{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]],"date-time":"2026-04-30T09:27:57Z","timestamp":1777541277592,"version":"3.51.4"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783319195742","type":"print"},{"value":"9783319195759","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,1,1]],"date-time":"2015-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1420070400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-19575-9_11","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,5]],"date-time":"2015-10-05T15:35:32Z","timestamp":1444059332000},"page":"301-321","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Formalising Debates About Law-Making Proposals as Practical Reasoning"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Henry","family":"Prakken","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"11_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.009","volume":"171","author":"Katie Atkinson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Atkinson, Katie, and Trevor Bench-Capon. 2007. Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artificial Intelligence 171:855\u2013874.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"11_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, Trevor, and Henry Prakken. 2010. A lightweight formal model of two\u2013phase democratic deliberation. In Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX 2010: The twenty\u2013third annual conference, ed. R. Winkels, 27\u201336. Amsterdam etc.: IOS.","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-60750-682-9-27"},{"key":"11_CR3","first-page":"21","volume-title":"Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law","author":"Trevor Bench-Capon","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, Trevor, Henry Prakken, and Wietske Visser. 2011. Argument schemes for two\u2013phase democratic deliberation. In Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law, 21\u201330. New York: ACM Press."},{"key":"11_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9780262026437.001.0001","volume-title":"Elements of argumentation","author":"Philippe Besnard","year":"2008","unstructured":"Besnard, Philippe, and Anthony Hunter. 2008. Elements of argumentation. Cambridge: MIT Press."},{"key":"11_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(97)00015-5","volume":"93","author":"Andrey Bondarenko","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bondarenko, Andrey, Phan Minh Dung, Robert Kowalski, and Francesca Toni. 1997. An abstract, argumentation\u2013theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 93:63\u2013101.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"11_CR6","first-page":"111","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 11th european conference on logics in artificial intelligence (JELIA 2006), Number 4160 in springer lecture notes in AI","author":"Martin Caminada","year":"2006","unstructured":"Caminada, Martin. 2006. On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. In Proceedings of the 11th european conference on logics in artificial intelligence (JELIA 2006), Number 4160 in springer lecture notes in AI, 111\u2013123. Berlin: Springer."},{"key":"11_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dung, Phan MInh. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non\u2013monotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n\u2013person games. Artificial Intelligence 77:321\u2013357.","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"11_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.010","volume":"171","author":"Thomas Gordon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gordon, Thomas, Henry Prakken, and Douglas Walton. 2007. The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence 171:875\u2013896.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"11_CR9","volume-title":"Law and philosophy library","author":"Jaap Hage","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hage, Jaap. 1997. Reasoning with rules. An essay on legal reasoning and its underlying logic, Law and philosophy library. Dordrecht\/Boston\/London: Kluwer Academic."},{"key":"11_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hage, Jaap. 2004. Comparing alternatives in the law. Legal applications of qualitative comparative reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12:181\u2013225.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-005-6926-z"},{"key":"11_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325211000036","volume":"17","author":"John Horty","year":"2011","unstructured":"Horty, John. 2011. Rules and reasons in the theory of precedent. Legal Theory 17:1\u201333.","journal-title":"Legal Theory"},{"key":"11_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9125-8","volume":"20","author":"John Horty","year":"2012","unstructured":"Horty, John, and T. Bench-Capon, 2012. A factor-based definition of precedential constraint. Artificial Intelligence and Law 20:181\u2013214.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"11_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Modgil, Sanjay, and Henry Prakken 2010. Reasoning about preferences in structured extended argumentation frameworks. In Computational models of argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2010, ed. P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, and G. Simari, 347\u2013358. Amsterdam etc.: IOS Press.","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-60750-619-5-347"},{"key":"11_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2012.10.008","volume":"195","author":"Sanjay Modgil","year":"2013","unstructured":"Modgil, Sanjay, and Henry Prakken. 2013. A general account of argumentation with preferences. Artificial Intelligence 195:361\u2013397.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"11_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001","volume-title":"Cognitive Carpentry. A blueprint for how to build a person","author":"John Pollock","year":"1995","unstructured":"Pollock, John 1995. Cognitive Carpentry. A blueprint for how to build a person. Cambridge: MIT Press."},{"key":"11_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592","volume":"1","author":"Henry Prakken","year":"2010","unstructured":"Prakken, Henry 2010. An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument and Computation 1:93\u2013124.","journal-title":"Argument and Computation"},{"key":"11_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken, Henry 2012a. Formalising a legal opinion on a legislative proposal in the ASPIC+ framework. In Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX 2012: The twenty-fifth annual conference, ed. B. Schafer, 119\u2013128. Amsterdam etc.: IOS Press.","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-167-0-119"},{"key":"11_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken, Henry 2012b. Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics. Artificial Intelligence and Law 20:57\u201382.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9117-8"},{"key":"11_CR19","first-page":"167","volume-title":"From knowledge representation to argumentation in AI, law and policy making. A Festschrift in honour of Trevor Bench-Capon on the occasion of his 60th birthday","author":"Henry Prakken","year":"2013","unstructured":"Prakken, Henry 2013. Relating ways to instantiate abstract argumentation frameworks. In From knowledge representation to argumentation in AI, law and policy making. A Festschrift in honour of Trevor Bench-Capon on the occasion of his 60th birthday, ed. K. Atkinson, H. Prakken, and A. Wyner, 167\u2013189. London: College Publications."},{"key":"11_CR20","volume-title":"Rules, reasons, arguments: Formal studies of argumentation and defeat","author":"Bart Verheij","year":"1996","unstructured":"Verheij, Bart 1996. Rules, reasons, arguments: Formal studies of argumentation and defeat. Doctoral diss., University of Maastricht."},{"key":"11_CR21","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning","author":"Douglas Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 1996. Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates."},{"key":"11_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"Douglas Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."}],"container-title":["Legisprudence Library","Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-319-19575-9_11","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,30]],"date-time":"2025-05-30T22:35:35Z","timestamp":1748644535000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-319-19575-9_11"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015]]},"ISBN":["9783319195742","9783319195759"],"references-count":22,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-19575-9_11","relation":{},"ISSN":["2213-2813","2213-2856"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2213-2813","type":"print"},{"value":"2213-2856","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015]]}}}