{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,22]],"date-time":"2025-05-22T11:04:26Z","timestamp":1747911866553,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":87,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783319195742"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783319195759"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,1,1]],"date-time":"2015-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1420070400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,1,1]],"date-time":"2015-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1420070400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-19575-9_10","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,5]],"date-time":"2015-10-05T15:35:32Z","timestamp":1444059332000},"page":"253-297","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["The Concept of Normative Consequence and Legislative Discourse"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Micha\u0142","family":"Araszkiewicz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Krzysztof","family":"P\u0142eszka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"10_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-7091-7118-9","volume-title":"Normative systems","author":"Carlos Alchourr\u00f3n","year":"1971","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n, Carlos, and Eugenio Bulygin. 1971. Normative systems. Wien\/New York: Springer."},{"key":"10_CR2","unstructured":"Alexy, Robert. 1989. A theory of legal argumentation: The theory of rational discourse as a theory of legal justification. Trans. R. Adler and N. MacCormick. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1st German ed. 1978."},{"key":"10_CR3","volume-title":"The argument from injustice: A reply to legal positivism","author":"Robert Alexy","year":"2010","unstructured":"Alexy, Robert. 2010. The argument from injustice: A reply to legal positivism. Trans. B. Litschewski-Paulson and S.L. Paulson. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"10_CR4","first-page":"7","volume-title":"Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX: The twenty-third annual conference. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","author":"Micha\u0142 Araszkiewicz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Araszkiewicz, Micha\u0142. 2010. Balancing of legal principles and constraint satisfaction. In Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX: The twenty-third annual conference. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, vol. 223, ed. R. Winkels, 7\u201316. Amsterdam: IOS Press."},{"key":"10_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-35731-2_2","volume-title":"AI approaches to the complexity of legal system s. Models and ethical challenges for legal system s, legal language and legal ontologies, argumentation a","author":"Micha\u0142 Araszkiewicz","year":"2012","unstructured":"Araszkiewicz, Micha\u0142. 2012. Coherence-based account of the doctrine of consistent interpretation. In AI approaches to the complexity of legal system s. Models and ethical challenges for legal system s, legal language and legal ontologies, argumentation and software agents, ed. M. Palmirani, U. Pagallo, P. Casanovas, and G. Sartor, 33\u201347. Berlin\/New York: Springer."},{"key":"10_CR6","first-page":"15","volume-title":"Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX: The twenty-sixth annual conference. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","author":"Micha\u0142 Araszkiewicz","year":"2013","unstructured":"Araszkiewicz, Micha\u0142. 2013. Towards systematic research on statutory interpretation in AL and law. In Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX: The twenty-sixth annual conference. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, vol. 259, ed. K. Ashley, 15\u201324. Amsterdam: IOS Press."},{"key":"10_CR7","volume-title":"Problems of rules, normativity and rule-following","author":"Micha\u0142 Araszkiewicz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Araszkiewicz, Micha\u0142. 2014. Legal rules: Defeasible or indefeasible? In Problems of rules, normativity and rule-following, ed. M. Araszkiewicz, P. Bana, T. Gizbert-Studnicki, and K. P\u0142eszka. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"10_CR8","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX: The twenty-fifth annual conference. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","author":"Micha\u0142 Araszkiewicz","year":"2012","unstructured":"Araszkiewicz, Micha\u0142, and Jarom\u00edr \u0160avelka. 2012. Refined coherence as constraint satisfaction framework for representing judicial reasoning. In Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX: The twenty-fifth annual conference. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, vol. 250, ed. B. Sch\u00e4fer, 1\u201320. Amsterdam: IOS Press."},{"key":"10_CR9","volume-title":"Modeling legal argument: Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals","author":"Kevin Ashley","year":"1990","unstructured":"Ashley, Kevin. 1990. Modeling legal argument: Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. Cambridge: MIT Press."