{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,18]],"date-time":"2025-12-18T09:07:37Z","timestamp":1766048857179,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Berlin, Heidelberg","reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Berlin Heidelberg","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783662556641"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783662556658"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]],"date-time":"2017-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1483228800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-55665-8_14","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,23]],"date-time":"2017-08-23T15:01:02Z","timestamp":1503500462000},"page":"195-208","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["The Dynamics of Group Polarization"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Carlo","family":"Proietti","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"14_CR1","unstructured":"Caminada, M., Sakama, C.: On the issue of argumentation and informedness. In: 2nd International Workshop on Argument for Agreement and Assurance (AAA 2015) (2015)"},{"key":"14_CR2","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1007\/11518655_33","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS, vol. 3571, pp. 378\u2013389. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi: 10.1007\/11518655_33"},{"issue":"7","key":"14_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"876","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.03.001","volume":"54","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: Towards a better Understanding. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 54(7), 876\u2013899 (2013)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approx. Reason."},{"key":"14_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.012","volume":"171","author":"S Coste-Marquis","year":"2007","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Konieczny, S., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C., Marquis, P.: On the merging of Dung\u2019s argumentation systems. Artif. Intell. 171, 730\u2013753 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"6","key":"14_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1431","DOI":"10.2307\/1913390","volume":"50","author":"V Crawford","year":"1982","unstructured":"Crawford, V., Sobel, J.: Strategic information transmission. Econom. 50(6), 1431\u20131451 (1982)","journal-title":"Econom."},{"key":"14_CR6","first-page":"2911","volume":"2015","author":"J Delobelle","year":"2015","unstructured":"Delobelle, J., Konieczny, S., Vesic, S.: On the aggregation of argumentation frameworks. IJCAI 2015, 2911\u20132917 (2015)","journal-title":"IJCAI"},{"key":"14_CR7","unstructured":"Delobelle, J., Haret, A., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J., Rossit, J., Woltran, S.: Merging of abstract argumentation frameworks. In: KR 2016, pp. 33\u201342 (2016)"},{"key":"14_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2016.04.003","volume":"75","author":"F Dupin de Saint-Cyr","year":"2016","unstructured":"Dupin de Saint-Cyr, F., Bisquert, P., Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Argumentation update in YALLA (Yet Another Logic Language for Argumentation). Int. J. Approx. Reason. 75, 57\u201392 (2016)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approx. Reason."},{"issue":"2","key":"14_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"1","key":"14_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.2307\/2555533","volume":"18","author":"J Farrell","year":"1987","unstructured":"Farrell, J.: Cheap talk, coordination, and entry. RAND J. Econ. 18(1), 34\u201339 (1987)","journal-title":"RAND J. Econ."},{"key":"14_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9781503620766","volume-title":"A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance","author":"L Festinger","year":"1957","unstructured":"Festinger, L.: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA (1957)"},{"key":"14_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1080\/0022250X.2010.532261","volume":"35","author":"A Flache","year":"2011","unstructured":"Flache, A., Macy, M.W.: Small world and cultural polarization. J. Math. Sociol. 35, 146\u2013176 (2011)","journal-title":"J. Math. Sociol."},{"key":"14_CR13","volume-title":"How we know what isnt so","author":"T Gilovich","year":"1991","unstructured":"Gilovich, T.: How we know what isnt so. The Free Press, New York (1991)"},{"key":"14_CR14","unstructured":"Grossi, D., Modgil, S.: On the graded acceptability of arguments. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2017, pp. 868\u2013874 (2015)"},{"issue":"6","key":"14_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1141","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.50.6.1141","volume":"50","author":"DJ Isenberg","year":"1986","unstructured":"Isenberg, D.J.: Group polarization: a critical review and a meta-analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50(6), 1141\u20131151 (1986)","journal-title":"J. Pers. Soc. Psychol."},{"key":"14_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1007\/s10588-005-6282-2","volume":"10","author":"W Jager","year":"2004","unstructured":"Jager, W., Amblard, F.: Uniformity, bipolarization and pluriformity captured as generic stylized behavior with an agent-based simulation model of attitude change. Comput. Math. Organiz. Theor. 