{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,1]],"date-time":"2025-10-01T15:34:37Z","timestamp":1759332877464,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Singapore","reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Singapore","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9789811593222"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9789811593239"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-15-9323-9_27","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,10]],"date-time":"2021-03-10T14:03:39Z","timestamp":1615385019000},"page":"307-318","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Opinion Building Based on the Argumentative Dialogue System BEA"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Annalena","family":"Aicher","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Niklas","family":"Rach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Wolfgang","family":"Minker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Stefan","family":"Ultes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"27_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alsinet T, Argelich J, B\u00e9jar R, Fern\u00e1ndez C, Mateu C, Planes J (2017) Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in twitter. Int J Approx Reason 85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2017.02.004"},{"key":"27_CR2","unstructured":"Amgoud L, Ben-Naim J (2016) Evaluation of arguments from support relations: axioms and semantics. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI-16, pp 900\u2013906. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization (2016)"},{"key":"27_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud L, Ben-Naim J (2018) Weighted bipolar argumentation graphs: axioms and semantics. In: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh international joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI-18, pp 5194\u20135198. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2018\/720"},{"key":"27_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud L, Prade H (2009) Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artif Intell 173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2008.11.006"},{"key":"27_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40624-9_21","volume-title":"Computational logic in multi-agent systems","author":"P Baroni","year":"2013","unstructured":"Baroni P, Romano M, Toni F, Aurisicchio M, Bertanza G (2013) An argumentation-based approach for automatic evaluation of design debates. Computational logic in multi-agent systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 340\u2013356"},{"issue":"1","key":"27_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2014.1001791","volume":"6","author":"P Baroni","year":"2015","unstructured":"Baroni P, Romano M, Toni F, Aurisicchio M, Bertanza G (2015) Automatic evaluation of design alternatives with quantitative argumentation. Argument Comput 6(1):24\u201349","journal-title":"Argument Comput"},{"key":"27_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2008","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-39940-9_1073","volume-title":"Encyclopedia of database systems","author":"S Bechhofer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bechhofer S (2009) Owl: web ontology language. Encyclopedia of database systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 2008\u20132009"},{"issue":"14","key":"27_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6467","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2014.03.046","volume":"41","author":"C Briguez","year":"2014","unstructured":"Briguez C, Bud\u00e1n M, Deagustini C, Maguitman A, Capobianco M, Simari G (2014) Argument-based mixed recommenders and their application to movie suggestion. Expert Syst Appl 41(14):6467\u20136482","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"key":"27_CR9","unstructured":"Bud\u00e1n M, Simari G, Simari G (2016) Using argument features to improve the argumentation process. In: Computational models of argument - proceedings of COMMA 2016, Potsdam, Germany, 12\u201316 September, 2016, pp 151\u2013158"},{"key":"27_CR10","unstructured":"Jokinen K (2018) Natural language and dialogue interfaces"},{"issue":"2","key":"27_CR11","first-page":"10","volume":"16","author":"M Lippi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lippi M, Torroni P (2016) Argumentation mining: State of the art and emerging trends. ACM Trans Int Technol (TOIT) 16(2):10","journal-title":"ACM Trans Int Technol (TOIT)"},{"key":"27_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-85820-3_3","volume-title":"Content-based recommender systems: state of the art and trends","author":"P Lops","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lops P, de Gemmis M, Semeraro G (2011) Content-based recommender systems: state of the art and trends. Springer, Boston, pp 73\u2013105"},{"key":"27_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moens MF (2013) Argumentation mining: Where are we now, where do we want to be and how do we get there? In: Post-proceedings of the 4th and 5th workshops of the forum for information retrieval evaluation, p\u00a02. ACM","DOI":"10.1145\/2701336.2701635"},{"key":"27_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Palau RM, Moens MF (2009) Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in text. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 98\u2013107. ACM","DOI":"10.1145\/1568234.1568246"},{"key":"27_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2017.11.009","volume":"93","author":"S Polberg","year":"2018","unstructured":"Polberg S, Hunter A (2018) Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches. Int J Approx Reason 93:487\u2013543","journal-title":"Int J Approx Reason"},{"key":"27_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rach N, Langhammer S, Minker W, Ultes S (2018) Utilizing argument mining techniques for argumentative dialogue systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th international workshop on spoken dialogue systems (IWSDS)","DOI":"10.14236\/ewic\/HCI2018.67"},{"key":"27_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rach N, Weber K, Aicher A, Andr\u00e9 E, Minker W (2018) Emotion recognition based preference modelling in argumentative dialogue system. Submitted to the 1st international workshop on pervasive computing and spoken dialogue systems technology (PerDial)","DOI":"10.1109\/PERCOMW.2019.8730650"},{"key":"27_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rach N, Weber K, Pragst L, Andr\u00e9 E, Minker W, Ultes S (2018) Eva: a multimodal argumentative dialogue system. In: Proceedings of the 2018 on international conference on multimodal interaction, pp 551\u2013552. ACM","DOI":"10.1145\/3242969.3266292"},{"key":"27_CR19","unstructured":"Rago A, Toni F, Aurisicchio M, Baroni P (2016) Discontinuity-free decision support with quantitative argumentation debates. In: Fifteenth international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (KR 2016), pp 63\u201373"},{"key":"27_CR20","unstructured":"Rakshit G, Bowden K, Reed L, Misra A, Walker M (2017) Debbie, the debate bot of the future. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.03167"},{"key":"27_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4899-7637-6","volume-title":"Recommender systems handbook","author":"F Ricci","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B (2015) Recommender systems: introduction and challenges. In: Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B (eds) Recommender systems handbook. Springer, Boston"},{"key":"27_CR22","unstructured":"Rosenfeld A, Kraus S (2016) Strategical argumentative agent for human persuasion. In: ECAI, pp 320\u2013328"},{"key":"27_CR23","unstructured":"Stab C, Gurevych I (2014) Annotating argument components and relations in persuasive essays. In: COLING, pp 1501\u20131510"},{"key":"27_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1109\/TKDE.2005.99","volume":"17","author":"A Tuzhilin","year":"2005","unstructured":"Tuzhilin A, Adomavicius G (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17:734\u2013749","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering","Increasing Naturalness and Flexibility in Spoken Dialogue Interaction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-981-15-9323-9_27","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,21]],"date-time":"2022-12-21T00:26:11Z","timestamp":1671582371000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-981-15-9323-9_27"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9789811593222","9789811593239"],"references-count":24,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-981-15-9323-9_27","relation":{},"ISSN":["1876-1100","1876-1119"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1876-1100"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1876-1119"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 March 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}}]}}