{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,25]],"date-time":"2026-02-25T01:19:27Z","timestamp":1771982367882,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]],"date-time":"2016-11-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1480291200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Digit Imaging"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10278-016-9928-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]],"date-time":"2016-11-28T14:08:26Z","timestamp":1480342106000},"page":"185-196","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Optimization of Image Quality and Dose in Digital Mammography"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Agnes M. F.","family":"Fausto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"M. C.","family":"Lopes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"M. C.","family":"de Sousa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"T\u00e2nia A. C.","family":"Furquim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Anderson W.","family":"Mol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Fermin G.","family":"Velasco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"9928_CR1","unstructured":"IAEA\u2014International Atomic Energy Agency: Optimization of the Radiological Protection of Patients: Image Quality and Dose in Mammography (coordinated research in Europe). At Energy 1\u201383, 2005."},{"key":"9928_CR2","unstructured":"IAEA\u2014International Atomic Energy Agency: Quality Assurance Programme for Digital Mammography. Vienna, 2011"},{"key":"9928_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"962","DOI":"10.1118\/1.3276732","volume":"37","author":"NT Ranger","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ranger NT, Lo JY, Samei E: A technique optimization protocol and the potential for dose reduction in digital mammography. Med Phys 37:962\u2013969, 2010. doi: 10.1118\/1.3276732","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"9928_CR4","first-page":"11","volume":"4","author":"TC Furquim","year":"2011","unstructured":"Furquim TC, Nersissian DY: Studies of dose optimization and image quality in technological transition in mammography. Rev Bras Fis M\u00e9dica 4:11\u201314, 2011","journal-title":"Rev Bras Fis M\u00e9dica"},{"key":"9928_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncn026","volume":"129","author":"JM Fernandez","year":"2008","unstructured":"Fernandez JM, Ordiales JM, Guibelalde E, Prieto C, Va\u00f1o E: Physical image quality comparison of four types. Radiat Prot Dosim 129:140\u2013143, 2008","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosim"},{"key":"9928_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1118\/1.1544674","volume":"30","author":"EA Berns","year":"2003","unstructured":"Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Cutter GR: Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose. Med Phys 30:334\u2013340, 2003. doi: 10.1118\/1.1544674","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"9928_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aichinger H, Dierker J, Joice-Barfuss S, S\u00e4bel M: Radiation Exposure and Image Quality in X-Ray DIAGNOSTIC RADIology, 2nd ed., Berlin: Springer, 2012","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-11241-6"},{"key":"9928_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3485","DOI":"10.1118\/1.1813872","volume":"31","author":"U Neitzel","year":"2004","unstructured":"Neitzel U, Buhr E, Hilgers G, Granfors PR: Determination of the modulation transfer function using the edge method: influence of scattered radiation. Med Phys 31:3485\u20133491, 2004. doi: 10.1118\/1.1813872","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"9928_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"886","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-03879-2-248","volume":"25","author":"R Garc\u00eda-Moll\u00e1","year":"2009","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda-Moll\u00e1 R, Linares R, Ayala R: A study of DQE dependence with beam quality, GE Senographe essential detector for mammography. IFMBE Proc 25:886\u2013889, 2009. doi: 10.1007\/978-3-642-03879-2-248","journal-title":"IFMBE Proc"},{"key":"9928_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2205","DOI":"10.1118\/1.1766421","volume":"31","author":"U Neitzel","year":"2004","unstructured":"Neitzel U, Gunther-Kohfahl S, Borasi G, Samei E: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital X-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set. Med Phys 31:2205\u20132211, 2004. doi: 10.1118\/1.1766421","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"9928_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1007\/s10278-014-9695-y","volume":"27","author":"AJ Salazar","year":"2014","unstructured":"Salazar AJ, Romero J, Bernal O, Moreno A, Velasco S, D\u00edaz X: Evaluation of low-cost telemammography screening configurations: a comparison with film-screen readings in vulnerable areas. J Digit Imaging 27:679\u2013686, 2014. doi: 10.1007\/s10278-014-9695-y","journal-title":"J Digit Imaging"},{"key":"9928_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.12.10419","volume":"202","author":"B S\u00e9radour","year":"2014","unstructured":"S\u00e9radour B, Heid P, Est\u00e8ve J: Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French National Breast Cancer Screening Program. Am J Roentgenol 202:229\u2013236, 2014. doi: 10.2214\/AJR.12.10419","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"9928_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2013.02.013","volume":"22","author":"FH Souza","year":"2013","unstructured":"Souza FH, Wendland EM, Rosa MI, Polanczyk CA: Is full-field digital mammography more accurate than screen-film mammography in overall population screening? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 22:217\u2013224, 2013. doi: 10.1016\/j.breast.2013.02.013","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"9928_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.218.3.r01mr29873","volume":"218","author":"JM Lewin","year":"2001","unstructured":"Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D\u2019Orsi CJ, Isaacs PK, Moss LJ, Karellas A, Sisney G a, Kuni CC, Cutter GR: Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 218:873\u2013880, 2001. doi: 10.1148\/radiology.218.3.r01mr29873","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"9928_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.034","volume":"68","author":"S Lowes","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lowes S, Liyanage U, Holmes CE, Sibal N, McLean L: Detection of microcalcifications during breast screening: a comparison of digital versus screen-film mammography. Clin Radiol 68:S1\u2013S57, 2013. doi: 10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.034","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"9928_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2151","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.299.18.2151","volume":"299","author":"WA Berg","year":"2008","unstructured":"Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Ellen B, Lehrer D, B\u00f6hm-v\u00e9lez M, Pisano ED, Jong RA, Evans WP, Morton MJ, Mahoney MC, Larsen LH, Barr RG, Farria DM: Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography compared to mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer: results of the first-year screen in ACRIN 6666. Jama 299:2151\u20132163, 2008. doi: 10.1001\/jama.299.18.2151","journal-title":"Jama"},{"key":"9928_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2009.09.022","volume":"7","author":"CH Lee","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, Evans P, Monsees B, Monticciolo D, Brenner RJ, Bassett L, Berg W, Feig S, Hendrick E, Mendelson E, D\u2019Orsi C, Sickles E, Burhenne LW: Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the society of breast imaging and the acr on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 7:18\u201327, 2010. doi: 10.1016\/j.jacr.2009.09.022","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"},{"key":"9928_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. In: Ann Intern Med. Philadelphia, pp 716\u2013726, 2009","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00008"},{"key":"9928_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2251011667","volume":"225","author":"TM Kolb","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH: Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast us and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165\u2013175, 2002. doi: 10.1148\/radiol.2251011667","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"9928_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.7326\/M15-0971","volume":"164","author":"HD Nelson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Nelson HD, O\u2019Meara ES, Kerlikowske K, Balch S, Miglioretti D: Factors associated with rates of false-positive and false-negative results from digital mammography screening: an analysis of registry data. Ann Intern Med 164:226\u2013235, 2016. doi: 10.7326\/M15-0971","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"9928_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20160045","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20160045","volume":"89","author":"MT Le","year":"2016","unstructured":"Le MT, Mothersill CE, Seymour CB, McNeill FE: Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high? Br J Radiol 89:20160045, 2016. doi: 10.1259\/bjr.20160045","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"9928_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"772","DOI":"10.1007\/s10278-011-9389-7","volume":"24","author":"MC Mahoney","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mahoney MC, Meganathan K: False positive marks on unsuspicious screening mammography with computer-aided detection. J Digit Imaging 24:772\u2013777, 2011. doi: 10.1007\/s10278-011-9389-7","journal-title":"J Digit Imaging"},{"key":"9928_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carj.2014.03.002","volume":"65","author":"JI Payne","year":"2014","unstructured":"Payne JI, Martin T, Caines JS, Duggan R: The burden of false-positive results in analog and digital screening mammography: experience of the Nova Scotia breast screening program. Can Assoc Radiol J 65:315\u2013320, 2014. doi: 