{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,11]],"date-time":"2026-01-11T02:05:06Z","timestamp":1768097106652,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]],"date-time":"2023-10-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696896000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]],"date-time":"2023-10-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696896000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int J Game Theory"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00182-023-00872-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]],"date-time":"2023-10-10T07:02:42Z","timestamp":1696921362000},"page":"1077-1087","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["A note on the risk dominance of the Nash demand game"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"53","author":[{"given":"Yoshio","family":"Kamijo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"872_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9396.00289","volume":"9","author":"L Abrego","year":"2001","unstructured":"Abrego L, Perroni C, Whalley J, Wigle RM (2001) Trade and environment: bargaining outcomes from linked negotiations. Rev Int Econ 9(3):414\u2013428","journal-title":"Rev Int Econ"},{"issue":"4","key":"872_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.1007\/s10683-013-9352-1","volume":"16","author":"N Anbarci","year":"2013","unstructured":"Anbarci N, Feltovich N (2013) How sensitive are bargaining outcomes to changes in disagreement payoffs? Exp Econ 16(4):560\u2013596","journal-title":"Exp Econ"},{"issue":"2","key":"872_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-0531(85)90102-4","volume":"36","author":"RJ Aumann","year":"1985","unstructured":"Aumann RJ, Maschler M (1985) Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the talmud. J Econ Theory 36(2):195\u2013213","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"issue":"2","key":"872_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.2307\/2555382","volume":"17","author":"K Binmore","year":"1986","unstructured":"Binmore K, Rubinstein A, Wolinsky A (1986) The nash bargaining solution in economic modelling. RAND J Econ 17(2):176\u2013188","journal-title":"RAND J Econ"},{"issue":"1","key":"872_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1007\/s11238-013-9392-1","volume":"77","author":"S Birkeland","year":"2014","unstructured":"Birkeland S, Tungodden B (2014) Fairness motivation in bargaining: a matter of principle. Theory Decis 77(1):125\u2013151","journal-title":"Theory Decis"},{"issue":"1","key":"872_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.90.1.166","volume":"90","author":"GE Bolton","year":"2000","unstructured":"Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) Erc: a theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Am Econ Rev 90(1):166\u2013193","journal-title":"Am Econ Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"872_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-7187(99)00037-5","volume":"18","author":"A Cabrales","year":"2000","unstructured":"Cabrales A, Garc\u0131a-Fontes W, Motta M (2000) Risk dominance selects the leader: an experimental analysis. Int J Ind Organ 18(1):137\u2013162","journal-title":"Int J Ind Organ"},{"issue":"3","key":"872_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1162\/003355399556151","volume":"114","author":"E Fehr","year":"1999","unstructured":"Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114(3):817\u2013868","journal-title":"Q J Econ"},{"issue":"2","key":"872_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.2307\/1911498","volume":"52","author":"PA Grout","year":"1984","unstructured":"Grout PA (1984) Investment and wages in the absence of binding contracts: a nash bargaining approach. Econometrica 52(2):449\u2013460","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"issue":"2","key":"872_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01766187","volume":"4","author":"JC Harsanyi","year":"1975","unstructured":"Harsanyi JC (1975) The tracing procedure: a bayesian approach to defining a solution forn-person noncooperative games. Int J Game Theory 4(2):61\u201394","journal-title":"Int J Game Theory"},{"issue":"2","key":"872_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/0165-4896(82)90055-5","volume":"3","author":"JC Harsanyi","year":"1982","unstructured":"Harsanyi JC (1982) Solutions for some bargaining games under the harsanyi-selten solution theory, Part i: theoretical preliminaries. Math Soc Sci 3(2):179\u2013191","journal-title":"Math Soc Sci"},{"key":"872_CR12","unstructured":"Harsanyi JC (1986) Rational behaviour and bargaining equilibrium in games and social situations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"872_CR13","volume-title":"A general theory of equilibrium selection in games","author":"JC Harsanyi","year":"1988","unstructured":"Harsanyi JC, Selten R (1988) A general theory of equilibrium selection in games. The MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"872_CR14","unstructured":"Kamijo Y (2023) Fixation of inequality and emergence of the equal split norm: approach from behavioral bargaining theory. WINPEC Working Paper Series, E2209"},{"key":"872_CR15","unstructured":"Kamijo Y, Yokote K (2022) Behavioral bargaining theory: equality bias, risk attitude, and reference-dependent utility. WINPEC Working Paper