{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,22]],"date-time":"2025-03-22T08:50:55Z","timestamp":1742633455833},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1993,5,1]],"date-time":"1993-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":736214400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1993,5]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/bf02017752","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,8,12]],"date-time":"2005-08-12T02:28:15Z","timestamp":1123813695000},"page":"3-18","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":32,"title":["Scientific quality in the eyes of the scientist. A questionnaire study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"S.","family":"Hemlin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"BF02017752_CR1","unstructured":"I acknowledge Professor HenryMontgomery, University of Stockholm, for constructive criticism of the study. Also, I want to thank two anonymous referees for valuable comments on the manuscript. An earlier and more extensive version of this paper is to be found inG\u00f6teborg Psychological Reports, 21 (1991) No. 3 as one of five papers in a Ph. D. thesis (S. Hemlin,Quality in science. Researchers' conceptions and judgements, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of G\u00f6teborg, 1991). The study was supported by a grant from the Swedish Board of Universities and Colleges and a grant from the Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren's Science Foundation."},{"key":"BF02017752_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"881","DOI":"10.1126\/science.7302566","volume":"214","author":"S. Cole","year":"1981","unstructured":"In a study byS. Cole, J. R. Cole, G. A. Simon, Chance and consensus in peer review,Science, 214 (1981) 881\u2013885, they touched upon this question when studying judgements of applications to research projects at the National Science Foundation in the U. S. A. The results were discouraging when it comes to the reliability of peer judgements. They draw the conclusion that peers have different views of what good science is or should be.","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"BF02017752_CR3","first-page":"73","volume":"1","author":"S. Hemlin","year":"1990","unstructured":"S. Hemlin, H. Montgomery, Scientists' conceptions of scientific quality,Science Studies, 1 (1990) 73\u201381.","journal-title":"Science Studies"},{"key":"BF02017752_CR4","first-page":"73","volume":"1","author":"S. Hemlin","year":"1990","unstructured":"See note No. 3..","journal-title":"Science Studies"},{"key":"BF02017752_CR5","series-title":"An Attempt to Lay a Foundation for the Study of Society and History","volume-title":"Introduction to the Human Sciences","author":"W. Dilthey","year":"1923\/1988","unstructured":"W. Dilthey, Introduction to the Human Sciences. An Attempt to Lay a Foundation for the Study of Society and History, B. G. Teubner, Leipzig\/Wayne State University Press, Detroit, 1923\/1988."},{"key":"BF02017752_CR6","volume-title":"Science and the Sociology of Knowledge","author":"M. Mulkay","year":"1979","unstructured":"M. Mulkay,Science and the Sociology of Knowledge, George Allen & Unwin, London, 1979."},{"key":"BF02017752_CR7","first-page":"262","volume":"5","author":"J. M. Chase","year":"1970","unstructured":"J. M. Chase, Normative criteria for scientific publication,The American Sociologist, 5 (1970) 262\u2013265.","journal-title":"The American Sociologist"},{"key":"BF02017752_CR8","unstructured":"B.C. Griffith (Ed.),Key Papers in Information Science, Xerox copy, Undated."},{"key":"BF02017752_CR9","volume-title":"The Structure of Scientific Revolutions","author":"T. S. Kuhn","year":"1970","unstructured":"T. S. Kuhn,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd. ed.), The University of Chicago press, Chicago, 1970.","edition":"2nd. ed."},{"key":"BF02017752_CR10","unstructured":"H. Montgomery, S. Hemlin, A crossdisciplinary investigation of professorial evaluation documents,G\u00f6teborg Psychological Reports, 21 (1991) No. 4., (part of the dissertation referred to in note No. 1.)"},{"key":"BF02017752_CR11","first-page":"73","volume":"1","author":"S. Hemlin","year":"1990","unstructured":"See note No. 3..","journal-title":"Science Studies"},{"key":"BF02017752_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02072856","volume":"5","author":"J. P. Rushton","year":"1983","unstructured":"J. P. Rushton, H. G. Murray, S. V. Paunonen, Personality, research creativity, and teaching effectiveness in university professors,Scientometrics, 5 (1983) 93\u2013116.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"BF02017752_CR13","first-page":"73","volume":"1","author":"S. Hemlin","year":"1990","unstructured":"See note No. 3..","journal-title":"Science Studies"},{"key":"BF02017752_CR14","unstructured":"See note No. 1 I acknowledge Professor HenryMontgomery, University of Stockholm, for constructive criticism of the study. Also, I want to thank two anonymous referees for valuable comments on the manuscript. An earlier and more extensive version of this paper is to be found inG\u00f6teborg Psychological Reports, 21 (1991) No. 3 as one of five papers in a Ph. D. thesis (S. Hemlin,Quality in science. Researchers' conceptions and judgements, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of G\u00f6teborg, 1991). The study was supported by a grant from the Swedish Board of Universities and Colleges and a grant from the Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren's Science Foundation. as to the technical report this paper is based on."