10.1016\/j.carj.2014.03.002","journal-title":"Can Assoc Radiol J"},{"key":"9928_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-016-3931-8","volume":"159","author":"D Singh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Singh D, Pitk\u00e4niemi J, Malila N, Anttila A: Cumulative risk of false positive test in relation to breast symptoms in mammography screening: a historical prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 159:305\u2013313, 2016. doi: 10.1007\/s10549-016-3931-8","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"9928_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2053","DOI":"10.1111\/jocn.12426","volume":"23","author":"A Bolejko","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bolejko A, Zackrisson S, Hagell P, Wann-Hansson C: A roller coaster of emotions and sense\u2014coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of a false-positive screening mammography. J Clin Nurs 23:2053\u20132062, 2013. doi: 10.1111\/jocn.12426","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"key":"9928_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncr465","volume":"151","author":"M Borg","year":"2012","unstructured":"Borg M, Badr I, Royle GJ: The use of a figure-of-merit (FOM) for optimisation in digital mammography: a literature review. Radiat Prot Dosim 151:1\u20138, 2012. doi: 10.1093\/rpd\/ncr465","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosim"},{"key":"9928_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2006.09.009","volume":"61","author":"T Niimi","year":"2007","unstructured":"Niimi T, Imai K, Maeda H, Ikeda M: Information loss in visual assessments of medical images. Eur J Radiol 61:362\u2013366, 2007. doi: 10.1016\/j.ejrad.2006.09.009","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"9928_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1117\/12.595510","volume":"5745","author":"L Fletcher-Heath","year":"2005","unstructured":"Fletcher-Heath L: Quantifying the performance of human and software CDMAM phantom image observers for the qualification of digital mammography systems. Proc SPIE 5745:486\u2013498, 2005. doi: 10.1117\/12.595510","journal-title":"Proc SPIE"},{"key":"9928_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2011.02.027","volume":"81","author":"B Chen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chen B, Wang Y, Sun X, Guo W, Zhao M, Cui G, Hu L, Li P, Ren Y, Feng J, Yu J: Analysis of patient dose in full field digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 81:868\u2013872, 2012. doi: 10.1016\/j.ejrad.2011.02.027","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"9928_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nima.2007.05.197","volume":"580","author":"H Delis","year":"2007","unstructured":"Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G: Evaluating the Figure of Merit in mammography utilizing Monte Carlo simulation. Nucl Instruments Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrometers, Detect Assoc Equip 580:493\u2013496, 2007. doi: 10.1016\/j.nima.2007.05.197","journal-title":"Nucl Instruments Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrometers, Detect Assoc Equip"},{"key":"9928_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2368","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-006-0574-x","volume":"17","author":"P Toroi","year":"2007","unstructured":"Toroi P, Zanca F, Young KC, van Ongeval C, Marchal G, Bosmans H: Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten\/rhodium anode\/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system. Eur Radiol 17:2368\u20132375, 2007. doi: 10.1007\/s00330-006-0574-x","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"9928_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3185","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/52\/11\/017","volume":"52","author":"M Koutalonis","year":"2007","unstructured":"Koutalonis M, Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G: Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study. Phys Med Biol 52:3185\u20133199, 2007. doi: 10.1088\/0031-9155\/52\/11\/017","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"9928_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"960","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.04.1489","volume":"185","author":"TK Nishino","year":"2005","unstructured":"Nishino TK, Wu X, Johnson RF: Thickness of molybdenum filter and squared contrast-to-noise ratio per dose for digital mammography. Am J Roentgenol 185:960\u2013963, 2005. doi: 10.2214\/AJR.04.1489","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"9928_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.1118\/1.1561285","volume":"30","author":"E Samei","year":"2003","unstructured":"Samei E, Flynn MJ: An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. Med Phys 30:608\u2013622, 2003. doi: 10.1118\/1.1561285","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"9928_CR35","unstructured":"General Electric Medical Systems: Senographe DS Acquisition System 0459. Operator Manual 2385062\u2013100. Revision 2, 2004"},{"key":"9928_CR36","unstructured":"European Commission: European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. Luxembourg, 