{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T03:04:27Z","timestamp":1740107067618,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3-4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,20]],"date-time":"2024-01-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1705708800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,20]],"date-time":"2024-01-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1705708800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Soc Choice Welf"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Imagine that the judgments of some individuals on some issues are aggregated into collective judgments. Social deliberation about the issues prior to aggregation can lead to improved judgments, at both the individual and the collective level. In this paper I argue that the epistemic justification for a social deliberation design depends on the chosen judgment aggregation rule, and <jats:italic>vice versa<\/jats:italic>. This claim consists of two parts. First, the epistemic superiority of one deliberation design over another or over the absence of any deliberation depends on which procedure is subsequently used to aggregate individual judgments. Second, the epistemic superiority of one aggregation procedure over another depends on how the preceding social deliberation was designed. In short, the choice of deliberation design and of aggregation rule are intertwined. This claim is substantiated by two models. Both models display a tragic rise in competence: social deliberation raises individual competence while reducing collective competence. Here, individual and social epistemology come interestingly apart.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-023-01501-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,20]],"date-time":"2024-01-20T16:02:00Z","timestamp":1705766520000},"page":"475-507","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The interdependence of social deliberation and judgment aggregation"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"63","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3410-0531","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hendrik","family":"Siebe","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"1501_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Becker J, Brackbill D, Centola D (2017) Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, E5070-E5076. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1615978114","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1615978114"},{"key":"1501_CR2","unstructured":"Bohman J (1996) Public deliberation: pluralism, complexity, and democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"2","key":"1501_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1007\/s10670-017-9887-1","volume":"83","author":"LK Bright","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bright LK, Dang H, Heesen R (2018) A role for judgment aggregation in coauthoring scientific papers. Erkenntnis 83(2):231\u2013252. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10670-017-9887-1","journal-title":"Erkenntnis"},{"key":"1501_CR4","unstructured":"Cohen J (1989) Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. Hamlin AP, Pettit P (eds) The good polity. Blackwell, Oxford"},{"issue":"3","key":"1501_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.1086\/676670","volume":"81","author":"R De Langhe","year":"2014","unstructured":"De Langhe R (2014) The division of labour in science: the tradeoff between specialisation and diversity. Philos Sci 81(3):444\u2013459. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/676670","journal-title":"Philos Sci"},{"issue":"487","key":"1501_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzt074","volume":"122","author":"F Dietrich","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dietrich F, Spiekermann K (2013) Independent opinions? On the causal foundations of belief formation and jury theorems. Mind 122(487):655\u2013685. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/fzt074","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"1501_CR7","unstructured":"Dietrich F, Spiekermann K (2021) Jury theorems. Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/win2021\/entries\/jury-theorems\/"},{"issue":"1","key":"1501_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.2307\/2585926","volume":"92","author":"W Feddersen Timothy Pesendorfer","year":"1998","unstructured":"Feddersen Timothy Pesendorfer W (1998) Convicting the innocent\u202f: the inferiority of unanimous jury verdicts under strategic voting. Am Polit Sci Rev 92(1):23\u201335","journal-title":"Am Polit Sci Rev"},{"key":"1501_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Frey V, van de Rijt A (2020) Social influence undermines the wisdom of the crowd in sequential decision making. Manag Sci (Oct), 4273-4286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1287\/mnsc.2020.3713","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.2020.3713"},{"issue":"1","key":"1501_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1162\/neco.1992.4.1.1","volume":"4","author":"S Geman","year":"1992","unstructured":"Geman S, Bienenstock E, Doursat R (1992) Neural networks and the bias\/variance dilemma. Neural Comput 4(1):1\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/neco.1992.4.1.1","journal-title":"Neural Comput"},{"key":"1501_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00375996","volume":"63","author":"AI Goldman","year":"1991","unstructured":"Goldman AI, Shaked M (1991) An economic model of scientific activity and truth acquisition. Philos Stud 63:31\u201355","journal-title":"Philos Stud"},{"key":"1501_CR12","unstructured":"Habermas J (1991) The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger, Trans.). MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"1501_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-018-01936-6","author":"U Hahn","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hahn U, Hansen JU, Olsson EJ (2018) Truth tracking performance of social networks: how connectivity and clustering can make groups less competent. Synthese. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-018-01936-6","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"1501_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/0030-5073(78)90037-5","volume":"21","author":"R Hogarth","year":"1978","unstructured":"Hogarth R (1978) A note on aggregating opinions. Organ Behav Human Perform 21:40\u201346","journal-title":"Organ Behav Human Perform"},{"issue":"2","key":"1501_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mathsocsci.2008.09.002","volume":"57","author":"S Kaniovski","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kaniovski S (2009) An invariance result for homogeneous juries with correlated votes. Math Soc Sci 57(2):213\u2013222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.mathsocsci.2008.09.002","journal-title":"Math Soc Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"1501_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1007\/s11238-008-9120-4","volume":"69","author":"S Kaniovski","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kaniovski S (2010) Aggregation of correlated votes and Condorcet\u2019s jury theorem. Theory Decis 69(3):453\u2013468. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11238-008-9120-4","journal-title":"Theory Decis"},{"issue":"141","key":"1501_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20180130","DOI":"10.1098\/rsif.2018.0130","volume":"15","author":"AB Kao","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kao AB, Berdahl AM, Hartnett AT, Lutz MJ, Bak-Coleman JB, Ioannou CC, Couzin ID (2018) Counteracting estimation bias and social influence to improve the wisdom of crowds. J R Soc Interface 15(141):20180130. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rsif.2018.0130","journal-title":"J R Soc Interface"},{"issue":"1","key":"1501_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.2307\/2026796","volume":"87","author":"P Kitcher","year":"1990","unstructured":"Kitcher P (1990) The division of cognitive labor. J Philos 87(1):5\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2026796","journal-title":"J Philos"},{"key":"1501_CR19","first-page":"231","volume":"7","author":"A Krogh","year":"1994","unstructured":"Krogh A, Vedelsby J (1994) Neural network ensembles, cross validation, and active learning. Adv Neural Netw Process Syst 7:231\u2013238","journal-title":"Adv Neural Netw Process Syst"},{"issue":"3","key":"1501_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"617","DOI":"10.2307\/2111584","volume":"36","author":"KK Ladha","year":"1992","unstructured":"Ladha KK (1992) The condorcet jury theorem, free speech, and correlated votes. Am J Polit Sci 36(3):617\u2013634. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2111584","journal-title":"Am J Polit Sci"},{"key":"1501_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199591565.001.0001","volume-title":"Group agency: the possibility, design, and status of corporate agents","author":"C List","year":"2011","unstructured":"List C, Pettit P (2011) Group agency: the possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"issue":"22","key":"1501_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9020","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1008636108","volume":"108","author":"J Lorenz","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lorenz J, Rauhut H, Schweitzer F, Helbing D (2011) How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(22):9020\u20139025. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1008636108","journal-title":"Proc Natl Acad Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"1501_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2053168015582287","volume":"2","author":"J Lorenz","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lorenz J, Rauhut H, Kittel B (2015) Majoritarian democracy undermines truth-finding in deliberative committees. Res Polit 2(2):1\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2053168015582287","journal-title":"Res Polit"},{"issue":"1","key":"1501_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1177\/1088868311417243","volume":"16","author":"L Lu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lu L, Yuan YC, McLeod PL (2012) Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: a meta-analysis. Person Soc Psychol Rev 16(1):54\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1088868311417243","journal-title":"Person Soc Psychol Rev"},{"key":"1501_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lyon A, Pacuit E (2013) The wisdom of crowds: methods of human judgement aggregation. In: Handbook of human computation. Springer, New York, pp. 599-614","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4614-8806-4_47"},{"issue":"2","key":"1501_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1037\/a0036677","volume":"107","author":"AE Mannes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mannes AE, Soll JB, Larrick RP (2014) The wisdom of select crowds. J Person Soc Psychol 107(2):276\u2013299. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0036677","journal-title":"J Person Soc Psychol"},{"key":"1501_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674977860","volume-title":"The Enigma of Reason","author":"H Mercier","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mercier H, Sperber D (2017) The Enigma of Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"2","key":"1501_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1086\/644786","volume":"76","author":"R Muldoon","year":"2009","unstructured":"Muldoon R, Weisberg M (2009) Epistemic landscapes and the division of cognitive labor. Philos Sci 76(2):225\u2013252. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/644786","journal-title":"Philos Sci"},{"key":"1501_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmateco.2017.06.001","volume":"72","author":"M Pivato","year":"2017","unstructured":"Pivato M (2017) Epistemic democracy with correlated voters. J Math Econ 72:51\u201369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmateco.2017.06.001","journal-title":"J Math Econ"},{"key":"1501_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pivato M (2019) Realizing epistemic democracy. In: Laslier J-F, Moulin H, Sanver MR, Zwicker WS (eds) The future of economic design: The continuing development of a field as envisioned by its researchers (pp. 103-112). Springer International Publishing","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-18050-8_16"},{"key":"1501_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00028.x","volume":"44","author":"M Solomon","year":"2006","unstructured":"Solomon M (2006) Groupthink versus the wisdom of crowds: the social epistemology of deliberation and dissent. Southern J Philos 44:28\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00028.x","journal-title":"Southern J Philos"},{"issue":"03","key":"1501_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.3366\/epi.2006.3.3.192","volume":"3","author":"CR Sunstein","year":"2006","unstructured":"Sunstein CR (2006) Deliberating groups versus prediction markets (or Hayek\u2019s challenge to habermas). Episteme 3(03):192\u2013213. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3366\/epi.2006.3.3.192","journal-title":"Episteme"},{"key":"1501_CR33","unstructured":"Surowiecki J (2005) The wisdom of crowds. Anchor"},{"key":"1501_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ueda N, Nakano R (1996) Generalization error of ensemble estimators. In: Proceedings of international conference on neural networks (icnn\u201996) (Vol. 1, pp. 90-95). IEEE. Retrieved from http:\/\/ieeexplore.ieee.org\/document\/548872\/","DOI":"10.1109\/ICNN.1996.548872"},{"issue":"5","key":"1501_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"574","DOI":"10.1086\/525605","volume":"74","author":"KJS Zollman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Zollman KJS (2007) The communication structure of epistemic communities. Philos Sci 74(5):574\u2013587. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/525605","journal-title":"Philos Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"1501_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/s10670-009-9194-6","volume":"72","author":"KJ Zollman","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zollman KJ (2010) The epistemic benefit of transient diversity. Erkenntnis 72(1):17\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10670-009-9194-6","journal-title":"Erkenntnis"}],"container-title":["Social Choice and Welfare"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00355-023-01501-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00355-023-01501-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00355-023-01501-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,18]],"date-time":"2024-11-18T13:03:16Z","timestamp":1731934996000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00355-023-01501-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,20]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3-4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,11]]}},"alternative-id":["1501"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00355-023-01501-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0176-1714","1432-217X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0176-1714"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1432-217X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 February 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 October 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 January 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The author declares that all sources of funding for this research have been disclosed and that there are no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}