{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,22]],"date-time":"2025-11-22T18:30:08Z","timestamp":1763836208524,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":29,"publisher":"Springer Nature Switzerland","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783031573262"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783031573279"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,1]],"date-time":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704067200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,1]],"date-time":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1704067200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-57327-9_2","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,29]],"date-time":"2024-03-29T03:01:47Z","timestamp":1711681307000},"page":"20-36","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Identifying Relevant Factors of\u00a0Requirements Quality: An Industrial Case Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3995-6125","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Julian","family":"Frattini","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,30]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"2_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1086\/266520","volume":"18","author":"EM Bennett","year":"1954","unstructured":"Bennett, E.M., Alpert, R., Goldstein, A.: Communications through limited-response questioning. Public Opin. Q. 18(3), 303\u2013308 (1954)","journal-title":"Public Opin. Q."},{"key":"2_CR2","unstructured":"Board, I., Committee, I., et al.: IEEE recommended practice for software requirements specifications. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (1998)"},{"issue":"10","key":"2_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1462","DOI":"10.1109\/32.6191","volume":"14","author":"BW Boehm","year":"1988","unstructured":"Boehm, B.W., Papaccio, P.N.: Understanding and controlling software costs. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 14(10), 1462\u20131477 (1988)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Software Eng."},{"issue":"5","key":"2_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2017.3571562","volume":"34","author":"L Briand","year":"2017","unstructured":"Briand, L., Bianculli, D., Nejati, S., Pastore, F., Sabetzadeh, M.: The case for context-driven software engineering research: generalizability is overrated. IEEE Softw. 34(5), 72\u201375 (2017)","journal-title":"IEEE Softw."},{"key":"2_CR5","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-14192-8_21","volume-title":"Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality","author":"F de Bruijn","year":"2010","unstructured":"de Bruijn, F., Dekkers, H.L.: Ambiguity in natural language software requirements: a case study. In: Wieringa, R., Persson, A. (eds.) REFSQ 2010. LNCS, vol. 6182, pp. 233\u2013247. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-14192-8_21"},{"key":"2_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cruzes, D.S., Dyba, T.: Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering. In: 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. pp. 275\u2013284. IEEE (2011)","DOI":"10.1109\/ESEM.2011.36"},{"key":"2_CR7","unstructured":"Femmer, H.: Requirements quality defect detection with the Qualicen requirements scout. In: REFSQ Workshops (2018)"},{"key":"2_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2016.02.047","volume":"123","author":"H Femmer","year":"2017","unstructured":"Femmer, H., Fern\u00e1ndez, D.M., Wagner, S., Eder, S.: Rapid quality assurance with requirements smells. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 190\u2013213 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"2_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Femmer, H., Mund, J., Fern\u00e1ndez, D.M.: It\u2019s the activities, stupid! A new perspective on re quality. In: 2015 IEEE\/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Testing, pp. 13\u201319. IEEE (2015)","DOI":"10.1109\/RET.2015.11"},{"key":"2_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Feng, G.C.: Mistakes and how to avoid mistakes in using intercoder reliability indices. Methodol. Eur. J. Res. Methods Behav. Soc. Sci. 11(1), 13 (2015)","DOI":"10.1027\/1614-2241\/a000086"},{"issue":"2","key":"2_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2011.09.001","volume":"54","author":"DM Fernandez","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fernandez, D.M., Wagner, S., Lochmann, K., Baumann, A., de Carne, H.: Field study on requirements engineering: investigation of artefacts, project parameters, and execution strategies. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(2), 162\u2013178 (2012)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"2_CR12","unstructured":"Franch, X., et al.: How do practitioners perceive the relevance of requirements engineering research? IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. (2020)"},{"key":"2_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Franch, X., Palomares, C., Quer, C., Chatzipetrou, P., Gorschek, T.: The state-of-practice in requirements specification: an extended interview study at 12 companies. Requirements Eng., 1\u201333 (2023)","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-023-00399-7"},{"key":"2_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frattini, J., Fucci, D., Torkar, R., Mendez, D.: A second look at the impact of passive voice requirements on domain modeling: Bayesian reanalysis of an experiment. In: 1st International Workshop on Methodological Issues with Empirical Studies in Software Engineering (WSESE2024). ACM (2024)","DOI":"10.1145\/3643664.3648211"},{"key":"2_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frattini, J., Montgomery, L., Fischbach, J., Mendez, D., Fucci, D., Unterkalmsteiner, M.: Requirements quality research: a harmonized theory, evaluation, and roadmap. Requirements Eng. (2023)","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-023-00405-y"},{"key":"2_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frattini, J., Montgomery, L., Fischbach, J., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Mendez, D., Fucci, D.: A live extensible ontology of quality factors for textual requirements. In: 2022 IEEE 30th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 274\u2013280. IEEE (2022)","DOI":"10.1109\/RE54965.2022.00041"},{"key":"2_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Host, M., Runeson, P.: Checklists for software engineering case study research. In: First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007), pp. 479\u2013481. IEEE (2007)","DOI":"10.1109\/ESEM.2007.46"},{"key":"2_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2298","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-016-9451-7","volume":"22","author":"D M\u00e9ndez","year":"2017","unstructured":"M\u00e9ndez, D., et al.: Naming the pain in requirements engineering: contemporary problems, causes, and effects in practice. Empir. Softw. Eng. 22, 2298\u20132338 (2017)","journal-title":"Empir. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"2_CR19","unstructured":"Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M.: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage (1994)"},{"issue":"2","key":"2_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-021-00367-z","volume":"27","author":"L Montgomery","year":"2022","unstructured":"Montgomery, L., Fucci, D., Bouraffa, A., Scholz, L., Maalej, W.: Empirical research on requirements quality: a systematic mapping study. Requirements Eng. 27(2), 183\u2013209 (2022)","journal-title":"Requirements Eng."},{"key":"2_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Petersen, K., Wohlin, C.: Context in industrial software engineering research. In: 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 401\u2013404. IEEE (2009)","DOI":"10.1109\/ESEM.2009.5316010"},{"key":"2_CR22","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-37422-7_5","volume-title":"Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality","author":"EJ Philippo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Philippo, E.J., Heijstek, W., Kruiswijk, B., Chaudron, M.R.V., Berry, D.M.: Requirement ambiguity not as important as expected\u2014results of an empirical evaluation. In: Doerr, J., Opdahl, A.L. (eds.) REFSQ 2013. LNCS, vol. 7830, pp. 65\u201379. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-37422-7_5"},{"key":"2_CR23","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-54045-0_24","volume-title":"Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality","author":"B Rosadini","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rosadini, B., et al.: Using NLP to detect requirements defects: an industrial experience in the railway domain. In: Gr\u00fcnbacher, P., Perini, A. (eds.) REFSQ 2017. LNCS, vol. 10153, pp. 344\u2013360. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-54045-0_24"},{"key":"2_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Runeson, P., Host, M., Rainer, A., Regnell, B.: Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples. Wiley (2012)","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118181034"},{"key":"2_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sj\u00f8berg, D.I., Dyb\u00e5, T., Anda, B.C., Hannay, J.E.: Building theories in software engineering. In: Shull, F., Singer, J., Sj\u00f8berg, D.I.K. (eds.) Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, pp. 312\u2013336. Springer, London (2008). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-1-84800-044-5_12","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-84800-044-5_12"},{"key":"2_CR26","unstructured":"Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications (1990)"},{"issue":"2","key":"2_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3306607","volume":"28","author":"S Wagner","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wagner, S., et al.: Status quo in requirements engineering: a theory and a global family of surveys. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM) 28(2), 1\u201348 (2019)","journal-title":"ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM)"},{"key":"2_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2021.106514","volume":"133","author":"C Wohlin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wohlin, C.: Case study research in software engineering-it is a case, and it is a study, but is it a case study? Inf. Softw. Technol. 133, 106514 (2021)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"2_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., H\u00f6st, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wessl\u00e9n, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-29044-2","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-29044-2"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-031-57327-9_2","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]],"date-time":"2024-11-15T06:55:18Z","timestamp":1731653718000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-031-57327-9_2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"ISBN":["9783031573262","9783031573279"],"references-count":29,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-57327-9_2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"assertion":[{"value":"30 March 2024","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"REFSQ","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Winterthur","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Switzerland","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2024","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"8 April 2024","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"12 April 2024","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"30","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"refsq2024","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/2024.refsq.org\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"59","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"14","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"8","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"24% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}