{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,5]],"date-time":"2026-06-05T06:04:50Z","timestamp":1780639490197,"version":"3.54.1"},"publisher-location":"Singapore","reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Nature Singapore","isbn-type":[{"value":"9789819215263","type":"print"},{"value":"9789819215270","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767225600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767225600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-92-1527-0_7","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,5]],"date-time":"2026-06-05T05:41:20Z","timestamp":1780638080000},"page":"101-114","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Mapping Legal Propositions in\u00a0the\u00a0U.S. Supreme Court Party Briefs: A Human-In-The-Loop Approach"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5866-7746","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Heng","family":"Zheng","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alex","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"7_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.: From oral hearing to opinion in the U.S. Supreme Court. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, pp. 1\u201310. IOS Press (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/978-1-61499-359-9-1","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-359-9-1"},{"key":"7_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ariai, F., Mackenzie, J., Demartini, G.: Natural language processing for the legal domain: a survey of tasks, datasets, models, and challenges. ACM Comput. Surv. 58(6), 163:1\u2013163:37 (2025). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3777009","DOI":"10.1145\/3777009"},{"key":"7_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ashley, K., Pinkwart, N., Lynch, C., Aleven, V.: Learning by diagramming supreme court oral arguments. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 271\u2013275. ICAIL \u201907, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2007). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1276318.1276370","DOI":"10.1145\/1276318.1276370"},{"key":"7_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-025-09448-8","author":"J Breton","year":"2025","unstructured":"Breton, J., et al.: Leveraging LLMs for legal terms extraction with limited annotated data. Artif. Intell. Law (2025). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-025-09448-8","journal-title":"Artif. Intell. Law"},{"issue":"3","key":"7_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1177\/1065912907306474","volume":"61","author":"PC Corley","year":"2008","unstructured":"Corley, P.C.: The supreme court and opinion content: the influence of parties\u2019 briefs. Polit. Res. Q. 61(3), 468\u2013478 (2008). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1065912907306474","journal-title":"Polit. Res. Q."},{"key":"7_CR6","unstructured":"Dickinson, G.: A computational analysis of oral argument in the supreme court. Cornell J. Law Public Policy 28(3), 449\u2013482 (2019). https:\/\/scholarship.law.cornell.edu\/cjlpp\/vol28\/iss3\/3\/"},{"issue":"4","key":"7_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1740-1461.2007.00113.x","volume":"4","author":"M Evans","year":"2007","unstructured":"Evans, M., McIntosh, W., Lin, J., Cates, C.: Recounting the courts? Applying automated content analysis to enhance empirical legal research. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 4(4), 1007\u20131039 (2007). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1740-1461.2007.00113.x","journal-title":"J. Empir. Leg. Stud."},{"key":"7_CR8","unstructured":"Feldman, A.: Counting on quality: the effects of merits brief quality on supreme court decisions. Denver Law Rev. 94(1), 43 (2016). https:\/\/digitalcommons.du.edu\/dlr\/vol94\/iss1\/3"},{"key":"7_CR9","unstructured":"Fischer, J.: Summing It Up With Panache: framing a brief\u2019s summary of the argument. The John Marshall Law Rev. 48(4), 991\u20131014 (2015). https:\/\/repository.law.uic.edu\/lawreview\/vol48\/iss4\/2\/"},{"key":"7_CR10","unstructured":"Garner, B.A.: Interview with justice clarence thomas. Scribes J. Legal Writing 13, 99\u2013131 (2010). https:\/\/scribes.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Scribes_vol13_08_Clarence_Thomas.pdf"},{"key":"7_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Habernal, I., et al.: Mining legal arguments in court decisions. Artif. Intell. Law 32(3), 1\u201338 (2024). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-023-09361-y","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-023-09361-y"},{"key":"7_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Held, L., Habernal, I.: Contemporary LLMs struggle with extracting formal legal arguments. In: Aletras, N., Chalkidis, I., Barrett, L., Goant\u0103, C., Preotiuc-Pietro, D., Spanakis, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the Natural Legal Language Processing Workshop 2025, pp. 292\u2013303. Association for Computational Linguistics, Suzhou, China (2025). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18653\/v1\/2025.nllp-1.20","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2025.nllp-1.20"},{"key":"7_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Henderson, J., Bench-Capon, T.: Describing the development of case law. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 32\u201341. ICAIL \u201919, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3322640.3326697","DOI":"10.1145\/3322640.3326697"},{"key":"7_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Katz, D.M., Bommarito, M.J.: Measuring the complexity of the law: the united states code. Artif. Intell. Law 22(4), 337\u2013374 (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-014-9160-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-014-9160-8"},{"key":"7_CR15","unstructured":"Lebovits, G.: Thoughts on legal writing from the greatest of them all: Antonin Scalia and Bryan A. Garner \u2014 Part II (2019). https:\/\/nysba.org\/thoughts-on-legal-writing-from-the-greatest-of-them-all-antonin-scalia-and-bryan-a-garner-part-ii\/"},{"key":"7_CR16","unstructured":"Liepina, R., et al.: Legal argument mining: recent trends and open challenges. In: Koref, T., Held, L., Habernal, I. (eds.) Proceedings of the First Argument Mining and Empirical Legal Research Workshop. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol.\u00a04089, pp. 1\u201314. CEUR, Chicago, United States (2025). https:\/\/ceur-ws.org\/Vol-4089\/#paper1"},{"key":"7_CR17","unstructured":"Lockard, K., Slater, R., Sucrese, B.: Using NLP to Model U.S. Supreme Court Cases. SMU Data Sci. Rev. 7(1) (2023). https:\/\/scholar.smu.edu\/datasciencereview\/vol7\/iss1\/4"},{"issue":"2","key":"7_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1111\/jels.12413","volume":"22","author":"V Magesh","year":"2025","unstructured":"Magesh, V., Surani, F., Dahl, M., Suzgun, M., Manning, C.D., Ho, D.E.: Hallucination-Free? Assessing the reliability of leading AI legal research tools. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 22(2), 216\u2013242 (2025). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jels.12413","journal-title":"J. Empir. Leg. Stud."},{"key":"7_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clsr.2025.106165","volume":"58","author":"HT Nguyen","year":"2025","unstructured":"Nguyen, H.T., et al.: LLMs for legal reasoning: a unified framework and future perspectives. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 58, 106165 (2025). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clsr.2025.106165","journal-title":"Comput. Law Secur. Rev."},{"key":"7_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"\u0160avelka, J., Ashley, K.D.: Legal information retrieval for understanding statutory terms. Artif. Intell. Law 30(2), 245\u2013289 (2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-021-09293-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-021-09293-5"},{"key":"7_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sim, Y., Routledge, B., Smith, N.A.: Friends with Motives: using text to infer influence on SCOTUS. In: Su, J., Duh, K., Carreras, X. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1724\u20131733. Association for Computational Linguistics, Austin, Texas (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18653\/v1\/D16-1178","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D16-1178"},{"key":"7_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Smywi\u0144ski-Pohl, A., Libal, T.: Enhancing legal argument retrieval with\u00a0optimized language model techniques. In: Suzumura, T., Bono, M. (eds.) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. pp. 93\u2013108. Springer Nature, Singapore (2024). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-981-97-3076-6_7","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-97-3076-6_7"},{"key":"7_CR23","unstructured":"Supreme Court of the United States: Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States (2026). https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/filingandrules\/2026RulesoftheCourt_WEB.pdf"},{"key":"7_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Woo, J., Hashemi\u00a0Chaleshtori, F., Marasovic, A., Marino, K.: BriefMe: a legal NLP benchmark for assisting with legal briefs. In: Che, W., Nabende, J., Shutova, E., Pilehvar, M.T. (eds.) Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025, pp. 13139\u201313190. Association for Computational Linguistics, Vienna, Austria (2025). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18653\/v1\/2025.findings-acl.681","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2025.findings-acl.681"},{"issue":"3","key":"7_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.5204\/lthj.3623","volume":"6","author":"G Zambrano","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zambrano, G.: Case Law as Data: prompt engineering strategies for case outcome extraction with large language models in a zero-shot setting. Law, Technol. Hum. 6(3), 80\u2013101 (2024). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5204\/lthj.3623","journal-title":"Law, Technol. Hum."},{"key":"7_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zheng, H., Williams, D., Lud\u00e4scher, B.: Modeling U.S. Supreme Court Briefs with Computational Argumentation. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. pp. 439\u2013441. IOS Press (2025). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/FAIA251631","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA251631"},{"key":"7_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zin, M.M., Nguyen, H.T., Satoh, K., Nishino, F.: Addressing annotated data scarcity in\u00a0legal information extraction. In: Suzumura, T., Bono, M. (eds.) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 77\u201392. Springer Nature, Singapore (2024). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-981-97-3076-6_6","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-97-3076-6_6"},{"key":"7_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zin, M.M., Satoh, K., Borges, G.: Leveraging LLM for Identification and Extraction of Normative Statements. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, pp. 215\u2013225. IOS Press (2024). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/FAIA241247","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA241247"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-981-92-1527-0_7","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,5]],"date-time":"2026-06-05T05:41:31Z","timestamp":1780638091000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-981-92-1527-0_7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"ISBN":["9789819215263","9789819215270"],"references-count":28,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-981-92-1527-0_7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0302-9743","type":"print"},{"value":"1611-3349","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"assertion":[{"value":"6 June 2026","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"JSAI-isAI","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"JSAI International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Gunma","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Japan","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2026","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"7 June 2026","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"9 June 2026","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"18","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"jsai2026","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}}]}}