},{"key":"10_CR10","first-page":"3","volume-title":"International conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL \u201913, Rome","author":"Tara Athan","year":"2012","unstructured":"Athan, Tara, Boley Harold, Governatori Guido, Palmirani Monica, Paschke Aadrian, and Wyner Adam. 2012. OASIS LegalRuleML. In International conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL \u201913, Rome, 3\u201312. New York: ACM."},{"key":"10_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018369","volume-title":"The 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, proceedings of the conference, Pittsburgh","author":"Katie Atkinson","year":"2011","unstructured":"Atkinson, Katie, Trevor Bench-Capon, Dan Cartwright, and Adam Wyner. 2011. Semantic models for policy deliberation. In The 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, proceedings of the conference, Pittsburgh, 81\u201390. New York: ACM."},{"key":"10_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"605","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-6259-0_11","volume-title":"Handbook of philosophical logic . Volume II: Extensions of classical logic","author":"Lennart \u00c5qvist","year":"1984","unstructured":"\u00c5qvist, Lennart. 1984. Deontic logic. In Handbook of philosophical logic . Volume II: Extensions of classical logic, ed. D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, 605\u2013714. Dordrecht\/Boston\/Lancaster: D. Reidel."},{"key":"10_CR13","unstructured":"Ba\u0327cal, Adam, Dagmara Dominik, Ma\u0142gorzata Militz, and Piotr Ogi\u0144ski. 2009. Zasady dotycza\u0327ce podatku od towar\u00f3w i us\u0142ug (The Principles Concerning the Value Added Tax). Przegla\u0327d Podatkowy 11(223)."},{"issue":"4","key":"10_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888911000166","volume":"26","author":"Pietro Baroni","year":"2011","unstructured":"Baroni, Pietro, Martin Caminada, and Massimiliano Giacomin. 2011. An introduction to argumentation semantics. Knowledge Engineering Review 26(4):365\u2013410.","journal-title":"Knowledge Engineering Review"},{"key":"10_CR15","volume-title":"A course in mathematical logic","author":"John Bell","year":"1977","unstructured":"Bell, John, and Mosh\u00e9 Machover, 1977. A course in mathematical logic . Amsterdam\/New York\/Oxford: North Holland Publishing Company."},{"key":"10_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1145\/261618.261646","volume-title":"Proceedings of the sixth international conference on artificial intelligence and law ICAIL \u201997, Melbourne","author":"Trevor Bench-Capon","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, Trevor, and Pepijn R.S. Visser. 1997. Ontologies in legal information systems: The need for explicit specifications of domain conceptualisations. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on artificial intelligence and law ICAIL \u201997, Melbourne, 132\u2013141. New York: ACM."},{"key":"10_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1145\/41735.41757","volume-title":"Proceedings of the first international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL \u201987, Boston","author":"Trevor Bench-Capon","year":"1987","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, Trevor, G.O. Robinson, Tom Routen, and Marek J. Sergot. 1987. Logic programming for large scale applications in law: A formalisation of supplementary benefit legislation. In Proceedings of the first international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL \u201987, Boston. 190\u2013198. New York: ACM."},{"issue":"1","key":"10_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9337.2007.00383.x","volume":"21","author":"Eugenio Bulygin","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bulygin, Eugenio. 2008. What can one expect from logic in the law? (Not everything, but more than something: A reply to Susan Haack). Ratio Juris 21(1):150\u2013156.","journal-title":"Ratio Juris"},{"key":"10_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-1497-7","volume-title":"Legal ontology engineering. Methodologies, modelling trends and the ontology of professional judicial knowledge","author":"N\u00faria Casellas","year":"2011","unstructured":"Casellas, N\u00faria. 2011. Legal ontology engineering. Methodologies, modelling trends and the ontology of professional judicial knowledge. Dordrecht\/Heidelberg\/London\/New York: Springer."},{"issue":"2","key":"10_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"Phan Minh Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, Phan Minh. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2):321\u2013358.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"10_CR21","volume-title":"Taking rights seriously","author":"Ronald Dworkin","year":"1977","unstructured":"Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press."},{"key":"10_CR22","volume-title":"Justice in robes","author":"Ronald Dworkin","year":"2006","unstructured":"Dworkin, Ronald. 2006. Justice in robes. Cambridge\/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press."},{"key":"10_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ferrer Beltr\u00e1n, Jordi, and Giovanni Battista Ratti. eds. 2012. The logic of legal requirements: essays on defeasibilism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199661640.001.0001"},{"key":"10_CR24","volume-title":"Meta-logic al investigations in argumentation networks","author":"Dov Gabbay","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gabbay, Dov. 2013. Meta-logic al investigations in argumentation networks. London: College Publications."