{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,29]],"date-time":"2025-11-29T16:11:24Z","timestamp":1764432684735},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,5,5]],"date-time":"2009-05-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1241481600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Digit Imaging"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10278-009-9203-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,5,4]],"date-time":"2009-05-04T22:24:03Z","timestamp":1241475843000},"page":"520-526","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Effect of Dose Reduction on the Ability of Digital Mammography to Detect Simulated Microcalcifications"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"23","author":[{"given":"Mari","family":"Yakabe","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Shuji","family":"Sakai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Hidetake","family":"Yabuuchi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Yoshio","family":"Matsuo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Takeshi","family":"Kamitani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Taro","family":"Setoguchi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Mayumi","family":"Cho","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Masafumi","family":"Masuda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Masayuki","family":"Sasaki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,5,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"9203_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1773","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa052911","volume":"353","author":"ED Pisano","year":"2005","unstructured":"Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al: Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773\u20131783, 2005","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"9203_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2321031624","volume":"232","author":"P Skaane","year":"2004","unstructured":"Skaane P, Skjennald A: Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program\u2014The Oslo II Study. Radiology 232:197\u2013204, 2004","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"9203_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"877","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2293021171","volume":"229","author":"P Skaane","year":"2003","unstructured":"Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A: Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading\u2014Oslo I Study. Radiology 229:877\u2013884, 2003","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"9203_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1697","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-001-1269-y","volume":"12","author":"S Obenauer","year":"2002","unstructured":"Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, et al: Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions. Eur Radiol 12:1697\u20131702, 2002","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"9203_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"830","DOI":"10.1118\/1.1472497","volume":"29","author":"EA Berns","year":"2002","unstructured":"Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Cutter GR: Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice. Med Phys 29:830\u2013834, 2002","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"9203_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-007-0730-y","volume":"18","author":"E Vigeland","year":"2008","unstructured":"Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, et al: Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study. Eur Radiol 18:183\u2013191, 2008","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"9203_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1007\/s10278-007-9014-y","volume":"21","author":"S Sakai","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sakai S, Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, et al: Integration of temporal subtraction and nodule detection system for digital chest radiographs into picture archiving and communication system (PACS): four-year experience. J Digit Imaging 21:91\u201398, 2008","journal-title":"J Digit Imaging"},{"key":"9203_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2342030897","volume":"234","author":"ED Pisano","year":"2005","unstructured":"Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ: Digital mammography. Radiology 234:353\u2013362, 2005","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"9203_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1990","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-004-2446-6","volume":"14","author":"A Noel","year":"2004","unstructured":"Noel A, Thibault F: Digital detectors for mammography: the technical challenges. Eur Radiol 14:1990\u20131998, 2004","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"9203_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1276","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djg040","volume":"95","author":"HK Weir","year":"2003","unstructured":"Weir HK, Thun MJ, Hankey BF, et al: Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975\u20132000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1276\u20131299, 2003","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"9203_CR11","unstructured":"Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Guidelines. Available at: http:\/\/www.nccn.org\/professionals\/physician_gls\/PDF\/breast-screening.pdf . Accessed June 6, 2008"},{"key":"9203_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncm246","volume":"127","author":"C Streffer","year":"2007","unstructured":"Streffer C, International Commission on Radiation Protection: The ICRP 2007 recommendations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 127:2\u20137, 2007","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosimetry"},{"key":"9203_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3901","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/51\/16\/002","volume":"51","author":"CJ Lai","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lai CJ, Shaw CC, Whitman GJ, et al: Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the detection of simulated microcalcifications on mammograms using hardcopy images. Phys Med Biol 51:3901\u20133919, 2006","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"9203_CR14","unstructured":"American College of Radiology. Practice guideline for determinations of image quality in digital mammography. Available at: http:\/\/www.acr.org\/SecondaryMainMenuCategories\/quality_safety\/guidelines\/breast\/image_quality_digital_mammo.aspx . Accessed November 21, 2008"},{"key":"9203_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-006-0452-6","volume":"5","author":"T Kamitani","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, et al: Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study. Eur Radiol 5:1365\u20131371, 2007","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"9203_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1016\/S0001-2998(78)80014-2","volume":"8","author":"CE Metz","year":"1978","unstructured":"Metz CE: Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 8:283\u2013298, 1978","journal-title":"Semin Nucl Med"},{"key":"9203_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1097\/00004424-199209000-00015","volume":"27","author":"DD Dorfman","year":"1992","unstructured":"Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE: Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 27:723\u2013731, 1992","journal-title":"Invest Radiol"},{"key":"9203_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1118\/1.1543572","volume":"30","author":"W Huda","year":"2003","unstructured":"Huda W, Sajewicz AM, Ogden KM, et al: Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system. Med Phys 30:442\u2013448, 2003","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"9203_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3971","DOI":"10.1118\/1.2776253","volume":"34","author":"RS Saunders Jr","year":"2007","unstructured":"Saunders Jr, RS, Baker JA, Delong DM, et al: Does image quality matter? Impact of resolution and noise on mammographic task performance. Med Phys 34:3971\u20133981, 2007","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"9203_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2432061065","volume":"243","author":"E Samei","year":"2007","unstructured":"Samei E, Saunders Jr, RS, Baker JA, et al: Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance. Radiology 243:396\u2013404, 2007","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"9203_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3385","DOI":"10.1118\/1.2756607","volume":"34","author":"AS Chawla","year":"2007","unstructured":"Chawla AS, Samei E, Saunders R, et al: Effect of dose reduction on the detection of mammographic lesions: a mathematical observer model analysis. Med Phys 34:3385\u20133398, 2007","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"9203_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.184.3.1509041","volume":"184","author":"RE Bird","year":"1992","unstructured":"Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC: Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184:613\u2013617, 1992","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"9203_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1118\/1.2405324","volume":"34","author":"M Ruschin","year":"2007","unstructured":"Ruschin M, Timberg P, B\u00e5th M, et al: Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies. Med Phys 34:400\u2013407, 2007","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"9203_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/67597156","volume":"76","author":"S Obenauer","year":"2003","unstructured":"Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Grabbe E, et al: Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study. Br J Radiol 76:478\u2013482, 2003","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"9203_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/nch555","volume":"114","author":"B Hemdal","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hemdal B, Andersson I, Grahn A, et al: Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 114:383\u2013388, 2005","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosimetry"},{"key":"9203_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1118\/1.598632","volume":"26","author":"FO Bochud","year":"1999","unstructured":"Bochud FO, Valley JF, Verdun FR, et al: Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. Med Phys 26:1365\u20131370, 1999","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"9203_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/29933797","volume":"80","author":"T Svahn","year":"2007","unstructured":"Svahn T, Hemdal B, Ruschin M, et al: Dose reduction and its influence on diagnostic accuracy and radiation risk in digital mammography: an observer performance study using an anthropomorphic breast phantom. Br J Radiol 80:557\u2013562, 2007","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Digital Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10278-009-9203-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10278-009-9203-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10278-009-9203-y","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,29]],"date-time":"2019-05-29T12:01:45Z","timestamp":1559131305000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10278-009-9203-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,5,5]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,10]]}},"alternative-id":["9203"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10278-009-9203-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["0897-1889","1618-727X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0897-1889","type":"print"},{"value":"1618-727X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,5,5]]}}}