10, 295\u2013303 (2004)","journal-title":"Comput. Math. Organiz. Theor."},{"issue":"2","key":"14_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1037\/a0035941","volume":"121","author":"A Jern","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jern, A., Chang, K.K., Kemp, C.: Belief Polarization is not always irrational. Psychol. Rev. 121(2), 206\u2013224 (2014)","journal-title":"Psychol. Rev."},{"issue":"10","key":"14_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.5840\/jphil20081051024","volume":"105","author":"T Kelly","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kelly, T.: Disagreement, dogmatism, and belief polarization. J. Philos. 105(10), 611\u2013633 (2008)","journal-title":"J. Philos."},{"key":"14_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1002\/ejsp.345","volume":"37","author":"Z Krizan","year":"2007","unstructured":"Krizan, Z., Baron, R.S.: Group polarization and choice-dilemmas: How important is self-categorization? Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 37, 191\u2013201 (2007)","journal-title":"Eur. J. Soc. Psychol."},{"key":"14_CR20","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-29184-5_1","volume-title":"Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation","author":"H Li","year":"2012","unstructured":"Li, H., Oren, N., Norman, T.J.: Probabilistic argumentation frameworks. In: Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F. (eds.) TAFA 2011. LNCS, vol. 7132, pp. 1\u201316. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007\/978-3-642-29184-5_1"},{"issue":"3","key":"14_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1049\/iet-cta.2014.0511","volume":"9","author":"Q Liu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Liu, Q., Zhao, J., Wang, X.: Multi-agent model of group polarisation with biased assimilation of arguments. IET Control Theor. Appl. 9(3), 485\u2013492 (2014)","journal-title":"IET Control Theor. Appl."},{"issue":"11","key":"14_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2098","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.37.11.2098","volume":"37","author":"C Lord","year":"1979","unstructured":"Lord, C., Ross, L., Lepper, M.: Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37(11), 2098\u20132109 (1979)","journal-title":"J. Pers. Soc. Psychol."},{"issue":"11","key":"14_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e74516","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0074516","volume":"8","author":"M M\u00e4s","year":"2013","unstructured":"M\u00e4s, M., Flache, A.: Differentiation without distancing. explaining bi-polarization of opinions without negative influence. PLoS ONE 8(11), e74516 (2013)","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"14_CR24","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-87803-2_24","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"P-A Matt","year":"2008","unstructured":"Matt, P.-A., Toni, F.: A game-theoretic measure of argument strength for abstract argumentation. In: H\u00f6lldobler, S., Lutz, C., Wansing, H. (eds.) JELIA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5293, pp. 285\u2013297. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi: 10.1007\/978-3-540-87803-2_24"},{"issue":"75","key":"14_CR25","first-page":"177","volume":"2012","author":"C Sakama","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sakama, C.: Dishonest arguments in debate games. COMMA 2012(75), 177\u2013184 (2012)","journal-title":"COMMA"},{"key":"14_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1031(77)90001-4","volume":"13","author":"GS Sanders","year":"1977","unstructured":"Sanders, G.S., Baron, R.S.: Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts? J. Exper. Soc. Psychol. 13, 303\u2013314 (1977)","journal-title":"J. Exper. Soc. Psychol."},{"key":"14_CR27","unstructured":"Stoner, J.A.: A comparison of individual and group decision involving risk MA thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1961)"},{"key":"14_CR28","volume-title":"Why societies need Dissent","author":"C Sunstein","year":"2003","unstructured":"Sunstein, C.: Why societies need Dissent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2003)"},{"key":"14_CR29","volume-title":"The Uses of Argument","author":"S Toulmin","year":"1958","unstructured":"Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1958)"},{"issue":"3","key":"14_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1037\/h0036010","volume":"29","author":"A Vinokur","year":"1974","unstructured":"Vinokur, A., Burnstein, E.: Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 29(3), 305\u201315 (1974)","journal-title":"J. Pers. Soc. Psychol."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Logic, Rationality, and Interaction"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-662-55665-8_14","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,1]],"date-time":"2022-08-01T17:36:43Z","timestamp":1659375403000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-662-55665-8_14"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"ISBN":["9783662556641","9783662556658"],"references-count":30,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-662-55665-8_14","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}}}