},{"key":"10_CR25","unstructured":"Gordon, Thomas, and Douglas Walton. 2006. The Carneades argumentation framework \u2013 using presumptions and exceptions to model critical questions. In Proceedings of the first international conference on computational models of argument (COMMA 06), Liverpool, ed. P.E. Dunne, 195\u2013207."},{"key":"10_CR26","first-page":"137","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 10th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL 2009","author":"Thomas Gordon","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gordon, Thomas, and Douglas Walton. 2009. Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL 2009, 137\u2013146. New York: ACM."},{"issue":"1","key":"10_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9337.2007.00330.x","volume":"20","author":"Susan Haack","year":"2007","unstructured":"Haack, Susan. 2007. On logic in the law: \u201cSomething, but not all\u201d. Ratio Juris 20(1):1\u201331.","journal-title":"Ratio Juris"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"10_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118493","volume":"4","author":"Jaap Hage","year":"1996","unstructured":"Hage, Jaap. 1996. A theory of legal reasoning and a logic to match. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4(3\u20134):199\u2013273.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"10_CR29","first-page":"22","volume-title":"Proceedings of the eighth international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL 2001, St. Louis","author":"Jaap Hage","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hage, Jaap. 2001a. Formalizing legal coherence. In Proceedings of the eighth international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL 2001, St. Louis, 22\u201331. New York: ACM."},{"key":"10_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-2702-0_18","volume-title":"Pluralism and law","author":"Jaap Hage","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hage, Jaap. 2001b. Legal logic, its existence, nature and use. In Pluralism and law, ed. A. Soeteman, 347\u2013374. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic."},{"key":"10_CR31","volume-title":"Studies in legal logic","author":"Jaap Hage","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hage, Jaap. 2005. Studies in legal logic . Berlin: Springer."},{"key":"10_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hage, Jaap. 2014. Separating rules from normativity. In Problems of normativity, rules and rule-following. Law and philosophy library series, ed. M. Araszkiewicz, P. Bana\u015b, T. Gizbert-Studnicki, and K. P\u0142eszka. Cham\/Heidelberg\/New York\/Dordrecht\/London: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-09375-8_2"},{"key":"10_CR33","volume-title":"Logic in the theory and practice of lawmaking","author":"Jaap Hage","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hage, Jaap. 2016. The (onto)logical structure of law: A conceptual toolkit for legislators. In Logic in the theory and practice of lawmaking, ed. M. Araszkiewicz, K. P\u0142eszka. Cham: Springer."},{"key":"10_CR34","volume-title":"The concept of law","author":"Herbert L.A. Hart","year":"1994","unstructured":"Hart, Herbert L.A. 1994. The concept of law , 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.","edition":"2"},{"key":"10_CR35","volume-title":"The new European legal culture","author":"Martijn Hesselink","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hesselink, Martijn. 2001. The new European legal culture. Denventer: Kluwer Academic."},{"key":"10_CR36","first-page":"3","volume-title":"Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems","author":"Risto Hilpinen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hilpinen, Risto, and Paul McNamara. 2013. Deontic logic: A historical survey and introduction. In Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems, ed. D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden, and L. van der Torre, 3\u2013136. London: College Publications."},{"key":"10_CR37","volume-title":"The pure theory of law","author":"Hans Kelsen","year":"1970","unstructured":"Kelsen, Hans. 1970. The pure theory of law. Berkeley: University of California Press."},{"key":"10_CR38","volume-title":"Mathematical logic","author":"Stephen Cole Kleene","year":"1967","unstructured":"Kleene, Stephen Cole. 1967. Mathematical logic. Mineola\/New York: Dover Publications."},{"key":"10_CR39","unstructured":"Lanckoro\u0144ski, Bogus\u0142aw. 2014. Ekspertyza dotycza\u0327ca projektu ustawy o prawach konsumenta [Expert opinion concerning the Project of Consumer Rights Act]. http:\/\/orka.sejm.gov.pl\/rexdomk7.nsf\/Opdodr?OpenPage&nr=2076. Accessed 5 Aug 2014."},{"key":"10_CR40","first-page":"1215","volume":"76","author":"Brian Leiter","year":"2007","unstructured":"Leiter, Brian. 2007. Explaining theoretical disagreement. The University of Chicago Law Review 76:1215\u20131250.","journal-title":"The University of Chicago Law Review"},{"key":"10_CR41","volume-title":"Logic in the theory and practice of lawmaking","author":"Lars Lindahl","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lindahl, Lars, and David Reidhav. 