{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T14:37:38Z","timestamp":1743086258970,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Berlin, Heidelberg","reference-count":8,"publisher":"Springer Berlin Heidelberg","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783540927006"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783540927013"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,1,1]],"date-time":"2008-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1199145600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-92701-3_9","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,1,6]],"date-time":"2009-01-06T10:44:29Z","timestamp":1231238669000},"page":"131-145","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Extensive Questions"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Emmanuel J.","family":"Genot","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"9_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s10670-006-9001-6","volume":"65","author":"E.J. Olsson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Olsson, E.J., Westlund, D.: On the Role of Research Agenda in Epistemic Change. Erkenntnis\u00a065, 165\u2013183 (2006)","journal-title":"Erkenntnis"},{"key":"9_CR2","unstructured":"Enqvist, S., Olsson, E.J.: Contraction in Interrogative Belief Revision (March 2008) (manuscript)"},{"key":"9_CR3","unstructured":"Genot, E.J.: The Best of All Possible Worlds: Where Interrogative Games Meet Research Agendas. In: Olsson, E.J. (ed.) Science in Flux. LEUS. Springer, Heidelberg (forthcoming)"},{"key":"9_CR4","unstructured":"Genot, E.J.: The Game of Inquiry. In: LOCCOL 2008 Conference, Prague, September 10\u201314 (2008)"},{"key":"9_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-9313-7_3","volume-title":"Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery","author":"J. Hintikka","year":"1999","unstructured":"Hintikka, J., Halonen, I., Mutanen, A.: Interrogative Logic as a General Theory of Reasoning. In: Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery, pp. 47\u201390. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999)"},{"key":"9_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511619298","volume-title":"Socratic Epistemology","author":"J. Hintikka","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hintikka, J.: Socratic Epistemology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)"},{"key":"9_CR7","volume-title":"A Course in Game Theory","author":"M.J. Osborne","year":"1994","unstructured":"Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)"},{"key":"9_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370186","volume":"50","author":"S.O. Hansson","year":"1991","unstructured":"Hansson, S.O.: Belief Contraction without Recovery. Studia Logica\u00a050, 251\u2013260 (1991)","journal-title":"Studia Logica"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Logic and Its Applications"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-540-92701-3_9","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,8]],"date-time":"2020-01-08T23:49:01Z","timestamp":1578527341000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-540-92701-3_9"}},"subtitle":["From Research Agendas to Interrogative Strategies"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008]]},"ISBN":["9783540927006","9783540927013"],"references-count":8,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-92701-3_9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008]]}}}