{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,16]],"date-time":"2026-03-16T11:48:57Z","timestamp":1773661737991,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,26]],"date-time":"2012-01-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1327536000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Soc Choice Welf"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-011-0648-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,26]],"date-time":"2012-01-26T01:27:11Z","timestamp":1327541231000},"page":"871-911","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["A characterization of the uniform rule with several commodities and agents"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"Shuhei","family":"Morimoto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shigehiro","family":"Serizawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stephen","family":"Ching","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"648_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"952","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmateco.2010.08.019","volume":"46","author":"T Adachi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Adachi T (2010) The uniform rule with several commodities: a generalization of Sprumont\u2019s characterization. J Math Econ 46: 952\u2013964","journal-title":"J Math Econ"},{"key":"648_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1007\/s355-002-8325-6","volume":"19","author":"P Amor\u00f3s","year":"2002","unstructured":"Amor\u00f3s P (2002) Single-peaked preferences with several commodities. Soc Choice Welf 19: 57\u201367","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"648_CR3","unstructured":"Anno H, Sasaki H (2009) Second-best efficiency of allocation rules: strategy-proofness and single-peaked preferences with multiple commodities. Working Paper, Waseda University"},{"key":"648_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.2307\/2951697","volume":"51","author":"S Barber\u00e0","year":"1995","unstructured":"Barber\u00e0 S, Jackson MO (1995) Strategy-proof exchange. Econometrica 51: 51\u201387","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"648_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1006\/jeth.1993.1069","volume":"61","author":"S Barber\u00e0","year":"1993","unstructured":"Barber\u00e0 S, Gul F, Stacchetti E (1993) Generalized median voter schemes and committees. J Econ Theory 61: 262\u2013289","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"key":"648_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1006\/game.1997.0511","volume":"18","author":"S Barber\u00e0","year":"1997","unstructured":"Barber\u00e0 S, Jackson MO, Neme A (1997) Strategy-proof allotment rules. Games Econ Behav 18: 1\u201321","journal-title":"Games Econ Behav"},{"key":"648_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1006\/game.1997.0643","volume":"25","author":"S Barber\u00e0","year":"1998","unstructured":"Barber\u00e0 S, Mass\u00f3 J, Serizawa S (1998) Strategy-proof voting on compact ranges. Games Econ Behav 25: 272\u2013291","journal-title":"Games Econ Behav"},{"key":"648_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1648","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jet.2010.03.006","volume":"145","author":"S Barber\u00e0","year":"2010","unstructured":"Barber\u00e0 S, Berga D, Moreno B (2010) Individual versus group strategy-proofness: when do they coincide?. J Econ Theory 145: 1648\u20131674","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"key":"648_CR9","volume-title":"The economics of market disequilibrium","author":"JP B\u00e9nassy","year":"1982","unstructured":"B\u00e9nassy JP (1982) The economics of market disequilibrium. Academic Press, New York"},{"key":"648_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jet.2004.05.004","volume":"123","author":"A Bogomolnaia","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bogomolnaia A, Deb R, Ehlers L (2005) Strategy-proof assignment on the full preference domain. J Econ Theory 123: 161\u2013186","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"key":"648_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.2307\/2296962","volume":"50","author":"KC Border","year":"1983","unstructured":"Border KC, Jordan JS (1983) Straightforward elections, unanimity and phantom voters. Rev Econ Stud 50: 153\u2013170","journal-title":"Rev Econ Stud"},{"key":"648_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00179209","volume":"11","author":"S Ching","year":"1994","unstructured":"Ching S (1994) An alternative characterization of the uniform rule. Soc Choice Welf 11: 131\u2013136","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"648_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1006\/jeth.1997.2337","volume":"78","author":"S Ching","year":"1998","unstructured":"Ching S, Serizawa S (1998) A maximal domain for the existence of strategy-proof rules. J Econ Theory 78: 157\u2013166","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"key":"648_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-003-0259-1","volume":"21","author":"L