{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,11]],"date-time":"2026-06-11T10:59:50Z","timestamp":1781175590101,"version":"3.54.1"},"publisher-location":"Singapore","reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Nature Singapore","isbn-type":[{"value":"9789819200702","type":"print"},{"value":"9789819200719","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767225600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767225600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-92-0071-9_9","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,11]],"date-time":"2026-06-11T10:29:55Z","timestamp":1781173795000},"page":"124-138","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Heterogeneous Debate Engine: Identity-Grounded Cognitive Architecture for\u00a0Resilient LLM-Based Ethical Tutoring"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-4597-6335","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jakub","family":"Mas\u0142owski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4534-8652","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jaros\u0142aw A.","family":"Chudziak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"9_CR1","unstructured":"Carro, M.V., et al.: AI debaters are more persuasive when arguing in alignment with their own beliefs (2025), arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13912"},{"key":"9_CR2","unstructured":"Chan, C.M., et\u00a0al.: Chateval: towards better LLM-based evaluators through multi-agent debate. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 4199\u20134218. ACL (2023)"},{"key":"9_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen, R., et\u00a0al.: Theory of mind in large language models: assessment and enhancement. In: Proceedings of ACL, pp. 31539\u201331558. ACL (2025)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2025.acl-long.1522"},{"key":"9_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Choi, Y., Kang, E.J., Choi, S., Lee, M.K., Kim, J.: Proxona: supporting creators\u2019 sensemaking and ideation with LLM-powered audience personas (2025), arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10937","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3714034"},{"key":"9_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chudziak, J.A., Kostka, A.: AI-powered math tutoring: platform for personalized and adaptive education. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), pp. 462\u2013469. Springer (2025). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-98465-5_58","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-98465-5_58"},{"key":"9_CR6","unstructured":"Fang, Y., et\u00a0al.: Counterfactual debating with preset stances for hallucination elimination of LLMs. In: Proceedings of CIKM, pp. 608\u2013617. ACM (2024)"},{"key":"9_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ghosh, K., Smith, C.: Formal analysis of deontic logic model for ethical decisions. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Vol. 1: ICAART, pp. 218\u2013223. SciTePress (2025). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5220\/0013385200003890","DOI":"10.5220\/0013385200003890"},{"key":"9_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Harbar, Y., Chudziak, J.A.: Simulating oxford-style debates with LLM-based multi-agent systems. In: Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS), pp. 286\u2013300. Springer (2025)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-96-6008-7_21"},{"key":"9_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hayashi, H., et\u00a0al.: A new planning agent architecture that efficiently integrates an online planner with external legal and ethical checkers. In: Proceedings of ICAART (1), pp. 263\u2013272. SciTePress (2025)","DOI":"10.5220\/0013098300003890"},{"key":"9_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K.: The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Practices, Challenges, and Debates. Routledge (2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429329067","DOI":"10.4324\/9780429329067"},{"key":"9_CR11","unstructured":"Hou, X., et\u00a0al.: Eduthink4ai: translating educational critical thinking into multi-agent LLM systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15015 (2025)"},{"key":"9_CR12","unstructured":"Hou, Z., et\u00a0al.: Halo: hierarchical autonomous logic-oriented orchestration for multi-agent LLM systems (2025), arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13516"},{"key":"9_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ivanova, R.V., et\u00a0al.: Let\u2019s discuss! quality dimensions and annotated datasets for computational argument quality assessment. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 20749\u201320779. ACL (2024)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2024.emnlp-main.1155"},{"key":"9_CR14","unstructured":"Ju, T., et\u00a0al.: When disagreements elicit robustness: investigating self-repair capabilities under LLM multi-agent disagreements. arXiv preprint (2025), arXiv:2502.09082"},{"key":"9_CR15","unstructured":"Kim, K., et\u00a0al.: Can LLMs produce faithful explanations for fact-checking? Towards faithful explainable fact-checking via multi-agent debate (2024), arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07401"},{"key":"9_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kobayashi, Y., Fujita, K.: Pre-trained models and fine-tuning for negotiation strategies with end-to-end reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of ICAART (1), pp. 400\u2013411. SciTePress (2025)","DOI":"10.5220\/0013161500003890"},{"key":"9_CR17","unstructured":"Kostka, A., Chudziak, J.A.: Synergizing logical reasoning, knowledge management and collaboration in multi-agent LLM system (2025), arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02170"},{"key":"9_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ku, H.B., et\u00a0al.: Multi-agent LLM debate unveils the premise left unsaid. In: Proceedings of ArgMining, pp. 58\u201373. ACL (2025)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2025.argmining-1.6"},{"key":"9_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kurchyna, V., et\u00a0al.: Efficient selection of consistent plans using patterns and constraint satisfaction for beliefs-desires-intentions agents. In: Proceedings of ICAART (1), pp. 333\u2013341. SciTePress (2025)","DOI":"10.5220\/0013141700003890"},{"key":"9_CR20","unstructured":"LangChain Team: Langgraph (2023). https:\/\/langchain-ai.github.io\/langgraph\/. Accessed 10 Jan 2025"},{"key":"9_CR21","unstructured":"Li, F., et\u00a0al.: Aistorian lets ai be a historian: a kg-powered multi-agent system for accurate biography generation (2025), arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11346"},{"key":"9_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liang, T., et\u00a0al.: Encouraging divergent thinking in large language models through multi-agent debate. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 17889\u201317904. ACL (2024)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2024.emnlp-main.992"},{"key":"9_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lore, N., et\u00a0al.: Large model strategic thinking, small model efficiency: transferring theory of mind in large language models (2024), arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.05241","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4916298"},{"key":"9_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pei, J., et\u00a0al.: Socratic style chain-of-thoughts help LLMs to be a better reasoner. In: Findings of ACL, pp. 12384\u201312395. ACL (2025)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2025.findings-acl.640"},{"key":"9_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peng, X., et\u00a0al.: KELE: a multi-agent framework for structured socratic teaching with LLMs. In: Findings of EMNLP, pp. 16342\u201316362. ACL (2025)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2025.findings-emnlp.888"},{"key":"9_CR26","unstructured":"Platnick, D., et\u00a0al.: ID-RAG: identity retrieval-augmented generation for long-horizon persona coherence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.25299 (2025)"},{"key":"9_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scarlatos, A., et\u00a0al.: Training LLM-based tutors to improve student learning outcomes in dialogues. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), pp. 251\u2013266. Springer (2025)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-98414-3_18"},{"key":"9_CR28","unstructured":"Smit, A., et\u00a0al.: Should we be going mad? A look at multi-agent debate strategies for LLMs. In: Proceedings of ICML, vol.\u00a0235, pp. 45883\u201345905. PMLR (2024)"},{"key":"9_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Strachan, J.W.A., et\u00a0al.: Testing theory of mind in large language models and humans. Nat. Hum. Behav. 8(7), 1285\u20131295 (2024). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-024-01882-z","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-024-01882-z"},{"key":"9_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tian, C., et\u00a0al.: Agentinit: initializing LLM-based multi-agent systems via diversity orchestration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.19236 (2025)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2025.findings-emnlp.636"},{"key":"9_CR31","volume-title":"The Uses of Argument","author":"SE Toulmin","year":"1958","unstructured":"Toulmin, S.E.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)"},{"key":"9_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Trepczy\u0144ski, M.: AI as a Rational Theologian: A Comprehensive Skills Assessment. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warsaw (2025). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31338\/uw.9788323569183","DOI":"10.31338\/uw.9788323569183"},{"key":"9_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Upreti, N., et\u00a0al.: Towards developing ethical reasoners: integrating probabilistic reasoning and decision-making for complex ai systems. In: Proceedings of ICAART (1), pp. 588\u2013599. SciTePress (2025)","DOI":"10.5220\/0013314200003890"},{"key":"9_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vallor, S.: Virtue ethics, technology, and human flourishing. In: Technology and the Virtues. Oxford University Press (2016)","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780190498511.003.0002"},{"key":"9_CR35","unstructured":"West, A., et\u00a0al.: Abduct, act, predict: scaffolding causal inference for automated failure attribution in multi-agent systems (2025), arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.10401"},{"key":"9_CR36","unstructured":"Wynn, A., et\u00a0al.: Talk isn\u2019t always cheap: understanding failure modes in multi-agent debate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.05396 (2025)"},{"key":"9_CR37","unstructured":"Yang, S., et\u00a0al.: On the eligibility of LLMs for counterfactual reasoning: a decompositional study (2025), arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11839"},{"key":"9_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zamojska, M., Chudziak, J.A.: Simulating human communication games: transactional analysis in LLM agent interactions. In: Recent Challenges in Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS), pp. 173\u2013187. Springer (2025)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-96-5881-7_14"},{"key":"9_CR39","unstructured":"Zhu, Y., et\u00a0al.: Argrag: explainable retrieval augmented generation using quantitative bipolar argumentation (2025), arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.20131"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Intelligent Information and Database Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-981-92-0071-9_9","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,11]],"date-time":"2026-06-11T10:30:13Z","timestamp":1781173813000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-981-92-0071-9_9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"ISBN":["9789819200702","9789819200719"],"references-count":39,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-981-92-0071-9_9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0302-9743","type":"print"},{"value":"1611-3349","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 June 2026","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Disclosure of Interest"}},{"value":"ACIIDS","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Kaohsiung","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Taiwan","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2026","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"13 April 2026","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"15 April 2026","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"18","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"aciids2026","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/aciids.pwr.edu.pl\/2026\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}}]}}