{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T00:28:52Z","timestamp":1761611332100},"publisher-location":"Berlin, Heidelberg","reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Berlin Heidelberg","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783642403804"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783642403811"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_12","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,10]],"date-time":"2013-09-10T21:49:06Z","timestamp":1378849746000},"page":"148-161","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["A Logical Theory about Dynamics in Abstract Argumentation"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Richard","family":"Booth","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Souhila","family":"Kaci","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tjitze","family":"Rienstra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Leendert","family":"van der Torre","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"12_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"P.M. Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell.\u00a077(2), 321\u2013358 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"12_CR2","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Brewka, G.: Expanding argumentation frameworks: Enforcing and monotonicity results. In: Baroni, P., Cerutti, F., Giacomin, M., Simari, G.R. (eds.) COMMA. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol.\u00a0216, pp. 75\u201386. IOS Press (2010)"},{"issue":"1","key":"12_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.2965","volume":"38","author":"C. Cayrol","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: Adding an argument. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research\u00a038(1), 49\u201384 (2010)","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research"},{"key":"12_CR4","unstructured":"Booth, R., Kaci, S., Rienstra, T., van der Torre, L.: Monotonic and non-monotonic inference for abstract argumentation. In: FLAIRS (2013)"},{"key":"12_CR5","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1007\/11853886_11","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"M. Caminada","year":"2006","unstructured":"Caminada, M.: On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds.) JELIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol.\u00a04160, pp. 111\u2013123. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)"},{"issue":"4","key":"12_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888911000166","volume":"26","author":"P. Baroni","year":"2011","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: An introduction to argumentation semantics. Knowledge Eng. Review\u00a026(4), 365\u2013410 (2011)","journal-title":"Knowledge Eng. Review"},{"issue":"3","key":"12_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(91)90069-V","volume":"52","author":"H. Katsuno","year":"1991","unstructured":"Katsuno, H., Mendelzon, A.O.: Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change. Artificial Intelligence\u00a052(3), 263\u2013294 (1991)","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"12_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n, C.E., G\u00e4rdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of symbolic logic, 510\u2013530 (1985)","DOI":"10.2307\/2274239"},{"key":"12_CR9","unstructured":"Baumann, R.: What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation. In: Raedt, L.D., Bessi\u00e8re, C., Dubois, D., Doherty, P., Frasconi, P., Heintz, F., Lucas, P.J.F. (eds.) ECAI. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol.\u00a0242, pp. 127\u2013132. IOS Press (2012)"},{"key":"12_CR10","series-title":"LNAI","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-20832-4_11","volume-title":"Logic Programming, Knowledge Representation, and Nonmonotonic Reasoning","author":"F. Toni","year":"2011","unstructured":"Toni, F., Sergot, M.: Argumentation and answer set programming. In: Balduccini, M., Son, T.C. (eds.) Gelfond Festschrift. LNCS (LNAI), vol.\u00a06565, pp. 164\u2013180. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)"},{"key":"12_CR11","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","volume-title":"Logic Programming","year":"2008","unstructured":"de la Banda, M.G., Pontelli, E. (eds.): ICLP 2008. LNCS, vol.\u00a05366. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)"},{"issue":"2","key":"12_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2010.486479","volume":"1","author":"U. Egly","year":"2010","unstructured":"Egly, U., Gaggl, S.A., Woltran, S.: Answer-set programming encodings for argumentation frameworks. Argument and Computation\u00a01(2), 147\u2013177 (2010)","journal-title":"Argument and Computation"},{"issue":"2","key":"12_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.3233\/AIC-2011-0491","volume":"24","author":"M. Gebser","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gebser, M., Kaufmann, B., Kaminski, R., Ostrowski, M., Schaub, T., Schneider, M.: Potassco: The potsdam answer set solving collection. AI Communications\u00a024(2), 107\u2013124 (2011)","journal-title":"AI Communications"},{"issue":"11","key":"12_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1790","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2011.03.006","volume":"175","author":"B.S. Liao","year":"2011","unstructured":"Liao, B.S., Jin, L., Koons, R.C.: Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method. Artif. Intell.\u00a0175(11), 1790\u20131814 (2011)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"12_CR15","unstructured":"Roos, N.: Preferential model and argumentation semantics. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, NMR 2010 (2010)"},{"key":"12_CR16","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-34799-3_9","volume-title":"Multi-Agent Systems","author":"C. Gratie","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gratie, C., Florea, A.M.: Argumentation semantics for agents. In: Cossentino, M., Kaisers, M., Tuyls, K., Weiss, G. (eds.) EUMAS 2011. LNCS, vol.\u00a07541, pp. 129\u2013144. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)"},{"key":"12_CR17","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-29184-5_15","volume-title":"Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation","author":"G. Boella","year":"2012","unstructured":"Boella, G., Gabbay, D.M., Perotti, A., van der Torre, L., Villata, S.: Conditional labelling for abstract argumentation. In: Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F. (eds.) TAFA 2011. LNCS, vol.\u00a07132, pp. 232\u2013248. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)"},{"key":"12_CR18","unstructured":"Grossi, D.: On the logic of argumentation theory. In: van der Hoek, W., Kaminka, G.A., Lesp\u00e9rance, Y., Luck, M., Sen, S. (eds.) AAMAS, pp. 409\u2013416. IFAAMAS (2010)"},{"key":"12_CR19","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-33353-8_28","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"F. Schwarzentruber","year":"2012","unstructured":"Schwarzentruber, F., Vesic, S., Rienstra, T.: Building an epistemic logic for argumentation. In: del Cerro, L.F., Herzig, A., Mengin, J. (eds.) JELIA 2012. LNCS, vol.\u00a07519, pp. 359\u2013371. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)"},{"key":"12_CR20","unstructured":"Besnard, P., Doutre, S.: Checking the acceptability of a set of arguments. In: Delgrande, J.P., Schaub, T. (eds.) NMR, pp. 59\u201364 (2004)"},{"key":"12_CR21","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1007\/11794578_2","volume-title":"Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems","author":"G. Boella","year":"2006","unstructured":"Boella, G., Hulstijn, J., van der Torre, L.W.N.: A logic of abstract argumentation. In: Parsons, S., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P., Rahwan, I. (eds.) ArgMAS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol.\u00a04049, pp. 29\u201341. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)"},{"key":"12_CR22","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Marquis, P.: Constrained argumentation frameworks. In: Doherty, P., Mylopoulos, J., Welty, C.A. (eds.) KR, pp. 112\u2013122. AAAI Press (2006)"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Scalable Uncertainty Management"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_12","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,3]],"date-time":"2020-08-03T18:55:05Z","timestamp":1596480905000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_12"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013]]},"ISBN":["9783642403804","9783642403811"],"references-count":22,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_12","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013]]}}}