Ehlers","year":"2003","unstructured":"Ehlers L, Klaus B (2003) Coalitional strategy-proof and resource-monotonic solutions for multiple assignment problems. Soc Choice Welf 21: 265\u2013280","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"648_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1215","DOI":"10.2307\/2171885","volume":"65","author":"M Fleurbaey","year":"1997","unstructured":"Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F (1997) Implementability and horizontal equity imply no-envy. Econometrica 65: 1215\u20131219","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"648_CR16","first-page":"45","volume":"7","author":"D Foley","year":"1967","unstructured":"Foley D (1967) Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Econ Essays 7: 45\u201398","journal-title":"Yale Econ Essays"},{"key":"648_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-009-0376-6","volume":"33","author":"JW Hatfield","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hatfield JW (2009) Strategy-proof, efficient, and nonbossy quota allocations. Soc Choice Welf 33: 505\u2013515","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"648_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"605","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0262.00038","volume":"67","author":"M Le Breton","year":"1999","unstructured":"Le Breton M, Sen A (1999) Separable preferences, strategyproofness, and decomposability. Econometrica 67: 605\u2013628","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"648_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-008-0358-0","volume":"33","author":"M Le Breton","year":"2009","unstructured":"Le Breton M, Zaporozhets V (2009) On the equivalence of coalitional and individual strategy-proofness properties. Soc Choice Welf 33: 287\u2013309","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"648_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-937X.00076","volume":"66","author":"E Maskin","year":"1999","unstructured":"Maskin E (1999) Nash equilibrium and welfare optimality. Rev Econ Stud 66: 23\u201338","journal-title":"Rev Econ Stud"},{"key":"648_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1006\/game.2001.0850","volume":"37","author":"J Mass\u00f3","year":"2001","unstructured":"Mass\u00f3 J, Neme A (2001) Maximal domain of preferences in the division problem. Games Econ Behav 37: 367\u2013387","journal-title":"Games Econ Behav"},{"key":"648_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geb.2007.01.006","volume":"61","author":"J Mass\u00f3","year":"2007","unstructured":"Mass\u00f3 J, Neme A (2007) Bribe-proof rules in the division problem. Games Econ Behav 61: 331\u2013343","journal-title":"Games Econ Behav"},{"key":"648_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1006\/jeth.2000.2703","volume":"100","author":"E Miyagawa","year":"2001","unstructured":"Miyagawa E (2001) House allocation with transfers. J Econ Theory 100: 329\u2013355","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"key":"648_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-006-0112-4","volume":"27","author":"H Mizobuchi","year":"2006","unstructured":"Mizobuchi H, Serizawa S (2006) Maximal domain for strategy-proof rules in allotment economies. Soc Choice Welf 27: 195\u2013210","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"648_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morimoto S, Serizawa S, Ching S (2010) A characterization of the uniform rule with several commodities and agents. Osaka University, ISER discussion paper no. 769","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.1547465"},{"key":"648_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00128122","volume":"35","author":"H Moulin","year":"1980","unstructured":"Moulin H (1980) On strategy-proofness and single-peakedness. Public Choice 35: 437\u2013456","journal-title":"Public Choice"},{"key":"648_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01213907","volume":"7","author":"G Otten","year":"1996","unstructured":"Otten G, Peters H, Volij O (1996) Two characterizations of the uniform rule for division problems with single-peaked preferences. Econ Theory 7: 291\u2013306","journal-title":"Econ Theory"},{"key":"648_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1403","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0262.00166","volume":"68","author":"S P\u00e1pai","year":"2000","unstructured":"P\u00e1pai S (2000) Strategyproof assignment by hierarchical exchange. Econometrica 68: 1403\u20131433","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"648_CR29","unstructured":"Sasaki H (2003) Limitation of efficiency: strategy-proofness and single-peaked preferences with many commodities. Working paper, Rice University"},{"key":"648_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.2307\/2297198","volume":"48","author":"MA Satterthwaite","year":"1981","unstructured":"Satterthwaite MA, Sonnenschein H (1981) Strategy-proof allocation mechanisms at