},{"key":"BF02017752_CR15","unstructured":"Reference structures of the principal component analyses are presented in the technical report (see note No. 1). I acknowledge Professor HenryMontgomery, University of Stockholm, for constructive criticism of the study. Also, I want to thank two anonymous referees for valuable comments on the manuscript. An earlier and more extensive version of this paper is to be found inG\u00f6teborg Psychological Reports, 21 (1991) No. 3 as one of five papers in a Ph. D. thesis (S. Hemlin,Quality in science. Researchers' conceptions and judgements, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of G\u00f6teborg, 1991). The study was supported by a grant from the Swedish Board of Universities and Colleges and a grant from the Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren's Science Foundation."},{"key":"BF02017752_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"See notes Nos 1 and 3. I acknowledge Professor HenryMontgomery, University of Stockholm, for constructive criticism of the study. Also, I want to thank two anonymous referees for valuable comments on the manuscript. An earlier and more extensive version of this paper is to be found inG\u00f6teborg Psychological Reports, 21 (1991) No. 3 as one of five papers in a Ph. D. thesis (S. Hemlin,Quality in science. Researchers' conceptions and judgements, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of G\u00f6teborg, 1991). The study was supported by a grant from the Swedish Board of Universities and Colleges and a grant from the Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren's Science Foundation.S. Hemlin, H. Montgomery, Scientists' conceptions of scientific quality,Science Studies, 1 (1990) 73\u201381.","DOI":"10.23987\/sts.55025"},{"key":"BF02017752_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"This analysis was performed inHemlin andMontgomery (1990). See note No. 3.S. Hemlin, H. Montgomery, Scientists' conceptions of scientific quality,Science Studies, 1 (1990) 73\u201381.","DOI":"10.23987\/sts.55025"},{"key":"BF02017752_CR18","unstructured":"Whether these results hold across nations is an empirical question to be answered. The sample drawn reflects the Swedish research communities of the five areas mentioned above. (c.f.T. Luukkonen,Citations in the Rhetorical, Reward, and Communication Systems of Science, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere, 1990, p. 22)."},{"key":"BF02017752_CR19","first-page":"73","volume":"1","author":"S. Hemlin","year":"1990","unstructured":"See note No. 3..","journal-title":"Science Studies"},{"key":"BF02017752_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.2307\/2094423","volume":"39","author":"I. I. Mitroff","year":"1974","unstructured":"I. I. Mitroff, Norms and counter-norms in a select group of the Apollo moon scientists: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists,American Sociological Review, 39 (1974) 579\u2013595.","journal-title":"American Sociological Review"},{"key":"BF02017752_CR21","volume-title":"Science and Behavior. An Introduction to Methods of Research","author":"J. M. Neale","year":"1973\/1980","unstructured":"J. M. Neale, R. M. Liebert,Science and Behavior. An Introduction to Methods of Research, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1973\/1980."},{"key":"BF02017752_CR22","first-page":"73","volume":"1","author":"S. Hemlin","year":"1990","unstructured":"See note No. 13.. Besides from the document analysis findings, the results of this study are largely supported by interview data (see note No. 3).","journal-title":"Science Studies"},{"key":"BF02017752_CR23","unstructured":"A. Christensen, Sl\u00e4pp in m\u00e4nniskorna. (Let the people in).Dagens Nyheter, Humanvetenskapliga dagar 1985 (bilaga) (1985, May 7) 23."},{"key":"BF02017752_CR24","unstructured":"M. Brohult, Humaniora i kris eller p\u00e5 uppg\u00e5ng? (Are the humanities in a crises or on the rise?),Svenska Dagbladet, (1987, May 26)."},{"key":"BF02017752_CR25","volume-title":"Psychology of Science. Contributions to Metascience","year":"1989","unstructured":"B. Gholson, W. R. Shadish Jr., R. A. Neimeyer, A. C. Houts (Eds),Psychology of Science. Contributions to Metascience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989."}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/BF02017752.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/BF02017752\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/BF02017752","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,15]],"date-time":"2021-07-15T10:35:01Z","timestamp":1626345301000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/BF02017752"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1993,5]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1993,5]]}},"alternative-id":["BF02017752"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/bf02017752","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1993,5]]}}}