{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,27]],"date-time":"2026-03-27T13:56:38Z","timestamp":1774619798730,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,29]],"date-time":"2020-10-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1603929600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,29]],"date-time":"2020-10-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1603929600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001659","name":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["SFB 884"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["SFB 884"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001659","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Erasmus University"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Soc Choice Welf"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>We elicit distributional fairness ideals of impartial spectators using an incentivized experiment in a large and heterogeneous sample of the German population. We document several empirical facts: (i) egalitarianism is more popular than efficiency- and maxi-min ideals; (ii) females are more egalitarian than men; (iii) men are relatively more efficiency minded; (iv) left-leaning voters are more likely to be egalitarians, whereas right-leaning voters are more likely to be efficiency-minded; and (v) young and high-educated participants hold different fairness ideals than the rest of the population. Moreover, we show that fairness ideals predict preferences for redistribution and intervention by the government, as well as actual charitable giving, even after controlling for a range of covariates. This paper thus contributes to our understanding of the underpinnings of voting behavior and ideological preferences and to the literature that links laboratory measures and field behavior.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-020-01289-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,29]],"date-time":"2020-10-29T22:02:17Z","timestamp":1604008937000},"page":"679-711","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Fairness views and political preferences: evidence from a large and heterogeneous sample"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"56","author":[{"given":"Daniel","family":"M\u00fcller","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2495-9219","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sander","family":"Renes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,29]]},"reference":[{"issue":"02","key":"1289_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266267113000175","volume":"29","author":"F Aguiar","year":"2013","unstructured":"Aguiar F, Becker A, Miller L (2013) Whose impartiality? An experimental study of veiled stakeholders, involved spectators and detached observers. Econ Philos 29(02):155\u2013174","journal-title":"Econ Philos"},{"issue":"4","key":"1289_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1507","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.97.4.1507","volume":"97","author":"A Alesina","year":"2007","unstructured":"Alesina A, Fuchs-Sch\u00fcndeln N (2007) Goodbye lenin (or not?): the effect of communism on people\u2019s preferences. Am Econ Rev 97(4):1507\u20131528","journal-title":"Am Econ Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"1289_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2269","DOI":"10.3982\/ECTA10637","volume":"81","author":"I Alger","year":"2013","unstructured":"Alger I, Weibull JW (2013) Homo moralis\u2013preference evolution under incomplete information and assortative matching. Econometrica 81(6):2269\u20132302","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"1289_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alm\u00e5s I, Cappelen AW, Tungodden B (2019) Cutthroat capitalism versus cuddly socialism: Are americans more meritocratic and efficiency-seeking than scandinavians? Journal of Political Economy","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3343315"},{"issue":"2","key":"1289_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-008-0324-x","volume":"32","author":"Y Amiel","year":"2009","unstructured":"Amiel Y, Cowell FA, Gaertner W (2009) To be or not to be involved: a questionnaire-experimental view on Harsanyi\u2019s utilitarian ethics. Soc Choice Welf 32(2):299\u2013316","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"issue":"1","key":"1289_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1162\/003355301556419","volume":"116","author":"J Andreoni","year":"2001","unstructured":"Andreoni J, Vesterlund L (2001) Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Q J Econ 116(1):293\u2013312","journal-title":"Q J Econ"},{"key":"1289_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Becchetti L, Antoni GD, Ottone S, Solferino N (2011) Spectators versus stakeholders with or without veil of ignorance: the difference it makes for justice and chosen distribution criteria. Working Paper","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2007180"},{"issue":"4","key":"1289_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"815","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0262.2008.00860.x","volume":"76","author":"C Bellemare","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bellemare C, Kr\u00f6ger S, Van Soest A (2008) Measuring inequity aversion in a heterogeneous population using experimental decisions and subjective probabilities. Econometrica 76(4):815\u2013839","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"1289_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blom AG, Gathmann C, Krieger U (2015) Setting up an online panel representative of the general population the german internet panel. Field Methods, 27(4):391\u2013408","DOI":"10.1177\/1525822X15574494"},{"issue":"1","key":"1289_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1177\/0894439315574825","volume":"34","author":"AG Blom","year":"2016","unstructured":"Blom AG, Bosnjak M, Cornilleau A, Cousteaux A-S, Das M, Douhou S, Krieger U (2016) A comparison of four probability-based online and mixed-mode panels in Europe. Soc Sci Comput Rev 34(1):8\u201325","journal-title":"Soc Sci Comput Rev"},{"key":"1289_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blom AG, Herzing JME, Cornesse C, Sakshaug JW, Krieger U, Bossert D (2017) Does the recruitment of offline households increase the sample representativeness of probability-based online panels? evidence from the german