2016. Conflict of legal norms: Definition and varieties. In Logic in the theory and practice of lawmaking, ed. M. Araszkiewicz and K. P\u0142eszka. Cham: Springer."},{"key":"10_CR42","first-page":"63","volume-title":"International conference on alternative methods of argumentation in law, Brno, 25 Oct 2012","author":"Fabrizio Macagno","year":"2012","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio, Douglas Walton, and Giovanni Sartor. 2012. Argumentation schemes for statutory interpretation. In International conference on alternative methods of argumentation in law, Brno, 25 Oct 2012, ed. M. Araszkiewicz, M. My\u0161ka, T. Smejk\u00e1lova, J. \u0160avelka, and M. \u0160kop, 63\u201375. Brno: Masarykova University."},{"key":"10_CR43","unstructured":"MacCormick, Neil. 1978. Legal reasoning and legal theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Reprinted in 2003."},{"key":"10_CR44","volume-title":"Bridges from classical to nonmonotonic logic","author":"David Makinson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Makinson, David. 2005. Bridges from classical to nonmonotonic logic . London: College Publications."},{"key":"10_CR45","volume-title":"Introduction to mathematical Logic","author":"Eliot Mendelson","year":"1977","unstructured":"Mendelson, Eliot. 1977. Introduction to mathematical Logic, 4th ed. New York: Chapman & Hall.","edition":"4"},{"key":"10_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198537472.003.0007","volume-title":"Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming","author":"Donald Nute","year":"1994","unstructured":"Nute, Donald. 1994. Defeasible logic. In Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming, ed. D. Gabbay, C. Hogger, and J. Robinson, 353\u2013396. Oxford: Clarendon Press."},{"volume-title":"Defeasible deontic logic . Synthese library","year":"1997","key":"10_CR47","unstructured":"Nute, Donald. ed. 1997. Defeasible deontic logic . Synthese library. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers."},{"key":"10_CR48","volume-title":"Zagadnienia teorii prawa [Issues in Legal Theory]","author":"Kazimierz Opa\u0142ek","year":"1969","unstructured":"Opa\u0142ek, Kazimierz, and Jerzy Wr\u00f3blewski. 1969. Zagadnienia teorii prawa [Issues in Legal Theory]. PWN: Warszawa."},{"key":"10_CR49","volume-title":"The basis of legal justification","author":"Aleksander Peczenik","year":"1983","unstructured":"Peczenik, Aleksander. 1983. The basis of legal justification. Lund: A. Peczenik."},{"key":"10_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118495","volume":"4","author":"Aleksander Peczenik","year":"1996","unstructured":"Peczenik, Aleksander. 1996. Jumps and logic in the law: What one can expect from logical models of legal argumentation? Artificial Intelligence and Law 4:297\u2013329.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"10_CR51","volume-title":"On law and reason","author":"Aleksander Peczenik","year":"2008","unstructured":"Peczenik, Aleksander. 2008. On law and reason, 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Springer.","edition":"2"},{"key":"10_CR52","volume-title":"Trait\u00e9 de l\u2019argumentation: La nouvelle rh\u00e9torique","author":"Cha\u00efm Perelman","year":"1958","unstructured":"Perelman, Cha\u00efm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1958. Trait\u00e9 de l\u2019argumentation: La nouvelle rh\u00e9torique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France."},{"key":"10_CR53","unstructured":"Pokrop, Dorota. 2012. Propozycja rozwia\u0327za\u0144 prawnych [A proposal of legal solutions]. http:\/\/orka.sejm.gov.pl\/opinie7.nsf\/opdodr?OpenPage&nr=805. Accessed 6 Aug 2014."},{"key":"10_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4","volume":"11","author":"John Pollock","year":"1987","unstructured":"Pollock, John. 1987. Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science 11:481\u2013518.","journal-title":"Cognitive Science"},{"key":"10_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001","volume-title":"Cognitive carpentry: A blueprint for how to build a person","author":"John Pollock","year":"1995","unstructured":"Pollock, John. 1995. Cognitive carpentry: A blueprint for how to build a person. Cambridge: MIT Press."},{"key":"10_CR56","unstructured":"Postema, Gerald, 2001. Legal philosophy in the twentieth century: The common law world. A treatise of legal philosophy and general jurisprudence, vol. 11, ed. E. Pattaro. Dordrecht\/Heidelberg\/London\/New York: Springer."},{"key":"10_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-011-5668-4","volume-title":"Logic al tools for modelling legal argument: A study of defeasible reasoning in law","author":"Henry Prakken","year":"1997","unstructured":"Prakken, Henry. 1997. Logic al tools for modelling legal argument: A study of defeasible reasoning in law. Dordrecht\/Boston\/London: Kluwer Academic."},{"issue":"2","key":"10_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592","volume":"1","author":"Henry Prakken","year":"2010","unstructured":"Prakken, Henry. 2010. An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument & Computation 1(2):93\u2013124.","journal-title":"Argument & Computation"},{"key":"10_CR59","volume-title":"Logic in the theory and practice of lawmaking","author":"Henry Prakken","year":"2016","unstructured":"Prakken, Henry. 