Series, E2208"},{"issue":"2","key":"872_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.2307\/1907266","volume":"18","author":"JF Nash","year":"1950","unstructured":"Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155\u2013162","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"issue":"1","key":"872_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.2307\/1906951","volume":"21","author":"JF Nash","year":"1953","unstructured":"Nash JF (1953) Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica 21(1):128\u2013140","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"issue":"4","key":"872_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1016\/0165-4896(82)90029-4","volume":"2","author":"B O\u2019Neill","year":"1982","unstructured":"O\u2019Neill B (1982) A problem of rights arbitration from the talmud. Math Soc Sci 2(4):345\u2013371","journal-title":"Math Soc Sci"},{"issue":"5","key":"872_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.2307\/2951543","volume":"60","author":"A Rubinstein","year":"1992","unstructured":"Rubinstein A, Safra Z, Thomson W (1992) On the interpretation of the nash bargaining solution and its extension to non-expected utility preferences. Econometrica 60(5):1171\u20131186","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"issue":"2","key":"872_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1016\/S0899-8256(02)00552-3","volume":"42","author":"D Schmidt","year":"2003","unstructured":"Schmidt D, Shupp R, Walker JM, Ostrom E (2003) Playing safe in coordination games: the roles of risk dominance, payoff dominance, and history of play. Games Econ Behav 42(2):281\u2013299","journal-title":"Games Econ Behav"},{"issue":"1","key":"872_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1177\/0022002794038001006","volume":"38","author":"B Sopher","year":"1994","unstructured":"Sopher B (1994) Concession behavior in a bargaining game: a laboratory test of the risk dominance principle. J Confl Resolut 38(1):117\u2013137","journal-title":"J Confl Resolut"},{"issue":"4","key":"872_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/1062-9769(95)90048-9","volume":"35","author":"PG Straub","year":"1995","unstructured":"Straub PG (1995) Risk dominance and coordination failures in static games. Q Rev Econ Finance 35(4):339\u2013363","journal-title":"Q Rev Econ Finance"},{"issue":"5","key":"872_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1055","DOI":"10.2307\/1912322","volume":"54","author":"J Svejnar","year":"1986","unstructured":"Svejnar J (1986) Bargaining power, fear of disagreement, and wage settlements: theory and evidence from US industry. Econometrica 54(5):1055\u20131078","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"issue":"3","key":"872_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1016\/S0165-4896(02)00070-7","volume":"45","author":"W Thomson","year":"2003","unstructured":"Thomson W (2003) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. Math Soc Sci 45(3):249\u2013297","journal-title":"Math Soc Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"872_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.2307\/1914185","volume":"47","author":"A Tversky","year":"1979","unstructured":"Tversky A, Kahneman D (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263\u2013292","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"issue":"1","key":"872_CR26","first-page":"234","volume":"80","author":"JB Van Huyck","year":"1990","unstructured":"Van Huyck JB, Battalio RC, Beil RO (1990) Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. Am Econ Rev 80(1):234\u2013248","journal-title":"Am Econ Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"872_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1006\/jeth.1993.1009","volume":"59","author":"HP Young","year":"1993","unstructured":"Young HP (1993) An evolutionary model of bargaining. J Econ Theory 59(1):145\u2013168","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"issue":"5","key":"872_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.1007\/s10784-017-9351-3","volume":"17","author":"S Yu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yu S, van Ierland E, Weikard H-P, Zhu X (2017) Nash bargaining solutions for international climate agreements under different sets of bargaining weights. Int Environ Agreem Politics Law Econ 17(5):709\u2013729","journal-title":"Int Environ Agreem Politics Law Econ"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Game Theory"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00182-023-00872-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00182-023-00872-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00182-023-00872-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,23]],"date-time":"2024-12-23T12:03:41Z","timestamp":1734955421000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00182-023-00872-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,9]]}},"alternative-id":["872"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00182-023-00872-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7276","1432-1270"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7276","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-1270","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"6 September 2023","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 October 2023","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}