{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T18:01:19Z","timestamp":1781632879745,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":78,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,28]],"date-time":"2024-08-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1724803200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,28]],"date-time":"2024-08-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1724803200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004569","name":"Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["RID\/SP\/0046\/2024\/01"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["RID\/SP\/0046\/2024\/01"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004569","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Rev"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>In today\u2019s globalized technological area, aligning decisions with customer preferences is crucial yet challenging due to the complexities and uncertainties involved. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) serves as a vital tool for constructing support systems that cater to customer-centric trends. While existing MCDA methods vary in their calculation concepts, some prioritize ideal solutions, while others accommodate personalized preferences within dynamic decision contexts. Moreover, determining the relevance of criteria based on expert knowledge adds another layer of personalization to the evaluation process, further individualizing decision-making. However, current decision models often fail to integrate these concepts, leaving a gap in how recommendations can be enhanced when both are combined. To address these challenges, this paper introduces an innovative approach integrating Ranking Comparison and Expected Solution Point Stable Preference Ordering Towards Ideal Solution methods. This hybrid model incorporates personalization into multi-criteria evaluation, catering to individual preferences. By representing customer preferences through two distinct measures, the proposed approach ensures personalized recommendations aligned with decision-makers\u2019 needs. The efficacy of the hybrid model was validated through its application to the electric vehicle selection problem. The verification process highlighted potential disparities compared to other multi-criteria approaches, establishing a consumer preference-based Decision Support System approach for more precise and personalized selection recommendations.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10462-024-10901-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,28]],"date-time":"2024-08-28T09:02:56Z","timestamp":1724835776000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["Adaptive multi-criteria decision making for electric vehicles: a hybrid approach based on RANCOM and ESP-SPOTIS"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"57","author":[{"given":"Jakub","family":"Wi\u0119ckowski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jaros\u0142aw","family":"W\u0105tr\u00f3bski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna","family":"Shkurina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wojciech","family":"Sa\u0142abun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"10901_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.engappai.2022.105777","volume":"119","author":"M Akram","year":"2023","unstructured":"Akram M, Ramzan N, Deveci M (2023) Linguistic pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC-EDAS method for multiple-attribute group decision analysis. Eng Appl Artif Intell 119:105777","journal-title":"Eng Appl Artif Intell"},{"key":"10901_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2015.11.003","volume":"46","author":"M Alemi-Ardakani","year":"2016","unstructured":"Alemi-Ardakani M, Milani AS, Yannacopoulos S, Shokouhi G (2016) On the effect of subjective, objective and combinative weighting in multiple criteria decision making: a case study on impact optimization of composites. Expert Syst Appl 46:426\u2013438","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"issue":"5","key":"10901_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.3390\/info14050285","volume":"14","author":"B Ayan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ayan B, Abac\u0131o\u011flu S, Basilio MP (2023) A comprehensive review of the novel weighting methods for multi-criteria decision-making. Information 14(5):285","journal-title":"Information"},{"issue":"1","key":"10901_CR4","first-page":"57","volume":"6","author":"B Bairagi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Bairagi B (2023) A new framework for green selection of material handling equipment under fuzzy environment. Decis Mak: Appl Manag Eng 6(1):57\u201369","journal-title":"Decis Mak: Appl Manag Eng"},{"issue":"3","key":"10901_CR5","first-page":"453","volume":"21","author":"S Biswas","year":"2023","unstructured":"Biswas