differentiable points. Rev of Econ Stud 48: 587\u2013597","journal-title":"Rev of Econ Stud"},{"key":"648_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1006\/game.1999.0718","volume":"30","author":"J Schummer","year":"2000","unstructured":"Schummer J (2000) Eliciting preferences to assign positions and compensation. Games Econ Behav 30: 293\u2013318","journal-title":"Games Econ Behav"},{"key":"648_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01213663","volume":"7","author":"S Serizawa","year":"1996","unstructured":"Serizawa S (1996) Strategy-proof and individually rational social choice functions for public good economies. Econ Theory 7: 501\u2013512","journal-title":"Econ Theory"},{"key":"648_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1006\/jeth.2002.2940","volume":"106","author":"S Serizawa","year":"2002","unstructured":"Serizawa S (2002) Inefficiency of strategy-proof rules for pure exchange economies. J Econ Theory 106: 219\u2013241","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"key":"648_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-006-0099-x","volume":"26","author":"S Serizawa","year":"2006","unstructured":"Serizawa S (2006) Pairwise strategy-proofness and self-enforcing manipulation. Soc Choice Welf 26: 305\u2013331","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"648_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.2307\/2938268","volume":"59","author":"Y Sprumont","year":"1991","unstructured":"Sprumont Y (1991) The division problem with single-peaked preferences: a characterization of the uniform allocation rule. Econometrica 59: 509\u2013519","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"648_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1007\/s001990100232","volume":"20","author":"L-G Svensson","year":"2002","unstructured":"Svensson L-G, Larsson B (2002) Strategy-proof and nonbossy allocation of indivisible goods and money. Econ Theory 20: 483\u2013502","journal-title":"Econ Theory"},{"key":"648_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thomson W (1990) The consistency principle. In: Ichiishi T, Neyman A, Tauman Y (eds) Game theory and applications, proceedings of the 1987 international conference, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Academic Press, pp 187\u2013215","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-370182-4.50015-5"},{"key":"648_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1006\/jeth.1994.1041","volume":"63","author":"W Thomson","year":"1994","unstructured":"Thomson W (1994a) Consistent solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked. J Econ Theory 63: 219\u2013245","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"key":"648_CR39","first-page":"205","volume":"11","author":"W Thomson","year":"1994","unstructured":"Thomson W (1994b) Resource-monotonic solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked. Soc Choice Welf 11: 205\u2013223","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"648_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01215201","volume":"5","author":"W Thomson","year":"1995","unstructured":"Thomson W (1995) Population-monotonic solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked. Econ Theory 5: 229\u2013246","journal-title":"Econ Theory"},{"key":"648_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1006\/jeth.1997.2294","volume":"76","author":"W Thomson","year":"1997","unstructured":"Thomson W (1997) The replacement principle in economies with single-peaked preferences. J Econ Theory 76: 145\u2013168","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"key":"648_CR42","volume-title":"Consistency and its converse: an elementary introduction","author":"W Thomson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Thomson W (2004) Consistency and its converse: an elementary introduction. University of Rochester, Mimeo"},{"key":"648_CR43","first-page":"1","volume":"14","author":"W Thomson","year":"2010","unstructured":"Thomson W (2010) Implementation of solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked. Rev Econ Des 14: 1\u201315","journal-title":"Rev Econ Des"}],"container-title":["Social Choice and Welfare"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00355-011-0648-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00355-011-0648-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00355-011-0648-9","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,22]],"date-time":"2019-06-22T23:06:54Z","timestamp":1561244814000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00355-011-0648-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,26]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]}},"alternative-id":["648"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00355-011-0648-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0176-1714","1432-217X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0176-1714","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-217X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,26]]}}}