{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,14]],"date-time":"2026-04-14T16:38:05Z","timestamp":1776184685284,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,11]],"date-time":"2022-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641859200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,11]],"date-time":"2022-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641859200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AI &amp; Soc"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The rapid and dynamic nature of digital transformation challenges companies that wish to develop and deploy novel digital technologies. Like other actors faced with this transformation, companies need to find robust ways to ethically guide their innovations and business decisions. Digital ethics has recently featured in a plethora of both practical corporate guidelines and compilations of high-level principles, but there remains a gap concerning the development of sound ethical guidance in specific business contexts. As a multinational science and technology company faced with a broad range of digital ventures and associated ethical challenges, Merck KGaA has laid the foundations for bridging this gap by developing a Code of Digital Ethics (CoDE) tailored for this context. Following a comprehensive analysis of existing digital ethics guidelines, we used a reconstructive social research approach to identify 20 relevant principles and derive a code designed as a multi-purpose tool. Versatility was prioritised by defining non-prescriptive guidelines that are open to different perspectives and thus well-suited for operationalisation for varied business purposes. We also chose a clear nested structure that highlights the relationships between five core and fifteen subsidiary principles as well as the different levels of reference\u2014data and algorithmic systems\u2014to which they apply. The CoDE will serve Merck KGaA and its new Digital Ethics Advisory Panel to guide ethical reflection, evaluation and decision-making across the full spectrum of digital developments encountered and undertaken by the company whilst also offering an opportunity to increase transparency for external partners, and thus trust.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-021-01376-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,11]],"date-time":"2022-01-11T11:02:44Z","timestamp":1641898964000},"page":"2629-2639","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":26,"title":["A Code of Digital Ethics: laying the foundation for digital ethics in a science and technology company"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"38","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8228-2571","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sarah J.","family":"Becker","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Andr\u00e9 T.","family":"Nemat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Simon","family":"Lucas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ren\u00e9 M.","family":"Heinitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Manfred","family":"Klevesath","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jean Enno","family":"Charton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"1376_CR1","unstructured":"Agenzia per l\u2019Italia Digitale (2018) AI White paper. https:\/\/ai-white-paper.readthedocs.io\/en\/latest\/doc\/raccomandazioni.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR2","unstructured":"AI HLEG-Independent High-Level Expert Group on AI (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/digital-single-market\/en\/news\/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"issue":"11","key":"1376_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2019.1665402","volume":"19","author":"T Beauchamp","year":"2019","unstructured":"Beauchamp T, Childress J (2019) Principles of biomedical ethics: marking its fortieth anniversary. Am J Bioethics 19(11):9\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15265161.2019.1665402","journal-title":"Am J Bioethics"},{"key":"1376_CR4","unstructured":"Blackman R (2020) A practical guide to building ethical AI. Harv Bus Rev. https:\/\/hbr.org\/2020\/10\/a-practical-guide-to-building-ethical-ai. Accessed 29 Nov 2020"},{"key":"1376_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bohnsack R (1999) Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung Einf\u00fchrung in Methodologie und Praxis qualitativer Forschung. Leske + Budrich, Opladen","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-663-01190-3"},{"key":"1376_CR6","unstructured":"Bynum T (2018) Computer and information ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive (Summer 2018 Edition). https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/sum2018\/entries\/ethics-computer\/. Accessed 26 Nov 2020"},{"key":"1376_CR7","unstructured":"CEPEJ-European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2018) European ethical Charter on the use of Artificial Intelligence in judicial systems and their environment. https:\/\/rm.coe.int\/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018\/16808f699c. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR8","unstructured":"Datenethikkommission (2019) Gutachten der Datenethikkommission. https:\/\/datenethikkommission.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/191128_DEK_Gutachten_bf_b.pdf. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR9","unstructured":"Deutsche Telekom AG (2018) KI-Leitlinien. https:\/\/www.telekom.com\/resource\/blob\/532444\/87e1e54df08cce6f4483985bd25250b6\/dl-180710-ki-leitlinien-data.