S, Bo\u017eani\u0107 D, Pamu\u010dar D, Marinkovi\u0107 D (2023) A spherical fuzzy based decision making framework with Einstein aggregation for comparing preparedness of SMEs in quality 4.0. Facta Univ, Ser: Mech Eng 21(3):453\u2013478","journal-title":"Facta Univ, Ser: Mech Eng"},{"key":"10901_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2015.12.011","volume":"337","author":"E Cables","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cables E, Lamata MT, Verdegay JL (2016) RIM-reference ideal method in multicriteria decision making. Inform Sci 337:1\u201310","journal-title":"Inform Sci"},{"key":"10901_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1007\/s13748-016-0093-1","volume":"5","author":"B Ceballos","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ceballos B, Lamata MT, Pelta DA (2016) A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods. Progress Artif Intell 5:315\u2013322","journal-title":"Progress Artif Intell"},{"key":"10901_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chakraborty S, Yeh C-H (2009) A simulation comparison of normalization procedures for TOPSIS. In: 2009 International conference on computers & industrial engineering, pp. 1815\u20131820. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/ICCIE.2009.5223811"},{"issue":"2","key":"10901_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.3390\/systems11020074","volume":"11","author":"K-H Chang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chang K-H (2023) Integrating subjective-objective weights consideration and a combined compromise solution method for handling supplier selection issues. Systems 11(2):74","journal-title":"Systems"},{"issue":"4","key":"10901_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.5267\/j.dsl.2016.5.004","volume":"5","author":"P Chatterjee","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chatterjee P, Chakraborty S (2016) A comparative analysis of VIKOR method and its variants. Decis Sci Lett 5(4):469\u2013486","journal-title":"Decis Sci Lett"},{"key":"10901_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2014.10.054","volume":"297","author":"T-Y Chen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chen T-Y (2015) An interval type-2 fuzzy LINMAP method with approximate ideal solutions for multiple criteria decision analysis. Inform Sci 297:50\u201379","journal-title":"Inform Sci"},{"key":"10901_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3969","DOI":"10.1007\/s00521-017-3326-8","volume":"31","author":"T-Y Chen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chen T-Y (2019) A novel VIKOR method with an application to multiple criteria decision analysis for hospital-based post-acute care within a highly complex uncertain environment. Neural Comput Appl 31:3969\u20133999","journal-title":"Neural Comput Appl"},{"issue":"5","key":"10901_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5205","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2010.10.039","volume":"38","author":"Y Chen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chen Y, Li KW, Liu S-F (2011) An OWA-TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision analysis. Expert Syst Appl 38(5):5205\u20135211","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"issue":"1","key":"10901_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2007.05.006","volume":"189","author":"S-Y Chou","year":"2008","unstructured":"Chou S-Y, Chang Y-H, Shen C-Y (2008) A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective\/subjective attributes. Eur J Oper Res 189(1):132\u2013145","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10901_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.31181\/jscda21202428","volume":"2","author":"HA Da\u011f\u0131stanl\u0131","year":"2024","unstructured":"Da\u011f\u0131stanl\u0131 HA (2024) An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR approach for R &D project selection in defense industry investment decisions. J Soft Comput Decis Anal 2(1):1\u201313","journal-title":"J Soft Comput Decis Anal"},{"key":"10901_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-00032-9_13","volume-title":"Statistical models for data analysis","author":"L Dancelli","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dancelli L, Manisera M, Vezzoli M (2013) On two classes of weighted rank correlation measures deriving from the spearman\u2019s $$\\rho$$. Statistical models for data analysis. Springer, Cham, pp 107\u2013114"},{"key":"10901_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dezert J, Tchamova A, Han D, Tacnet J-M (2020) The SPOTIS rank reversal free method for multi-criteria decision-making support. In: 2020 IEEE 23rd International conference on information fusion (FUSION), pp. 1\u20138. IEEE","DOI":"10.23919\/FUSION45008.2020.9190347"},{"issue":"10","key":"10901_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13260","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2011.04.144","volume":"38","author":"P Dheena","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dheena P, Mohanraj G (2011) Multicriteria decision-making combining fuzzy set theory, ideal and anti-ideal points for location site selection. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):13260\u201313265","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"key":"10901_CR19","unstructured":"EV-Database: Electric Vehicle Database. https:\/\/ev-database.org\/. [Online; accessed 06-December-2023] (2023)"},{"issue":"21","key":"10901_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10397","DOI":"10.3390\/app112110397","volume":"11","author":"B Ezell","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ezell B, Lynch CJ, Hester PT (2021) Methods for weighting decisions to assist modelers and decision analysts: a review of ratio assignment and approximate techniques. Appl Sci 11(21):10397","journal-title":"Appl Sci"},{"key":"10901_CR21","first-page":"145","volume":"9","author":"A Ganti","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ganti A (2020) Correlation coefficient. Corp. Financ. Account 9:145\u2013152","journal-title":"Corp. Financ. Account"},{"key":"10901_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Giove S, Brancia A, Satterstrom FK, Linkov I (2009) Decision support systems and environment: Role of MCDA. In: Decision support systems for risk-based management of contaminated sites, 1\u201321","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-09722-0_3"},{"issue":"1","key":"10901_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.31181\/jopi21202413","volume":"2","author":"Y G\u00f6kalp","year":"2024","unstructured":"G\u00f6kalp Y, Din\u00e7er H, Eti S, Y\u00fcksel S (2024) Generating a novel artificial intelligence-based decision-making model for determining priority strategies for improving community health. J Oper Intell 2(1):1\u201313","journal-title":"J Oper Intell"},{"key":"10901_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2019.05.010","volume":"96","author":"M Guo","year":"2020","unstructured":"Guo M, Liao X, Liu J, Zhang Q (2020) Consumer preference analysis: a data-driven multiple criteria approach integrating online information. Omega 96:102074","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"10901_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hadasik B, Kubiczek J (2021) Dataset of electric passenger cars with their specifications. Mendeley Data V2 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17632\/tb9yrptydn.2","DOI":"10.17632\/tb9yrptydn.2"},{"key":"10901_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7399","DOI":"10.1007\/s00500-018-3092-2","volume":"22","author":"S Hashemkhani Zolfani","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hashemkhani Zolfani S, Yazdani M, Zavadskas EK (2018) An extended stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method for improving criteria prioritization process. Soft Comput 22:7399\u20137405","journal-title":"Soft Comput"},{"issue":"1","key":"10901_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1109\/TSMC.2020.3043016","volume":"51","author":"E Herrera-Viedma","year":"2020","unstructured":"Herrera-Viedma E, Palomares I, Li C-C, Cabrerizo FJ, Dong Y, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2020) Revisiting fuzzy and linguistic decision making: scenarios and challenges for making wiser decisions in a better way. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern: Syst 51(1):191\u2013208","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern: Syst"},{"issue":"6","key":"10901_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jiph.2021.03.003","volume":"14","author":"S Hezer","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hezer S, Gelmez E, \u00d6zceylan E (2021) Comparative analysis of topsis, vikor and copras methods for the covid-19 regional safety assessment. J Infect Public Health 14(6):775\u2013786","journal-title":"J Infect Public Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"10901_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1207\/S15327663JCP1102_01","volume":"11","author":"AM Isen","year":"2001","unstructured":"Isen AM (2001) An influence of positive affect on decision making in complex situations: theoretical issues with practical implications. J Consum Psychol 11(2):75\u201385","journal-title":"J Consum Psychol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10901_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.31181\/jopi21202422","volume":"2","author":"K Kara","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kara K, Yal\u00e7\u0131n GC, Kayg\u0131s\u0131z EG, Edinsel S (2024) Assessing the academic performance of Turkish Universities in 2023: a MEREC-WEDBA hybrid methodology approach. J Oper Intell 2(1):252\u2013272","journal-title":"J Oper Intell"},{"issue":"3","key":"10901_CR31","first-page":"1","volume":"50","author":"M