{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,8]],"date-time":"2024-09-08T12:10:15Z","timestamp":1725797415977},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783319098692"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783319098708"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-09870-8_10","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,20]],"date-time":"2014-07-20T21:06:07Z","timestamp":1405890367000},"page":"142-156","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Multi-valued Argumentation Frameworks"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Pierpaolo","family":"Dondio","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"10_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, C.D.: Acceptability semantics accounting for strength of attacks in argumentation. In: 19th ECAI, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 995\u2013996 (2010)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICTAI.2010.36"},{"key":"10_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"P. Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence\u00a077, 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"10_CR3","unstructured":"Dung, P., Thang, P.: Towards (Probabilistic) Argumentation for Jury-based Dispute Resolution. In: COMMA 2010, pp. 171\u2013182. IOS Press (2010)"},{"key":"10_CR4","series-title":"LNAI","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-29184-5_1","volume-title":"Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation","author":"H. Li","year":"2012","unstructured":"Li, H., Oren, N., Norman, T.J.: Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks. In: Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F. (eds.) TAFA 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol.\u00a07132, pp. 1\u201316. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)"},{"key":"10_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hunter, A.: A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (2012)","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2012.08.003"},{"issue":"2-3","key":"10_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-009-9218-x","volume":"93","author":"M.W.A. Caminada","year":"2009","unstructured":"Caminada, M.W.A., Gabbay, D.M.: A logical account of formal argumentation. Studia Logica\u00a093(2-3), 109\u2013145 (2009)","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"10_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(01)00145-X","volume":"133","author":"J. Pollock","year":"2001","unstructured":"Pollock, J.: Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification. Artificial Intelligence\u00a0133, 233\u2013282 (2001)","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"2-3","key":"10_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2012.704398","volume":"3","author":"M. Gabbay","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gabbay, M.: Equational approach to argumentation networks. Argument & Computation\u00a03(2-3), 87\u2013142 (2012)","journal-title":"Argument & Computation"},{"key":"10_CR9","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., Hunter, A., McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Inconsistency tolerance in weighted argument systems. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2009 (2009)"},{"key":"10_CR10","unstructured":"Martinez, D.C., Garcia, A.J.: An abstract argumentation framework with varied-strength attacks. In: Proc. of KR 2008, pp. 135\u2013143 (2008)"},{"key":"10_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(96)00041-0","volume":"90","author":"G. Vreeswijk","year":"1997","unstructured":"Vreeswijk, G.: Abstract argumentation systems. Artificial Intelligence\u00a090, 225\u2013279 (1997)","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"10_CR12","unstructured":"Thimm, M.: A Probabilistic Semantics for abstract Argumentation. In: ECAI (2012)"},{"key":"10_CR13","unstructured":"Janssen, J.: Fuzzy argumentation frameworks. Information. In: Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems (2008)"},{"key":"10_CR14","series-title":"LNAI","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-33152-7_1","volume-title":"Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems","author":"C. Gratie","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gratie, C., Florea, A.M.: Fuzzy labelling for argumentation frameworks. In: McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I. (eds.) ArgMAS 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol.\u00a07543, pp. 1\u20138. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)"},{"key":"10_CR15","series-title":"LNAI","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40624-9_21","volume-title":"Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems","author":"P. Baroni","year":"2013","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Romano, M., Toni, F., Aurisicchio, M., Bertanza, G.: Argumentation-Based Approach for Automatic Evaluation of Design Debates. In: Leite, J., Son, T.C., Torroni, P., van der Torre, L., Woltran, S. (eds.) CLIMA XIV 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol.\u00a08143, pp. 340\u2013356. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)"},{"key":"10_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lukasiewicz, T., Straccia, U.: Managing uncertainty and vagueness in description logics for the semantic web. In: Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol.\u00a06(4), pp. 291\u2013308 (2008)","DOI":"10.1016\/j.websem.2008.04.001"},{"key":"10_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boella, G., Souhila, K., Van Der Torre, L.: Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: Attack refinement and the grounded extension. In: Proceedings of The 8th AAMAS Conference (2009)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-12805-9_9"},{"key":"10_CR18","series-title":"LNAI","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40624-9_8","volume-title":"Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems","author":"P. Dondio","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dondio, P.: Computing the Grounded Semantics in all the Subgraphs of an Argumentation Framework: An Empirical Evaluation. In: Leite, J., Son, T.C., Torroni, P., van der Torre, L., Woltran, S. (eds.) CLIMA XIV 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol.\u00a08143, pp. 119\u2013137. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)"},{"key":"10_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/0165-0114(96)00066-8","volume":"84","author":"H. Prade","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prade, H., Dubois, D.: What are fuzzy rules and how to use them. Fuzzy Sets Syst.\u00a084, 169\u2013185 (1996)","journal-title":"Fuzzy Sets Syst."},{"key":"10_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dubois, Prade, Smeths. Gradual properties vs. uncertainty: Fuzzy logic vs. possibilistic logic, Technical report (2000), retrieved from \n                    \n                      http:\/\/iridia.ulb.ac.be\/~psmets\/Gradual_vs_Uncert.pdf","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4615-5261-1_1"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Rules on the Web. From Theory to Applications"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-319-09870-8_10","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,27]],"date-time":"2019-05-27T07:19:06Z","timestamp":1558941546000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-319-09870-8_10"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014]]},"ISBN":["9783319098692","9783319098708"],"references-count":20,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-09870-8_10","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014]]}}}