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR10","unstructured":"Deutscher Ethikrat (2017) Big Data und Gesundheit\u2014Datensouver\u00e4nit\u00e4t als informationelle Freiheitsgestaltung. https:\/\/www.ethikrat.org\/fileadmin\/Publikationen\/Stellungnahmen\/deutsch\/stellungnahme-big-data-und-gesundheit.pdf. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR11","unstructured":"Die Bundesregierung (2018) Strategie K\u00fcnstliche Intelligenz der Bundesregierung. https:\/\/www.bmbf.de\/files\/Nationale_KI-Strategie.pdf. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR12","unstructured":"EDPS Ethics Advisory Group (2018) Towards a digital ethics. https:\/\/edps.europa.eu\/sites\/edp\/files\/publication\/18-01-25_eag_report_en.pdf. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR13","unstructured":"Ekspertgruppe om dataetik (2018) Data for the benefit of the people. Recommendations from the Danish Expert Group on Data Ethics. https:\/\/em.dk\/media\/12190\/dataethics-v2.pdf. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR14","unstructured":"European Commission (2020) Whiter paper on artificial intelligence\u2014a European approach to excellence and trust. https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/info\/sites\/info\/files\/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR15","unstructured":"European Commission (2021) Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/ALL\/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206"},{"key":"1376_CR16","unstructured":"European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (EGE) (2018) Statement on artificial intelligence, robotics and 'Autonomous' systems. http:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/research\/ege\/pdf\/ege_ai_statement_2018.pdf. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR17","unstructured":"Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (FMLS) (2020) International frameworks: guide for global business. https:\/\/www.csr-in-deutschland.de\/EN\/What-is-CSR\/Background\/International-Frameworks\/international-frameworks-article.html. Accessed 16 Dec 2020"},{"key":"1376_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3518482","author":"J Fjeld","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fjeld J, Achten N, Hilligoss H, Nagy A, Srikumar M (2020) Principled artificial intelligence: mapping consensus in ethical and rights-based approaches to principles for AI. Berkman Klein Center Res Publ No. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.3518482","journal-title":"Berkman Klein Center Res Publ No"},{"key":"1376_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199641321.001.0001","volume-title":"The ethics of information","author":"L Floridi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Floridi L (2013) The ethics of information. Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"key":"1376_CR20","volume-title":"The fourth revolution: how the infosphere is reshaping human reality","author":"L Floridi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Floridi L (2014) The fourth revolution: how the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"issue":"2","key":"1376_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-019-00354-x","volume":"32","author":"L Floridi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Floridi L (2019) Translating principles into practices of digital ethics: five risks of being unethical. Philos Technol 32(2):185\u2013193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13347-019-00354-x","journal-title":"Philos Technol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1376_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1162\/99608f92.8cd550d1","volume":"1","author":"L Floridi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Floridi L, Cowls J (2019) A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Sci Rev 1(1):1\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/99608f92.8cd550d1","journal-title":"Harvard Data Sci Rev"},{"issue":"2083","key":"1376_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1098\/rsta.2016.0360","volume":"374","author":"L Floridi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Floridi L, Taddeo M (2016) What is data ethics? Philos Trans R Soc A 374(2083):1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rsta.2016.0360","journal-title":"Philos Trans R Soc A"},{"issue":"4","key":"1376_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-018-9482-5","volume":"28","author":"L Floridi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Floridi L, Cowls J, Beltrametti M, Chatila R, Chazerand P, Dignum V, Luetge C, Madelin R, Pagallo U, Rossi F, Schafer B, Valcke P, Vayena E (2018) AI4People\u2014an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds Mach 28(4):689\u2013707. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-018-9482-5","journal-title":"Minds Mach"},{"key":"1376_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-021-01194-0","volume":"36","author":"JS Gordon","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gordon JS (2021) AI and law: ethical, legal, and socio-political implications. AI Soc 36:403\u2013404. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01194-0","journal-title":"AI Soc"},{"issue":"1","key":"1376_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-020-09517-8","volume":"30","author":"T Hagendorff","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hagendorff T (2020) The ethics of AI ethics: an evaluation of guidelines. Minds Mach 30(1):99\u2013120. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-020-09517-8","journal-title":"Minds Mach"},{"key":"1376_CR27","unstructured":"Handelsblatt Research Institute (2015) Datenschutz und big data\u2014Ein Leitfaden f\u00fcr Unternehmen. https:\/\/www.umweltdialog.de\/de-wAssets\/docs\/2014-Dokumente-zu-Artikeln\/leitfaden_unternehmen.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1007\/s43681-020-00008-1","volume":"1","author":"M Hickok","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hickok M (2020) Lessons learned from AI ethics principles for future actions. AI Ethics 1:41\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43681-020-00008-1","journal-title":"AI Ethics"},{"key":"1376_CR29","unstructured":"ICDPPC\u2014International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners (2018) Declaration on ethics and data protection in artificial intelligence. https:\/\/edps.europa.eu\/sites\/default\/files\/publication\/icdppc-40th_ai-declaration_adopted_en_0.pdf. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR30","unstructured":"Institute for Business Ethics (2018) Business ethics and artificial intelligence. https:\/\/www.ibe.org.uk\/uploads\/assets\/5f167681-e05f-4fae-ae1bef7699625a0d\/ibebriefing58businessethicsandartificialintelligence.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR31","unstructured":"ITI\u2014Information Technology Industry Council (2017) AI policy principles. https:\/\/www.itic.org\/public-policy\/ITIAIPolicyPrinciplesFINAL.pdf. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"issue":"9","key":"1376_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1038\/s42256-019-0088-2","volume":"1","author":"A Jobin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E (2019) The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat Mach Intell 1(9):389\u2013399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s42256-019-0088-2","journal-title":"Nat Mach Intell"},{"key":"1376_CR33","unstructured":"Merck KGaA (2020a) Annual report 2019. https:\/\/www.merckgroup.com\/en\/annualreport\/2019\/downloads\/merck_annual_report_2019.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2020."},{"key":"1376_CR34","unstructured":"Merck KGaA (2020b) Corporate responsibility report 2019. https:\/\/www.merckgroup.com\/en\/cr-report\/2019\/servicepages\/downloads\/files\/entire_merck_crr19.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2020"},{"key":"1376_CR35","unstructured":"Merck KGaA (2021) Merck announces formation of merck digital ethics advisory panel. News Release, 8 Jan 2021. https:\/\/www.merckgroup.com\/press-releases\/2021\/jan\/en\/Digital-Ethics-Advisory-Panel-EN.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2021"},{"issue":"11","key":"1376_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1038\/s42256-019-0114-4","volume":"1","author":"BD Mittelstadt","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mittelstadt BD (2019) Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nat Mach Intell 1(11):501\u2013507. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s42256-019-0114-4","journal-title":"Nat Mach Intell"},{"issue":"2","key":"1376_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-015-9652-2","volume":"22","author":"BD Mittelstadt","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mittelstadt BD, Floridi L (2016) The ethics of big data: current and foreseeable issues in biomedical contexts. Sci Eng Ethics 22(2):303\u2013341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-015-9652-2","journal-title":"Sci Eng Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"1376_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2053951716679679","volume":"3","author":"BD Mittelstadt","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mittelstadt BD, Allo P, Taddeo M, Wachter S, Floridi L (2016) The ethics of algorithms: mapping the debate. Big Data Soc 3(2):1\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2053951716679679","journal-title":"Big Data Soc"},{"key":"1376_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-021-09577-4","author":"J M\u00f6kander","year":"2021","unstructured":"M\u00f6kander J, Axente M, Casolari F, Floridi L (2021a) Conformity assessments and post-market monitoring: a guide to the role of auditing in the proposed European AI regulation. Minds Mach. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-021-09577-4","journal-title":"Minds Mach"},{"key":"1376_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-021-00319-4","volume":"27","author":"J M\u00f6kander","year":"2021","unstructured":"M\u00f6kander J, Morley J, Taddeo M, Floridi L (2021b) Ethics-based auditing of automated decision-making systems: nature, scope, and limitations. Sci Eng Ethics 27:44. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00319-4","journal-title":"Sci Eng Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"1376_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00173.x","volume":"16","author":"JH Moor","year":"1985","unstructured":"Moor JH (1985) What is computer ethics? Metaphilosophy 16(4):266\u2013275. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00173.x","journal-title":"Metaphilosophy"},{"issue":"2","key":"1376_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-021-09563-w","volume":"31","author":"J Morley","year":"2021","unstructured":"Morley J, Elhalal A, Garcia F, Kinsey L, M\u00f6kander J, Floridi L (2021a) Ethics as a service: a pragmatic operationalisation of AI ethics. Minds Mach 31(2):239\u2013256. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-021-09563-w","journal-title":"Minds Mach"},{"key":"1376_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-021-01308-8","author":"J Morley","year":"2021","unstructured":"Morley J, Kinsey L, Elhalal A, Garcia F, Ziosi M, Floridi L (2021b) Operationalising AI ethics: barriers, enablers and next steps. AI Soc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01308-8","journal-title":"AI Soc"},{"issue":"4","key":"1376_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-020-00402-x","volume":"33","author":"SS \u00d3h\u00c9igeartaigh","year":"2020","unstructured":"\u00d3h\u00c9igeartaigh SS, Whittlestone J, Liu Y, Zeng Y, Liu Z (2020) Overcoming barriers to cross-cultural cooperation in AI ethics and governance. Philos Technol 33(4):571\u2013593. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13347-020-00402-x","journal-title":"Philos Technol"},{"key":"1376_CR45","first-page":"224","volume-title":"Relational perspective in organizational studies","author":"MF \u00d6zbilgin","year":"2006","unstructured":"\u00d6zbilgin MF (2006) Relational methods in organization studies: a review of the field. In: Kyriakidou O, \u00d6zbilgin MF (eds) Relational perspective in organizational studies. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, pp 224\u2013264"},{"key":"1376_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-020-01069-w","volume":"36","author":"J Rochel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rochel J, Ev\u00e9quoz F (2021) Getting into the engine room: a blueprint to investigate the shadowy steps of AI ethics. AI Soc 36:609\u2013622. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-020-01069-w","journal-title":"AI Soc"},{"key":"1376_CR47","unstructured":"Safavi K, Kalis B (2020) How can leader make recent digital health gains last? Re-examining the Accenture 2020 Digital Health Consumer Survey. US Findings. Accenture https:\/\/www.accenture.com\/_acnmedia\/PDF-130\/Accenture-2020-Digital-Health-Consumer-Survey-US.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2020"},{"key":"1376_CR48","unstructured":"SAP SE (2018) SAPs guiding principles for artificial intelligence. https:\/\/www.sap.com\/docs\/download\/2018\/09\/940c6047-1c7d-0010-87a3-c30de2ffd8ff.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR49","unstructured":"Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft (2020) K\u00fcnstliche Intelligenz: Wie geht der Bund damit um? https:\/\/www.sbfi.admin.ch\/sbfi\/de\/home\/dienstleistungen\/publikationen\/publikationsdatenbank\/s-n-2020-6\/s-n-2020-6f.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"issue":"8","key":"1376_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2018.1489653","volume":"18","author":"J Sugarman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sugarman J, Shivakumar S, Rook M, Loring JF, Rehmann-Sutter C, Taupitz J, Rheinhard-Rupp J, Hildemann S (2018) Ethical considerations in the manufacture, sale, and distribution of genome editing technologies. Am J Bioethics 18(8):3\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15265161.2018.1489653","journal-title":"Am J Bioethics"},{"key":"1376_CR51","unstructured":"Telef\u00f3nica SA (2018) AI principles of telef\u00f3nica. https:\/\/www.telefonica.com\/documents\/1258915\/0\/Infographics-AI\/ Accessed 5 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR52","unstructured":"UK Government (2018) Data ethics framework. https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/data-ethics-framework\/dataethics-framework. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR53","unstructured":"Villani C (2018) For a meaningful artificial intelligence towards a French and European strategy. French Parliament. https:\/\/www.aiforhumanity.fr\/pdfs\/MissionVillani_Report_ENG-VF.pdf. Accessed 9 Mar 2021"},{"key":"1376_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctvddzm2j","volume-title":"Rekonstruktive Organisationsforschung: Qualitative Methodologie und theoretische Integration\u2014eine Einf\u00fchrung","author":"W Vogd","year":"2009","unstructured":"Vogd W (2009) Rekonstruktive Organisationsforschung: Qualitative Methodologie und theoretische Integration\u2014eine Einf\u00fchrung. Verlag Barbara Budrich, Opladen"},{"key":"1376_CR55","unstructured":"Zeng Y, Lu E, Huangfu C (2018) Linking artificial intelligence principles. arXiv: 1812.04814"}],"container-title":["AI &amp; SOCIETY"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01376-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01376-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01376-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,22]],"date-time":"2023-12-22T12:13:20Z","timestamp":1703247200000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01376-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,11]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1376"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01376-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0951-5666","1435-5655"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0951-5666","type":"print"},{"value":"1435-5655","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 August 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 December 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 January 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"S.B., A.N., R.H. are employed by idigiT GmbH. S.L., M.K. and J.E.C. are employed by Merck KGaA. idigiT GmbH has been commissioned by Merck KGaA to consult the company on digital ethics. In her role as advisor to Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, S.B. has been a compensated private consultant. For this editorial, the authors acted as independent scholars and did not receive payment for their contributions. Editorial assistance, including writing, was provided by Nora Schultz and was funded by Merck KGaA.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}]}}