{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,10]],"date-time":"2026-04-10T11:02:40Z","timestamp":1775818960168,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,27]],"date-time":"2025-01-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1737936000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,27]],"date-time":"2025-01-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1737936000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004063","name":"Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004063","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Umea University"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>In cooperative human decision-making, agreements are often not total; a partial degree of agreement is sufficient to commit to a decision and move on, as long as one is somewhat confident that the involved parties are likely to stand by their commitment in the future, given no drastic unexpected changes. In this paper, we introduce the notion of <jats:italic>agreement scenarios<\/jats:italic> that allow artificial autonomous agents to reach such agreements, using formal models of argumentation, in particular abstract argumentation and value-based argumentation. We introduce the notions of degrees of satisfaction and (minimum, mean, and median) agreement, as well as a measure of the impact a value in a value-based argumentation framework has on these notions. We then analyze how degrees of agreement are affected when agreement scenarios are expanded with new information, to shed light on the reliability of partial agreements in dynamic scenarios. An implementation of the introduced concepts is provided as part of an argumentation-based reasoning software library.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-025-09688-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,27]],"date-time":"2025-01-27T08:12:18Z","timestamp":1737965538000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Disagree and commit: degrees of argumentation-based agreements"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Timotheus","family":"Kampik","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Juan Carlos","family":"Nieves","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"9688_CR1","unstructured":"Kampik, T., & Nieves, J.C. (2021). Toward consistent agreement approximation in abstract argumentation and beyond. Lomuscio, A., Endriss, U., Now\u00e9, A. (eds.) AAMAS \u201921: 20th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, virtual event, United Kingdom, May 3-7, 2021, (pp. 1551\u20131553). ACM. https:\/\/www.ifaamas.org\/Proceedings\/aamas2021\/pdfs\/p1551.pdf"},{"key":"9688_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ossowski, S., Sierra, C., & Botti, V. (2013). In: Ossowski, S. (ed.) Agreement technologies: A computing perspective, (pp. 3\u201316). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-007-5583-3_1","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5583-3_1"},{"issue":"10","key":"9688_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.001","volume":"171","author":"TJM Bench-Capon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Dunne, P. E. (2007). Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 171(10), 619\u2013641. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.001","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9688_CR4","volume-title":"Handbook of formal argumentation","year":"2018","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Gabbay, D., Giacomin, M., & Torre, L. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of formal argumentation. College Publications."},{"key":"9688_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liao, B., Slavkovik, M., & Torre, L. (2019). Building jiminy cricket: An architecture for moral agreements among stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI\/ACM conference on AI, ethics, and society, (pp. 147\u2013153).","DOI":"10.1145\/3306618.3314257"},{"issue":"6","key":"9688_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"861","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-018-9396-x","volume":"32","author":"C Yan","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yan, C., Lindgren, H., & Nieves, J. C. (2018). A dialogue-based approach for dealing with uncertain and conflicting information in medical diagnosis. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 32(6), 861\u2013885.","journal-title":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems"},{"issue":"4","key":"9688_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.3233\/AIC-190622","volume":"32","author":"JC Nieves","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nieves, J. C. (2019). Approximating agreements in formal argumentation dialogues. AI Communications, 32(4), 335\u2013346.","journal-title":"AI Communications"},{"issue":"3","key":"9688_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijproman.2008.03.001","volume":"27","author":"P Patanakul","year":"2009","unstructured":"Patanakul, P., & Milosevic, D. (2009). The effectiveness in managing a group of multiple projects: Factors of influence and measurement criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 216\u2013233. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijproman.2008.03.001","journal-title":"International Journal of Project Management"},{"issue":"2","key":"9688_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2), 321\u2013357.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"3","key":"9688_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429","volume":"13","author":"TJ Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T. J. (2003). Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13(3), 429\u2013448.","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"issue":"2","key":"9688_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exab003","volume":"31","author":"T Kampik","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kampik, T., & Nieves, J. C. (2021). Abstract argumentation and the rational man. Journal of Logic and Computation, 31(2), 654\u2013699. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/exab003","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"9688_CR12","first-page":"357","volume":"96","author":"B Verheij","year":"1996","unstructured":"Verheij, B. (1996). Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: Admissible sets and argumentation stages. Proceedings of NAIC, 96, 357\u2013368.","journal-title":"Proceedings of NAIC"},{"key":"9688_CR13","unstructured":"Atkinson, K. (2006). Value-based argumentation for democratic decision support. In P. E. Dunne, T. J. M. Bench-Capon (eds.) Computational models of argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006, September 11-12, 2006, Liverpool, UK. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 144, (pp. 47\u201358). IOS Press. http:\/\/www.booksonline.iospress.nl\/Content\/View.aspx?piid=1925"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"9688_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1007\/S10506-011-9113-4","volume":"19","author":"B Burgemeestre","year":"2011","unstructured":"Burgemeestre, B., Hulstijn, J., & Tan, Y. (2011). Value-based argumentation for justifying compliance. Artifical Intelligence and Law, 19(2\u20133), 149\u2013186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S10506-011-9113-4","journal-title":"Artifical Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"9688_CR15","unstructured":"Kaci, S., Torre, L., & Villata, S. (2018). Preference in abstract argumentation. In Computational models of argument, (pp. 405\u2013412). IOS Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"9688_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.10.010","volume":"55","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2014","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., & Vesic, S. (2014). Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 55(2), 585\u2013606. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.10.010","journal-title":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning"},{"issue":"2","key":"9688_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exac094","volume":"33","author":"T Kampik","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kampik, T., Gabbay, D., & Sartor, G. (2023). A comprehensive account of the burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation, 33(2), 257\u2013288. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/exac094","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"issue":"2","key":"9688_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/0749-5978(91)90020-T","volume":"50","author":"I Ajzen","year":"1991","unstructured":"Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179\u2013211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0749-5978(91)90020-T","journal-title":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes"},{"key":"9688_CR19","unstructured":"Kampik, T., & Gabbay, D. (2020). Towards diarg: An argumentation-based dialogue reasoning engine. In SAFA@ COMMA, (pp. 14\u201321)."},{"key":"9688_CR20","first-page":"75","volume":"10","author":"R Baumann","year":"2010","unstructured":"Baumann, R., & Brewka, G. (2010). Expanding argumentation frameworks: Enforcing and monotonicity results. COMMA, 10, 75\u201386.","journal-title":"COMMA"},{"key":"9688_CR21","unstructured":"Torre, L., & Vesic, S. (2017). The principle-based approach to abstract argumentation semantics. IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications (FLAP), 4(8)."},{"issue":"2","key":"9688_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1002\/j.1538-7305.1950.tb00463.x","volume":"29","author":"RW Hamming","year":"1950","unstructured":"Hamming, R. W. (1950). Error detecting and error correcting codes. The Bell System Technical Journal, 29(2), 147\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/j.1538-7305.1950.tb00463.x","journal-title":"The Bell System Technical Journal"},{"key":"9688_CR23","unstructured":"Delobelle, J., Haret, A., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J.-G., Rossit, J., & Woltran, S. (2016). Merging of abstract argumentation frameworks. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. KR\u201916, pp. 33\u201342. AAAI Press."},{"key":"9688_CR24","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Caminada, M., & Giacomin, M. (2018). Abstract argumentation frameworks and their semantics. In P. Baroni, D. Gabbay, G. Massimiliano, L. Torre, (eds.), Handbook of formal argumentation. College Publications, pp. 159\u2013236. College Publications. Chap. 4."},{"key":"9688_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Brewka, G., & Ulbricht, M. (2020). Revisiting the foundations of abstract argumentation-semantics based on weak admissibility and weak defense. In AAAI, (pp. 2742\u20132749).","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v34i03.5661"},{"key":"9688_CR26","first-page":"307","volume":"28","author":"L Shapley","year":"1953","unstructured":"Shapley, L. (1953). A value for n-person games. Annals of Mathematics Studies, 28, 307\u2013318.","journal-title":"Annals of Mathematics Studies"},{"key":"9688_CR27","unstructured":"Thimm, M. (2014). Tweety: A comprehensive collection of java libraries for logical aspects of artificial intelligence and knowledge representation. In Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. KR\u201914, (pp. 528\u2013537). AAAI Press."},{"key":"9688_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Potyka, N. (2018). Measuring disagreement among knowledge bases. In D. Ciucci, G. Pasi, & B. Vantaggi (Eds.), Scalable uncertainty management (pp. 212\u2013227). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-00461-3_15"},{"key":"9688_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-160014","volume":"8","author":"G Bodanza","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bodanza, G., Tohm\u00e9, F., & Auday, M. (2017). Collective argumentation: A survey of aggregation issues around argumentation frameworks. Argument & Computation, 8, 1\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/AAC-160014","journal-title":"Argument & Computation"},{"key":"9688_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-180425","volume":"9","author":"S Doutre","year":"2018","unstructured":"Doutre, S., & Mailly, J.-G. (2018). Constraints and changes: A survey of abstract argumentation dynamics. Argument & Computation, 9, 223\u2013248. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/AAC-180425","journal-title":"Argument & Computation"},{"key":"9688_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.2965","volume":"38","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Saint Cyr-Bannay, F., & Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C. (2010). Adding an argument. Change in abstract argumentation frameworks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 38, 49\u201384.","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research"},{"key":"9688_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bisquert, P., Cayrol, C., Saint Cyr-Bannay, F., & Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C. (2011). Change in argumentation systems: Exploring the interest of removing an argument. In SUM\u201911, (pp. 275\u2013288).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-23963-2_22"},{"issue":"4","key":"9688_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1065","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exu007","volume":"26","author":"D Gabbay","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gabbay, D. (2014). The handling of loops in argumentation networks. Journal of Logic and Computation, 26(4), 1065\u20131147. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/exu007","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"issue":"6","key":"9688_CR34","first-page":"1623","volume":"8","author":"R Baumann","year":"2021","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Doutre, S., Mailly, J.-G., & Wallner, J. P. (2021). Enforcement in formal argumentation. IfColog Journal of Logics and their Applications (FLAP), 8(6), 1623\u20131678.","journal-title":"IfColog Journal of Logics and their Applications (FLAP)"},{"key":"9688_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baumann, R. (2012). What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation. In ECAI, vol. 12, (pp. 127\u2013132).","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-098-7-127"},{"key":"9688_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1099","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1.11791","volume":"66","author":"M Ulbricht","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ulbricht, M., & Baumann, R. (2019). If nothing is accepted-repairing argumentation frameworks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 66, 1099\u20131145.","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research"},{"key":"9688_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_6","volume-title":"Theory and applications of formal argumentation","author":"K \u010cyras","year":"2015","unstructured":"\u010cyras, K., & Toni, F. (2015). Non-monotonic inference properties for assumption-based argumentation. In E. Black, S. Modgil, & N. Oren (Eds.), Theory and applications of formal argumentation (pp. 92\u2013111). Springer."},{"key":"9688_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_13","volume-title":"Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation","author":"T Rienstra","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rienstra, T., Sakama, C., & Torre, L. (2015). Persistence and monotony properties of argumentation semantics. In E. Black, S. Modgil, & N. Oren (Eds.), Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation (pp. 211\u2013225). Springer."},{"key":"9688_CR39","unstructured":"Endriss, U. (2017). Trends in computational social choice. AI Access."},{"key":"9688_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Skiba, K., Rienstra, T., Thimm, M., Heyninck, J., & Kern-Isberner, G. (2021). Ranking extensions in abstract argumentation. In Z. Zhou, (Ed.), Proceedings of the thirtieth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI 2021, Virtual Event \/ Montreal, Canada, 19-27 August 2021, (pp. 2047\u20132053). ijcai.org, Vienna, Austria. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24963\/IJCAI.2021\/282","DOI":"10.24963\/IJCAI.2021\/282"},{"key":"9688_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jet.2020.105042","volume":"188","author":"M Richter","year":"2020","unstructured":"Richter, M., & Rubinstein, A. (2020). The permissible and the forbidden. Journal of Economic Theory, 188, 105042. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jet.2020.105042","journal-title":"Journal of Economic Theory"},{"issue":"3","key":"9688_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2008.11.006","volume":"173","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2009","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., & Prade, H. (2009). Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artificial Intelligence, 173(3), 413\u2013436.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9688_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-04238-6_7","volume-title":"Logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning","author":"G Brewka","year":"2009","unstructured":"Brewka, G., & Eiter, T. (2009). Argumentation context systems: A framework for abstract group argumentation. In E. Erdem, F. Lin, & T. Schaub (Eds.), Logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning (pp. 44\u201357). Springer."}],"container-title":["Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10458-025-09688-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10458-025-09688-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10458-025-09688-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,7]],"date-time":"2025-07-07T03:53:40Z","timestamp":1751860420000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10458-025-09688-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,27]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]}},"alternative-id":["9688"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10458-025-09688-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1387-2532","1573-7454"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1387-2532","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7454","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 January 2025","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 January 2025","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}],"article-number":"8"}}