{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,10]],"date-time":"2024-09-10T03:17:23Z","timestamp":1725938243099},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":11,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783319737058"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783319737065"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]],"date-time":"2018-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1514764800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-73706-5_26","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,5]],"date-time":"2018-01-05T10:55:40Z","timestamp":1515149740000},"page":"301-308","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Using Argumentative Structure to Grade Persuasive Essays"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Andreas","family":"Stiegelmayr","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Margot","family":"Mieskes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"26_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dong, F., Zhang, Y.: Automatic features for essay scoring - an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1072\u20131077 (2016)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D16-1115"},{"key":"26_CR2","unstructured":"Faulkner, A.R.: Automated Classification of Argument Stance in Student Essays: A Linguistically Motivated Approach with an Application for Supporting Argument Summarization. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate Center, City University of New York (2014)"},{"key":"26_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ghosh, D., Khanam, A., Han, Y., Muresan, S.: Coarse-grained argumentation features for scoring persuasive essays. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Short Papers, vol. 2, pp. 549\u2013554. Association for Computational Linguistics (2016). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.18653\/v1\/P16-2089\n\n. \nhttp:\/\/aclweb.org\/anthology\/P16-2089","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/P16-2089"},{"issue":"1","key":"26_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1162\/COLI_a_00276","volume":"43","author":"I Habernal","year":"2017","unstructured":"Habernal, I., Gurevych, I.: Argumentation mining in user-generated web discourse. Comput. Linguist. 43(1), 125\u2013179 (2017)","journal-title":"Comput. Linguist."},{"key":"26_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Houy, C., Niesen, T., Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Towards automated identification and analysis of argumentation structures in the decision corpus of the German Federal Constitutional Court. In: The 7th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (IEEE DEST-2013) (2013)","DOI":"10.1109\/DEST.2013.6611332"},{"key":"26_CR6","volume-title":"Searching for Arguments - Automatic analysis of arguments about controversial educational topics in web documents","author":"R Kluge","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kluge, R.: Searching for Arguments - Automatic analysis of arguments about controversial educational topics in web documents. AV Akademikerverlaug, Saarbr\u00fccken (2014)"},{"issue":"1","key":"26_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310","volume":"33","author":"RJ Landis","year":"1977","unstructured":"Landis, R.J., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1), 159\u2013174 (1977)","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"26_CR8","unstructured":"Meyer, C.M., Mieskes, M., Stab, C., Gurevych, I.: DKPro Agreement: an open-source Java library for measuring inter-rater agreement. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Dublin, Ireland, pp. 105\u2013109 (2014)"},{"key":"26_CR9","unstructured":"Peldszus, A., Stede, M.: Ranking the annotators: an agreement study on argumentation structure. In: Proceedings of the 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse, pp. 196\u2013204 (2013)"},{"key":"26_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stab, C., Gurevych, I.: Identifying argumentative discourse structures in persuasive essays. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 46\u201356. Association for Computational Linguistics (2014). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3115\/v1\/D14-1006\n\n. \nhttp:\/\/aclweb.org\/anthology\/D14-1006","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/D14-1006"},{"key":"26_CR11","unstructured":"Wachsmuth, H., Al-Khatib, K., Stein, B.: Using argument mining to assess the argumentation quality of essays. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2016), pp. 1680\u20131692, December 2016"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Language Technologies for the Challenges of the Digital Age"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-319-73706-5_26","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,5]],"date-time":"2018-01-05T11:05:40Z","timestamp":1515150340000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-319-73706-5_26"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"ISBN":["9783319737058","9783319737065"],"references-count":11,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-73706-5_26","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018]]}}}