2006"},{"key":"9928_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4612-0943-0","volume-title":"Introduction to Statistics: The Nonparametric Way","author":"GE Noether","year":"1991","unstructured":"Noether GE: Introduction to Statistics: The Nonparametric Way. Springer, New York, 1991"},{"key":"9928_CR38","unstructured":"Karssemeijer N, Thijssen MAO: Determination of contrast-detail curves of mammography systems by automated image analysis. In: International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Chicago 3:155\u2013160, 1996"},{"key":"9928_CR39","unstructured":"Van der Burght R, Thijssen M, Bijkerk R: Manual contrast-detail phantom CDMAM 3.4 & CDMAM Analyser software V1.2., 2009"},{"key":"9928_CR40","unstructured":"NHSBSP Equipment Report: Commissioning and Routine Testing of Full Field Digital Mammography Systems. London, 2009"},{"key":"9928_CR41","unstructured":"European Commission: European Protocol on Dosimetry in Mammography. EUR 1623 EN, 1996"},{"key":"9928_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3225","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/45\/11\/308","volume":"45","author":"DR Dance","year":"2000","unstructured":"Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, Becktt JR, Kotre CJ: Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys Med Biol 45:3225\u20133240, 2000","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"9928_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1259\/0007-1285-65-774-528","volume":"65","author":"AR Cowen","year":"1992","unstructured":"Cowen AR, Brettle DS, Coleman NJ, Parkin GJS: A preliminary investigation of the imaging performance of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography using a new design of mammographic quality control test object. Br J Radiol 65:528\u2013535, 1992","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"9928_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2853","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/44\/11\/312","volume":"44","author":"CJ Kotre","year":"1999","unstructured":"Kotre CJ, Birch IP: Phase contrast enhancement of X-ray mammography: a design study. Phys Med Biol 44:2853\u20132866, 1999","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"9928_CR45","volume-title":"Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences","author":"S Siegel","year":"1988","unstructured":"Siegel S, Castellan NJ: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988"},{"key":"9928_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1049\/iet-ipr.2013.0778","volume":"9","author":"M Tiwari","year":"2015","unstructured":"Tiwari M, Gupta B, Shrivastava M: High-speed quantile-based histogram equalisation for brightness preservation and contrast enhancement. IET Image Process 9:80\u201389, 2015. doi: 10.1049\/iet-ipr.2013.0778","journal-title":"IET Image Process"},{"key":"9928_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"782","DOI":"10.1049\/iet-ipr.2013.0657","volume":"8","author":"Y Hongbo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hongbo Y, Xia H: Histogram modification using grey-level co-occurrence matrix for image contrast enhancement. IET Image Process 8:782\u2013793, 2014. doi: 10.1049\/iet-ipr.2013.0657","journal-title":"IET Image Process"},{"key":"9928_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1063\/1.3591892","volume":"30","author":"U Ewert","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ewert U, Heyne K, Zscherpel U, Jechow M, Bavendiek K: Optimum exposure conditions for computed radiography depending on fixed pattern noise and efficiency of imaging plate-scanner systems. AIP Conf Proc 30:493\u2013500, 2011. doi: 10.1063\/1.3591892","journal-title":"AIP Conf Proc"},{"key":"9928_CR49","unstructured":"Gonzalez RC, Woods RE: Digital Image Processing, 3rd ed. Pearson Education, 2008"},{"key":"9928_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5743","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/50\/23\/023","volume":"50","author":"A Pascoal","year":"2005","unstructured":"Pascoal A, Lawinski CP, Honey I, Blake P: Evaluation of a software package for automated quality assessment of contrast detail images\u2014comparison with subjective visual assessment. Phys Med Biol 50:5743\u20135757, 2005. doi: 10.1088\/0031-9155\/50\/23\/023","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Digital Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10278-016-9928-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10278-016-9928-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10278-016-9928-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,15]],"date-time":"2019-09-15T21:24:10Z","timestamp":1568582650000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10278-016-9928-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,4]]}},"alternative-id":["9928"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10278-016-9928-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0897-1889","1618-727X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0897-1889","type":"print"},{"value":"1618-727X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]]}}}