{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T00:27:48Z","timestamp":1761611268691},"publisher-location":"Dordrecht","reference-count":59,"publisher":"Springer Netherlands","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9789048195879"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9789048195886"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-481-9588-6_12","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,1]],"date-time":"2010-10-01T22:14:08Z","timestamp":1285971248000},"page":"239-261","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Relevance in the Law"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Dov M.","family":"Gabbay","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Woods","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"12_CR1","volume-title":"Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol.1","author":"AR Anderson","year":"1975","unstructured":"Anderson AR and Belnap N Jr (1975). Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol.1. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press."},{"key":"12_CR2","unstructured":"Australian Law Reform Commission Report 26, volume 1, Evidence, 11. Relevance, 1985."},{"key":"12_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110839807","volume-title":"From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logic and Argumentation.","author":"EM Barth","year":"1982","unstructured":"Barth EM and Krabbe ECW (1982). From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logic and Argumentation. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter."},{"key":"12_CR4","first-page":"65","volume":"XII","author":"G Bowles","year":"1990","unstructured":"Bowles G (1990). Propositional relevance. Informal Logic XII, 65\u201377.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"12_CR5","unstructured":"Brouwer LEJ (1975). In Heyting A (ed) Collected Works 1. Philosophy and Foundations of Mathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland."},{"key":"12_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198244127.001.0001","volume-title":"The Probable and the Provable","author":"LJ Cohen","year":"1977","unstructured":"Cohen LJ (1977). The Probable and the Provable. Oxford: Clarendon Press."},{"key":"12_CR7","volume-title":"An Outline of the Law of Evidence","author":"R Cross","year":"1964","unstructured":"Cross R and Wilkins N (1964). An Outline of the Law of Evidence. London: Butterworths."},{"key":"12_CR8","unstructured":"Dejnozka J (1996). Logical relevance, presented to Richard D. Friedman\u2019s Advanced Evidence Seminar, University of Michigan School of Law, April 22, 1996; edited for the web May 8, 2004. Available online at http:\/\/www.members.tripod.com\/~Jan_Dejnozka \/"},{"key":"12_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-011-4574-9_7","volume-title":"Logic, Language and Reasoning","author":"R Demolombe","year":"1999","unstructured":"Demolombe R and Jones AJT (1999). Sentences of the kind \u2018sentence P is about topic T\u2019. In Ohlbach HJ and Reyle U (eds) Logic, Language and Reasoning. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer, pp. 115\u2013133."},{"key":"12_CR10","volume-title":"Seminars on Evidence","author":"R Eggleston","year":"1970","unstructured":"Eggleston R (1970). The relationship between relevance and admissibility in the law of evidence. In Glass HH (ed) Seminars on Evidence. Sydney: Law Book Co."},{"key":"12_CR11","unstructured":"Federal Rules of Evidence, Ithaca, NY: Legal Information Institute, Cornell University, 1999. Updated version at http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/rules\/fre\/overview.html ."},{"key":"12_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-9219-2","volume-title":"Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation","author":"E Feteris","year":"1999","unstructured":"Feteris E (1999). Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer."},{"key":"12_CR13","unstructured":"Frege G (1879). In van Heijenoort J (ed) Begriffsschrift, A Formula Language, Modeled Upon That of Arithmetic for Pure Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press."},{"key":"12_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1010370420383","volume":"127","author":"DM Gabbay","year":"2001","unstructured":"Gabbay DM and Woods J (2001a). Non-cooperation in dialogue logic. Synthese 127, 161\u2013186.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"12_CR15","first-page":"321","volume":"9","author":"DM Gabbay","year":"2001","unstructured":"Gabbay DM and Woods J (2001b). More on non-cooperation in dialogue logic. Logic Journal of the IGPL 9, 321\u2013339.","journal-title":"Logic Journal of the IGPL"},{"key":"12_CR16","first-page":"157","volume":"9","author":"DM Gabbay","year":"2001","unstructured":"Gabbay DM and Woods J (2001c). The new logic. Logic Journal of the IGPL 9, 157\u2013190.","journal-title":"Logic Journal of the IGPL"},{"key":"12_CR17","volume-title":"Agenda Relevance: A Study in Formal Pragmatics","author":"DM Gabbay","year":"2003","unstructured":"Gabbay DM and Woods J (2003a). Agenda Relevance: A Study in Formal Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier\/North-Holland."},{"key":"12_CR18","first-page":"4","volume":"7","author":"DM Gabbay","year":"2005","unstructured":"Gabbay DM and Woods J (2005). Logic and the law: Crossing the lines of discipline, \u03a6 News 7, 4\u201345.","journal-title":"News"},{"key":"12_CR19","unstructured":"Gabbay DM and Woods J (2006a). Probability in the law, to appear in 2006a."