{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T14:56:15Z","timestamp":1772808975037,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,29]],"date-time":"2021-03-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1616976000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,29]],"date-time":"2021-03-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1616976000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001665","name":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["ANR-14-CE24-0007-01"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["ANR-14-CE24-0007-01"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001665","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001665","name":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001665","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Soc Choice Welf"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-021-01327-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,29]],"date-time":"2021-03-29T06:02:17Z","timestamp":1616997737000},"page":"535-555","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["An Arrovian impossibility in combining ranking and evaluation"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"57","author":[{"given":"Justin","family":"Kruger","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9890-5876","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"M. Remzi","family":"Sanver","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,29]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"1327_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-013-0766-7","volume":"43","author":"JCR Alcantud","year":"2014","unstructured":"Alcantud JCR, Laruelle A (2014) Disapproval voting: a characterization. Soc Choice Welf 43(1):1\u201310","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"1327_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mathsocsci.2006.09.002","volume":"53","author":"F Aleskerov","year":"2007","unstructured":"Aleskerov F, Yakuba V, Yuzbashev D (2007) A \u2018threshold aggregation\u2019 of three-graded rankings. Math Soc Sci 53:106\u2013110","journal-title":"Math Soc Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"1327_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1086\/256963","volume":"58","author":"KJ Arrow","year":"1950","unstructured":"Arrow KJ (1950) A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. J Polit Econ 58(4):328\u2013346","journal-title":"J Polit Econ"},{"issue":"21","key":"1327_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8720","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.0702634104","volume":"104","author":"M Balinski","year":"2007","unstructured":"Balinski M, Laraki R (2007) A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(21):8720\u20138725","journal-title":"Proc Natl Acad Sci"},{"key":"1327_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Balinski M, Laraki R (2011) Majority judgment: measuring, ranking, and electing. MIT Press","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9780262015134.001.0001"},{"key":"1327_CR6","unstructured":"Balinski M, Laraki R (2016) Majority judgment vs majority rule. https:\/\/hal.archives-ouvertes.fr\/hal-01304043(preprint)"},{"issue":"3","key":"1327_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1018324807861","volume":"99","author":"GW Bassett","year":"1999","unstructured":"Bassett GW, Persky J (1999) Robust voting. Public Choice 99(3):299\u2013310","journal-title":"Public Choice"},{"issue":"5","key":"1327_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1511\/2011.92.426","volume":"99","author":"SJ Brams","year":"2011","unstructured":"Brams SJ (2011) Grading candidates. Am Sci 99(5):426","journal-title":"Am Sci"},{"key":"1327_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2014.10.044","volume":"295","author":"MA Zahid","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zahid MA, De Swart H (2015) The Borda majority count. Inf Sci 295:429\u2013440","journal-title":"Inf Sci"},{"issue":"03","key":"1327_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"831","DOI":"10.2307\/1955105","volume":"72","author":"SJ Brams","year":"1978","unstructured":"Brams SJ, Fishburn PC (1978) Approval voting. Am Polit Sci Rev 72(03):831\u2013847","journal-title":"Am Polit Sci Rev"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"1327_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1007\/s11127-015-0303-6","volume":"165","author":"SJ Brams","year":"2015","unstructured":"Brams SJ, Potthoff RF (2015) The paradox of grading systems. Public Choice 165(3\u20134):193\u2013210","journal-title":"Public Choice"},{"key":"1327_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-79128-7_12","volume-title":"The mathematics of preference, choice and order","author":"SJ Brams","year":"2009","unstructured":"Brams SJ, Sanver MR (2009) Voting systems that combine approval and preference. In: Brams SJ, Gehrlein WV, Roberts FS (eds) The mathematics of preference, choice and order. Springer, Berlin, pp 215\u2013237"},{"issue":"2","key":"1327_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00054448","volume":"59","author":"SJ Brams","year":"1988","unstructured":"Brams SJ, Fishburn PC, Merrill S (1988a) Rejoinder to Saari and Van Newenhizen. Public Choice 59(2):149","journal-title":"Public Choice"},{"issue":"2","key":"1327_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00054448","volume":"59","author":"SJ Brams","year":"1988","unstructured":"Brams SJ, Fishburn PC, Merrill S (1988b) The responsiveness of approval voting: Comments on Saari and Van Newenhizen. Public Choice 59(2):121\u2013131","journal-title":"Public Choice"},{"issue":"1","key":"1327_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/PL00007172","volume":"17","author":"DE Campbell","year":"2000","unstructured":"Campbell DE, Kelly JS (2000) Information and preference aggregation. Soc Choice Welf 17(1):3\u201324","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"1327_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jet.2015.03.012","volume":"160","author":"F Dietrich","year":"2015","unstructured":"Dietrich F (2015) Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others. Journal of Economic Theory 160:463\u2013493","journal-title":"Journal of Economic Theory"},{"issue":"1","key":"1327_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-006-0196-x","volume":"29","author":"F Dietrich","year":"2007","unstructured":"Dietrich F, List C (2007) Arrow\u2019s theorem in judgment aggregation. Soc Choice Welf 29(1):19\u201333","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"issue":"3\/4","key":"1327_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1007\/s11127-011-9818-7","volume":"151","author":"PH Edelman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Edelman PH (2012) Review of majority judgment: measuring, ranking and electing. Public Choice 151(3\/4):807\u2013810","journal-title":"Public Choice"},{"issue":"3","key":"1327_CR19","first-page":"319","volume":"25","author":"DS Felsenthal","year":"2008","unstructured":"Felsenthal DS, Machover M (2008) The majority judgement voting procedure: a critical evaluation. Homo Oeconomicus 25(3):319\u2013334","journal-title":"Homo