{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T03:17:18Z","timestamp":1740107838279,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,12]],"date-time":"2018-07-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1531353600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100010686","name":"H2020 European Institute of Innovation and Technology","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["723596","768824"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["723596","768824"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100010686","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"MINECO\/FEDER","award":["TIN2015-71799-C2-2-P","TIN2015-71799-C2-2-P"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["TIN2015-71799-C2-2-P","TIN2015-71799-C2-2-P"]}]},{"name":"MINECO\/FEDER","award":["TIN2015-71799-C2-2-P"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["TIN2015-71799-C2-2-P"]}]},{"name":"AGAUR","award":["2017 SGR 1537","2017 SGR 1537"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2017 SGR 1537","2017 SGR 1537"]}]},{"name":"AGAUR","award":["2017 SGR 1537"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2017 SGR 1537"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Soft Comput"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00500-018-3380-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,12]],"date-time":"2018-07-12T01:07:34Z","timestamp":1531357654000},"page":"2147-2166","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["A distributed argumentation algorithm for mining consistent opinions in weighted Twitter discussions"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"23","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4594-5502","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Teresa","family":"Alsinet","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Josep","family":"Argelich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ram\u00f3n","family":"B\u00e9jar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Joel","family":"Cemeli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"3380_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alsinet T, Argelich J, B\u00e9jar R, Esteva F, Godo L (2017a) A probabilistic author-centered model for Twitter discussions. In: IJCAI workshop on logical foundations for uncertainty and machine learning, pp 3\u20138","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-91476-3_56"},{"key":"3380_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2017.02.004","volume":"85","author":"T Alsinet","year":"2017","unstructured":"Alsinet T, Argelich J, B\u00e9jar R, Fern\u00e1ndez C, Mateu C, Planes J (2017b) Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter. Int J Approx Reason 85:21\u201335","journal-title":"Int J Approx Reason"},{"key":"3380_CR3","unstructured":"Alsinet T, Argelich J, B\u00e9jar R, Planes J, Cemeli J, Sanahuja C (2017c) A distributed approach for the analysis of discussions in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on social influence analysis co-located with 26th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI 2017), Melbourne, Australia, August 19, 2017, pp 45\u201356"},{"key":"3380_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1016\/j.patrec.2017.07.004","volume":"105","author":"T Alsinet","year":"2018","unstructured":"Alsinet T, Argelich J, B\u00e9jar R, Fern\u00e1ndez C, Mateu C, Planes J (2018) An argumentative approach for discovering relevant opinions in Twitter with probabilistic valued relationships. Pattern Recogn Lett 105:191\u2013199. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.patrec.2017.07.004","journal-title":"Pattern Recogn Lett"},{"key":"3380_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baroni P, Giacomin M (2001) A distributed self-stabilizing algorithm for argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 15th international parallel and distributed processing symposium (IPDPS-01), IEEE Computer Society, p 79","DOI":"10.1109\/IPDPS.2001.925027"},{"issue":"4","key":"3380_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1080\/09528130110116642","volume":"14","author":"P Baroni","year":"2002","unstructured":"Baroni P, Giacomin M (2002) Argumentation through a distributed self-stabilizing approach. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 14(4):273\u2013301","journal-title":"J Exp Theor Artif Intell"},{"key":"3380_CR7","unstructured":"Bench-Capon TJM (2002) Value-based argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of 9th international workshop on non-monotonic reasoning, NMR 2002, pp 443\u2013454"},{"issue":"3","key":"3380_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429","volume":"13","author":"TJM Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon TJM (2003) Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J Log Comput 13(3):429\u2013448","journal-title":"J Log Comput"},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"3380_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.001","volume":"171","author":"TJM Bench-Capon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bench-Capon TJM, Dunne PE (2007) Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artif Intell 171(10\u201315):619\u2013641","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"3380_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(01)00071-6","volume":"128","author":"P Besnard","year":"2001","unstructured":"Besnard P, Hunter A (2001) A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artif Intell 128(1\u20132):203\u2013235","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"1","key":"3380_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1145\/2700060","volume":"15","author":"DR Bild","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bild DR, Liu Y, Dick RP, Mao ZM, Wallach DS (2015) Aggregate characterization of user behavior in Twitter and analysis of the retweet graph. ACM Trans Internet Technol 15(1):41\u2013424","journal-title":"ACM Trans Internet Technol"},{"key":"3380_CR12","first-page":"21","volume":"2016","author":"T Bosc","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bosc T, Cabrio E, Villata S (2016) Tweeties squabbling: positive and negative results in applying argument mining on social media. Comput Models Argum\u2013Proc COMMA 2016:21\u201332","journal-title":"Comput Models Argum\u2013Proc COMMA"},{"key":"3380_CR13","unstructured":"Bud\u00e1n MCD, Simari GI, Simari GR (2016) Using argument features to improve the argumentation process. In: Proceedings of COMMA 2016 Computational Models of Argument, Potsdam, Germany, 12-16 September, 2016, pp 151\u2013158"},{"key":"3380_CR14","unstructured":"Caminada M (2007) Comparing two unique extension semantics for formal argumentation: ideal and eager. In: Proceedings of 19th Belgian\u2013Dutch conference on artificial intelligence (BNAIC 2007), pp 