{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,8]],"date-time":"2024-09-08T17:00:15Z","timestamp":1725814815709},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783319147253"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783319147260"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,1,1]],"date-time":"2015-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1420070400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-14726-0_21","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,1,7]],"date-time":"2015-01-07T03:37:32Z","timestamp":1420601852000},"page":"309-324","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["What Is a Reasonable Argumentation Semantics?"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Sarah Alice","family":"Gaggl","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sebastian","family":"Rudolph","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Micha\u00ebl","family":"Thomazo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"21_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20254","volume":"23","author":"L. Amgoud","year":"2008","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., Lagasquie, M.-C., Livet, P.: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. Int. Journal of Intelligent Systems\u00a023, 1\u201332 (2008)","journal-title":"Int. Journal of Intelligent Systems"},{"key":"21_CR2","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: Repairing preference-based argumentation frameworks. In: Proc. IJCAI 2009, pp. 665\u2013670 (2009)"},{"issue":"4","key":"21_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888911000166","volume":"26","author":"P. Baroni","year":"2011","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: An introduction to argumentation semantics. Knowledge Eng. Review\u00a026(4), 365\u2013410 (2011)","journal-title":"Knowledge Eng. Review"},{"issue":"10-15","key":"21_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.004","volume":"171","author":"P. Baroni","year":"2007","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell.\u00a0171(10-15), 675\u2013700 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"3","key":"21_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429","volume":"13","author":"T.J.M. Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput.\u00a013(3), 429\u2013448 (2003)","journal-title":"J. Log. Comput."},{"issue":"1","key":"21_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1109\/MIS.2013.122","volume":"29","author":"G. Brewka","year":"2014","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Polberg, S., Woltran, S.: Generalizations of dung frameworks and their role in formal argumentation. IEEE Intel. Sys.\u00a029(1), 30\u201338 (2014)","journal-title":"IEEE Intel. Sys."},{"key":"21_CR7","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Woltran, S.: Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. In: Proc. KR 2010, pp. 102\u2013111 (2010)"},{"key":"21_CR8","unstructured":"B\u00fcchi, R.J.: On a decision method in restricted second order arithmetic. In: Proc. Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science 1960, pp. 1\u201311 (1962)"},{"issue":"5-6","key":"21_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.02.003","volume":"171","author":"M. Caminada","year":"2007","unstructured":"Caminada, M., Amgoud, L.: On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms. Artif. Intell.\u00a0171(5-6), 286\u2013310 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"21_CR10","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1007\/11518655_28","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"S. Coste-Marquis","year":"2005","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Marquis, P.: Symmetric argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol.\u00a03571, pp. 317\u2013328. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)"},{"issue":"1-2","key":"21_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-3975(96)80707-9","volume":"170","author":"Y. Dimopoulos","year":"1996","unstructured":"Dimopoulos, Y., Torres, A.: Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories. Theor. Comput. Sci.\u00a0170(1-2), 209\u2013244 (1996)","journal-title":"Theor. Comput. Sci."},{"issue":"2","key":"21_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"P.M. Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell.\u00a077(2), 321\u2013358 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"1\/2","key":"21_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(02)00261-8","volume":"141","author":"P.E. Dunne","year":"2002","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Coherence in finite argument systems. Artif. Intell.\u00a0141(1\/2), 187\u2013203 (2002)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"21_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_5","volume-title":"Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence","author":"P.E. Dunne","year":"2009","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., Wooldridge, M.: Complexity of abstract argumentation. In: Simari, G., Rahwan, I. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 85\u2013104. Springer, US (2009)"},{"key":"21_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k, W., Gaggl, S.A.: Stage semantics and the scc-recursive schema for argumentation semantics. J. Log. Comput. 2014 (2014)","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exu006"},{"key":"21_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2013.10.001","volume":"206","author":"W. Dvo\u0159\u00e1k","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k, W., J\u00e4rvisalo, M., Wallner, J.P., Woltran, S.: Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation. Artif. Intell.\u00a0206, 53\u201378 (2014)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"21_CR17","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-33362-0_7","volume-title":"Scalable Uncertainty Management","author":"W. Dvo\u0159\u00e1k","year":"2012","unstructured":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k, W., Szeider, S., Woltran, S.: Abstract argumentation via monadic second order logic. In: H\u00fcllermeier, E., Link, S., Fober, T., Seeger, B. (eds.) SUM 2012. LNCS, vol.\u00a07520, pp. 85\u201398. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)"},{"issue":"2","key":"21_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2010.486479","volume":"1","author":"U. Egly","year":"2010","unstructured":"Egly, U., Gaggl, S., Woltran, S.: Answer-set programming encodings for argumentation frameworks. In Argument and Computation\u00a01(2), 147\u2013177 (2010)","journal-title":"In Argument and Computation"},{"key":"21_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Modgil, S., Caminada, M.: Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Rahwan, I., Simari, G. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 105\u2013132. Springer (2009)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_6"},{"issue":"14-15","key":"21_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1985","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2011.06.003","volume":"175","author":"E. Oikarinen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Oikarinen, E., Woltran, S.: Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell.\u00a0175(14-15), 1985\u20132009 (2011)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-319-14726-0_21","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,19]],"date-time":"2019-08-19T09:27:14Z","timestamp":1566206834000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-319-14726-0_21"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015]]},"ISBN":["9783319147253","9783319147260"],"references-count":20,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-14726-0_21","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015]]}}}