},{"key":"12_CR20","unstructured":"Gabbay DM and Woods J (2006b). The proof standard at the criminal bar: an abductive paradox, to appear in 2006b."},{"key":"12_CR21","unstructured":"Gabbay DM and Woods J (2006c). Should we legalize Bayes\u2019 Theorem?, to appear in 2006c."},{"key":"12_CR22","first-page":"1","volume-title":"The Adaptive Toolbox","author":"G Gigerenzer","year":"2001","unstructured":"Gigerenzer G and Selten R (2001) Rethinking rationality. In Gigerenzer G and Selten R (eds) The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 1\u201312."},{"key":"12_CR23","volume-title":"Change in View: Principles of Reasoning","author":"G Harman","year":"1986","unstructured":"Harman G (1986). Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press."},{"key":"12_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00136775","volume":"1","author":"J Hintikka","year":"1987","unstructured":"Hintikka J (1987). The fallacy of fallacies. Argumentation 1, 211\u2013238, 1987.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"12_CR25","first-page":"295","volume-title":"Handbook of the Logic of Argument and Inference: The Turn Towards the Practical.","author":"J Hintikka","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hintikka J, Halonen I and Mutanen A (2002). Interrogative logic as a general theory of reasoning. In Gabbay DM, Johnson RH, Ohlbach HJ and Woods J (eds) Handbook of the Logic of Argument and Inference: The Turn Towards the Practical. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 295\u2013337."},{"key":"12_CR26","first-page":"11","volume":"10","author":"C Ilbert","year":"1960","unstructured":"Ilbert C (1960). Evidence. Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed., 10, 11\u201321.","journal-title":"Encyclopedia Britannica"},{"key":"12_CR27","volume-title":"Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument.","author":"RH Johnson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Johnson RH (2000). Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum."},{"key":"12_CR28","volume-title":"The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes","author":"JM Keynes","year":"1971","unstructured":"Keynes JM (1971). The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. New York: St. Martin\u2019s Press."},{"key":"12_CR29","volume-title":"A Modern Approach to Evidence","author":"R Lempert","year":"1977","unstructured":"Lempert R (1977). A Modern Approach to Evidence. Minneapolis Minn: West Publishing Company."},{"key":"12_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370166","volume":"XLIX","author":"J MacKenzie","year":"1990","unstructured":"MacKenzie J (1990). Four dialogue systems. Studia Logica XLIX, 567\u2013583.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"12_CR31","volume-title":"Murphy on Evidence","author":"P Murphy","year":"2000","unstructured":"Murphy P (2000). Murphy on Evidence, 7th ed. London: Blackstone.","edition":"7"},{"key":"12_CR32","volume-title":"The Law of Evidence","author":"D Paciocco","year":"2002","unstructured":"Paciocco D and Stuesser L (2002). The Law of Evidence, 3rd ed. Toronto: Irwin Law.","edition":"3"},{"key":"12_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-3687-4","volume-title":"In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent","author":"G Priest","year":"1987","unstructured":"Priest G (1987). In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic."},{"key":"12_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.2307\/2214309","volume":"6","author":"R Routley","year":"1972","unstructured":"Routley R and Routley V (1972). The semantics of first degree entailment. No\u00fbs 6, 335\u2013395.","journal-title":"No\u00fbs"},{"key":"12_CR35","first-page":"201","volume":"19","author":"R Routley","year":"1985","unstructured":"Routley R and Routley V (1985). Negation and contradiction. Rifista Columbiana de Matem\u00e1ticas 19, 201\u2013231.","journal-title":"Rifista Columbiana de Matem\u00e1ticas"},{"key":"12_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/XIV.4.479","volume":"14","author":"B Russell","year":"1905","unstructured":"Russell B (1905). On denoting. Mind 14, 479\u2013493.","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"12_CR37","volume-title":"Relevance: Communication and Cognition","author":"D Sperber","year":"1995","unstructured":"Sperber D and Wilson D (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.","edition":"2"},{"key":"12_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4324\/9781410603432","volume-title":"Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning.","author":"KA Stanovich","year":"1999","unstructured":"Stanovich KA (1999). Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum."},{"key":"12_CR39","volume-title":"Digest of the Law of Evidence.","author":"J Stephen","year":"1927","unstructured":"Stephen J (1927). Digest of the Law of Evidence. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co. Originally published in 1876."},{"key":"12_CR40","volume-title":"MacCormick on Evidence","author":"JW Strong","year":"1999","unstructured":"Strong JW (1999). MacCormick on Evidence, 5th ed. St. Paul MN: West Group.","edition":"5"},{"key":"12_CR41","volume-title":"A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law","author":"JB Thayer","year":"1927","unstructured":"Thayer JB (1927). A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law. Cambridge, MA: Legal Essays. Originally published in 1898."