81\u201387"},{"issue":"2","key":"3380_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell 77(2):321\u2013357","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"3380_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.003","volume":"171","author":"PM Dung","year":"2007","unstructured":"Dung PM, Mancarella P, Toni F (2007) Computing ideal sceptical argumentation. Artif Intell 171(10\u201315):642\u2013674","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"3380_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.03.006","volume":"171","author":"PE Dunne","year":"2007","unstructured":"Dunne PE (2007) Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints. Artif Intell 171(10\u201315):701\u2013729","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"3380_CR18","unstructured":"Dunne PE (2008) The computational complexity of ideal semantics I: abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of computational models of argument, COMMA 2008, Toulouse, France, pp 147\u2013158"},{"issue":"18","key":"3380_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1559","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2009.09.001","volume":"173","author":"PE Dunne","year":"2009","unstructured":"Dunne PE (2009) The computational complexity of ideal semantics. Artif Intell 173(18):1559\u20131591","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"3380_CR20","unstructured":"Dunne PE, Bench-Capon T (2001) Complexity and combinatorial properties of argument systems. Tech. rep., University of Liverpool. \n                    http:\/\/www.csc.liv.ac.uk\/~ped\/papers\/csd_rep_argument.ps"},{"key":"3380_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dusmanu M, Cabrio E, Villata S (2017) Argument mining on twitter: arguments, facts and sources. In: Proceedings of the 2017 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, EMNLP 2017, pp 2317\u20132322","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D17-1245"},{"key":"3380_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2012.03.002","volume":"186","author":"W Dvor\u00e1k","year":"2012","unstructured":"Dvor\u00e1k W, Ordyniak S, Szeider S (2012) Augmenting tractable fragments of abstract argumentation. Artif Intell 186:157\u2013173. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2012.03.002","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"3380_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Egly U, Gaggl SA, Woltran S (2008) Aspartix: implementing argumentation frameworks using answer-set programming. In: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on logic programming, ICLP 2008, pp 734\u2013738","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-89982-2_67"},{"key":"3380_CR24","unstructured":"Fazzinga B, Flesca S, Parisi F (2013) On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation. In: IJCAI 2013, Proceedings of the 23rd international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 898\u2013904. IJCAI\/AAAI"},{"key":"3380_CR25","unstructured":"Grosse K, Ches\u00f1evar CI, Maguitman AG (2012) An argument-based approach to mining opinions from Twitter. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on agreement technologies, AT 2012, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol 918, pp 408\u2013422. CEUR-WS.org"},{"issue":"3","key":"3380_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.3233\/AIC-140627","volume":"28","author":"K Grosse","year":"2015","unstructured":"Grosse K, Gonz\u00e1lez MP, Ches\u00f1evar CI, Maguitman AG (2015) Integrating argumentation and sentiment analysis for mining opinions from Twitter. AI Commun 28(3):387\u2013401","journal-title":"AI Commun"},{"key":"3380_CR27","unstructured":"Hunter A (2012) Some foundations for probabilistic abstract argumentation. In: Computational Models of Argument\u2013Proceedings of COMMA 2012, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol 245, pp 117\u2013128. IOS Press"},{"issue":"2","key":"3380_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.09.002","volume":"55","author":"A Hunter","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hunter A (2014) Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation. Int J Approx Reason 55(2):607\u2013638","journal-title":"Int J Approx Reason"},{"key":"3380_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li H, Oren N, Norman TJ (2011) Probabilistic argumentation frameworks. In: Theory and applications of formal argumentation\u2013first international workshop, TAFA 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7132, pp 1\u201316. Springer, Berlin","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-29184-5_1"},{"key":"3380_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Malewicz G, Austern MH, Bik AJC, Dehnert JC, Horn I, Leiser N, Czajkowski G (2010) Pregel: a system for large-scale graph processing. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, SIGMOD 2010, pp 135\u2013146","DOI":"10.1145\/1807167.1807184"},{"key":"3380_CR31","volume-title":"Argumentation in artificial intelligence","author":"I Rahwan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rahwan I, Simari GR (2009) Argumentation in artificial intelligence, 1st edn. Springer Publishing Company, Berlin","edition":"1"},{"key":"3380_CR32","unstructured":"Thimm M (2012) A probabilistic semantics for abstract argumentation. In: ECAI 2012\u201320th European conference on artificial intelligence, frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, vol 242, pp 750\u2013755. IOS Press"},{"issue":"1","key":"3380_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcss.2010.06.012","volume":"77","author":"LG Valiant","year":"2011","unstructured":"Valiant LG (2011) A bridging model for multi-core computing. J Comput Syst Sci 77(1):154\u2013166","journal-title":"J Comput Syst Sci"}],"container-title":["Soft Computing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00500-018-3380-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00500-018-3380-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00500-018-3380-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,19]],"date-time":"2019-09-19T21:44:06Z","timestamp":1568929446000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00500-018-3380-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,12]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]}},"alternative-id":["3380"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00500-018-3380-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-7643","1433-7479"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1432-7643"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1433-7479"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 July 2018","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"Author J. Cemeli has a contract with Company Starloop Studios. Authors T. Alsinet, J. Argelich, and R. B\u00e9jar declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}