Oeconomicus"},{"issue":"3","key":"1327_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mathsocsci.2012.01.006","volume":"63","author":"W Gaertner","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gaertner W, Xu Y (2012) A general scoring rule. Math Soc Sci 63(3):193\u2013196","journal-title":"Math Soc Sci"},{"key":"1327_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hillinger C (2005) The case for utilitarian voting. Discussion paper 2005-11, University of Munich","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.732285"},{"issue":"3","key":"1327_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00193812","volume":"11","author":"JS Kelly","year":"1994","unstructured":"Kelly JS (1994) The Bordes\u2013LeBreton exceptional case. Soc Choice Welf 11(3):273\u2013281","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"1327_CR23","unstructured":"Laslier J-F (2017) L\u2019\u00e9trange \u201cjugement majoritaire\u201d. In: Working papers 2017-23, PSE"},{"issue":"2","key":"1327_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0106.00129","volume":"6","author":"C List","year":"2001","unstructured":"List C (2001) A note on introducing a \u201czero-line\u201d of welfare as an escape route from Arrow\u2019s theorem. Pac Econ Rev 6(2):223\u2013238","journal-title":"Pac Econ Rev"},{"key":"1327_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"List C, Puppe C (2009) Judgment aggregation. In:\u00a0Anand P, Pattanaik P, Puppe C (eds) Handbook of rational and social choice. Oxford University Press","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199290420.003.0020"},{"key":"1327_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmateco.2018.09.002","volume":"79","author":"A Mac\u00e9","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mac\u00e9 A (2018) Voting with evaluations: characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting. J Math Econ 79:10\u201317","journal-title":"J Math Econ"},{"key":"1327_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mathsocsci.2015.10.001","volume":"79","author":"F Maniquet","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maniquet F, Mongin P (2016) A theorem on aggregating classifica-tions. Math Soc Sci 79:6\u201310","journal-title":"Math Soc Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"1327_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.2307\/1907651","volume":"20","author":"KO May","year":"1952","unstructured":"May KO (1952) A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision. Econometrica 20(4):680\u2013684","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"1327_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4337\/9781781008119","volume-title":"Condorcet: foundations of social choice and political theory","author":"I McLean","year":"1994","unstructured":"McLean I, Hewitt F et al (1994) Condorcet: foundations of social choice and political theory. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham"},{"issue":"3","key":"1327_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1007\/s11238-012-9310-y","volume":"73","author":"P Mongin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mongin P (2012) The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory. Theor Decis 73(3):315\u2013355","journal-title":"Theor Decis"},{"issue":"3","key":"1327_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1016\/S0165-1765(03)00118-6","volume":"80","author":"K Nehring","year":"2003","unstructured":"Nehring K (2003) Arrow\u2019s theorem as a corollary. Econ Lett 80(3):379\u2013382","journal-title":"Econ Lett"},{"key":"1327_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mathsocsci.2013.08.002","volume":"67","author":"M Pivato","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pivato M (2014) Formal utilitarianism and range voting. Math Soc Sci 67:50\u201356","journal-title":"Math Soc Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"1327_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.2307\/2297001","volume":"47","author":"KW Roberts","year":"1980","unstructured":"Roberts KW (1980) Possibility theorems with interpersonally comparable welfare levels. Rev Econ Stud 47(2):409\u2013420","journal-title":"Rev Econ Stud"},{"issue":"2","key":"1327_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00054447","volume":"59","author":"DG Saari","year":"1988","unstructured":"Saari DG, Van Newenhizen J (1988) The problem of indeterminacy in approval, multiple, and truncated voting systems. Public Choice 59(2):101\u2013120","journal-title":"Public Choice"},{"key":"1327_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-02839-7_20","volume-title":"Handbook on approval voting","author":"MR Sanver","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sanver MR (2010) Approval as an intrinsic part of preference. In: Laslier J-F, Sanver MR (eds) Handbook on approval voting. Springer, Berlin, pp 469\u2013481"},{"issue":"7","key":"1327_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.2307\/1913949","volume":"45","author":"A Sen","year":"1977","unstructured":"Sen A (1977) On weights and measures: informational constraints in social welfare analysis. Econometrica 45(7):1539\u20131572","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"issue":"4","key":"1327_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1007\/s003550050164","volume":"16","author":"MR Sertel","year":"1999","unstructured":"Sertel MR, Y\u0131lmaz B (1999) The majoritarian compromise is majoritarian-optimal and subgame-perfect implementable. Soc Choice Welf 16(4):615\u2013627","journal-title":"Soc Choice Welf"},{"key":"1327_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-0531(72)90051-8","volume":"5","author":"R Wilson","year":"1972","unstructured":"Wilson R (1972) Social choice theory without the Pareto principle. J Econ Theory 5:478\u2013486","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"},{"key":"1327_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-0531(75)90062-9","volume":"10","author":"R Wilson","year":"1975","unstructured":"Wilson R (1975) On the theory of aggregation. J Econ Theory 10:89\u201399","journal-title":"J Econ Theory"}],"container-title":["Social Choice and Welfare"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00355-021-01327-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00355-021-01327-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00355-021-01327-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,24]],"date-time":"2023-10-24T07:25:35Z","timestamp":1698132335000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00355-021-01327-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,29]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]}},"alternative-id":["1327"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00355-021-01327-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0176-1714","1432-217X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0176-1714","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-217X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 April 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 March 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 March 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}