2016. Formalizing debates about law-making proposals as practical reasoning. In Logic in the theory and practice of lawmaking, ed. M. Araszkiewicz and K. P\u0142eszka. Cham: Springer."},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"10_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118496","volume":"4","author":"Henry Prakken","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prakken, Henry, and Giovanni Sartor. 1996. A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4(3\u20134):331\u2013368.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"issue":"2\u20134","key":"10_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008278309945","volume":"6","author":"Henry Prakken","year":"1998","unstructured":"Prakken, Henry, and Giovanni Sartor. 1998. Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6(2\u20134):231\u2013287.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"10_CR62","first-page":"219","volume-title":"Handbook of philosophical logic , vol. 4","author":"Henry Prakken","year":"2002","unstructured":"Prakken, Henry, and Gerard Vreeswijk. 2002. Logics for defeasible argumentation. In Handbook of philosophical logic , vol. 4, 2nd ed., ed. Dov Gabbay and Franz Guenthner, 219\u2013318. Dodrecht\/Boston\/London: Kluwer Academic.","edition":"2"},{"volume-title":"Argumentation in artificial intelligence","year":"2009","key":"10_CR63","unstructured":"Rahwan, Iyad, and Guillermo R. Simari. eds. 2009. Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Dordrecht\/Heidelberg\/London\/New York: Springer."},{"key":"10_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198253631.001.0001","volume-title":"The concept of a legal system : An introduction to the theory of the legal system","author":"Joseph Raz","year":"1980","unstructured":"Raz, Joseph. 1980. The concept of a legal system : An introduction to the theory of the legal system . Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"10_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(80)90014-4","volume":"13","author":"R. Reiter","year":"1980","unstructured":"Reiter, R. 1980. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13(1\u20132):81\u2013132.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"6","key":"10_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7373(91)90013-W","volume":"34","author":"Edwina Rissland","year":"1991","unstructured":"Rissland, Edwina, and David B. Skalak. 1991. CABARET: Rule interpretation in a hybrid architecture. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34(6):839\u2013887.","journal-title":"International Journal of Man-Machine Studies"},{"key":"10_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-9099-0","volume-title":"Extending deontic logic for the formalisation of legal rules","author":"Lamb\u00e8r M.M. Royakkers","year":"1998","unstructured":"Royakkers, Lamb\u00e8r M.M. 1998. Extending deontic logic for the formalisation of legal rules. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"10_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00114921","volume":"1","author":"Giovanni Sartor","year":"1992","unstructured":"Sartor, Giovanni. 1992. Normative conflicts in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1(2\u20133):209\u2013235.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"10_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8531-6_4","volume-title":"Informatics and the foundations of legal reasoning","author":"Giovanni Sartor","year":"1995","unstructured":"Sartor, Giovanni. 1995. Defeasibility in legal reasoning. In Informatics and the foundations of legal reasoning, ed. Z. Bankowski, I. White, and U. Hahn, 119\u2013137. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic."},{"key":"10_CR70","volume-title":"A treatise of legal philosophy and general jurisprudence","author":"Giovanni Sartor","year":"2005","unstructured":"Sartor, Giovanni. 2005. Legal reasoning. A cognitive approach to law. A treatise of legal philosophy and general jurisprudence, vol. 5. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"volume-title":"Approaches to legal ontologies: Theories, domains, methodologies","year":"2011","key":"10_CR71","unstructured":"Sartor, Giovanni, Pompeu Casanovas, Maria Angela Biasotti, and Meritxell Fern\u00e1ndez-Barrera. eds. 2011. Approaches to legal ontologies: Theories, domains, methodologies. Dordrecht\/Heidelberg\/London\/New York: Springer."},{"key":"10_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-6110-0_11","volume-title":"Coherence: Insights from philosophy, jurisprudence and artificial intelligence","author":"Jarom\u00edr \u0160avelka","year":"2013","unstructured":"\u0160avelka, Jarom\u00edr. 2013. Coherence as constraint satisfaction: Judicial reasoning support mechanism. In Coherence: Insights from philosophy, jurisprudence and artificial intelligence, ed. M. Araszkiewicz and J. \u0160avelka, 203\u2013216. Dordrecht\/Heidelberg\/New York\/London: Springer."},{"key":"10_CR73","first-page":"353","volume-title":"Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems","author":"Marek Sergot","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sergot, Marek. 