Keshavarz Ghorabaee","year":"2016","unstructured":"Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J (2016) A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res 50(3):1","journal-title":"Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"10901_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.3390\/sym10040091","volume":"10","author":"M Keshavarz-Ghorabaee","year":"2018","unstructured":"Keshavarz-Ghorabaee M, Amiri M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J (2018) An extended step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis with symmetric interval type-2 fuzzy sets for determining the subjective weights of criteria in multi-criteria decision-making problems. Symmetry 10(4):91","journal-title":"Symmetry"},{"key":"10901_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.softx.2023.101368","volume":"22","author":"B Kizielewicz","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kizielewicz B, Shekhovtsov A, Sa\u0142abun W (2023) pymcdm-The universal library for solving multi-criteria decision-making problems. SoftwareX 22:101368","journal-title":"SoftwareX"},{"key":"10901_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1016\/j.inffus.2018.11.009","volume":"49","author":"E Koksalmis","year":"2019","unstructured":"Koksalmis E, Kabak \u00d6 (2019) Deriving decision makers\u2019 weights in group decision making: an overview of objective methods. Inform Fusion 49:146\u2013160","journal-title":"Inform Fusion"},{"issue":"6","key":"10901_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"973","DOI":"10.3390\/sym13060973","volume":"13","author":"AR Krishnan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Krishnan AR, Kasim MM, Hamid R, Ghazali MF (2021) A modified CRITIC method to estimate the objective weights of decision criteria. Symmetry 13(6):973","journal-title":"Symmetry"},{"key":"10901_CR36","first-page":"1471","volume":"10","author":"R Kumar","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kumar R, Singh S, Bilga PS, Singh J, Singh S, Scutaru M-L, Pruncu CI et al (2021) Revealing the benefits of entropy weights method for multi-objective optimization in machining operations: a critical review. J Market Res 10:1471\u20131492","journal-title":"J Market Res"},{"key":"10901_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2016.01.059","volume":"55","author":"S Liu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Liu S, Chan FT, Ran W (2016) Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: an improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective\/subjective attributes. Expert Syst Appl 55:37\u201347","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"key":"10901_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2020.113738","volume":"161","author":"Y Liu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Liu Y, Eckert CM, Earl C (2020) A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Syst Appl 161:113738","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"key":"10901_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2021.107168","volume":"103","author":"P Liu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Liu P, Zhu B, Wang P (2021) A weighting model based on best-worst method and its application for environmental performance evaluation. Appl Soft Comput 103:107168","journal-title":"Appl Soft Comput"},{"issue":"1","key":"10901_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.31181\/jscda21202440","volume":"2","author":"H-W Lo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lo H-W, Wang L-Y, Weng AK-W, Lin S-W (2024) Assessing supplier disruption risks using a modified Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-TOPSIS approach. J Soft Comput Decis Anal 2(1):169\u2013187","journal-title":"J Soft Comput Decis Anal"},{"key":"10901_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10726-023-09825-1","volume":"32","author":"A Mahmoudi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mahmoudi A, Javed SA (2023) Uncertainty analysis in group decisions through interval ordinal priority approach. Group Decis Negot 32:1\u201327","journal-title":"Group Decis Negot"},{"issue":"3","key":"10901_CR42","first-page":"537","volume":"19","author":"E Mahmutagi\u0107","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mahmutagi\u0107 E, Stevi\u0107 \u017d, Nuni\u0107 Z, Chatterjee P, Tanackov I (2021) An integrated decision-making model for efficiency analysis of the forklifts in warehousing systems. Facta Univ, Ser: Mech Eng 19(3):537\u2013553","journal-title":"Facta Univ, Ser: Mech Eng"},{"issue":"10","key":"10901_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1226","DOI":"10.1080\/09537325.2015.1061121","volume":"27","author":"MDR Mart\u00ednez-Torres","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mart\u00ednez-Torres MDR, Rodriguez-Pi\u00f1ero F, Toral SL (2015) Customer preferences