},{"key":"12_CR42","volume-title":"Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore","author":"W Twining","year":"1985","unstructured":"Twining W (1985). Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson."},{"key":"12_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110846089","volume-title":"Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion.","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1984","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH and Grootendorst R (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris\/Berlin."},{"key":"12_CR44","volume-title":"Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1992","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH and Grootendoest R (1992a). Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates."},{"issue":"2","key":"12_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00154322","volume":"6","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1992","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH and Grootendorst R (1992b). Relevance reviewed; The case of argumentum ad hominem. Argumentation 6 (2), 141\u2013159.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"12_CR46","volume-title":"A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"2004","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH and Grootendorst R (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"12_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1075\/pb.iii.8","volume-title":"Topical Relevance in Argumentation","author":"D Walton","year":"1982","unstructured":"Walton D (1982). Topical Relevance in Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins."},{"key":"12_CR48","volume-title":"A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy","author":"D Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton D (19945), A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press."},{"key":"12_CR49","volume-title":"Commitment in Dialogue, Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton D and Krabbe ECW (1995). Commitment in Dialogue, Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press."},{"key":"12_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3138\/9781487574475","volume-title":"Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory","author":"D Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton D (1996). Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press."},{"key":"12_CR51","volume-title":"Legal Argumentation and Evidence","author":"D Walton","year":"2002","unstructured":"Walton D (2002). Legal Argumentation and Evidence. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press."},{"key":"12_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4324\/9781410609441","volume-title":"Relevance in Argumentation","author":"D Walton","year":"2003","unstructured":"Walton D (2003). Relevance in Argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"12_CR53","volume-title":"Evidence in Trials at Common Law (Wigmore on Evidence)","author":"JH Wigmore","year":"1940","unstructured":"Wigmore JH (1940). Evidence in Trials at Common Law (Wigmore on Evidence). Boston: Little Brown."},{"key":"12_CR54","volume-title":"A Kaleidoscope of Justice: Containing Authentic Accounts of Trial Scenes From All Times and Climes","author":"JH Wigmore","year":"1983","unstructured":"Wigmore JH (1983). A Kaleidoscope of Justice: Containing Authentic Accounts of Trial Scenes From All Times and Climes. Littleton, Colo: F.B. Rothman."},{"key":"12_CR55","volume-title":"The Law of Evidence","author":"W. Wills","year":"1938","unstructured":"W. Wills (1938). The Law of Evidence, 3rd ed. London: Stevens & Sons.","edition":"3"},{"key":"12_CR56","first-page":"93","volume-title":"New Essays in Informal Logic, edited by","author":"J Woods","year":"1994","unstructured":"Woods J (1994). Sunny prospects for relevance? In Johnson RH and Blair JA (eds) New Essays in Informal Logic, edited by. Windsor, ON: Informal Logic Press, pp. 93\u2013104."},{"key":"12_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-2712-3","volume-title":"The Death of Argument: Fallacies in Agent-Based Reasoning","author":"J Woods","year":"2004","unstructured":"Woods J (2004). The Death of Argument: Fallacies in Agent-Based Reasoning. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer."},{"key":"12_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1005035327621","volume":"113","author":"J Woods","year":"1997","unstructured":"Woods J and Hansen HV (1997). Hintikka on Aristotle\u2019s fallacies. Synthese 113, 217\u2013239.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"12_CR59","first-page":"395","volume":"176","author":"J Woods","year":"2001","unstructured":"Woods J and Hansen HV (2001). The subtleties of Aristotle\u2019s non-cause. Logique et Analyse 176, 395\u2013415.","journal-title":"Logique et Analyse"}],"container-title":["Approaches to Legal Rationality"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-90-481-9588-6_12","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,12]],"date-time":"2020-06-12T09:24:43Z","timestamp":1591953883000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-90-481-9588-6_12"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010]]},"ISBN":["9789048195879","9789048195886"],"references-count":59,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-90-481-9588-6_12","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010]]}}}