{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,1]],"date-time":"2025-06-01T11:10:06Z","timestamp":1748776206578,"version":"3.41.0"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":44,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783319295848"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783319295855"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,1]],"date-time":"2016-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1451606400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-29585-5_27","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,10]],"date-time":"2016-02-10T22:43:49Z","timestamp":1455144229000},"page":"462-485","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["The Impact of Rubric-Based Peer Assessment on Feedback Quality in Blended MOOCs"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Ahmed Mohamed Fahmy","family":"Yousef","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Usman","family":"Wahid","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Mohamed Amine","family":"Chatti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ulrik","family":"Schroeder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Marold","family":"Wosnitza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"27_CR1","volume-title":"Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Approach","author":"C Argyris","year":"1978","unstructured":"Argyris, C., Schon, D.: Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Approach. Addision Wesley, Reading (1978)"},{"issue":"2","key":"27_CR2","first-page":"187","volume":"9","author":"DO Bruff","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bruff, D.O., Fisher, D.H., McEwen, K.E., Smith, B.E.: Wrapping a MOOC: Student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. MERLOT J. Online Learn. Teach. 9(2), 187\u2013199 (2013)","journal-title":"MERLOT J. Online Learn. Teach."},{"key":"27_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4419-1428-6_635","volume-title":"Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning","author":"Mohamed Amine Chatti","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chatti, M.A., Jarke, M., Schroeder, U.: Double-loop learning. In: Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, pp. 1035\u20131037 (2012)"},{"key":"27_CR4","unstructured":"Chatti, M.A.: The LaaN theory. In: Personalization in Technology Enhanced Learning: A Social Software Perspective, pp. 19-42. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, Germany (2010)"},{"key":"27_CR5","unstructured":"Chatti, M.A., Lukarov, V., Th\u00fcs, H., Muslim, A., Yousef, A.M.F., Wahid, U., Greven, C., Chakrabarti, A., Schroeder, U.: Learning analytics: challenges and future research directions. eleed, iss. 10 (2014). (urn:nbn:de:0009-5-40350)"},{"key":"27_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clow, D.: MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 185\u2013189. ACM (2013)","DOI":"10.1145\/2460296.2460332"},{"key":"27_CR7","unstructured":"Coursera: How will my grade be determined?. http:\/\/help.coursera.org\/customer\/portal\/articles\/1163304-how-will-my-grade-be-determined . Accessed 20 January 2015"},{"key":"27_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Daniel, J.: Making sense of MOOCs: musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. J. Interact. Media Educ. 3 (2012)","DOI":"10.5334\/2012-18"},{"key":"27_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davis, H., Dikens, K., Leon-Urrutia, M., Sanch\u00e9z-Vera, M.M., White, S.: MOOCs for Universities and learners an analysis of motivating factors. In: Proceedings of CSEDU 2014 Conference, pp. 105\u2013116. INSTICC (2014)","DOI":"10.5220\/0004844901050116"},{"key":"27_CR10","unstructured":"D\u00edez, J., Luaces, O., Alonso-Betanzos, A., Troncoso, A., Bahamonde, A.: Peer assessment in MOOCs using preference learning via matrix factorization. In: NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education, December 2013"},{"key":"27_CR11","unstructured":"edX: Open Response Assessments. http:\/\/edx-guide-for-students.readthedocs.org\/en\/latest\/SFD_ORA.html . Accessed 20 January 2015"},{"key":"27_CR12","first-page":"14","volume":"8","author":"K Ghadiri","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ghadiri, K., Qayoumi, M.H., Junn, E., Hsu, P., Sujitparapitaya, S.: The transformative potential of blended learning using MIT edX\u2019s 6.002 x online MOOC content combined with student team-based learning in class. Environment 8, 14 (2013)","journal-title":"Environment"},{"issue":"6","key":"27_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1080\/03075071003759037","volume":"36","author":"S Gielen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gielen, S., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K., Smeets, S.: Goals of peer assessment and their associated quality concepts. Stud. High. Educ. 36(6), 719\u2013735 (2011)","journal-title":"Stud. High. Educ."},{"issue":"4","key":"27_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007","volume":"20","author":"S Gielen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K.: Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learn. Instr. 