versus managerial decision-making in open innovation communities: the case of Starbucks. Technol Anal Strat Manag 27(10):1226\u20131238","journal-title":"Technol Anal Strat Manag"},{"issue":"1","key":"10901_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2017.02.038","volume":"265","author":"M Marttunen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Marttunen M, Belton V, Lienert J (2018) Are objectives hierarchy related biases observed in practice? A meta-analysis of environmental and energy applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Eur J Oper Res 265(1):178\u2013194","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"10901_CR45","first-page":"76","volume":"4","author":"I Mukhametzyanov","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mukhametzyanov I (2021) Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: entropy, CRITIC and SD. Decis Mak: Appl Manag Eng 4(2):76\u2013105","journal-title":"Decis Mak: Appl Manag Eng"},{"issue":"3","key":"10901_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1626","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2005.10.003","volume":"177","author":"M Nowak","year":"2007","unstructured":"Nowak M (2007) Aspiration level approach in stochastic MCDM problems. Eur J Oper Res 177(3):1626\u20131640","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"issue":"8","key":"10901_CR47","first-page":"1449","volume":"23","author":"G Odu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Odu G (2019) Weighting methods for multi-criteria decision making technique. J Appl Sci Environ Manag 23(8):1449\u20131457","journal-title":"J Appl Sci Environ Manag"},{"issue":"3","key":"10901_CR48","first-page":"419","volume":"18","author":"D Pamucar","year":"2020","unstructured":"Pamucar D, Ecer F (2020) Prioritizing the weights of the evaluation criteria under fuzziness: the fuzzy full consistency method-FUCOM-F. Facta Univ, Ser: Mech Eng 18(3):419\u2013437","journal-title":"Facta Univ, Ser: Mech Eng"},{"issue":"9","key":"10901_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.3390\/sym10090393","volume":"10","author":"D Pamu\u010dar","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pamu\u010dar D, Stevi\u0107 \u017d, Sremac S (2018) A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in mcdm models: full consistency method (fucom). Symmetry 10(9):393","journal-title":"Symmetry"},{"issue":"10","key":"10901_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1874","DOI":"10.3390\/sym13101874","volume":"13","author":"B Paradowski","year":"2021","unstructured":"Paradowski B, Shekhovtsov A, B\u0105czkiewicz A, Kizielewicz B, Sa\u0142abun W (2021) Similarity analysis of methods for objective determination of weights in multi-criteria decision support systems. Symmetry 13(10):1874","journal-title":"Symmetry"},{"key":"10901_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cie.2022.108138","volume":"169","author":"AR Paramanik","year":"2022","unstructured":"Paramanik AR, Sarkar S, Sarkar B (2022) OSWMI: an objective-subjective weighted method for minimizing inconsistency in multi-criteria decision making. Comput Ind Eng 169:108138","journal-title":"Comput Ind Eng"},{"issue":"2","key":"10901_CR52","first-page":"1","volume":"54","author":"V Podvezko","year":"2020","unstructured":"Podvezko V, Zavadskas EK, Podviezko A (2020) An extension of the new objective weight assessment methods CILOS and IDOCRIW to fuzzy MCDM. Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res 54(2):1","journal-title":"Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"10901_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1002\/mcda.1530","volume":"22","author":"J Razmak","year":"2015","unstructured":"Razmak J, Aouni B (2015) Decision support system and multi-criteria decision aid: a state of the art and perspectives. J Multi-Crit Decis Anal 22(1\u20132):101\u2013117","journal-title":"J Multi-Crit Decis Anal"},{"issue":"8","key":"10901_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1991","DOI":"10.1007\/s10115-021-01588-y","volume":"63","author":"M \u015eahin","year":"2021","unstructured":"\u015eahin M (2021) Location selection by multi-criteria decision-making methods based on objective and subjective weightings. Knowl Inform Syst 63(8):1991\u20132021","journal-title":"Knowl Inform Syst"},{"issue":"3","key":"10901_CR55","first-page":"62","volume":"5","author":"W Sa\u0142abun","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sa\u0142abun W (2014) Reduction in the number of comparisons required to create matrix of expert judgment in the comet method. Manag Prod Eng Rev 5(3):62\u201369","journal-title":"Manag Prod Eng Rev"},{"issue":"9","key":"10901_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1549","DOI":"10.3390\/sym12091549","volume":"12","author":"W Sa\u0142abun","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sa\u0142abun W, W\u0105tr\u00f3bski J, Shekhovtsov A (2020) Are MCDA methods benchmarkable? A comparative study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II methods. Symmetry 12(9):1549","journal-title":"Symmetry"},{"key":"10901_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sa\u0142abun W, Urbaniak K (2020) A new coefficient of rankings similarity in decision-making problems. In: Computational Science\u2013ICCS 2020: 20th International Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 3\u20135, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 20, pp. 632\u2013645. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-50417-5_47"},{"issue":"1","key":"10901_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.31181\/jdaic10030042024s","volume":"4","author":"M Sarfraz","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sarfraz M (2024) Application of interval-valued T-spherical fuzzy Dombi Hamy mean operators in the antiviral mask selection against COVID-19. J Decis Anal Intell Comput 4(1):67\u201398","journal-title":"J Decis Anal Intell Comput"},{"key":"10901_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.trd.2017.12.022","volume":"59","author":"B Sennaroglu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sennaroglu B, Celebi GV (2018) A military airport location selection by ahp integrated promethee and vikor methods. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 59:160\u2013173","journal-title":"Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ"},{"key":"10901_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4556","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2022.09.519","volume":"207","author":"A Shekhovtsov","year":"2022","unstructured":"Shekhovtsov A (2022) Decision-making process customization by using expected solution point. Procedia Comput Sci 207:4556\u20134564","journal-title":"Procedia Comput Sci"},{"key":"10901_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2023.119456","volume":"647","author":"A Shekhovtsov","year":"2023","unstructured":"Shekhovtsov A, Kizielewicz B, Sa\u0142abun W (2023) Advancing individual decision-making: an extension of the characteristic objects method using expected solution point. Inform Sci 647:119456","journal-title":"Inform Sci"},{"key":"10901_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shekhovtsov A, Kizielewicz B, Sa\u0142abun W (2023) Version [1.1]-[pymcdm\u2013The universal library for solving multi-criteria decision-making problems]. SoftwareX 24:101519","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4366030"},{"key":"10901_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shekhovtsov A, Wi\u0119ckowski J, W\u0105tr\u00f3bski J (2021) Toward reliability in the mcda rankings: Comparison of distance-based methods. In: Intelligent decision technologies: proceedings of the 13th KES-IDT 2021 conference, pp. 321\u2013329. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-16-2765-1_27"},{"key":"10901_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2022.117839","volume":"206","author":"F Sitorus","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sitorus F, Brito-Parada PR (2022) The selection of renewable energy technologies using a hybrid subjective and objective multiple criteria decision making method. Expert Syst Appl 206:117839","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"key":"10901_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jretconser.2021.102728","volume":"63","author":"Y Song","year":"2021","unstructured":"Song Y, Li G, Li T, Li Y (2021) A purchase decision support model considering consumer personalization about aspirations and risk attitudes. J Retail Consum Serv 63:102728","journal-title":"J Retail Consum Serv"},{"key":"10901_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.est.2023.107089","volume":"66","author":"M Tajik","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tajik M, Makui A, Tosarkani BM (2023) Sustainable cathode material selection in lithium-ion batteries using a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making. J Energy Storage 66:107089","journal-title":"J Energy Storage"},{"key":"10901_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1590\/0101-7438.2018.038.02.0331","volume":"38","author":"RFDF Aires","year":"2018","unstructured":"Aires RFDF, Ferreira LA (2018) The rank reversal problem in multi-criteria decision making literature review. Pesquisa Operacional 38:331\u2013362","journal-title":"Pesquisa Operacional"},{"issue":"1","key":"10901_CR68","first-page":"535","volume":"6","author":"DK Tripathi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tripathi DK, Nigam SK, Rani P, Shah AR (2023) New intuitionistic fuzzy parametric divergence measures and score function-based CoCoSo method for decision-making problems. Decis Mak: Appl Manag Eng 6(1):535\u2013563","journal-title":"Decis Mak: Appl Manag