2013. Normative positions. In Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems, ed. D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden, and L. van der Torre, 353\u2013406. London: College Publications."},{"issue":"5","key":"10_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.1145\/5689.5920","volume":"29","author":"Marek Sergot","year":"1986","unstructured":"Sergot, Marek, Fariba Sadri, Robert A. Kowalski, Frank Kriwaczek, Peter Hammond, and H.T. Cory. 1986. The British nationality act as a logic program. Communications ACM 29(5):370\u2013386.","journal-title":"Communications ACM"},{"key":"10_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139167109.002","volume-title":"Ronald Dworkin","author":"Scott Shapiro","year":"2007","unstructured":"Shapiro, Scott, 2007. The \u201cHart\u2013Dworkin Debate\u201d: A short guide for the perplexed. In Ronald Dworkin, ed. A. Ripstein, 22\u201355. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"10_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046009.10530.fd","volume":"11","author":"Arend Soeteman","year":"2003","unstructured":"Soeteman, Arend. 2003. Legal logic? Or can we do without? Artificial Intelligence and Law 11(2\u20133):197\u2013210.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"10_CR77","unstructured":"Tarski, Alfred. 1936. On the concept of logical consequence. In Logic , semantics, metamathematics, ed. A. Tarski, 409\u2013420. Trans. J.H. Woodger. Oxford: Clarendon Press."},{"key":"10_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1900.001.0001","volume-title":"Coherence in thought and action","author":"Paul Thagard","year":"2000","unstructured":"Thagard, Paul. 2000. Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge: MIT Press."},{"key":"10_CR79","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning","author":"Douglas Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 1996. Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. New York\/London: Routledge."},{"key":"10_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"Douglas Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"10_CR81","unstructured":"Wole\u0144ski, Jan. 1972. Logic zne problemy wyk\u0142adni prawa [Logic al problems of legal interpretation]. Krak\u00f3w: Uniwersytet Jagiello\u0144ski."},{"key":"10_CR82","unstructured":"Wr\u00f3blewski, Jerzy. 1980. Poj\u0229cie systemu prawa a informatyka prawnicza [The concept of legal system and legal informatics]. Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne XXV."},{"key":"10_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8050-2","volume-title":"Judicial application of law, ed","author":"Jerzy Wr\u00f3blewski","year":"1992","unstructured":"Wr\u00f3blewski, Jerzy. 1992. Judicial application of law, ed. Zenon Bankowski and Neil MacCormick. Dordrecht\/Boston\/London: Kluwer Academic."},{"key":"10_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1145\/222092.222257","volume-title":"Proceedings of the fifth international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL \u201995, College Park, Maryland","author":"Hajime Yoshino","year":"1995","unstructured":"Yoshino, Hajime. 1995. The systematization of legal meta-inference. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL \u201995, College Park, Maryland, 266\u2013275. New York: ACM."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"10_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008289826410","volume":"5","author":"Hajime Yoshino","year":"1997","unstructured":"Yoshino, Hajime. 1997. On the logical foundations of compound predicate formulae for legal knowledge representation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 5(1\u20132):77\u201396.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"issue":"12","key":"10_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10772","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2012.02.188","volume":"39","author":"Tomasz \u017burek","year":"2012","unstructured":"\u017burek, Tomasz. 2012. Modelling of a fortiori reasoning. Expert Systems and Applications 39(12):10772\u201310779.","journal-title":"Expert Systems and Applications"},{"key":"10_CR87","first-page":"160","volume-title":"International conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL \u201913, Rome","author":"Tomasz \u017burek","year":"2013","unstructured":"\u017burek, Tomasz and Micha\u0142 Araszkiewicz. 2013. Modeling teleological interpretation. In International conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL \u201913, Rome, 160\u2013168. New York: ACM."}],"container-title":["Legisprudence Library","Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-319-19575-9_10","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,11]],"date-time":"2024-06-11T15:27:26Z","timestamp":1718119646000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-319-19575-9_10"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015]]},"ISBN":["9783319195742","9783319195759"],"references-count":87,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-19575-9_10","relation":{},"ISSN":["2213-2813","2213-2856"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2213-2813"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2213-2856"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015]]}}}