20(4), 304\u2013315 (2010)","journal-title":"Learn. Instr."},{"key":"27_CR15","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40814-4_29","volume-title":"Scaling up Learning for Sustained Impact","author":"M Totschnig","year":"2013","unstructured":"Totschnig, M., Willems, C., Meinel, C., Gr\u00fcnewald, F.: Designing MOOCs for the support of multiple learning styles. In: Hern\u00e1ndez-Leo, D., Ley, T., Klamma, R., Harrer, A. (eds.) EC-TEL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8095, pp. 371\u2013382. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)"},{"key":"27_CR16","unstructured":"Hill, P.: Some validation of MOOC student patterns graphic (2013). http:\/\/mfeldstein.com\/validation-mooc-student-patterns-graphic\/"},{"key":"27_CR17","unstructured":"Jordan, K.: MOOC completion rates: The data (2013). http:\/\/www.katyjordan.com\/MOOCproject . Accessed 20 January 2015"},{"key":"27_CR18","unstructured":"Kaplan, F., Bornet, C.A.M.: A preparatory analysis of peer-grading for a digital humanities MOOC. In: Digital Humanities 2014: Book of Abstracts no. EPFL-CONF-200911, pp. 227\u2013229 (2014)"},{"issue":"7","key":"27_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.19173\/irrodl.v12i7.1041","volume":"12","author":"R Kop","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kop, R., Fournier, H., Mak, J.S.F.: A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 12(7), 74\u201393 (2011)","journal-title":"Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn."},{"issue":"6","key":"27_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1145\/2505057","volume":"20","author":"C Kulkarni","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kulkarni, C., Wei, K.P., Le, H., Chia, D., Papadopoulos, K., Cheng, J., Koller, D., Klemmer, S.R.: Peer and self assessment in massive online classes. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 20(6), 33 (2013)","journal-title":"ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. (TOCHI)"},{"key":"27_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Luo, H., Robinson, A.C., Park, J.Y.: Peer Grading in a MOOC: reliability, validity, and perceived effects. Online Learn. Official J. Online Learn. Consortium 18(2) (2014)","DOI":"10.24059\/olj.v18i2.429"},{"issue":"6","key":"27_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"677","DOI":"10.1007\/s10734-012-9570-z","volume":"65","author":"O McGarr","year":"2013","unstructured":"McGarr, O., Clifford, A.M.: \u2018Just enough to make you take it seriously\u2019: exploring students\u2019 attitudes towards peer assessment. High. Educ. 65(6), 677\u2013693 (2013)","journal-title":"High. Educ."},{"issue":"3","key":"27_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2648.2003.02528.x","volume":"41","author":"M McMullan","year":"2003","unstructured":"McMullan, M., Endacott, R., Gray, M.A., Jasper, M., Miller, C.M., Scholes, J., Webb, C.: Portfolios and assessment of competence: a review of the literature. J. Adv. Nurs. 41(3), 283\u2013294 (2003)","journal-title":"J. Adv. Nurs."},{"key":"27_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nielsen, J.: Usability inspection methods. In: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 413\u2013414. ACM (1994)","DOI":"10.1145\/259963.260531"},{"key":"27_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195092691.001.0001","volume-title":"The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation","author":"I Nonaka","year":"1995","unstructured":"Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)"},{"key":"27_CR26","unstructured":"Ostashewski, N., Reid, D.: Delivering a MOOC using a social networking site: the SMOOC design model. In: Proceedings of IADIS International Conference on Internet Technologies and Society, pp. 217\u2013220 (2012)"},{"key":"27_CR27","unstructured":"O\u2019Toole, R.: Pedagogical strategies and technologies for peer assessment in massively open online courses (MOOCs). Discussion Paper, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK (2013). http:\/\/wrap.warwick.ac.uk\/54602\/"},{"key":"27_CR28","unstructured":"Piech, C., Huang, J., Chen, Z., Do, C., Ng, A., Koller, D.: Tuned models of peer assessment in MOOCs (2013). arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.2579"},{"key":"27_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pr\u00fcmper, J.: Der Benutzungsfragebogen ISONORM 9241\/10: Ergebnisse zur Reliabilit\u00e4t und Validit\u00e4t. In: Software-Ergonomie 1997, pp. 253\u2013262. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag (1997)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-322-86782-7_21"},{"issue":"1","key":"27_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.7238\/rusc.v12i1.2262","volume":"12","author":"Mar\u00eda del Mar S\u00e1nchez-Vera","year":"2015","unstructured":"S\u00e1nchez-Vera, M.M., Prendes-Espinosa, M.P.: Beyond objective testing and peer assessment: alternative ways of assessment in MOOCs. RUSC Univ. Knowl. Soc. J. 12(1), 119\u2013130 (2015). doi: http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.7238\/rusc.v12i1.2262","journal-title":"RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"27_CR31","first-page":"5","volume":"8","author":"C Sandeen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sandeen, C.: Assessment\u2019s place in the new MOOC world. Res. Pract. Assess. 