{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,7]],"date-time":"2026-02-07T11:11:35Z","timestamp":1770462695783,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":61,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,20]],"date-time":"2022-08-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1660953600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,20]],"date-time":"2022-08-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1660953600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Requirements Eng"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Crowd-based Requirements Engineering (CrowdRE) promotes the active involvement of a large number of stakeholders in RE activities. A prominent strand of CrowdRE research concerns the creation and use of online platforms for a crowd of stakeholders to formulate ideas, which serve as an additional input for requirements elicitation. Most of the reported case studies are of small size, and they analyze the size of the crowd, rather than the quality of the collected ideas. By means of an iterative design that includes three case studies conducted at two organizations, we present the CREUS method for crowd-based elicitation via user stories. Besides reporting the details of these case studies and quantitative results on the number of participants, ideas, votes, etc., a key contribution of this paper is a qualitative analysis of the elicited ideas. To analyze the quality of the user stories, we apply criteria from the Quality User Story framework, we calculate automated text readability metrics, and we check for the presence of vague words. We also study whether the user stories can be linked to software qualities, and the specificity of the ideas. Based on the results, we distill six key findings regarding CREUS and, more generally, for CrowdRE via pull feedback.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-022-00384-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,20]],"date-time":"2022-08-20T19:35:41Z","timestamp":1661024141000},"page":"429-455","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Crowd-based requirements elicitation via pull feedback: method and case studies"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"27","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4723-9161","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jelle","family":"Wouters","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Abel","family":"Menkveld","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2977-8911","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sjaak","family":"Brinkkemper","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4480-3887","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fabiano","family":"Dalpiaz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"384_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2017.33","volume":"34","author":"EC Groen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Groen EC, Seyff N, Ali R, Dalpiaz F, Doerr J, Guzman E, Hosseini M, Marco J, Oriol M, Perini A et al (2017) The crowd in requirements engineering: the landscape and challenges. IEEE Softw 34(2):44\u201352","journal-title":"IEEE Softw"},{"key":"384_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-019-00314-z","volume":"25","author":"MZ Kolpondinos","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kolpondinos MZ, Glinz M (2020) GARUSO: a gamification approach for involving stakeholders outside organizational reach in requirements engineering. Requir Eng 25:185\u2013212","journal-title":"Requir Eng"},{"key":"384_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kabbedijk J, Brinkkemper S, Jansen S, van\u00a0der Veldt B (2009) Customer involvement in requirements management: lessons from mass market software development. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 281\u2013286. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2009.28"},{"key":"384_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Regnell B, Brinkkemper S (2005) Market-driven requirements engineering for software products. In: Engineering and Managing Software Requirements. Springer, pp 287\u2013308","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-28244-0_13"},{"key":"384_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johann T, Maalej W (2015) Democratic mass participation of users in requirements engineering?. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 256\u2013261. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2015.7320433"},{"key":"384_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Khan JA, Liu L, Wen L, Ali R (2019) Crowd intelligence in requirements engineering: current status and future directions. In: Proc. of the international working conference on requirements engineering: foundation for software quality (REFSQ). LNCS, vol. 11412, pp 245\u2013261","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-15538-4_18"},{"key":"384_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-28244-0_2","volume-title":"Engineering and managing software requirements","author":"D Zowghi","year":"2005","unstructured":"Zowghi D, Coulin C (2005) Requirements elicitation: a survey of techniques, approaches, and tools. In: Aurum A, Wohlin C (eds) Engineering and managing software requirements. Springer, Berlin, pp 19\u201346"},{"issue":"3","key":"384_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-016-0250-x","volume":"21","author":"G Lucassen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lucassen G, Dalpiaz F, van der Werf JME, Brinkkemper S (2016) Improving agile requirements: the quality user story framework and tool. Requir Eng 21(3):383\u2013403","journal-title":"Requir Eng"},{"key":"384_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Snijders R, Dalpiaz F, Brinkkemper S, Hosseini M, Ali R, Ozum A (2015) REfine: a gamified platform for participatory requirements engineering. In: Proc. of the International workshop on crowd-based requirements engineering (CrowdRE), pp 1\u20136. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/CrowdRE.2015.7367581"},{"key":"384_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Renzel D, Behrendt M, Klamma R, Jarke M (2013) Requirements bazaar: social requirements engineering for community-driven innovation. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 326\u2013327. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2013.6636738"},{"key":"384_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van\u00a0de Weerd I, Brinkkemper S (2009) Meta-modeling for situational analysis and design methods. In: Handbook of research on modern systems analysis and design technologies and applications. IGI Global, pp. 35\u201354","DOI":"10.4018\/978-1-59904-887-1.ch003"},{"key":"384_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Menkveld A, Brinkkemper S, Dalpiaz F (2019) User story writing in crowd requirements engineering: the case of a web application for sports tournament planning. In: Proc. of the international workshop on crowd-based requirements engineering (CrowdRE), pp 174\u2013179. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/REW.2019.00037"},{"key":"384_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wouters J, Janssen R, van Hulst B, van Veenhuizen J, Dalpiaz F, Brinkkemper S (2021) CrowdRE in a governmental setting: lessons from two case studies. In: Proceedings of the international requirements engineering conference, industrial innovation track (RE), pp 312\u2013322. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE51729.2021.00035"},{"key":"384_CR14","volume-title":"User stories applied: for agile software development","author":"M Cohn","year":"2004","unstructured":"Cohn M (2004) User stories applied: for agile software development. Addison-Wesley Professional, USA"},{"key":"384_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Groen EC, Doerr J, Adam S (2015) Towards crowd-based requirements engineering: a research preview. In: Proc. of the international working conference on requirements engineering: foundation for software quality (REFSQ). Springer, pp 247\u2013253","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-16101-3_16"},{"key":"384_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Snijders R, Dalpiaz F, Hosseini M, Shahri A, Ali R (2014) Crowd-centric requirements engineering. In: Proc. of the international workshop on crowdsourcing and gamification in the cloud (CGCloud). IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/UCC.2014.96"},{"key":"384_CR17","unstructured":"Hosseini M, Phalp K, Taylor J, Ali R (2014) Towards crowdsourcing for requirements engineering. In: Joint proceedings of REFSQ-2014 workshops, doctoral symposium, empirical track, and posters. CEUR workshop proceedings, vol. 1138, pp 82\u2013101. http:\/\/ceur-ws.org\/"},{"key":"384_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2012.10.059","volume":"15","author":"J Fernandes","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fernandes J, Duarte D, Ribeiro C, Farinha C, Pereira JM, da Silva MM (2012) iThink: a game-based approach towards improving collaboration and participation in requirement elicitation. Procedia Comput Sci 15:66\u201377","journal-title":"Procedia Comput Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"384_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1016\/j.entcom.2014.04.002","volume":"5","author":"C Ribeiro","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ribeiro C, Farinha C, Pereira J, da Silva MM (2014) Gamifying requirement elicitation: practical implications and outcomes in improving stakeholders collaboration. Entertain Comput 5(4):335\u2013345","journal-title":"Entertain Comput"},{"key":"384_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glinz M (2019) CrowdRE: achievements, opportunities and pitfalls. In: Proc. of the international workshop on crowd-based requirements engineering (CrowdRE), pp 172\u2013173. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/REW.2019.00036"},{"key":"384_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pagano D, Maalej W (2013) User feedback in the AppStore: an empirical study. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 125\u2013134. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2013.6636712"},{"issue":"3","key":"384_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-016-0251-9","volume":"21","author":"W Maalej","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maalej W, Kurtanovi\u0107 Z, Nabil H, Stanik C (2016) On the automatic classification of app reviews. Requir Eng 21(3):311\u2013331","journal-title":"Requir Eng"},{"key":"384_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Panichella S, Di\u00a0Sorbo A, Guzman E, Visaggio CA, Canfora G, Gall HC (2015) How can I improve my app? classifying user reviews for software maintenance and evolution. In: Proc. of the international conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME), pp 281\u2013290. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSM.2015.7332474"},{"key":"384_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dalpiaz F, Parente M (2019) RE-SWOT: from user feedback to requirements via competitor analysis. In: Proc. of the international working conference on requirements engineering: foundation for software quality (REFSQ). LNCS, vol. 11412","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-15538-4_4"},{"issue":"9","key":"384_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2016.2630689","volume":"43","author":"W Martin","year":"2016","unstructured":"Martin W, Sarro F, Jia Y, Zhang Y, Harman M (2016) A survey of app store analysis for software engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 43(9):817\u2013847","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Softw Eng"},{"key":"384_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johann T, Stanik C, Maalej W et\u00a0al (2017) Safe: a simple approach for feature extraction from app descriptions and app reviews. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 21\u201330. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2017.71"},{"key":"384_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guzman E, Maalej W (2014) How do users like this feature? a fine grained sentiment analysis of app reviews. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 153\u2013162. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2014.6912257"},{"issue":"1","key":"384_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/S0024-6301(96)00095-7","volume":"30","author":"T Hill","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hill T, Westbrook R (1997) SWOT analysis: it\u2019s time for a product recall. Long Range Plan 30(1):46\u201352","journal-title":"Long Range Plan"},{"key":"384_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111136","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2021.111136","volume":"184","author":"V Garousi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Garousi V, Cutting D, Felderer M (2022) Mining user reviews of COVID contact-tracing apps: an exploratory analysis of nine European apps. J Syst Softw 184:111136","journal-title":"J Syst Softw"},{"key":"384_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-021-00357-1","author":"J Tizard","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tizard J, Rietz T, Liu X, Blincoe K (2021) Voice of the users: an extended study of software feedback engagement. Requir Eng. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00766-021-00357-1","journal-title":"Requir Eng"},{"key":"384_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Williams G, Mahmoud A (2017) Mining Twitter feeds for software user requirements. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 1\u201310. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2017.14"},{"key":"384_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guzman E, Alkadhi R, Seyff N (2016) A needle in a haystack: what do Twitter users say about software?. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 96\u2013105. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2016.67"},{"key":"384_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morales-Ramirez I, Kifetew FM, Perini A (2017) Analysis of online discussions in support of requirements discovery. In: Proc. of the international conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE). LNCS, vol. 10253. Springer, pp 159\u2013174","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-59536-8_11"},{"key":"384_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kanchev GM, Murukannaiah PK, Chopra AK, Sawyer P (2017) Canary: extracting requirements-related information from online discussions. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 31\u201340. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2017.83"},{"key":"384_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tizard J, Wang H, Yohannes L, Blincoe K (2019) Can a conversation paint a picture? Mining requirements in software forums. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 17\u201327. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2019.00014"},{"key":"384_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Murukannaiah PK, Ajmeri N, Singh MP (2016) Acquiring creative requirements from the crowd: understanding the influences of personality and creative potential in Crowd RE. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 176\u2013185. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2016.68"},{"key":"384_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Vliet M, Groen EC, Dalpiaz F, Brinkkemper S (2020) Identifying and classifying user requirements in online feedback via crowdsourcing. In: Proc. of the international working conference on requirements engineering: foundation for software quality (REFSQ). LNCS, vol. 12045. Springer, pp 143\u2013159","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-44429-7_11"},{"key":"384_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Breaux TD, Schaub F (2014) Scaling requirements extraction to the crowd: experiments with privacy policies. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 163\u2013172. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2014.6912258"},{"key":"384_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-43839-8","volume-title":"Design science methodology for information systems and software engineering","author":"RJ Wieringa","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wieringa RJ (2014) Design science methodology for information systems and software engineering. Springer, Berlin"},{"issue":"1","key":"384_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/01449290301782","volume":"22","author":"S Kujala","year":"2003","unstructured":"Kujala S (2003) User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behav Inf Technol 22(1):1\u201316","journal-title":"Behav Inf Technol"},{"key":"384_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2014.06.011","volume":"58","author":"M Bano","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bano M, Zowghi D (2015) A systematic review on the relationship between user involvement and system success. Inf Softw Technol 58:148\u2013169","journal-title":"Inf Softw Technol"},{"issue":"1","key":"384_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2575.2004.00162.x","volume":"14","author":"R Davison","year":"2004","unstructured":"Davison R, Martinsons MG, Kock N (2004) Principles of canonical action research. Inf Syst J 14(1):65\u201386","journal-title":"Inf Syst J"},{"issue":"6","key":"384_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3684","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-018-9596-7","volume":"23","author":"A Ferrari","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ferrari A, Gori G, Rosadini B, Trotta I, Bacherini S, Fantechi A, Gnesi S (2018) Detecting requirements defects with NLP patterns: an industrial experience in the railway domain. Empir Softw Eng 23(6):3684\u20133733","journal-title":"Empir Softw Eng"},{"key":"384_CR44","unstructured":"Senter R, Smith EA (1967) Automated readability index. Technical report, Cincinnati University, Ohio"},{"issue":"3","key":"384_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1037\/h0057532","volume":"32","author":"R Flesch","year":"1948","unstructured":"Flesch R (1948) A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 