internet panel. Social Science Computer Review, 35(4):498\u2013520","DOI":"10.1177\/0894439316651584"},{"key":"1289_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) Erc: a theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Am Econ Rev, pp 166\u2013193","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.90.1.166"},{"key":"1289_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/S1049-2585(04)11005-3","volume":"11","author":"K Bosmans","year":"2004","unstructured":"Bosmans K, Schokkaert E (2004) Social welfare, the veil of ignorance and purely individual risk: An empirical examination. Research on Economic Inequality 11:85\u2013114","journal-title":"Research on Economic Inequality"},{"key":"1289_CR14","unstructured":"Brafman RI, Tennenholtz M (1997) On the axiomatization of qualitative decision criteria. In: AAAI\/IAAI, pp 76\u201381. Citeseer"},{"key":"1289_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cappelen AW, Hole AD, S\u00f8rensen E, Tungodden B (2007) The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach. American Economic Review, 97(3):818\u2013827","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.97.3.818"},{"issue":"4","key":"1289_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1398","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.103.4.1398","volume":"103","author":"AW Cappelen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cappelen AW, Konow J, S\u00f8rensen E, Tungodden B (2013) Just luck: an experimental study of risk-taking and fairness. Am Econ Rev 103(4):1398\u20131413","journal-title":"Am Econ Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"1289_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1306","DOI":"10.1111\/sjoe.12114","volume":"117","author":"AW Cappelen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cappelen AW, Nygaard K, S\u00f8rensen E, Tungodden B (2015) Social preferences in the lab: a comparison of students and a representative population. Scand J Econ 117(4):1306\u20131326","journal-title":"Scand J Econ"},{"issue":"11","key":"1289_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3739","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.2016.2535","volume":"63","author":"E Cettolin","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cettolin E, Riedl A (2016) Justice under uncertainty. Manage Sci 63(11):3739\u20133759","journal-title":"Manage Sci"},{"key":"1289_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Q J Econ, pp 817\u2013869","DOI":"10.1162\/003355302760193904"},{"issue":"3","key":"1289_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jebo.2008.10.007","volume":"69","author":"R Croson","year":"2009","unstructured":"Croson R, Konow J (2009) Social preferences and moral biases. J Econ Behav Org 69(3):201\u2013212","journal-title":"J Econ Behav Org"},{"issue":"4","key":"1289_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1007\/s10683-011-9283-7","volume":"14","author":"C Engel","year":"2011","unstructured":"Engel C (2011) Dictator games: a meta study. Exp Econ 14(4):583\u2013610","journal-title":"Exp Econ"},{"key":"1289_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Engelmann D, Strobel M (2004) Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. Am Econ Rev, pp 857\u2013869","DOI":"10.1257\/0002828042002741"},{"key":"1289_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ, pp 817\u2013868","DOI":"10.1162\/003355399556151"},{"issue":"5","key":"1289_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1858","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.97.5.1858","volume":"97","author":"R Fisman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Fisman R, Kariv S, Markovits D (2007) Individual preferences for giving. Am Econ Rev 97(5):1858\u20131876","journal-title":"Am Econ Rev"},{"key":"1289_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpubeco.2017.08.010","volume":"155","author":"R Fisman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fisman R, Jakiela P, Kariv S (2017) Distributional preferences and political behavior. J Public Econ 155:1\u201310","journal-title":"J Public Econ"},{"issue":"02","key":"1289_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.2307\/1963529","volume":"84","author":"N Frohlich","year":"1990","unstructured":"Frohlich N, Oppenheimer JA (1990) Choosing justice in experimental democracies with production. Am Polit Sci Rev 84(02):461\u2013477","journal-title":"Am Polit Sci Rev"},{"key":"1289_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1525\/9780520914490","volume-title":"Choosing justice: an experimental approach to ethical theory","author":"N Frohlich","year":"1992","unstructured":"Frohlich N, Oppenheimer JA (1992) Choosing justice: an experimental approach to ethical theory, vol 22. University of California Press, California"},{"key":"1289_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frohlich N, Oppenheimer JA, Eavey CL (1987a) Choices of principles of distributive justice in experimental groups. Am J Polit Sci, pp 606\u2013636","DOI":"10.2307\/2111285"},{"issue":"1","key":"1289_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1017\/S0007123400004580","volume":"17","author":"N Frohlich","year":"1987","unstructured":"Frohlich N, Oppenheimer JA, Eavey CL (1987b) Laboratory results on Rawls\u2019s distributive justice. Br J Polit Sci 17(1):1\u201321","journal-title":"Br J Polit Sci"},{"key":"1289_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gaertner W, Schokkaert E (2011) Empirical social choice: questionnaire-experimental studies on distributive justice. Cambridge University Press","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139012867"},{"issue":"1","key":"1289_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1017\/S0003055412000585","volume":"107","author":"JE Green","year":"2013","unstructured":"Green JE (2013) Rawls and the forgotten figure of the most advantaged: in defense of reasonable envy toward the superrich. Am Polit Sci Rev 107(1):123\u2013138","journal-title":"Am Polit Sci Rev"},{"key":"1289_CR32","unstructured":"Gsottbauer E, M\u00fcller D, M\u00fcller S, Trautmann S, Zudenkova G (2020) Social class and (un)ethical behavior: Causal versus correlational evidence. Innsbruck Working Paper Series"},{"issue":"5","key":"1289_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.1086\/257416","volume":"61","author":"J Harsanyi","year":"1953","unstructured":"Harsanyi J (1953) Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking. J