-19 misinformation: how does scientific information literacy prevent it? PEDAGOGIK: Jurnal Pendidikan 8(1), 39\u201376 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33650\/pjp.v8i1.2167","journal-title":"PEDAGOGIK: Jurnal Pendidikan"},{"key":"9_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1177\/0963662506070159","volume":"17","author":"N Allum","year":"2008","unstructured":"Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D., Brunton-Smith, I.: Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis. Public Underst. Sci. 17, 35\u201354 (2008). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963662506070159","journal-title":"Public Underst. Sci."},{"key":"9_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1002\/sce.20480","volume":"96","author":"E Thomm","year":"2012","unstructured":"Thomm, E., Bromme, R.: \u201cIt should at least seem scientific!\u201d textual features of \u201cscientificness\u201d and their impact on lay assessments of online information. Sci. Educ. 96, 187\u2013211 (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sce.20480","journal-title":"Sci. Educ."},{"key":"9_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"820","DOI":"10.1080\/01443410.2019.1694646","volume":"40","author":"BA Zaboski","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zaboski, B.A., Therriault, D.J.: Faking science: scientificness, credibility, and belief in pseudoscience. Educ. Psychol. 40, 820\u2013837 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01443410.2019.1694646","journal-title":"Educ. Psychol."},{"key":"9_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jesp.2021.104184","volume":"96","author":"TC O\u2019Brien","year":"2021","unstructured":"O\u2019Brien, T.C., Palmer, R., Albarracin, D.: Misplaced trust: when trust in science fosters belief in pseudoscience and the benefits of critical evaluation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 96, 104184 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jesp.2021.104184","journal-title":"J. Exp. Soc. Psychol."},{"key":"9_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hahn, O., Lemke, S., Mazarakis, A., Peters, I.: Which visual elements make texts appear scientific? An empirical analysis. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Mensch und Computer, pp. 61\u201365. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3404983.3410014","DOI":"10.1145\/3404983.3410014"},{"key":"9_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1177\/0963662514549688","volume":"25","author":"A Tal","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tal, A., Wansink, B.: Blinded with science: trivial graphs and formulas increase ad persuasiveness and belief in product efficacy. Public Underst. Sci. 25, 117\u2013125 (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963662514549688","journal-title":"Public Underst. Sci."},{"key":"9_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"849","DOI":"10.1007\/s11251-012-9261-2","volume":"41","author":"M-B Isberner","year":"2013","unstructured":"Isberner, M.-B., Richter, T., Maier, J., Knuth-Herzig, K., Horz, H., Schnotz, W.: Comprehending conflicting science-related texts: graphs as plausibility cues. Instr. Sci. 41, 849\u2013872 (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11251-012-9261-2","journal-title":"Instr. Sci."},{"key":"9_CR13","unstructured":"Kessler, S., Reifegerste, D., Guenther, L.: Die Evidenzkraft von Bildern in der Wissenschaftskommunikation. In: Wissenschaftskommunikation zwischen Risiko und (Un-)Sicherheit. pp. 171\u2013192. Herbert von Halem Verlag, K\u00f6ln (2016)"},{"key":"9_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"938","DOI":"10.1177\/0963662512454072","volume":"21","author":"D Gruber","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gruber, D., Dickerson, J.A.: Persuasive images in popular science: testing judgments of scientific reasoning and credibility. Public Underst. Sci. 21, 938\u2013948 (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963662512454072","journal-title":"Public Underst. Sci."},{"key":"9_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2007.07.017","volume":"107","author":"DP McCabe","year":"2008","unstructured":"McCabe, D.P., Castel, A.D.: Seeing is believing: the effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition 107, 343\u2013352 (2008). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2007.07.017","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"key":"9_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wittwer, J., Bromme, R., Jucks, R.: Kann man dem Internet trauen, wenn es um die Gesundheit geht?\u00a0Die Glaubw\u00fcrdigkeitsbeurteilung medizinischer Fachinformationen im Internet durch Laien. Z. F\u00fcr Medien. 16, 48\u201356 (2004). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1026\/1617-6383.16.2.48","DOI":"10.1026\/1617-6383.16.2.48"},{"key":"9_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"746","DOI":"10.1017\/S1930297500003296","volume":"7","author":"K Eriksson","year":"2012","unstructured":"Eriksson, K.: The nonsense math effect. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 7, 746\u2013749 (2012)","journal-title":"Judgm. Decis. Mak."},{"key":"9_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1080\/00028533.1997.11978016","volume":"33","author":"EJ Baesler","year":"1997","unstructured":"Baesler, E.J.: Persuasive effects of story and statistical evidence. Argum. Advocacy. 33, 170\u2013175 (1997). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00028533.1997.11978016","journal-title":"Argum. Advocacy."},{"key":"9_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1080\/19371918.2020.1785983","volume":"35","author":"B Salvador-Mata","year":"2020","unstructured":"Salvador-Mata, B., Corti\u00f1as-Rovira, S.: Pharmacists\u2019 attitudes to and perceptions of pseudoscience: how pseudoscience operates in health and social communication. Soc. Work Public Health. 35, 321\u2013333 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/19371918.2020.1785983","journal-title":"Soc. Work Public Health."},{"key":"9_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1007\/s10212-014-0243-4","volume":"30","author":"M Thiebach","year":"2015","unstructured":"Thiebach, M., Mayweg-Paus, E., Jucks, R.: \u201cProbably true\u201d says the expert: how two types of lexical hedges influence students\u2019 evaluation of scientificness. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 30, 369\u2013384 (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10212-014-0243-4","journal-title":"Eur. J. Psychol. Educ."},{"key":"9_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1002\/tea.21172","volume":"52","author":"R Bromme","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bromme, R., Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., H\u00f6mberg, J., Torspecken, R.: Is it believable when it\u2019s scientific? How scientific discourse style influences laypeople\u2019s resolution of conflicts: discourse style and lay conflict resolution. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 52, 36\u201357 (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/tea.21172","journal-title":"J. Res. Sci. Teach."},{"key":"9_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-2958.2008.00324.x","volume":"34","author":"JD Jensen","year":"2008","unstructured":"Jensen, J.D.: Scientific uncertainty in news coverage of cancer research: effects of hedging on scientists and journalists credibility. Hum. Commun. Res. 34, 347\u2013369 (2008). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1468-2958.2008.00324.x","journal-title":"Hum. Commun. Res."},{"key":"9_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18898","DOI":"10.1525\/collabra.18898","volume":"7","author":"M Kerwer","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kerwer, M., Chasiotis, A., Stricker, J., G\u00fcnther, A., Rosman, T.: Straight from the scientist\u2019s mouth\u2014plain language summaries promote laypeople\u2019s comprehension and knowledge acquisition when reading about individual research findings in psychology. Collabra Psychol. 7, 18898 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/collabra.18898","journal-title":"Collabra Psychol."},{"key":"9_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e16685","DOI":"10.2196\/16685","volume":"22","author":"L K\u00f6nig","year":"2020","unstructured":"K\u00f6nig, L., Jucks, R.: Effects of positive language and profession on trustworthiness and credibility in online health advice: experimental study. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e16685 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/16685","journal-title":"J. Med. Internet Res."},{"key":"9_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1080\/0163853X.2013.813835","volume":"50","author":"L Scharrer","year":"2013","unstructured":"Scharrer, L., Britt, M.A., Stadtler, M., Bromme, R.: Easy to understand but difficult to decide: information comprehensibility and controversiality affect laypeople\u2019s science-based decisions. Discourse Process. 50, 361\u2013387 (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0163853X.2013.813835","journal-title":"Discourse Process."},{"key":"9_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1660","DOI":"10.1111\/jasp.12118","volume":"43","author":"DS Krull","year":"2013","unstructured":"Krull, D.S., Silvera, D.H.: The stereotyping of science: superficial details influence perceptions of what is scientific: stereotyping of science. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 43, 1660\u20131667 (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jasp.12118","journal-title":"J. Appl. Soc. Psychol."},{"key":"9_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1177\/0741088388005002004","volume":"5","author":"A Crismore","year":"1988","unstructured":"Crismore, A., Vande Kopple, W.J.: Readers\u2019 learning from prose: the effects of hedges. Writ. Commun. 5, 184\u2013202 (1988). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0741088388005002004","journal-title":"Writ. Commun."},{"key":"9_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"614","DOI":"10.1177\/0963662520942122","volume":"29","author":"A Gustafson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gustafson, A., Rice, R.E.: A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication. Public Underst. Sci. 29, 614\u2013633 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963662520942122","journal-title":"Public Underst. Sci."},{"key":"9_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00151","volume":"2","author":"C Boothby","year":"2021","unstructured":"Boothby, C., Murray, D., Waggy, A.P., Tsou, A., Sugimoto, C.R.: Credibility of scientific information on social media: variation by platform, genre and presence of formal credibility cues. Quant. Sci. Stud. 2, 845\u2013863 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00151","journal-title":"Quant. Sci. Stud."},{"key":"9_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1177\/0963662515607406","volume":"25","author":"R Bonney","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bonney, R., Phillips, T.B., Ballard, H.L., Enck, J.W.: Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Underst. Sci. 25, 2\u201316 (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963662515607406","journal-title":"Public Underst. Sci."},{"key":"9_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1177\/09636625221098539","volume":"32","author":"YN Golumbic","year":"2023","unstructured":"Golumbic, Y.N., Dalyot, K., Barel-Ben David, Y., Keller, M.: Establishing an everyday scientific reasoning scale to learn how non-scientists reason with science. Public Underst. Sci. 32, 40\u201355 (2023). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09636625221098539","journal-title":"Public Underst. Sci."},{"key":"9_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1080\/21670811.2023.2193344","volume":"11","author":"AS L\u00f8vlie","year":"2023","unstructured":"L\u00f8vlie, A.S., Waagstein, A., Hyldg\u00e5rd, P.: \u201cHow trustworthy is this research?\u201d designing a tool to help readers understand evidence and uncertainty in science journalism. Digit. J. 11, 431\u2013464 (2023). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/21670811.2023.2193344","journal-title":"Digit. J."}],"container-title":["Communications in Computer and Information Science","Information Experience and Information Literacy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-031-52998-6_9","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,31]],"date-time":"2024-01-31T08:14:19Z","timestamp":1706688859000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-031-52998-6_9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"ISBN":["9783031529979","9783031529986"],"references-count":32,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-52998-6_9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-0929","1865-0937"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1865-0929","type":"print"},{"value":"1865-0937","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 February 2024","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"ECIL","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"European Conference on Information Literacy","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Krak\u00f3w","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Poland","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2023","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"9 October 2023","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"12 October 2023","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"8","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"ecil2023","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/ecil2023.ilconf.org\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Conftool","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"182","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"47","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"26% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"6, 3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}