32(3):221","journal-title":"J Appl Psychol"},{"key":"384_CR46","unstructured":"Systems and software engineering (2011) Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)\u2014System and software quality models. ISO\/IEC Standard 25010:2011. International Organization for Standardization"},{"issue":"3","key":"384_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1207\/s15326934crj1803_13","volume":"18","author":"A Cropley","year":"2006","unstructured":"Cropley A (2006) In praise of convergent thinking. Creat Res J 18(3):391\u2013404","journal-title":"Creat Res J"},{"issue":"3","key":"384_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1037\/gdn0000010","volume":"18","author":"EE Jones","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jones EE, Lambertus JD (2014) Expecting less from groups: a new perspective on shortcomings in idea generation groups. Group Dyn Theory Res Pract 18(3):237","journal-title":"Group Dyn Theory Res Pract"},{"issue":"4","key":"384_CR49","first-page":"3","volume":"2","author":"C Berger","year":"1993","unstructured":"Berger C, Blauth R, Boger D (1993) Kano\u2019s methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center Qual Manag J 2(4):3\u201336","journal-title":"Center Qual Manag J"},{"key":"384_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Groen EC, Kopczy\u0144ska S, Hauer MP, Krafft TD, Doerr J (2017) Users-the hidden software product quality experts? A study on how app users report quality aspects in online reviews. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 80\u201389. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2017.73"},{"key":"384_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gilson F, Galster M, Georis F (2019) Extracting quality attributes from user stories for early architecture decision making. In: Companion proc. of the IEEE international conference on software architecture (ICSA-C), pp 129\u2013136. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSA-C.2019.00031"},{"key":"384_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dalpiaz F (2018) Requirements data sets (user stories). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17632\/7zbk8zsd8y.1","DOI":"10.17632\/7zbk8zsd8y.1"},{"key":"384_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eckhardt J, Vogelsang A, Fern\u00e1ndez DM (2016) Are non-functional requirements really non-functional? an investigation of non-functional requirements in practice. In: Proc. of the international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 832\u2013842","DOI":"10.1145\/2884781.2884788"},{"issue":"4","key":"384_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"923","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2011.47","volume":"38","author":"RB Svensson","year":"2011","unstructured":"Svensson RB, Gorschek T, Regnell B, Torkar R, Shahrokni A, Feldt R (2011) Quality requirements in industrial practice-an extended interview study at eleven companies. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 38(4):923\u2013935","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Softw Eng"},{"issue":"2","key":"384_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-008-9102-8","volume":"14","author":"P Runeson","year":"2009","unstructured":"Runeson P, H\u00f6st M (2009) Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empir Softw Eng 14(2):131\u2013164","journal-title":"Empir Softw Eng"},{"key":"384_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310","volume":"33","author":"JR Landis","year":"1977","unstructured":"Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159\u2013174","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"384_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2018.09.005","volume":"106","author":"J Horkoff","year":"2019","unstructured":"Horkoff J, Maiden N, Asboth D (2019) Creative goal modeling for innovative requirements. Inf Softw Technol 106:85\u2013100","journal-title":"Inf Softw Technol"},{"key":"384_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2016.02.047","volume":"123","author":"H Femmer","year":"2017","unstructured":"Femmer H, Fern\u00e1ndez DM, Wagner S, Eder S (2017) Rapid quality assurance with requirements smells. J Syst Softw 123:190\u2013213","journal-title":"J Syst Softw"},{"key":"384_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rietz T, Maedche A (2019) LadderBot: a requirements self-elicitation system. In: Proc. of the international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 357\u2013362. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2019.00045"},{"key":"384_CR60","unstructured":"Backlog Item. Scrum dictionary. https:\/\/scrumdictionary.com\/term\/backlog-item\/. Accessed 18 Jan 2022"},{"key":"384_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leavitt A, Robinson JJ (2017) Upvote my news: The practices of peer information aggregation for breaking news on reddit.com. In: Proc. of the conference on human-computer interaction (CSCW). ACM New York, NY, USA, pp 1\u201318","DOI":"10.1145\/3134700"}],"container-title":["Requirements Engineering"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00766-022-00384-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00766-022-00384-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00766-022-00384-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,24]],"date-time":"2022-11-24T14:29:45Z","timestamp":1669300185000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00766-022-00384-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,20]]},"references-count":61,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["384"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00766-022-00384-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0947-3602","1432-010X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0947-3602","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-010X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 January 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 July 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 August 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}