{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,16]],"date-time":"2026-04-16T14:56:14Z","timestamp":1776351374000,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":84,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,17]],"date-time":"2023-01-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1673913600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,17]],"date-time":"2023-01-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1673913600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001827","name":"Universiteit van Amsterdam","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["Humane AI Projects 2020\/2021"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Humane AI Projects 2020\/2021"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001827","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AI &amp; Soc"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The need for fair and just AI is often related to the possibility of understanding AI itself, in other words, of turning an opaque box into a glass box, as inspectable as possible. Transparency and explainability, however, pertain to the technical domain and to philosophy of science, thus leaving the ethics and epistemology of AI largely disconnected. To remedy this, we propose an integrated approach premised on the idea that a glass-box epistemology should explicitly consider how to incorporate values and other normative considerations, such as intersectoral vulnerabilities, at critical stages of the whole process from design and implementation to use and assessment. To connect ethics and epistemology of AI, we perform a double shift of focus. First, we move from trusting the output of an AI system to trusting the process that leads to the outcome. Second, we move from expert assessment to more inclusive assessment strategies, aiming to facilitate expert and non-expert assessment. Together, these two moves yield a framework usable for experts and non-experts when they inquire into relevant epistemological and ethical aspects of AI systems. We dub our framework \u2018epistemology-cum-ethics\u2019 to signal the equal importance of both aspects. We develop it from the vantage point of the designers: how to create the conditions to internalize values into the whole process of design, implementation, use, and assessment of an AI system, in which values (epistemic and non-epistemic) are explicitly considered at each stage and inspectable by every salient actor involved at any moment.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-022-01617-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,17]],"date-time":"2023-01-17T19:02:37Z","timestamp":1673982157000},"page":"1585-1603","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":40,"title":["Connecting ethics and epistemology of AI"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"39","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1993-9697","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Federica","family":"Russo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Eric","family":"Schliesser","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9304-5766","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jean","family":"Wagemans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"1617_CR1","unstructured":"AI HLEG (2018) A definition of AI: main capabilities and scientific disciplines. European Commission, Brussels. https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/futurium\/en\/system\/files\/ged\/ai_hleg_definition_of_ai_18_december_1.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2023"},{"key":"1617_CR2","unstructured":"AI HLEG (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission, Brussels. https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/futurium\/en\/ai-alliance-consultation.1.html. Accessed 6 Jan 2023"},{"issue":"3","key":"1617_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"973","DOI":"10.1177\/1461444816676645","volume":"20","author":"M Ananny","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ananny M, Crawford K (2018) Seeing without knowing: limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media Soc 20(3):973\u2013989. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1461444816676645","journal-title":"New Media Soc"},{"key":"1617_CR4","unstructured":"Anderson E (2020) Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Spring 2020 edn. https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/feminism-epistemology\/. Accessed 6 Jan 2023"},{"key":"1617_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139013451.041","volume-title":"Cambridge handbook of engineering education research","author":"BE Barry","year":"2014","unstructured":"Barry BE, Herkert JR (2014) Engineering ethics. In: Johri A, Olds BM (eds) Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 673\u2013692. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9781139013451.041"},{"issue":"3","key":"1617_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-020-01112-w","volume":"36","author":"L Bezuidenhout","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bezuidenhout L, Ratti E (2021) What does it mean to embed ethics in data science? An integrative approach based on microethics and virtues. AI Soc 36(3):939\u2013953. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-020-01112-w","journal-title":"AI Soc"},{"key":"1617_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17169\/fqs-4.2.698","author":"F Breuer","year":"2003","unstructured":"Breuer F (2003) Subjectivity and reflexivity in the social sciences: epistemic windows and methodical consequences. Forum Qual Soc Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17169\/fqs-4.2.698","journal-title":"Forum Qual Soc Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"1617_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1086\/684173","volume":"83","author":"LK Bright","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bright LK, Malinsky D, Thompson M (2016) Causally interpreting intersectionality theory. Philos Sci 83(1):60\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/684173","journal-title":"Philos Sci"},{"key":"1617_CR01","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Burrell J (2016) How the machine \u2018thinks\u2019: understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data Soc 3(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2053951715622512","DOI":"10.1177\/2053951715622512"},{"key":"1617_CR9","volume-title":"Ethnography and reflexivity. Notes on the construction of objectivity in ethnographic research","author":"M Cardano","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cardano M (2009) Ethnography and reflexivity. Notes on the construction of objectivity in ethnographic research, vol 1. Dipartimento di scienze sociali Universit\u00e0 degli studi di Torino, Torino"},{"key":"1617_CR10","unstructured":"Carr K (2021) FOUR things to know about race and gender bias in algorithms. https:\/\/twitter.com\/kareem_carr\/status\/1375828049720135691. Accessed 6 Jan 2023"},{"key":"1617_CR11","volume-title":"AI ethics. The MIT Press essential knowledge series","author":"M Coeckelbergh","year":"2020","unstructured":"Coeckelbergh M (2020) AI ethics. The MIT Press essential knowledge series. The MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"1","key":"1617_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-021-01184-2","volume":"37","author":"N Colaner","year":"2022","unstructured":"Colaner N (2022) Is explainable artificial intelligence intrinsically valuable? AI Soc 37(1):231\u2013238. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01184-2","journal-title":"AI Soc"},{"key":"1617_CR13","volume-title":"Rethinking expertise","author":"H Collins","year":"2009","unstructured":"Collins H, Evans R (2009) Rethinking expertise, Paperback. University of Chicago Press, Chicago","edition":"Paperback"},{"key":"1617_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.12987\/9780300252392","volume-title":"Atlas of AI: power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence","author":"K Crawford","year":"2021","unstructured":"Crawford K (2021) Atlas of AI: power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press, New Haven"},{"issue":"4","key":"1617_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1086\/709729","volume":"87","author":"KA Creel","year":"2020","unstructured":"Creel KA (2020) Transparency in complex computational systems. Philos Sci 87(4):568\u2013589. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/709729","journal-title":"Philos Sci"},{"key":"1617_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199730568.001.0001","volume-title":"The economist\u2019s oath: on the need for and content of professional economic ethics","author":"G DeMartino","year":"2011","unstructured":"DeMartino G (2011) The economist\u2019s oath: on the need for and content of professional economic ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"key":"1617_CR17","volume-title":"Responsible artificial intelligence: how to develop and use Ai in a responsible way","author":"V Dignum","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dignum V (2020) Responsible artificial intelligence: how to develop and use Ai in a responsible way. Springer, Berlin"},{"key":"1617_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctt6wrc78","volume-title":"Science, policy, and the value-free ideal","author":"H Douglas","year":"2009","unstructured":"Douglas H (2009) Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh"},{"key":"1617_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Draus S, van Achter M (2012) Circuit breakers and market runs. CSEF working papers 313. Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF). University of Naples. https:\/\/ideas.repec.org\/p\/sef\/csefwp\/313.html. Accessed 6 Jan 2023","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2081962"},{"key":"1617_CR20","volume-title":"The Oxford handbook of ethics of AI. Oxford handbooks series","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dubber MD, Pasquale F, Das S (eds) (2020) The Oxford handbook of ethics of AI. Oxford handbooks series. Oxford University Press, New York"},{"key":"1617_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-90882-3","volume-title":"Computer simulations in science and engineering","author":"JM Dur\u00e1n","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dur\u00e1n JM (2018) Computer simulations in science and engineering. Springer, New York"},{"issue":"August","key":"1617_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103498","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2021.103498","volume":"297","author":"JM Dur\u00e1n","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dur\u00e1n JM (2021) Dissecting scientific explanation in AI (SXAI): a case for medicine and healthcare. Artif Intell 297(August):103498. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2021.103498","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"4","key":"1617_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-018-9481-6","volume":"28","author":"JM Dur\u00e1n","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dur\u00e1n JM, Formanek N (2018) Grounds for trust: essential epistemic opacity and computational reliabilism. Mind Mach 28(4):645\u2013666. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-018-9481-6","journal-title":"Mind Mach"},{"key":"1617_CR24","volume-title":"The 4th revolution: how the infosphere is reshaping human reality","author":"L Floridi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Floridi L (2016) The 4th revolution: how the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"key":"1617_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Floridi L (ed) (2021) Ethics, governance, and policies in artificial intelligence. Springer Cham","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-81907-1"},{"key":"1617_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/99608f92.8cd550d1","author":"L Floridi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Floridi L, Cowls J (2019) A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Sci Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/99608f92.8cd550d1","journal-title":"Harvard Data Sci Rev"},{"key":"1617_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/7585.001.0001","volume-title":"Value sensitive design: shaping technology with moral imagination","author":"B Friedman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Friedman B, Hendry DG (2019) Value sensitive design: shaping technology with moral imagination. MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"1617_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glennan S, Illari P (eds) (2018) The Routledge handbook of mechanisms and mechanical philosophy. Routledge","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315731544"},{"issue":"2","key":"1617_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007756117287","volume":"12","author":"J Goodwin","year":"1998","unstructured":"Goodwin J (1998) Forms of authority and the real ad verecundiam. Argumentation 12(2):267\u2013280. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1007756117287","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"3","key":"1617_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-011-9219-6","volume":"25","author":"J Goodwin","year":"2011","unstructured":"Goodwin J (2011) Accounting for the appeal to the authority of experts. Argumentation 25(3):285\u2013296. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-011-9219-6","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"1","key":"1617_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-020-09517-8","volume":"30","author":"T Hagendorff","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hagendorff T (2020) The ethics of AI ethics: an evaluation of guidelines. Mind Mach 30(1):99\u2013120. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-020-09517-8","journal-title":"Mind Mach"},{"issue":"1","key":"1617_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1007\/s43681-021-00121-9","volume":"2","author":"C Herzog","year":"2022","unstructured":"Herzog C (2022) On the risk of confusing interpretability with explicability. AI Ethics 2(1):219\u2013225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43681-021-00121-9","journal-title":"AI Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"1617_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v35i4.4386","volume":"35","author":"MD Hinton","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hinton MD (2015) Mizrahi and Seidel: experts in confusion. Inf Logic 35(4):539. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v35i4.4386","journal-title":"Inf Logic"},{"issue":"3","key":"1617_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-008-9435-2","volume":"169","author":"P Humphreys","year":"2009","unstructured":"Humphreys P (2009) The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods. Synthese 169(3):615\u2013626. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-008-9435-2","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"1617_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-021-03215-3","author":"M Jim\u00e9nez-Buedo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jim\u00e9nez-Buedo M, Russo F (2021) Experimental practices and objectivity in the social sciences: re-embedding construct validity in the internal-external validity distinction. Synthese. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-021-03215-3","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"1617_CR36","volume-title":"The ethical algorithm: the science of socially aware algorithm design","author":"M Kearns","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kearns M, Roth A (2020) The ethical algorithm: the science of socially aware algorithm design. Oxford University Press, New York"},{"issue":"3","key":"1617_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1111\/jofi.12498","volume":"72","author":"A Kirilenko","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kirilenko A, Kyle AS, Samadi M, Tuzun T (2017) The flash crash: high-frequency trading in an electronic market: the flash crash. J Financ 72(3):967\u2013998. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jofi.12498","journal-title":"J Financ"},{"key":"1617_CR38","volume-title":"The moral status of technical artefacts. Philosophy of engineering and technology","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kroes P, Verbeek P-P (eds) (2014) The moral status of technical artefacts. Philosophy of engineering and technology, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht"},{"issue":"July","key":"1617_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103473","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2021.103473","volume":"296","author":"M Langer","year":"2021","unstructured":"Langer M, Oster D, Speith T, Hermanns H, K\u00e4stner L, Schmidt E, Sesing A, Baum K (2021) What do we want from explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)? A stakeholder perspective on XAI and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI research. Artif Intell 296(July):103473. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2021.103473","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"4","key":"1617_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1007\/s43681-021-00067-y","volume":"1","author":"MS Lee","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lee MS, Ah LF, Singh J (2021) Formalising trade-offs beyond algorithmic fairness: lessons from ethical philosophy and welfare economics. AI Ethics 1(4):529\u2013544. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43681-021-00067-y","journal-title":"AI Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"1617_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsb.2010.07.001","volume":"41","author":"J Lenhard","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lenhard J, Winsberg E (2010) Holism, entrenchment, and the future of climate model pluralism. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part B Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 41(3):253\u2013262. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.shpsb.2010.07.001","journal-title":"Stud Hist Philos Sci Part B Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys"},{"key":"1617_CR42","unstructured":"Levy DM, Peart SJ (2017) Escape from democracy: the role of experts and the public in economic policy. https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/books\/escape-from-democracy\/D56EB10CECD0CAC0CCDF6B3F54344C5D. Accessed 6 Jan 2023"},{"key":"1617_CR43","volume-title":"Ethics of artificial intelligence","year":"2020","unstructured":"Liao SM (ed) (2020) Ethics of artificial intelligence. Oxford University Publication, New York"},{"key":"1617_CR44","unstructured":"Matsakis L (2019) The WIRED guide to your personal data (and who is using it). Wired, 15 February 2019. https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/wired-guide-personal-data-collection\/. Accessed 6 Jan 2023"},{"issue":"3","key":"1617_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.2307\/258792","volume":"20","author":"RC Mayer","year":"1995","unstructured":"Mayer RC, Davis JH, David Schoorman F (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):709. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/258792","journal-title":"Acad Manag Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"1617_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205395171667967","DOI":"10.1177\/2053951716679679","volume":"3","author":"BD Mittelstadt","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mittelstadt BD, Allo P, Taddeo M, Wachter S, Floridi L (2016) The ethics of algorithms: mapping the debate. Big Data Soc 3(2):205395171667967. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2053951716679679","journal-title":"Big Data Soc"},{"key":"1617_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mittelstadt BD, Russell C, Wachter S (2019) Explaining explanations in AI. In: Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. ACM, Atlanta GA USA, pp 279\u2013288. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3287560.3287574","DOI":"10.1145\/3287560.3287574"},{"issue":"2","key":"1617_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-021-09557-8","volume":"31","author":"J M\u00f6kander","year":"2021","unstructured":"M\u00f6kander J, Floridi L (2021) Ethics-based auditing to develop trustworthy AI. Mind Mach 31(2):323\u2013327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-021-09557-8","journal-title":"Mind Mach"},{"issue":"2","key":"1617_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1162\/POSC_a_00089","volume":"21","author":"MS Morgan","year":"2013","unstructured":"Morgan MS, Gr\u00fcne-Yanoff T (2013) Modeling practices in the social and human sciences. An interdisciplinary exchange. Perspect Sci 21(2):143\u2013156","journal-title":"Perspect Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"1617_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2141","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-019-00165-5","volume":"26","author":"J Morley","year":"2020","unstructured":"Morley J, Floridi L, Kinsey L, Elhalal A (2020) From what to how: an initial review of publicly available ai ethics tools, methods and research to translate principles into practices. Sci Eng Ethics 26(4):2141\u20132168. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-019-00165-5","journal-title":"Sci Eng Ethics"},{"key":"1617_CR51","unstructured":"Nair N (2018) What is value-centered design? UX Collective (blog). https:\/\/uxdesign.cc\/what-is-value-centered-design-a9c5fbf2641. Accessed 6 Jan 2023"},{"key":"1617_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-47286-7_18","volume-title":"History and philosophy of computing. IFIP advances in information and communication technology","author":"J Newman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Newman J (2016) Epistemic opacity, confirmation holism and technical debt: computer simulation in the light of empirical software engineering. In: Gadducci F, Tavosanis M (eds) History and philosophy of computing. IFIP advances in information and communication technology, vol 487. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 256\u2013272. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-47286-7_18"},{"key":"1617_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Oberkampf W, Hirsch C, Trucano T (2003) Verification, validation, and predictive capability in computational engineering and physics. SAND2003-3769, 918370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2172\/918370","DOI":"10.2172\/918370"},{"key":"1617_CR54","unstructured":"Oxford Reference (2023) Compensation principle. In: Oxford Reference https:\/\/www.oxfordreference.com\/view\/10.1093\/oi\/authority.20110803095628821. Accessed 6 Jan 2023"},{"key":"1617_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4126409","author":"VG Perry","year":"2022","unstructured":"Perry VG, Martin K (2022) Algorithms for all: has digitalization in the mortgage market expanded access to homeownership? SSRN Electron J. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.4126409","journal-title":"SSRN Electron J"},{"key":"1617_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-020-09537-4","volume":"30","author":"I van de Poel","year":"2020","unstructured":"van de Poel I (2020) Embedding values in artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Mind Mach 30:385\u2013409. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-020-09537-4","journal-title":"Mind Mach"},{"key":"1617_CR57","volume-title":"On the foundations of computing","author":"G Primiero","year":"2020","unstructured":"Primiero G (2020) On the foundations of computing, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York","edition":"1"},{"key":"1617_CR58","unstructured":"Pupillo L, Fantin S, Ferreira A, Polito C, Centre for European Policy Studies (2021) Artificial intelligence and cybersecurity technology, governance and policy challenges: final report of a CEPS task force. https:\/\/www.ceps.eu\/download\/publication\/?id=33262&pdf=CEPS-TFR-Artificial-Intelligence-and-Cybersecurity.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2023"},{"key":"1617_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s43681-022-00141-z","author":"E Ratti","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ratti E, Graves M (2022) Explainable machine learning practices: opening another black box for reliable medical AI. AI Ethics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43681-022-00141-z","journal-title":"AI Ethics"},{"issue":"10","key":"1617_CR60","first-page":"135","volume":"22","author":"F Russo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Russo F (2021) Value-promoting concepts in the health sciences and public health. Philos News 22(10):135\u2013148","journal-title":"Philos News"},{"key":"1617_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5771\/9781786612342","volume-title":"Techno-scientific practices: an informational approach","author":"F Russo","year":"2022","unstructured":"Russo F (2022) Techno-scientific practices: an informational approach. Rowman and Littlefield International, Lanham"},{"issue":"3","key":"1617_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1163\/187226311X599899","volume":"5","author":"E Schliesser","year":"2011","unstructured":"Schliesser E (2011) Four species of reflexivity and history of economics in economic policy science. J Philos Hist 5(3):425\u2013445. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/187226311X599899","journal-title":"J Philos Hist"},{"key":"1617_CR63","volume-title":"The Routledge handbook of trust and philosophy","year":"2021","unstructured":"Simon J (ed) (2021) The Routledge handbook of trust and philosophy. Routledge, New York, NY"},{"key":"1617_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Snoeck Henkemans AF, Wagemans JHM (2012) The reasonableness of argumentation from expert opinion in medical discussions: institutional safeguards for the quality of shared decision making. In: Iowa State University summer symposium on science communication, 12247422. Iowa State University, Digital Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31274\/sciencecommunication-180809-83","DOI":"10.31274\/sciencecommunication-180809-83"},{"key":"1617_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-69978-9","volume-title":"Artificial intelligence for a better future: an ecosystem perspective on the ethics of AI and emerging digital technologies","author":"BC Stahl","year":"2021","unstructured":"Stahl BC (2021) Artificial intelligence for a better future: an ecosystem perspective on the ethics of AI and emerging digital technologies. Springer, Cham. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-69978-9"},{"key":"1617_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2059799119863276","author":"S Subramani","year":"2019","unstructured":"Subramani S (2019) Practising reflexivity: ethics, methodology and theory construction. Methodol Innov. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2059799119863276","journal-title":"Methodol Innov"},{"issue":"3","key":"1617_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-014-0163-x","volume":"27","author":"J Symons","year":"2014","unstructured":"Symons J, Horner J (2014) Software intensive science. Philos Technol 27(3):461\u2013477. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13347-014-0163-x","journal-title":"Philos Technol"},{"key":"1617_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780190498511.001.0001","volume-title":"Technology and the virtues: a philosophical guide to a future worth wanting","author":"S Vallor","year":"2016","unstructured":"Vallor S (2016) Technology and the virtues: a philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford University Press, New York"},{"key":"1617_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-66913-3","volume-title":"AI for the good: artificial intelligence and ethics. Management for professionals","year":"2021","unstructured":"Vieweg S (ed) (2021) AI for the good: artificial intelligence and ethics. Management for professionals. Springer, Cham. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-66913-3"},{"key":"1617_CR70","unstructured":"Wagemans JHM (2011a) \u2018Argumenteren Met Behulp van Juridische Expertsystemen. Commentaar Op Mireille Hildebrandt, \u2018Oordeelsvorming Door Mens En Machine: Heuristieken, Algoritmes En Legitimatie\u2019. In: Gewogen Oordelen: Essays over Argumentatie En Recht: Bijdragen Aan Het Zesde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie 24 Juni 2011a, 357\u201360. Erasmus University Rotterdam: Boom Juridische uitgevers. https:\/\/hdl.handle.net\/11245\/1.462093. Accessed 6 Jan 2023"},{"issue":"3","key":"1617_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-011-9225-8","volume":"25","author":"JHM Wagemans","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wagemans JHM (2011b) The assessment of argumentation from expert opinion. Argumentation 25(3):329\u2013339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-011-9225-8","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"1617_CR72","unstructured":"Wagemans JHM (2015) Argumentation from expert opinion in the 2011 US debt ceiling debate\u2019. In: Palczewski CH (ed) Disturbing argument: selected works from the 18th NCA\/AFA Alta conference on argumentation. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London, New York, pp 49\u201356"},{"key":"1617_CR73","unstructured":"Wagemans JHM (2016) Criteria for deciding what is the best scientific explanation. In: Mohammed D, Lewi\u0144ski M (eds) Argumentation and reasoned action: Proceedings of the 1st European conference on argumentation, vol II. College Publications, London, pp 43\u201354"},{"key":"1617_CR74","unstructured":"Wagemans JHM (2020) Why missing premises can be missed: evaluating arguments by determining their lever. In: Cook J (ed) Proceedings of OSSA 12: evidence, persuasion and diversity. OSSA conference archive. https:\/\/scholar.uwindsor.ca\/ossaarchive\/OSSA12\/Saturday\/1. Accessed 6 Jan 2023"},{"issue":"4","key":"1617_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-016-0666-3","volume":"32","author":"D Walton","year":"2017","unstructured":"Walton D, Koszowy M (2017) Arguments from authority and expert opinion in computational argumentation systems. AI Soc 32(4):483\u2013496. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-016-0666-3","journal-title":"AI Soc"},{"key":"1617_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Walton DN, Reed C, Macagno F (2008) Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034"},{"key":"1617_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3668444","author":"D Watson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Watson D (2020) Conceptual Challenges for Interpretable Machine Learning. SSRN Electron J. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.3668444","journal-title":"SSRN Electron J"},{"key":"1617_CR02","unstructured":"Wiener N (1988) The human use of human beings: cybernetics and society. Da Capo Press"},{"key":"1617_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctv1pncnrh","volume-title":"Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: piecewise approximations to reality","author":"WC Wimsatt","year":"2007","unstructured":"Wimsatt WC (2007) Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: piecewise approximations to reality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"1","key":"1617_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1086\/367872","volume":"70","author":"E Winsberg","year":"2003","unstructured":"Winsberg E (2003) Simulated experiments: methodology for a virtual world. Philos Sci 70(1):105\u2013125. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/367872","journal-title":"Philos Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"1617_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1177\/0162243915605575","volume":"41","author":"T Zarsky","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zarsky T (2016) The trouble with algorithmic decisions: an analytic road map to examine efficiency and fairness in automated and opaque decision making. Sci Technol Hum Values 41(1):118\u2013132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0162243915605575","journal-title":"Sci Technol Hum Values"},{"issue":"2","key":"1617_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-019-00382-7","volume":"34","author":"C Zednik","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zednik C (2021) Solving the black box problem: a normative framework for explainable artificial intelligence. Philos Technol 34(2):265\u2013288. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13347-019-00382-7","journal-title":"Philos Technol"},{"key":"1617_CR82","volume-title":"The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power","author":"S Zuboff","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zuboff S (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power, Paperback. Profile Books, London","edition":"Paperback"}],"container-title":["AI &amp; SOCIETY"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00146-022-01617-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00146-022-01617-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00146-022-01617-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,13]],"date-time":"2024-08-13T06:03:39Z","timestamp":1723529019000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00146-022-01617-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,17]]},"references-count":84,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,8]]}},"alternative-id":["1617"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-022-01617-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0951-5666","1435-5655"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0951-5666","type":"print"},{"value":"1435-5655","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"6 May 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 December 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 January 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"We declare no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}