8(1), 5\u201312 (2013)","journal-title":"Res. Pract. Assess."},{"key":"27_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sitthiworachart, J., Joy, M.: Effective peer assessment for learning computer programming. In: ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 122\u2013126. ACM (2004)","DOI":"10.1145\/1026487.1008030"},{"key":"27_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Suen, H.K.: Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs). Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 15(3) (2014)","DOI":"10.19173\/irrodl.v15i3.1680"},{"issue":"3","key":"27_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.3102\/00346543068003249","volume":"68","author":"K Topping","year":"1998","unstructured":"Topping, K.: Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Rev. Educ. Res. 68(3), 249\u2013276 (1998)","journal-title":"Rev. Educ. Res."},{"issue":"4","key":"27_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004","volume":"20","author":"M Zundert Van","year":"2010","unstructured":"Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., Van Merri\u00ebnboer, J.: Effective peer assessment processes: research findings and future directions. Learn. Instr. 20(4), 270\u2013279 (2010)","journal-title":"Learn. Instr."},{"issue":"1","key":"27_CR36","first-page":"3","volume":"7","author":"K Wolf","year":"2007","unstructured":"Wolf, K., Stevens, E.: The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning. J. Effective Teach. 7(1), 3\u201314 (2007)","journal-title":"J. Effective Teach."},{"issue":"1","key":"27_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.5944\/openpraxis.5.1.13","volume":"5","author":"S Yin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Yin, S., Kawachi, P.: Improving open access through prior learning assessment. Open Praxis 5(1), 59\u201365 (2013)","journal-title":"Open Praxis"},{"key":"27_CR38","unstructured":"Yorke, M.: Assessment, especially in the first year of higher education: old principles in new wrapping. In: REAP International Online Conference on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility (2007)"},{"key":"27_CR39","unstructured":"Yousef, A.M.F., Chatti, M.A., Ahmad, I., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M.: An evaluation of learning analytics in a blended MOOC environment. In: The European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2015 (2015a Submitted)"},{"key":"27_CR40","unstructured":"Yousef, A.M.F., Chatti, M.A., Danoyan, N., Th\u00fcs, H., Schroeder, U.: An evaluation of learning analytics in a blended MOOC environment. In: The European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2015 (2015b Submitted)"},{"issue":"1","key":"27_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.7238\/rusc.v12i1.2253","volume":"12","author":"Ahmed Mohamed Fahmy Yousef","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yousef, A.M.F., Chatti, M. A., Wosnitza, M., Schroeder, U.: A cluster analysis of MOOC stakeholder perspectives. RUSC Univ. Knowl. Soc. J. 12(1), 74\u201390 (2015c)","journal-title":"RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal"},{"key":"27_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yousef, A.M.F., Chatti, M.A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M.: A usability evaluation of a blended MOOC environment: an experimental case study. In: The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, (2015d, Accepted)","DOI":"10.19173\/irrodl.v16i2.2032"},{"key":"27_CR43","unstructured":"Yousef, A.M.F., Chatti, M.A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., Jakobs, H.: MOOCs - a review of the state-of-the-art. In: Proceedings of CSEDU 2014 Conference, vol. 3, pp. 9\u201320. INSTICC, 2014 (2014a)"},{"key":"27_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yousef, A.M.F., Chatti, M.A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M.: What drives a successful MOOC? an empirical examination of criteria to assure design quality of MOOCs. In: 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies Proceedings. ICALT 2014, pp. 44\u201348 (2014b)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICALT.2014.23"}],"container-title":["Communications in Computer and Information Science","Computer Supported Education"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-319-29585-5_27","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,1]],"date-time":"2025-06-01T10:34:52Z","timestamp":1748774092000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-319-29585-5_27"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016]]},"ISBN":["9783319295848","9783319295855"],"references-count":44,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-29585-5_27","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-0929","1865-0937"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-0929"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-0937"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016]]}}}