{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,24]],"date-time":"2026-01-24T14:59:53Z","timestamp":1769266793935,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]],"date-time":"2016-11-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1480291200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Soc Choice Welf"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-016-1006-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]],"date-time":"2016-11-28T02:56:28Z","timestamp":1480301788000},"page":"327-356","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"48","author":[{"given":"J\u00e9r\u00f4me","family":"Lang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Gabriella","family":"Pigozzi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Marija","family":"Slavkovik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Leendert","family":"van der Torre","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Srdjan","family":"Vesic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"1006_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-47904-9_6","volume-title":"Economics and computation, chap 6","author":"D Baumeister","year":"2016","unstructured":"Baumeister D, Erd\u00e9lyi G, Rothe J (2016) Judgment aggregation. In: Rothe J (ed) Economics and computation, chap 6. Springer, Berlin, pp 361\u2013394"},{"key":"1006_CR2","volume-title":"Handbook of social choice and welfare","author":"S Brams","year":"2004","unstructured":"Brams S, Fishburn P (2004) Chapter 4: Voting procedures. In: Arrow K, Sen A, Suzumura K (eds) Handbook of social choice and welfare. Elsevier, Amsterdam"},{"issue":"4","key":"1006_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-013-0757-8","volume":"42","author":"F Dietrich","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dietrich F (2014) Scoring rules for judgment aggregation. Soc Choice Welf 42(4):873\u2013911","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"issue":"1","key":"1006_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-006-0196-x","volume":"29","author":"F Dietrich","year":"2007","unstructured":"Dietrich F, List C (2007a) Arrow\u2019s theorem in judgment aggregation. Soc Choice Welf 29(1):19\u201333","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"issue":"19","key":"1006_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1177\/0951629807080775","volume":"4","author":"F Dietrich","year":"2007","unstructured":"Dietrich F, List C (2007b) Judgment aggregation by quota rules: majority voting generalized. J Theor Polit 4(19):391\u2013424","journal-title":"J Theor Polit"},{"key":"1006_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266267107001496","volume":"23","author":"F Dietrich","year":"2007","unstructured":"Dietrich F, List C (2007c) Strategy-proof judgment aggregation. Econ Philos 23:269\u2013300","journal-title":"Econ Philos"},{"issue":"1","key":"1006_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-007-0263-y","volume":"31","author":"F Dietrich","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dietrich F, List C (2008) A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation. Soc Choice Welf 31(1):59\u201378","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"issue":"2","key":"1006_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"562","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jet.2010.01.011","volume":"145","author":"F Dietrich","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dietrich F, Mongin P (2010) The premise-based approach to judgment aggregation. J Econ Theory 145(2):562\u2013582","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"issue":"4","key":"1006_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-011-0565-y","volume":"39","author":"C Duddy","year":"2012","unstructured":"Duddy C, Piggins A (2012) A measure of distance between judgment sets. Soc Choice Welf 39(4):855\u2013867","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"1006_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Duddy C, Piggins A, Zwicker WS (2016) Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach. Soc Choice Welf 46(2):301\u2013333. doi: 10.1007\/s00355-015-0914-3","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-015-0914-3"},{"key":"1006_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Elkind E, Faliszewski P, Slinko A (2009) On distance rationalizability of some voting rules. In: Proceedings of the 12th conference on theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge, pp 108\u2013117","DOI":"10.1145\/1562814.1562831"},{"key":"1006_CR12","volume-title":"Handbook of computational social choice, chap 17","author":"U Endriss","year":"2016","unstructured":"Endriss U (2016) Judgment aggregation. In: Brandt F, Conitzer Brandt V, Endriss U, Lang J, Procaccia AD (eds) Handbook of computational social choice, chap 17. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"1006_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.3708","volume":"45","author":"U Endriss","year":"2012","unstructured":"Endriss U, Grandi U, Porello D (2012) Complexity of judgment aggregation. J Artif Intell Res 45:481\u2013514","journal-title":"J Artif Intell Res"},{"key":"1006_CR14","unstructured":"Endriss U, Grandi U, de\u00a0Haan R, Lang J (2016) Succinctness of languages for judgment aggregation. In: Principles of knowledge representation and reasoning: proceedings of the fifteenth international conference, KR 2016, Cape Town, South Africa, April 25\u201329, 2016, pp 176\u2013186"},{"key":"1006_CR15","unstructured":"Everaere P, Konieczny S, Marquis P (2014) Counting votes for aggregating judgments. In: International conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, pp 1177\u20131184"},{"key":"1006_CR16","unstructured":"Everaere P, Konieczny S, Marquis P (2015) Belief merging versus judgment aggregation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS 2015, Istanbul, Turkey, May 4\u20138, 2015, pp 999\u20131007"},{"key":"1006_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2013.05.001","volume":"199","author":"U Grandi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Grandi U, Endriss U (2013) Lifting integrity constraints in binary aggregation. Artif Intell 199:45\u201366","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"1006_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Grossi D, Pigozzi G (2014) Judgment aggregation: a primer. Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael. doi: 10.2200\/S00559ED1V01Y201312AIM027","DOI":"10.2200\/S00559ED1V01Y201312AIM027"},{"issue":"5","key":"1006_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/12.5.773","volume":"12","author":"S Konieczny","year":"2002","unstructured":"Konieczny S, Pino-P\u00e9rez R (2002) Merging information under constraints: a logical framework. J Log Comput 12(5):773\u2013808","journal-title":"J Log Comput"},{"key":"1006_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lang J (2015) Twenty-five years of preferred subtheories. In: Eiter T, Strass H, Truszczynski M, Woltran S (eds.) Advances in knowledge representation, logic programming, and abstract argumentation\u2014essays dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9060, pp 157\u2013172. Springer, Berlin","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-14726-0_11"},{"key":"1006_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lang J, Slavkovik M (2013) Judgment aggregation rules and voting rules. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on algorithmic decision theory. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol 8176, pp 230\u2013244. Springer, Berlin","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-41575-3_18"},{"key":"1006_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lang J, Pigozzi G, Slavkovik M, van der Torre L (2011) Judgment aggregation rules based on minimization. In: TARK XIII Proceedings of the 13th conference on theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge, Groningen, The Netherlands, 12\u201314 July 2011. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 238\u2013246","DOI":"10.1145\/2000378.2000407"},{"key":"1006_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"List C, Pettit C (2004) Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. Synthese 104(1\u20132):207\u2013235","DOI":"10.1023\/B:SYNT.0000029950.50517.59"},{"key":"1006_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"List C, Puppe C (2009) Judgment aggregation: a survey. In: Handbook of rational and social choice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 457\u2013482","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199290420.003.0020"},{"issue":"4","key":"1006_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-008-0340-x","volume":"32","author":"M Miller","year":"2009","unstructured":"Miller M, Osherson D (2009) Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation. Soc Choice Welf 32(4):575\u2013601","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"1006_CR26","unstructured":"Nehring K, Pivato M (2013) Majority rule in the absence of a majority. MPRA Paper 46721, University Library of Munich, Germany. http:\/\/ideas.repec.org\/p\/pra\/mprapa\/46721.html"},{"key":"1006_CR27","unstructured":"Nehring K, Pivato M (2016) The median rule in judgment aggregation. Technical report"},{"key":"1006_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jet.2013.12.013","volume":"151","author":"K Nehring","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nehring K, Pivato M, Puppe C (2014) The Condorcet set: majority voting over interconnected decisions. J Econ Theory 151:268\u2013303","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"key":"1006_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0951629815586884","author":"K Nehring","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nehring K, Pivato M, Puppe C (2015) Unanimity overruled: majority voting and the burden of history. J Theor Polit. doi: 10.1177\/0951629815586884","journal-title":"J Theor Polit"},{"issue":"2","key":"1006_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-006-9063-7","volume":"152","author":"G Pigozzi","year":"2006","unstructured":"Pigozzi G (2006) Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation. Synthese 152(2):285\u2013298","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"1006_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pigozzi G, Slavkovik M, van\u00a0der Torre L (2009) A complete conclusion-based procedure for judgment aggregation. In: Rossi F, Tsouki\u00e0s A (eds.) 1rst International conference on algorithmic decision theory, Venice, Italy, October 20\u201323, 2009. Proceedings. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5783, pp 1\u201313. Springer, Berlin","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-04428-1_1"},{"key":"1006_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Slavkovik M, \u00c5gotnes T (2014) Measuring dissimilarity between judgment sets. In: Logics in artificial intelligence. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8761, pp 609\u2013617. Springer International Publishing, Berlin","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-11558-0_44"},{"issue":"3","key":"1006_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00433944","volume":"4","author":"TN Tideman","year":"1987","unstructured":"Tideman TN (1987) Independence of clones as a criterion for voting rules. Soc Choice Welf 4(3):185\u2013206","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"issue":"2","key":"1006_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-0531(77)90012-6","volume":"16","author":"H Young","year":"1977","unstructured":"Young H (1977) Extending Condorcet\u2019s rule. J Econ Theory 16(2):335\u2013353","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"issue":"35","key":"1006_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1137\/0135023","volume":"2","author":"H Young","year":"1978","unstructured":"Young H, Levenglick A (1978) A consistent extension of Condorcet\u2019s election principle. SIAM J Appl Math 2(35):285\u2013300","journal-title":"SIAM J Appl Math"},{"key":"1006_CR36","unstructured":"Zwicker W (2011) Towards a Borda count for judgment aggregation. Working paper"},{"key":"1006_CR37","unstructured":"Zwicker W (2014) Voting: an introduction. In: Handbook of computational social choice. Oxford University Press, Oxford"}],"container-title":["Social Choice and Welfare"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00355-016-1006-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00355-016-1006-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00355-016-1006-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,15]],"date-time":"2019-09-15T20:56:09Z","timestamp":1568580969000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00355-016-1006-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]}},"alternative-id":["1006"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00355-016-1006-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0176-1714","1432-217X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0176-1714","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-217X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]]}}}