{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,26]],"date-time":"2025-03-26T21:51:27Z","timestamp":1743025887122,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Nature Switzerland","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783031849237"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783031849244"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,1]],"date-time":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735689600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,1]],"date-time":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735689600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-84924-4_9","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,17]],"date-time":"2025-03-17T12:00:50Z","timestamp":1742212850000},"page":"130-145","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A Weighted Bipolar Argumentation Framework and\u00a0Its ASP-Based Implementation"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-3393-2293","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yan","family":"Yan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-6232-9352","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Junru","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-7165-5054","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fangzhou","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-8230-0140","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Zerong","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9851-6184","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Zhizheng","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"9_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Guida, G.: SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell. 168(1), 162\u2013210 (2005). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2005.05.006. https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0004370205000962","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2005.05.006"},{"issue":"3","key":"9_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429","volume":"13","author":"TJM Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 13(3), 429\u2013448 (2003)","journal-title":"J. Log. Comput."},{"key":"9_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Caminada, M.W.A., Gabbay, D.M.: A logical account of formal argumentation. Studia Logica 93, 109\u2013145 (2009). https:\/\/api.semanticscholar.org\/CorpusID:7749403","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-009-9218-x"},{"key":"9_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1007\/11518655_33","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, pp. 378\u2013389. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)"},{"key":"9_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 54(7), 876\u2013899 (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.03.001. https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0888613X13000509, special issue: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence and Databases","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.03.001"},{"issue":"4","key":"9_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jal.2014.12.001","volume":"13","author":"A Cohen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cohen, A., Gottifredi, S., Garc\u00eda, A.J., Simari, G.R.: An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support. J. Appl. Log. 13(4), 509\u2013533 (2015)","journal-title":"J. Appl. Log."},{"key":"9_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-21686-2_36","volume-title":"Intelligent Systems","author":"R Cordeiro","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cordeiro, R., Alc\u00e2ntara, J.: Generalising semantics to weighted bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Xavier-Junior, J.C., Rios, R.A. (eds.) Intelligent Systems, pp. 520\u2013534. Springer, Cham (2022)"},{"key":"9_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Doutre, S., Lafages, M., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Argumentation frameworks with higher-order attacks: labellings and complexity. In: 2020 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), pp. 1210\u20131217 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICTAI50040.2020.00183","DOI":"10.1109\/ICTAI50040.2020.00183"},{"key":"9_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2005.07.002","volume":"170","author":"P Dung","year":"2006","unstructured":"Dung, P., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation. Artif. Intell. 170, 114\u2013159 (2006). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2005.07.002","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"2","key":"9_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"9_CR11","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., Hunter, A., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.: Inconsistency tolerance in weighted argument systems. In: Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2009, vol. 2, pp. 851\u2013858. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC (2009)"},{"issue":"2","key":"9_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2010.09.005","volume":"175","author":"PE Dunne","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., Hunter, A., Mcburney, P., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.: Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results. Artif. Intell. 175(2), 457\u2013486 (2011)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"9_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-39951-1_5","volume-title":"Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems","author":"W Dvo\u0159\u00e1k","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k, W., Rapberger, A., Wallner, J.P., Woltran, S.: Aspartix-v19 - an answer-set programming based system for abstract argumentation. In: Herzig, A., Kontinen, J. (eds.) Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems, pp. 79\u201389. Springer, Cham (2020)"},{"key":"9_CR14","first-page":"136","volume-title":"AIxIA 2020 - Advances in Artificial Intelligence","author":"S Ferilli","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ferilli, S.: Introducing general argumentation frameworks and their use. In: Baldoni, M., Bandini, S. (eds.) AIxIA 2020 - Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 136\u2013153. Springer, Cham (2021)"},{"key":"9_CR15","unstructured":"Ferilli, S., Leuzzi, F.: An analysis of the avetrana murder case through abstract argumentation. In: $$\\text{AI}^{3}$$@AI*IA (2019). https:\/\/api.semanticscholar.org\/CorpusID:210472385"},{"key":"9_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gelfond, M., Kahl, Y.: Knowledge Representation, Reasoning, and the Design of Intelligent Agents: The Answer-Set Programming Approach. Cambridge University Press (2014)","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139342124"},{"issue":"5\u20136","key":"9_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"942","DOI":"10.1017\/S1471068417000400","volume":"17","author":"J Lee","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lee, J., Talsania, S., Wang, Y.: Computing LPMLN using ASP and MLN solvers. Theory Pract. Logic Program. 17(5\u20136), 942\u2013960 (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1471068417000400","journal-title":"Theory Pract. Logic Program."},{"key":"9_CR18","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation","author":"H Li","year":"2012","unstructured":"Li, H., Oren, N., Norman, T.J.: Probabilistic argumentation frameworks. In: Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F. (eds.) Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation, pp. 1\u201316. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)"},{"key":"9_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Morveli\u00a0Espinoza, M., Possebom, A.T., Tacla, C.A.: Argumentation-based agents that explain their decisions. In: 2019 8th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS), pp. 467\u2013472 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/BRACIS.2019.00088","DOI":"10.1109\/BRACIS.2019.00088"},{"key":"9_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-75526-5_4","volume-title":"Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems","author":"SH Nielsen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Nielsen, S.H., Parsons, S.: A generalization of dung\u2019s abstract framework for argumentation: Arguing with sets of attacking arguments. In: Maudet, N., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I. (eds.) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 54\u201373. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)"},{"key":"9_CR21","unstructured":"Nishihana, K., Nomura, S., Takahashi, K.: Hybrid reasoning using weighted bipolar argumentation framework for legal simulation. In: Proceedings of JURISIN, pp. 68\u201381 (2021)"},{"key":"9_CR22","unstructured":"Pazienza, A., Ferilli, S., Esposito, F.: Constructing and evaluating bipolar weighted argumentation frameworks for online debating systems. In: Bistarelli, S., Giacomin, M., Pazienza, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 2017), Bari, Italy, 16\u201317 November 2017. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol.\u00a02012, pp. 111\u2013125. CEUR-WS.org (2017). http:\/\/ceur-ws.org\/Vol-2012\/AI3-2017_paper_12.pdf"},{"key":"9_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-60438-1_20","volume-title":"Foundations of Intelligent Systems","author":"A Pazienza","year":"2017","unstructured":"Pazienza, A., Ferilli, S., Esposito, F.: On the gradual acceptability of arguments in bipolar weighted argumentation frameworks with degrees of trust. In: Kryszkiewicz, M., Appice, A., \u015al\u0119zak, D., Rybinski, H., Skowron, A., Ra\u015b, Z.W. (eds.) Foundations of Intelligent Systems, pp. 195\u2013204. Springer, Cham (2017)"},{"key":"9_CR24","unstructured":"Potyka, N.: Continuous dynamical systems for weighted bipolar argumentation. In: The 16th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (2018)"},{"key":"9_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Potyka, N.: Abstract argumentation with Markov networks. In: European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2020). https:\/\/api.semanticscholar.org\/CorpusID:221714427","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA200177"},{"key":"9_CR26","unstructured":"de\u00a0Tarl\u00e9, L.D.: A gradual semantic to model opinion using bipolar argumentation graphs. JIAF-JFPDA, p.\u00a020 (2023). https:\/\/api.semanticscholar.org\/CorpusID:261700472"},{"key":"9_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yamaguchi, K., Matsuda, Y.: Cost-based framework for natural language argumentation analysis. In: 2021 19th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), pp. 1\u201310 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ITHET50392.2021.9759813","DOI":"10.1109\/ITHET50392.2021.9759813"},{"key":"9_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhang, H., Zhang, S.: A divide-and-conquer method for computing preferred extensions of argumentation frameworks. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge (ICBK), pp.\u00a01\u20137 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICKG52313.2021.00039","DOI":"10.1109\/ICKG52313.2021.00039"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-031-84924-4_9","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,17]],"date-time":"2025-03-17T12:00:57Z","timestamp":1742212857000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-031-84924-4_9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025]]},"ISBN":["9783031849237","9783031849244"],"references-count":28,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-84924-4_9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 March 2025","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"The authors\u00a0have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Disclosure of Interests"}},{"value":"PADL","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Symposium on Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Denver, CO","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"USA","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2025","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20 January 2025","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"26 January 2025","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"27","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"padl2025","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}}]}}