{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]],"date-time":"2026-03-12T10:27:50Z","timestamp":1773311270410,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,29]],"date-time":"2021-03-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1616976000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,29]],"date-time":"2021-03-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1616976000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AI &amp; Soc"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Although Japanese society has become aware of some types of robots, social acceptance of robots is still not widespread. This study conducted an online questionnaire survey to investigate the relationships between experiences with and knowledge of vacuum, pet-type, and communication robots and acceptance of these robots, including the intention to use and trust. The results suggested that experiences with, knowledge of functions, and acceptance of the robots differed depending on the type of robot, and the influence of these factors on acceptance of the robots also differed depending on the robot types.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-021-01196-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,29]],"date-time":"2021-03-29T18:02:50Z","timestamp":1617040970000},"page":"367-374","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Experiences, knowledge of functions, and social acceptance of robots: an exploratory case study focusing on Japan"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"37","author":[{"given":"Tatsuya","family":"Nomura","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Motoharu","family":"Tanaka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"1196_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-019-00593-0","volume":"11","author":"C Br\u00f6hl","year":"2019","unstructured":"Br\u00f6hl C, Nelles J, Brandl C, Mertens A, Nitsc V (2019) Human-robot collaboration acceptance model: development and comparison for Germany, Japan, China and the USA. Int J Soc Robot 11:709\u2013726","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"issue":"3","key":"1196_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.2307\/249008","volume":"13","author":"FD Davis","year":"1989","unstructured":"Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319","journal-title":"MIS Q"},{"issue":"12","key":"1196_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1476","DOI":"10.1016\/j.robot.2013.07.007","volume":"61","author":"MM De Graaf","year":"2013","unstructured":"De Graaf MM, Allouch SB (2013) Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robot Auton Syst 61(12):1476\u20131486","journal-title":"Robot Auton Syst"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"1196_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/S0921-8890(02)00374-3","volume":"42","author":"BR Duffy","year":"2003","unstructured":"Duffy BR (2003) Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robot Auton Syst 42(3\u20134):177\u2013190","journal-title":"Robot Auton Syst"},{"issue":"4","key":"1196_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.114.4.864","volume":"114","author":"N Epley","year":"2007","unstructured":"Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 114(4):864\u2013886","journal-title":"Psychol Rev"},{"key":"1196_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fink, J. (2012). Anthropomorphism and human likeness in the design of robots and human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2021), pp 199\u2013208","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-34103-8_20"},{"key":"1196_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-010-0068-5","volume":"2","author":"M Heerink","year":"2010","unstructured":"Heerink M, Kr\u00f6se B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2010) Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the Almere Model. Int J Soc Robot 2:361\u2013375","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"key":"1196_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kochigami K, Okada K, Inaba M (2018) Social acceptance of interactive robots in Japan: comparison of children and adults and analysis of people's opinion. In: Companion of the 2018 ACM\/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp 157\u2013158","DOI":"10.1145\/3173386.3177012"},{"issue":"4","key":"1196_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2018.12.017","volume":"93","author":"R Latikka","year":"2019","unstructured":"Latikka R, Turja T, Oksanen A (2019) Self-efficacy and acceptance of robots. Comput Hum Behav 93(4):157\u2013163","journal-title":"Comput Hum Behav"},{"issue":"8","key":"1196_CR10","first-page":"37","volume":"10","author":"H Lee","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lee H, Kang H, Kim MG, Lee J, Kwak SS (2016) Pepper or roomba? Effective robot design type based on cultural analysis between Korean and Japanese users. Int J Softw Eng Appl 10(8):37\u201346","journal-title":"Int J Softw Eng Appl"},{"key":"1196_CR11","unstructured":"Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, Japan. (2019). Information and Communications in Japan 2019 (summary). https:\/\/www.soumu.go.jp\/main_sosiki\/joho_tsusin\/eng\/whitepaper\/2019\/index.html"},{"issue":"2","key":"1196_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1054","DOI":"10.1111\/ecin.12412","volume":"55","author":"M Morikawa","year":"2017","unstructured":"Morikawa M (2017) Firms\u2019 expectations about the impact of AI and robotics: evidence from a survey. Econ Inq 55(2):1054\u20131063","journal-title":"Econ Inq"},{"key":"1196_CR13","unstructured":"Nitto H, Taniyama D, Inagaki H (2017) Social acceptance and impact of robots and artificial intelligence: findings of survey in Japan, the US and Germany. NRI Papers No. 211"},{"key":"1196_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nomura T (2014) Influences of experiences of robots into negative attitudes toward robots. In: Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2014), pp 460\u2013464","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2014.6926295"},{"key":"1196_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1089\/gg.2016.29002.nom","volume":"1","author":"T Nomura","year":"2017","unstructured":"Nomura T (2017) Robots and Gender. Gender Genome 1:18\u201325","journal-title":"Gender Genome"},{"key":"1196_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nomura T, Ura K (2018) Exploration of basic images about robots in adolescents: a survey based on drawings in Japan. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI 2018), pp 321\u2013323","DOI":"10.1145\/3284432.3287173"},{"key":"1196_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1075\/is.7.3.14nom","volume":"7","author":"T Nomura","year":"2006","unstructured":"Nomura T, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Kato K (2006) Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interact Stud 7:437\u2013454","journal-title":"Interact Stud"},{"key":"1196_CR18","unstructured":"Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet (2015) New robot strategy: Japan\u2019s robot strategy\u2014vision, strategy, action plan. https:\/\/www.kantei.go.jp\/jp\/singi\/keizaisaisei\/pdf\/robot_honbun_150210EN.pdf"},{"issue":"2","key":"1196_CR19","first-page":"123","volume":"4","author":"N Reich","year":"2013","unstructured":"Reich N, Eyssel F (2013) Attitudes towards service robots in domestic environments: the role of personality characteristics, individual interests, and demographic variables. Paladyn J Behav Robot 4(2):123\u2013130","journal-title":"Paladyn J Behav Robot"},{"key":"1196_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1007\/s10209-005-0118-1","volume":"4","author":"M Scopelliti","year":"2005","unstructured":"Scopelliti M, Giuliani MV, Fornara F (2005) Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach. Univ Access Inf Soc 4:146\u2013155","journal-title":"Univ Access Inf Soc"},{"key":"1196_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smarr C-A, Prakash A, Beer JM, Mitzner TL, Kemp CC, Rogers WA (2012) Older Adults' Preferences for and acceptance of robot assistance for everyday living tasks. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 56(1): 153\u2013157","DOI":"10.1177\/1071181312561009"},{"issue":"3","key":"1196_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1109\/MRA.2019.2928823","volume":"27","author":"N Spatola","year":"2019","unstructured":"Spatola N, Monceau S, Ferrand L (2019a) Cognitive impact of social robots: how anthropomorphism boosts performance. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 27(3):73\u201383","journal-title":"IEEE Robot Autom Mag"},{"key":"1196_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.3389\/frobt.2019.00021","volume":"6","author":"N Spatola","year":"2019","unstructured":"Spatola N, Anier N, Redersdorff S, Ferrand L, Belletier C, Normand A, Huguet P (2019b) National stereotypes and robots\u2019 perception: the \u201cmade in\u201d effect. Front Robot AI 6:21","journal-title":"Front Robot AI"},{"key":"1196_CR24","unstructured":"Weiss A, Bernhaupt R, Tscheligi M, Yoshida E (2009) Addressing user experience and societal impact in a user study with a humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on New Frontiers in Human\u2013Robot Interaction, pp 150\u2013157"}],"container-title":["AI &amp; SOCIETY"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01196-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01196-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01196-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,15]],"date-time":"2022-02-15T03:10:39Z","timestamp":1644894639000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01196-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,29]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]}},"alternative-id":["1196"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01196-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["0951-5666","1435-5655"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0951-5666","type":"print"},{"value":"1435-5655","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 August 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 March 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 March 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}