Eng"},{"issue":"1","key":"10901_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15137","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-19554-1","volume":"12","author":"M Tsakalerou","year":"2022","unstructured":"Tsakalerou M, Efthymiadis D, Abilez A (2022) An intelligent methodology for the use of multi-criteria decision analysis in impact assessment: the case of real-world offshore construction. Sci Rep 12(1):15137","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"10","key":"10901_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1672","DOI":"10.3390\/math8101672","volume":"8","author":"A Uluta\u015f","year":"2020","unstructured":"Uluta\u015f A, Karabasevic D, Popovic G, Stanujkic D, Nguyen PT, Karak\u00f6y \u00c7 (2020) Development of a novel integrated CCSD-ITARA-MARCOS decision-making approach for stackers selection in a logistics system. Mathematics 8(10):1672","journal-title":"Mathematics"},{"key":"10901_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Uzun B, Taiwo M, Syidanova A, Uzun\u00a0Ozsahin D (2021) The technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental and Civil Engineering, 25\u201330","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-64765-0_4"},{"issue":"1","key":"10901_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.31181\/jscda11202313","volume":"1","author":"A Vahidinia","year":"2023","unstructured":"Vahidinia A, Hasani A (2023) A comprehensive evaluation model for smart supply chain based on the hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method. J Soft Comput Decis Anal 1(1):219\u2013237","journal-title":"J Soft Comput Decis Anal"},{"issue":"4","key":"10901_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1037\/a0027415","volume":"141","author":"XT Wang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wang XT, Johnson JG (2012) A tri-reference point theory of decision making under risk. J Exp Psychol Gen 141(4):743","journal-title":"J Exp Psychol Gen"},{"issue":"23","key":"10901_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9379","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2015.07.056","volume":"42","author":"L Wang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wang L, Zhang Z-X, Wang Y-M (2015) A prospect theory-based interval dynamic reference point method for emergency decision making. Expert Syst Appl 42(23):9379\u20139388","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"key":"10901_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.engappai.2023.106114","volume":"122","author":"J Wi\u0119ckowski","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wi\u0119ckowski J, Kizielewicz B, Shekhovtsov A, Sa\u0142abun W (2023) RANCOM: a novel approach to identifying criteria relevance based on inaccuracy expert judgments. Eng Appl Artif Intell 122:106114","journal-title":"Eng Appl Artif Intell"},{"issue":"4","key":"10901_CR76","first-page":"367","volume":"27","author":"J Wi\u0119ckowski","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wi\u0119ckowski J, Sa\u0142abun W, Kizielewicz B, B\u0105czkiewicz A, Shekhovtsov A, Paradowski B, W\u0105tr\u00f3bski J (2023) Recent advances in multi-criteria decision analysis: a comprehensive review of applications and trends. Int J Knowl-Based Intell Eng Syst 27(4):367\u2013393","journal-title":"Int J Knowl-Based Intell Eng Syst"},{"key":"10901_CR77","volume-title":"Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcomes in water resources management","author":"ZB Yusop","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yusop ZB, Ahmed K, Shirazi SM, Zardari NH (2015) Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcomes in water resources management. Springer, Cham"},{"key":"10901_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zaim H, Ramdani M, Haddi A (2020) Decision tree and MCDA under fuzziness to support e-customer satisfaction survey. In: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on soft computing and pattern recognition (SoCPaR 2018) 10, pp. 22\u201332. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-17065-3_3"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10462-024-10901-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10462-024-10901-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10462-024-10901-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,25]],"date-time":"2024-09-25T03:41:22Z","timestamp":1727235682000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10462-024-10901-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,28]]},"references-count":78,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10901"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10462-024-10901-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1573-7462"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1573-7462","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"6 August 2024","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 August 2024","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"270"}}