Polit Econ 61(5):434","journal-title":"J Polit Econ"},{"issue":"4","key":"1289_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1086\/257678","volume":"63","author":"JC Harsanyi","year":"1955","unstructured":"Harsanyi JC (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J Polit Econ 63(4):309\u2013321","journal-title":"J Polit Econ"},{"key":"1289_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1986) Fairness and the assumptions of economics. J Bus, pp S285\u2013S300","DOI":"10.1086\/296367"},{"key":"1289_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kerschbamer R, M\u00fcller D (2020) Social preferences and political attitudes: an online experiment on a large heterogeneous sample. J Public Econ, pp 182","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpubeco.2019.104076"},{"key":"1289_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Konow J (2000) Fair shares: accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. Am Econ Rev, pp 1072\u20131091","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.90.4.1072"},{"issue":"4","key":"1289_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1188","DOI":"10.1257\/002205103771800013","volume":"41","author":"J Konow","year":"2003","unstructured":"Konow J (2003) Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. J Econ Lit 41(4):1188\u20131239","journal-title":"J Econ Lit"},{"issue":"1","key":"1289_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-008-0348-2","volume":"33","author":"J Konow","year":"2009","unstructured":"Konow J (2009) Is fairness in the eye of the beholder? An impartial spectator analysis of justice. Soc Choice Welf 33(1):101\u2013127","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"issue":"4","key":"1289_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1478","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.20130360","volume":"105","author":"I Kuziemko","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kuziemko I, Norton MI, Saez E (2015) How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. Am Econ Rev 105(4):1478\u20131508","journal-title":"Am Econ Rev"},{"key":"1289_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Michelbach PA, Scott JT, Matland RE, Bornstein BH (2003) Doing rawls justice: An experimental study of income distribution norms. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3):523\u2013539","DOI":"10.1111\/1540-5907.00037"},{"issue":"4","key":"1289_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.65.4.629","volume":"65","author":"G Mitchell","year":"1993","unstructured":"Mitchell G, Tetlock PE, Mellers BA, Ordonez LD (1993) Judgments of social justice: compromises between equality and efficiency. J Personal Soc Psychol 65(4):629","journal-title":"J Personal Soc Psychol"},{"key":"1289_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jebo.2019.09.009","volume":"166","author":"D M\u00fcller","year":"2019","unstructured":"M\u00fcller D (2019) The anatomy of distributional preferences with group identity. J Econ Behav Org 166:785\u2013807","journal-title":"J Econ Behav Org"},{"key":"1289_CR44","unstructured":"Posner RA (1983) The economics of justice. Harvard University Press"},{"key":"1289_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674042605","volume-title":"A theory of justice","author":"J Rawls","year":"1971","unstructured":"Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Harvard"},{"key":"1289_CR46","volume-title":"Egalitarian perspectives: essays in philosophical economics","author":"JE Roemer","year":"1996","unstructured":"Roemer JE (1996) Egalitarian perspectives: essays in philosophical economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"11","key":"1289_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpubeco.2010.06.021","volume":"94","author":"H Schildberg-H\u00f6risch","year":"2010","unstructured":"Schildberg-H\u00f6risch H (2010) Is the veil of ignorance only a concept about risk? An experiment. J Public Econ 94(11):1062\u20131066","journal-title":"J Public Econ"},{"issue":"34","key":"1289_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10641","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1507949112","volume":"112","author":"P Smeets","year":"2015","unstructured":"Smeets P, Bauer R, Gneezy U (2015) Giving behavior of millionaires. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(34):10641\u201310644","journal-title":"Proc Natl Acad Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"1289_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-003-0303-1","volume":"24","author":"S Traub","year":"2005","unstructured":"Traub S, Seidl C, Schmidt U, Levati M (2005) Friedman, harsanyi, rawls, boulding-or somebody else? an experimental investigation of distributive justice. Soc Choice Welf 24(2):283\u2013309","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"issue":"5","key":"1289_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691613491272","volume":"8","author":"ST Trautmann","year":"2013","unstructured":"Trautmann ST, van de Kuilen G, Zeckhauser RJ (2013) Social class and (un) ethical behavior a framework, with evidence from a large population sample. Perspect Psychol Sci 8(5):487\u2013497","journal-title":"Perspect Psychol Sci"},{"key":"1289_CR51","unstructured":"Wright R (2010) The moral animal: why we are, the way we are: the new science of evolutionary psychology. Vintage"}],"container-title":["Social Choice and Welfare"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00355-020-01289-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00355-020-01289-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00355-020-01289-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,25]],"date-time":"2022-11-25T17:21:29Z","timestamp":1669396889000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00355-020-01289-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,29]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,5]]}},"alternative-id":["1289"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00355-020-01289-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0176-1714","1432-217X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0176-1714","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-217X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 February 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 September 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 October 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}