{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]],"date-time":"2026-04-15T10:09:49Z","timestamp":1776247789877,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,12]],"date-time":"2025-12-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1765497600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,12]],"date-time":"2025-12-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1765497600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003407","name":"MIUR","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["Departments of Excellence 2023\u20132027"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Departments of Excellence 2023\u20132027"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003407","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Soft Comput"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    We investigate the relations between bipolar logical argumentation frames and the three main t-norm-based fuzzy logics:\n                    <jats:italic>\u0141ukasiewicz<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u00a0(\n                    <jats:bold>\u0141<\/jats:bold>\n                    ),\n                    <jats:italic>G\u00f6del<\/jats:italic>\n                    (\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <jats:tex-math>$${\\textbf {G}}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ) and\n                    <jats:italic>product<\/jats:italic>\n                    logic (\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <jats:tex-math>$$\\varvec{\\Pi }$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ). The arguments that we consider are complex entities, and the inference relation between the support and the claim is instantiated with the standard consequence relation of one specific fuzzy logic. We introduce several\n                    <jats:italic>argumentative principles<\/jats:italic>\n                    defined in terms of the attack and the support relation that refine the existence of such relations whenever the involved arguments share some propositional formulas. Through the notion of argumentative immunity introduced in Corsi and Ferm\u00fcller (2018a) we finally recover complete semantics for\n                    <jats:bold>\u0141<\/jats:bold>\n                    ,\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <jats:tex-math>$${\\textbf {G}}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    and\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <jats:tex-math>$$\\varvec{\\Pi }.$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00500-025-10896-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,12]],"date-time":"2025-12-12T09:51:58Z","timestamp":1765533118000},"page":"47-72","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Bipolar argumentative semantics for t-norm based fuzzy logics"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4586-6049","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Esther Anna","family":"Corsi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"10896_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud L, Besnard P (2009) Bridging the gap between abstract argumentation systems and logic. In International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, pages 12\u201327. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-04388-8_3"},{"key":"10896_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud L, Besnard P (2010) A formal analysis of logic-based argumentation systems. In International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, pages 42\u201355. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-15951-0_10"},{"key":"10896_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud L, Besnard P, Vesic S (2011) Identifying the core of logic-based argumentation systems. In 2011 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pages 633\u2013636. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/ICTAI.2011.100"},{"issue":"1\u20133","key":"10896_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1014490210693","volume":"34","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2002","unstructured":"Amgoud L, Cayrol C (2002) A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Ann Math Artif Intell 34(1\u20133):197\u2013215","journal-title":"Ann Math Artif Intell"},{"issue":"10","key":"10896_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20307","volume":"23","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2008","unstructured":"Amgoud L, Cayrol C, Lagasquie-Schiex M-C, Livet P (2008) On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. Int J Intell Syst 23(10):1062\u20131093","journal-title":"Int J Intell Syst"},{"key":"10896_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arieli O (2013) A sequent-based representation of logical argumentation. In International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems, pages 69\u201385. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40624-9_5"},{"key":"10896_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2023.103966","volume":"322","author":"O Arieli","year":"2023","unstructured":"Arieli O, Borg A, Stra\u00dfer C (2023) A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation. Artif Intell 322:103966","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"10896_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arieli O, Stra\u00dfer C (2014) Dynamic derivations for sequent-based logical argumentation. In Proc. 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2014), pages 89\u2013100","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-436-7-89"},{"issue":"1","key":"10896_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2014.1002536","volume":"6","author":"O Arieli","year":"2015","unstructured":"Arieli O, Stra\u00dfer C (2015) Sequent-based logical argumentation. Argum Comput 6(1):73\u201399","journal-title":"Argum Comput"},{"key":"10896_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.entcs.2016.06.003","volume":"323","author":"O Arieli","year":"2016","unstructured":"Arieli O, Stra\u00dfer C (2016) Deductive argumentation by enhanced sequent calculi and dynamic derivations. Electron Notes Theor Comput Sci 323:21\u201337","journal-title":"Electron Notes Theor Comput Sci"},{"key":"10896_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tcs.2019.02.019","author":"O Arieli","year":"2019","unstructured":"Arieli O, Stra\u00dfer C (2019) Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems. Theor Comput Sci. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tcs.2019.02.019","journal-title":"Theor Comput Sci"},{"key":"10896_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arieli O, Stra\u00dfer C (2020) On minimality and consistency tolerance in logical argumentation frameworks. In Proc. 8th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2020), To appear in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS press","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA200495"},{"issue":"1\u20133","key":"10896_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/S0168-0072(01)00048-3","volume":"113","author":"M Baaz","year":"2001","unstructured":"Baaz M, H\u00e1jek P, Montagna F, Veith H (2001) Complexity of t-tautologies. Ann Pure Appl Logic 113(1\u20133):3\u201311","journal-title":"Ann Pure Appl Logic"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"10896_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(01)00071-6","volume":"128","author":"P Besnard","year":"2001","unstructured":"Besnard P, Hunter A (2001) A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artif Intell 128(1\u20132):203\u2013235","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"10896_CR15","first-page":"123","volume":"6","author":"P Besnard","year":"2006","unstructured":"Besnard P, Hunter A (2006) Knowledgebase compilation for efficient logical argumentation. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning 6:123\u2013133","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning"},{"key":"10896_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9780262026437.001.0001","volume-title":"Elements of Argumentation","author":"P Besnard","year":"2008","unstructured":"Besnard P, Hunter A (2008) Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"10896_CR17","unstructured":"Besnard P, Hunter A (2018) A review of argumentation based on deductive arguments. Handbook of Formal Argumentation, pages 437\u2013484"},{"key":"10896_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boella G, Gabbay DM, van\u00a0der Torre L, Villata S (2010) Support in abstract argumentation. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA\u201910), pages 40\u201351. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, IOS Press","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-60750-619-5-111"},{"key":"10896_CR19","first-page":"608","volume":"6","author":"M Caminada","year":"2005","unstructured":"Caminada M, Amgoud L (2005) An axiomatic account of formal argumentation. In AAAI 6:608\u2013613","journal-title":"In AAAI"},{"issue":"5\u20136","key":"10896_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.02.003","volume":"171","author":"M Caminada","year":"2007","unstructured":"Caminada M, Amgoud L (2007) On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms. Artif Intell 171(5\u20136):286\u2013310","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"10896_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cayrol C, Lagasquie-Schiex M-C (2005a) Gradual valuation for bipolar argumentation frameworks. In European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, pages 366\u2013377. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/11518655_32"},{"key":"10896_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cayrol C, Lagasquie-Schiex M-C (2005b) On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty: 8th European Conference, ECSQARU 2005, Barcelona, Spain, July 6-8, 2005. Proceedings 8, pages 378\u2013389. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/11518655_33"},{"issue":"7","key":"10896_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"876","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.03.001","volume":"54","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cayrol C, Lagasquie-Schiex M-C (2013) Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding. Int J Approx Reason 54(7):876\u2013899","journal-title":"Int J Approx Reason"},{"key":"10896_CR24","unstructured":"Cintula P, Ferm\u00fcller CG, H\u00e1jek P, Noguera C (2011, 2015) Handbook of Mathematical Fuzzy Logic (in 3 volumes), volume 37\/38\/58 of Studies in Logic, Mathematical Logic and Foundations. College Publications"},{"key":"10896_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Corsi EA, Ferm\u00fcller CG (2017) Logical argumentation principles, sequents, and nondeterministic matrices. In Logic, Rationality and Interaction (LORI 2017), volume 10455 of LNCS, pages 422\u2013437. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-55665-8_29"},{"key":"10896_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00500-018-3513-2","author":"EA Corsi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Corsi EA, Ferm\u00fcller CG (2018a) Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles. Soft Comput. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00500-018-3513-2","journal-title":"Soft Comput"},{"key":"10896_CR27","unstructured":"Corsi EA, Ferm\u00fcller CG (2018b) From semi-abstract argumentation to logical consequence. In Oswald, S. and Maillat, D., editors, Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017, volume\u00a02, pages 151\u2013164. London: College Publications"},{"key":"10896_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2018.05.003","volume":"262","author":"M D\u2019Agostino","year":"2018","unstructured":"D\u2019Agostino M, Modgil S (2018) Classical logic, argument and dialectic. Artif Intell 262:15\u201351","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"2","key":"10896_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell 77(2):321\u2013357","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"10896_CR200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Esther Anna C (2025) Attack principles in sequent-based argumentation theory. J Logic Comput 35(3):exad080","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exad080"},{"key":"10896_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Font JM (2015) Consequence and degrees of truth in many-valued logic. In Petr H\u00e1jek on Mathematical Fuzzy Logic, pages 117\u2013141. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-06233-4_6"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"10896_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1017\/S1471068403001674","volume":"4","author":"AJ Garc\u00eda","year":"2004","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda AJ, Simari GR (2004) Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory Pract Log Program 4(1\u20132):95\u2013138","journal-title":"Theory Pract Log Program"},{"key":"10896_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gentzen G (1935) Untersuchungen \u00fcber das Logische Schlie\u00dfen I & II. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 39(1):176\u2013210, 405\u2013431","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01201363"},{"key":"10896_CR33","first-page":"13","volume-title":"Selected Papers on \u0141ukasiewicz Sentential Calculi","author":"R Giles","year":"1977","unstructured":"Giles R (1977) A non-classical logic for physics. In: Wojcicki R, Malinkowski G (eds) Selected Papers on \u0141ukasiewicz Sentential Calculi. Polish Academy of Sciences, pp 13\u201351"},{"issue":"4","key":"10896_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7373(82)80041-2","volume":"17","author":"R Giles","year":"1982","unstructured":"Giles R (1982) Semantics for fuzzy reasoning. Int J Man-Mach Stud 17(4):401\u2013415","journal-title":"Int J Man-Mach Stud"},{"key":"10896_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1557","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1.12394","volume":"70","author":"MGE Gonzalez","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gonzalez MGE, Bud\u00e1n MC, Simari GI, Simari GR (2021) Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks. J Artif Intell Res 70:1557\u20131636","journal-title":"J Artif Intell Res"},{"issue":"9\u201310","key":"10896_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1479","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2010.12.003","volume":"175","author":"N Gorogiannis","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gorogiannis N, Hunter A (2011) Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties. Artif Intell 175(9\u201310):1479\u20131497","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"3","key":"10896_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/2.3.397","volume":"2","author":"G Gottlob","year":"1992","unstructured":"Gottlob G (1992) Complexity results for nonmonotonic logics. J Log Comput 2(3):397\u2013425","journal-title":"J Log Comput"},{"key":"10896_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-011-5300-3","volume-title":"Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic","author":"P H\u00e1jek","year":"1998","unstructured":"H\u00e1jek P (1998) Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers"},{"issue":"5","key":"10896_CR39","first-page":"453","volume":"12","author":"Z Hanikov\u00e1","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hanikov\u00e1 Z (2002) A note on the complexity of propositional tautologies of individual t-algebras. Neural Netw World 12(5):453\u2013460","journal-title":"Neural Netw World"},{"issue":"4","key":"10896_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1016\/S0306-4379(01)00020-5","volume":"26","author":"N Karacapilidis","year":"2001","unstructured":"Karacapilidis N, Papadias D (2001) Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the hermes system. Inf Syst 26(4):259\u2013277","journal-title":"Inf Syst"},{"key":"10896_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Karamlou A, Cyras K, Toni F (2019) Deciding the winner of a debate using bipolar argumentation. In ACM, I.\u00a0., editor, AAMAS \u201919 Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems","DOI":"10.65109\/DBUY9524"},{"key":"10896_CR42","unstructured":"Klement EP, Mesiar R, Pap E (2013) Triangular norms, volume\u00a08. Springer Science & Business Media"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"10896_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1016\/S0888-613X(98)10013-0","volume":"19","author":"J Lawry","year":"1998","unstructured":"Lawry J (1998) A voting mechanism for fuzzy logic. Int J Approx Reason 19(3\u20134):315\u2013333","journal-title":"Int J Approx Reason"},{"key":"10896_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2012.10.008","volume":"195","author":"S Modgil","year":"2013","unstructured":"Modgil S, Prakken H (2013) A general account of argumentation with preferences. Artif Intell 195:361\u2013397","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"10896_CR45","volume-title":"Handbook of Formal Argumentation","author":"S Modgil","year":"2018","unstructured":"Modgil S, Prakken H (2018) Abstract rule-based argumentation. In: Baroni P, Gabbay D, Giacomin M, van der Torre L (eds) Handbook of Formal Argumentation. College Publications"},{"issue":"3","key":"10896_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1007\/s005000050015","volume":"1","author":"JB Paris","year":"1997","unstructured":"Paris JB (1997) A semantics for fuzzy logic. Soft Comput 1(3):143\u2013147","journal-title":"Soft Comput"},{"issue":"3","key":"10896_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.347","volume":"13","author":"S Parsons","year":"2003","unstructured":"Parsons S, Wooldridge M, Amgoud L (2003) Properties and complexity of some formal inter-agent dialogues. J Log Comput 13(3):347\u2013376","journal-title":"J Log Comput"},{"key":"10896_CR48","first-page":"21","volume":"2669","author":"H Prakken","year":"2020","unstructured":"Prakken H, Grasso F, Green NL, Schneider J, Wells S et al (2020) On validating theories of abstract argumentation frameworks: the case of bipolar argumentation frameworks. Computational Models of Natural Argument CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2669:21\u201330","journal-title":"Computational Models of Natural Argument CEUR Workshop Proceedings"},{"key":"10896_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Proietti C, Grossi D, Smets S, Vel\u00e1zquez-Quesada FR (2019) Bipolar argumentation frameworks, modal logic and semantic paradoxes. Logic, Rationality, and Interaction: 7th International Workshop, LORI 2019, Chongqing, China, October 18\u201321, 2019, Proceedings 7, pages 214\u2013229","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-60292-8_16"},{"key":"10896_CR50","volume-title":"Argumentation in artificial intelligence,","author":"I Rahwan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rahwan I, Simari GR (2009) Argumentation in artificial intelligence, vol 47. Springer"},{"key":"10896_CR51","unstructured":"Verheij B (2002) On the existence and multiplicity of extensions in dialectical argumentation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2002), pages 416\u2013425"},{"key":"10896_CR52","unstructured":"Yu L, Van\u00a0der Torre L (2020) A principle-based approach to bipolar argumentation. In NMR 2020 Workshop Notes, volume 227"}],"container-title":["Soft Computing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00500-025-10896-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00500-025-10896-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00500-025-10896-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]],"date-time":"2026-04-15T09:15:44Z","timestamp":1776244544000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00500-025-10896-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,12]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10896"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00500-025-10896-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-7643","1433-7479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-7643","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-7479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 May 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 August 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 December 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Furthermore the authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with Ethical Standards"}}]}}