{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T00:50:18Z","timestamp":1740099018810,"version":"3.37.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783319731643"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783319731650"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,21]],"date-time":"2017-12-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1513814400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-73165-0_24","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,20]],"date-time":"2017-12-20T12:14:09Z","timestamp":1513772049000},"page":"240-248","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The European Project OpenUP: OPENing UP New Methods, Indicators and Tools for Peer Review, Impact Measurement and Dissemination of Research Results"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Alessia","family":"Bardi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Vittore","family":"Casarosa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Paolo","family":"Manghi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"24_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2011.08.002","volume":"6","author":"DW Aksnes","year":"2012","unstructured":"Aksnes, D.W., Schneider, J.W., Gunnarsson, M.: Ranking national research systems by citation Indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods. J. Informetrics 6, 36\u201343 (2012)","journal-title":"J. Informetrics"},{"key":"24_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Aleksic, J., Alexa, A., Attwood, T.K., et al.: An Open Science Peer Review Oath [v2; ref status: indexed, http:\/\/f1000r.es\/4wf , 9 January 2015] F1000Research, 3, 271 (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12688\/f1000research.5686.2","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.5686.2"},{"issue":"1\/2","key":"24_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1045\/january2015-assante","volume":"21","author":"M Assante","year":"2015","unstructured":"Assante, M., Candela, L., Castelli, D., Manghi, P., Pagano, P.: Science 2.0 repositories: time for a change in scholarly communication. D-Lib Mag. 21(1\/2) (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1045\/january2015-assante","journal-title":"D-Lib Mag."},{"key":"24_CR4","unstructured":"Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., Wouters, P.: Do \u201caltmetrics\u201d correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective? J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(10), 2003\u20132019 (2014)"},{"issue":"3","key":"24_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2007.04.001","volume":"1","author":"ID Craig","year":"2007","unstructured":"Craig, I.D., Plume, A.M., McVeigh, M.E., Pringle, J., Amin, M.: Do open access articles have greater citation impact?: a critical review of the literature. J. Informetrics 1(3), 239\u2013248 (2007)","journal-title":"J. Informetrics"},{"key":"24_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dinsmore, A., Dolby, K.: Alternative perspectives on impact: The potential of ALMs and altmetrics to inform funders about research impact. PLoS Biol. 12 (2014)","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.1002003"},{"issue":"2","key":"24_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<145::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-9","volume":"51","author":"L Egghe","year":"2000","unstructured":"Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., van Hooydonk, G.: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 51(2), 145\u2013157 (2000)","journal-title":"J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci."},{"issue":"1","key":"24_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-005-0239-6","volume":"64","author":"M Gauffriau","year":"2005","unstructured":"Gauffriau, M., Larsen, P.O.: Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies. Scientometrics 64(1), 85\u201393 (2005)","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"24_CR9","first-page":"1","volume":"25","author":"W Gunn","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gunn, W.: Social signals reflect academic impact: what it means when a scholar adds a paper to mendeley. Inf. Stand. Q. 25(2), 1\u20138 (2013). ISSN 1041-0031","journal-title":"Inf. Stand. Q."},{"key":"24_CR10","unstructured":"Guthrie, S., Gu\u00e9rin, B., Wu, H., Sharif I., Wooding, S.: Alternatives to Peer Review in Research Project Funding, RAND report 2013 update. Rand Europe, April 2013"},{"key":"24_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haustein, S., Sugimoto, C.R., Larivi\u00e8re, V.: Social media in scholarly communication. Aslib J. Inf. Manage. 67(3) (2015)","DOI":"10.1108\/AJIM-03-2015-0047"},{"issue":"7548","key":"24_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1038\/520429a","volume":"520","author":"D Hicks","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hicks, D., Wouters, P.: The leiden manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520(7548), 429\u2013431 (2015)","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"24_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Langfeldt, L.: The policy challenges of peer review: managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments. Res. Eval. 15(1), 31\u201341 (2006). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3152\/147154406781776039","DOI":"10.3152\/147154406781776039"},{"key":"24_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Liang, X., Su, L.Y.F., Yeo, S.K., Scheufele, D., Brossard, D., Xenos, M., Corley, E.: Building buzz: (Scientists) communicating science in new media environments. J. Mass Commun. Q. 91(4), 1\u201320 (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1077699014550092","DOI":"10.1177\/1077699014550092"},{"key":"24_CR15","unstructured":"OpenAIRE: OpenAIRE Open Peer Review Tenders: Selected Projects, Newsletter, 16 September 2015. https:\/\/www.openaire.eu\/openaire-open-peer-review-tenders"},{"issue":"2","key":"24_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1108\/JD-12-2013-0166","volume":"71","author":"S Peroni","year":"2015","unstructured":"Peroni, S., Dutton, A., Gray, T., Shotton, D.: Setting our bibliographic references free: towards open citation data. J. Documentation 71(2), 253\u2013277 (2015)","journal-title":"J. Documentation"},{"issue":"3","key":"24_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1080\/00987913.2011.10765376","volume":"37","author":"D Ponte","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ponte, D., Simon, J.: Scholarly communication 2.0: Exploring researchers\u2019 opinions on web 2.0 for scientific knowledge creation, evaluation and dissemination. Serials Rev. 37(3), 149\u2013156 (2011). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00987913.2011.10765376","journal-title":"Serials Rev."},{"key":"24_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"P\u00f6schl, U.: Multi-stage open peer review: scientific evaluation integrating the strengths of traditional peer review with the virtues of transparency and self-regulation. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 6(33) (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fncom.2012.00033","DOI":"10.3389\/fncom.2012.00033"},{"key":"24_CR19","unstructured":"Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J.: If you Build it, Will They Come? A Research Information Network report, July 2010. http:\/\/www.rin.ac.uk\/system\/files\/attachments\/web_2.0_screen.pdf"},{"issue":"10","key":"24_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.5860\/crln.73.10.8846","volume":"73","author":"RC Roemer","year":"2012","unstructured":"Roemer, R.C., Borchardt, R.: From bibliometrics to altmetrics. Coll. Res. Libr. News 73(10), 596\u2013600 (2012)","journal-title":"Coll. Res. Libr. News"},{"key":"24_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1607-5","volume":"104","author":"H Sotudeh","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sotudeh, H., Ghasempour, Z., Yaghtin, M.: The citation advantage of author-pays model: the case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals. Scientometrics 104, 581\u2013608 (2015)","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"24_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Su, L.Y.-F., Akin, H., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D.A., Xenos, M.A.: Science news consumption patterns and their implications for public understanding of science. J. Mass Commun. Q. (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1077699015586415","DOI":"10.1177\/1077699015586415"},{"issue":"2","key":"24_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.21678","volume":"63","author":"L Waltman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Waltman, L., Van Eck, N.J.: The inconsistency of the h-index. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 63(2), 406\u2013415 (2012)","journal-title":"J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol."}],"container-title":["Communications in Computer and Information Science","Digital Libraries and Multimedia Archives"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-319-73165-0_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,8]],"date-time":"2019-10-08T05:54:18Z","timestamp":1570514058000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-319-73165-0_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,21]]},"ISBN":["9783319731643","9783319731650"],"references-count":23,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-73165-0_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-0929","1865-0937"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-0929"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-0937"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,21]]}}}