{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,5]],"date-time":"2026-05-05T14:55:47Z","timestamp":1777992947740,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2-3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,26]],"date-time":"2018-11-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1543190400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Soc Choice Welf"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-018-1162-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,26]],"date-time":"2018-11-26T09:50:34Z","timestamp":1543225834000},"page":"363-395","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["The theoretical Shapley\u2013Shubik probability of an election inversion in a toy symmetric version of the US presidential electoral system"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"54","author":[{"given":"Olivier","family":"de Mouzon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Thibault","family":"Laurent","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michel","family":"Le Breton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dominique","family":"Lepelley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"1162_CR1","first-page":"317","volume":"19","author":"JF Banzhaf","year":"1965","unstructured":"Banzhaf JF (1965) Weighted voting does not work: a mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Rev 19:317\u2013343","journal-title":"Rutgers Law Rev"},{"key":"1162_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1309","DOI":"10.2307\/795047","volume":"75","author":"JF Banzhaf","year":"1966","unstructured":"Banzhaf JF (1966) Multi-member electoral districts: do they violate the one man, one vote principle. Yale Law J 75:1309\u20131338","journal-title":"Yale Law J"},{"key":"1162_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-0531(81)90022-3","volume":"25","author":"G Chamberlain","year":"1981","unstructured":"Chamberlain G, Rothschild M (1981) A note on the probability of casting a decisive vote. J Econ Theory 25:152\u2013162","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"key":"1162_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1007\/s00199-003-0375-2","volume":"23","author":"MR Feix","year":"2004","unstructured":"Feix MR, Lepelley D, Merlin V, Rouet JL (2004) The probability of conflicts in a U.S. presidential type election. Econ Theory 23:227\u2013257","journal-title":"Econ Theory"},{"key":"1162_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-03107-6","volume-title":"Voting paradoxes and group coherence","author":"WV Gehrlein","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gehrlein WV, Lepelley D (2011) Voting paradoxes and group coherence. Springer, Berlin"},{"key":"1162_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01718459","volume":"28","author":"PC Fishburn","year":"1976","unstructured":"Fishburn PC, Gehrlein WV (1976) Borda\u2019s rule, positional voting, and Condorcet\u2019s simple majority principle. Public Choice 28:79\u201388","journal-title":"Public Choice"},{"key":"1162_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1002\/bs.3830200104","volume":"20","author":"IJ Good","year":"1975","unstructured":"Good IJ, Mayer LS (1975) Estimating the efficacy of a vote. Behav Sci 20:25\u201333","journal-title":"Behav Sci"},{"key":"1162_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1080\/0022250X.1975.9989842","volume":"4","author":"MJ Hinich","year":"1972","unstructured":"Hinich MJ, Mickelsen R, Ordeshook PC (1972) The electoral college versus a direct vote: policy bias, reversals, and indeterminate outcomes. J Math Sociol 4:3\u201335","journal-title":"J Math Sociol"},{"key":"1162_CR9","volume-title":"The probability of majority inversion in a two-stage voting system with three states","author":"S Kaniovski","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kaniovski S, Zaigraev A (2017) The probability of majority inversion in a two-stage voting system with three states. Austrian Institute of Economic Research, Mimeo"},{"key":"1162_CR10","volume-title":"The likelihood of majority inversion in an indirect voting system","author":"K Kikuchi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kikuchi K (2017) The likelihood of majority inversion in an indirect voting system. Waseda University, Mimeo"},{"key":"1162_CR11","volume-title":"A note on election inversion","author":"K Kikuchi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kikuchi K (2018) A note on election inversion. Private Correspondence, Mimeo"},{"key":"1162_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.2307\/1914217","volume":"42","author":"K Kuga","year":"1974","unstructured":"Kuga K, Nagatani H (1974) Voter antagonism and the paradox of voting. Econometrica 42:1045\u20131067","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"1162_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.3917\/reco.653.0469","volume":"65","author":"M Breton Le","year":"2014","unstructured":"Le Breton M, Lepelley D (2014) Une analyse de la loi \u00e9lectorale du 29 Juin 1820. Rev \u00c9con 65:469\u2013518","journal-title":"Rev \u00c9con"},{"key":"1162_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmateco.2016.03.001","volume":"64","author":"M Breton Le","year":"2016","unstructured":"Le Breton M, Lepelley D, Smaoui H (2016) Correlation, partitioning and the probability of casting a decisive vote under the majority rule. J Math Econ 64:11\u201322","journal-title":"J Math Econ"},{"key":"1162_CR15","first-page":"227","volume":"23","author":"D Lepelley","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lepelley D, Merlin V, Rouet JL (2011) Three ways to compute accurately the probability of the referendum paradox. Math Soc Sci 23:227\u2013257","journal-title":"Math Soc Sci"},{"key":"1162_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1080\/00029890.1948.11999218","volume":"55","author":"K May","year":"1948","unstructured":"May K (1948) Probability of certain election results. Am Math Mon 55:203\u2013209","journal-title":"Am Math Mon"},{"key":"1162_CR17","volume-title":"Electoral systems, studies in social choice and welfare","author":"NR Miller","year":"2012","unstructured":"Miller NR (2012a) \u201cElection inversions by the U.S. Electoral College\u201d, Chapter 4. In: Felsenthal DDS, Machover M (eds) Electoral systems, studies in social choice and welfare. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg"},{"key":"1162_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11127-011-9874-z","volume":"150","author":"NR Miller","year":"2012","unstructured":"Miller NR (2012b) Why the Electoral College is good for political science (and public choice). Public Choice 150:1\u201325","journal-title":"Public Choice"},{"key":"1162_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-03782-9","volume-title":"Voting paradoxes and how to deal with them","author":"H Nurmi","year":"1999","unstructured":"Nurmi H (1999) Voting paradoxes and how to deal with them. Springer-Verlag, Berlin"},{"key":"1162_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.2307\/1958409","volume":"69","author":"G Owen","year":"1975","unstructured":"Owen G (1975) Evaluation of a presidential election game. Am Polit Sci Rev 69:947\u2013953","journal-title":"Am Polit Sci Rev"},{"key":"1162_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.2307\/1951053","volume":"48","author":"LS Shapley","year":"1954","unstructured":"Shapley LS, Shubik M (1954) A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. Am Polit Sci Rev 48:787\u2013792","journal-title":"Am Polit Sci Rev"},{"key":"1162_CR22","volume-title":"The Shapley value: essays in honor of Lloyd S","author":"PD Straffin","year":"1988","unstructured":"Straffin PD (1988) The Shapley-Shubik and Banzhaf power indices as probabilities. In: Roth AE (ed) The Shapley value: essays in honor of Lloyd S. Cambridge University Press, Shapley"},{"key":"1162_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.2307\/1958782","volume":"67","author":"ER Tufte","year":"1973","unstructured":"Tufte ER (1973) The relationship between seats and votes in two-party systems. Am J Polit Sci 67:540\u2013554","journal-title":"Am J Polit Sci"}],"container-title":["Social Choice and Welfare"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00355-018-1162-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00355-018-1162-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00355-018-1162-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,13]],"date-time":"2020-03-13T06:50:41Z","timestamp":1584082241000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00355-018-1162-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,26]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2-3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]}},"alternative-id":["1162"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00355-018-1162-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0176-1714","1432-217X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0176-1714","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-217X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"26 November 2018","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}