{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T08:21:12Z","timestamp":1760170872937,"version":"3.40.4"},"publisher-location":"Berlin, Heidelberg","reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Berlin Heidelberg","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783642543722"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783642543739"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-54373-9_2","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,3]],"date-time":"2014-02-03T02:39:17Z","timestamp":1391395157000},"page":"16-31","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Extending Social Abstract Argumentation with Votes on Attacks"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Sinan","family":"E\u011filmez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jo\u00e3o","family":"Martins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jo\u00e3o","family":"Leite","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"issue":"10","key":"2_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20307","volume":"23","author":"L. Amgoud","year":"2008","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., et al.: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Intell. Syst.\u00a023(10), 1062\u20131093 (2008)","journal-title":"Int. J. Intell. Syst."},{"issue":"10-15","key":"2_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.004","volume":"171","author":"P. Baroni","year":"2007","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell.\u00a0171(10-15), 675\u2013700 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"2_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boella, G., et al.: Support in abstract argumentation. In: Procs. of COMMA 2010. FAIA, vol.\u00a0216. IOS Press (2010)","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-60750-619-5-111"},{"key":"2_CR4","unstructured":"Cabrio, E., Villata, S.: Natural language arguments: A combined approach. In: Procs. of ECAI 2012. FAIA, vol.\u00a0242. IOS Press (2012)"},{"key":"2_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1411","volume":"23","author":"C. Cayrol","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Graduality in argumentation. J. Artif. Intell. Res.\u00a023, 245\u2013297 (2005)","journal-title":"J. Artif. Intell. Res."},{"issue":"4","key":"2_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888906001044","volume":"21","author":"C. Ches\u00f1evar","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ches\u00f1evar, C., et al.: Towards an argument interchange format. Knowledge Eng. Review\u00a021(4), 293\u2013316 (2006)","journal-title":"Knowledge Eng. Review"},{"issue":"2","key":"2_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"P.M. Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell.\u00a077(2), 321\u2013358 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"2","key":"2_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2010.09.005","volume":"175","author":"P. Dunne","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dunne, P., et al.: Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results. Artif. Intell.\u00a0175(2), 457\u2013486 (2011)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"2_CR9","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-33203-6_16","volume-title":"Web Reasoning and Rule Systems","author":"V. Evripidou","year":"2012","unstructured":"Evripidou, V., Toni, F.: Argumentation and voting for an intelligent user empowering business directory on the web. In: Kr\u00f6tzsch, M., Straccia, U. (eds.) RR 2012. LNCS, vol.\u00a07497, pp. 209\u2013212. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)"},{"issue":"2-3","key":"2_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2012.704398","volume":"3","author":"D.M. Gabbay","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gabbay, D.M.: Equational approach to argumentation networks. Argument & Computation\u00a03(2-3), 87\u2013142 (2012)","journal-title":"Argument & Computation"},{"key":"2_CR11","series-title":"LNCS (LNAI)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-32897-8_14","volume-title":"Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems","author":"D. Gabbay","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gabbay, D., Rodrigues, O.: A numerical approach to the merging of argumentation networks. In: Fisher, M., van der Torre, L., Dastani, M., Governatori, G. (eds.) CLIMA XIII 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol.\u00a07486, pp. 195\u2013212. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)"},{"key":"2_CR12","unstructured":"Gabbriellini, S., Torroni, P.: Large scale agreements via microdebates. In: Procs. of AT 2012. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol.\u00a0918 (2012)"},{"key":"2_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda, A., Dix, J., Simari, G.: Argument-based logic programming. In: Rahwan, I., Simari, G.R. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 153\u2013171. Springer (2009)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_8"},{"key":"2_CR14","unstructured":"Grosse, K., Ches\u00f1evar, C.I., Maguitman, A.G.: An argument-based approach to mining opinions from Twitter. In: Procs. of AT 2012. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol.\u00a0918 (2012)"},{"key":"2_CR15","unstructured":"Kontarinis, D., et al.: Picking the right expert to make a debate uncontroversial. In: Procs. of COMMA 2012. FAIA, vol.\u00a0245. IOS Press (2012)"},{"key":"2_CR16","unstructured":"Leite, J., Martins, J.: Social abstract argumentation. In: Procs. of IJCAI 2011. IJCAI\/AAAI (2011)"},{"issue":"9-10","key":"2_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"901","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2009.02.001","volume":"173","author":"S. Modgil","year":"2009","unstructured":"Modgil, S.: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell.\u00a0173(9-10), 901\u2013934 (2009)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"2_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Modgil, S., et al.: The added value of argumentation. In: Ossowski, S. (ed.) Agreement Technologies. Law, Governance and Tech. Series, vol.\u00a08, pp. 357\u2013403. Springer (2013)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5583-3_21"},{"key":"2_CR19","unstructured":"Modgil, S., Prakken, H.: Resolutions in structured argumentation. In: Procs. of COMMA 2012. FAIA, vol.\u00a0245, IOS Press (2012)"},{"key":"2_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oren, N., Atkinson, K., Li, H.: Group persuasion through uncertain audience modelling. In: Procs. of COMMA 2012. FAIA, vol.\u00a0245. IOS Press (2012)","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-111-3-350"},{"key":"2_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walton, D.: Argumentation theory: A very short introduction. In: Rahwan, I., Simari, G.R. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1\u201322. Springer (2009)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_1"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-642-54373-9_2","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,1]],"date-time":"2025-05-01T19:09:02Z","timestamp":1746126542000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-642-54373-9_2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014]]},"ISBN":["9783642543722","9783642543739"],"references-count":21,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-54373-9_2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014]]}}}