{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,19]],"date-time":"2026-10-19T05:32:04Z","timestamp":1792387924988,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3-4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,6]],"date-time":"2015-10-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1444089600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ann Math Artif Intell"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10472-015-9484-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,6]],"date-time":"2015-10-06T18:45:47Z","timestamp":1444157147000},"page":"303-321","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"78","author":[{"given":"Gregor","family":"Betz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,6]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"9484_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.2307\/2274239","volume":"50","author":"CE Alchourron","year":"1985","unstructured":"Alchourron, C.E., Peter, G., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change - partial meet contraction and revision functions. J. Symbo. Log. 50(2), 510\u2013530 (1985)","journal-title":"J. Symbo. Log."},{"key":"9484_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Besnard, P.: A formal analysis of logic-based argumentation systems. In: Deshpande, A., Hunter, A. (eds.) Scalable Uncertainty Management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 42\u201355. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-15951-0_10"},{"issue":"1\u20133","key":"9484_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1014490210693","volume":"34","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2002","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 34(1\u20133), 197\u2013215 (2002)","journal-title":"Ann. Math. Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"2","key":"9484_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1021603608656","volume":"29","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2002","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Autom. Reason. 29(2), 125\u2013169 (2002)","journal-title":"Int. J. Autom. Reason."},{"key":"9484_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., Cartwright, D., Wyner, A.: Semantic models for policy deliberations. In: Ashley, K.D., Van Engers, T.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2011), pp 81\u201390. ACM, New York (2011)","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018369"},{"key":"9484_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: Semantics of abstract argument systems. In: Rahwan, I., Simari, G. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp 25\u201344. Springer, Dordrecht, New York (2009)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_2"},{"issue":"2","key":"9484_CR7","first-page":"231","volume":"22","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T.: Agreeing to differ: Modelling persuasive dialogue between parties with different values. Inf. Log. 22(2), 231\u2013245 (2003)","journal-title":"Inf. Log."},{"key":"9484_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T., Atkinson, K.: Abstract argumentation and values. In: Rahwan, I, Simari, G (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp 45\u201364. Springer, Dordrecht, New York (2009)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_3"},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"9484_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.001","volume":"171","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T., Dunne, P.: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. 171(10\u201315), 619\u2013641 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"9484_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9780262026437.001.0001","volume-title":"Elements of Argumentation","author":"P Besnard","year":"2008","unstructured":"Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2008)"},{"key":"9484_CR11","volume-title":"Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs","author":"G Betz","year":"2012","unstructured":"Betz, G.: Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs. Synthese Library. Springer, Dordrecht (2012)"},{"key":"9484_CR12","volume-title":"Ethical Aspects of Climate Engineering","author":"G Betz","year":"2012","unstructured":"Betz, G., Cacean, S.: Ethical Aspects of Climate Engineering. KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe (2012)"},{"key":"9484_CR13","volume-title":"The Moral Controversy About Climate Engineering - An Argument Map, Version 2012-02-13","author":"G Betz","year":"2012","unstructured":"Betz, G., Cacean, S.: The Moral Controversy About Climate Engineering - An Argument Map, Version 2012-02-13. KIT, Karlsruhe (2012)"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9484_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(97)00015-5","volume":"93","author":"A Bondarenko","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bondarenko, A., Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 93(1\u20132), 63\u2013101 (1997)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"216","key":"9484_CR15","first-page":"3","volume":"2010","author":"G Brewka","year":"2010","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Gordon, T.F.: Carneades and abstract dialectical frameworks: A reconstruction. Comput. Models Argument: Proc. Comma 2010(216), 3\u201312 (2010)","journal-title":"Comput. Models Argument: Proc. Comma"},{"key":"9484_CR16","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Woltran, S.: Abstract dialectic frameworks. In: Lin, F., Sattler, U., Truszczynski, M. (eds.) Proceeding of the Twelfth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp 102\u2013111. AAAI Press, Palo Alto, California (2010)"},{"key":"9484_CR17","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Dunne, P.E., Woltran, S.: Relating the semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks and standard afs. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) IJCAI\u201911 Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, pp 780\u2013785. AAAI Press, Palo Alto, California (2011)"},{"issue":"5\u20136","key":"9484_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.02.003","volume":"171","author":"M Caminada","year":"2007","unstructured":"Caminada, M., Amgoud, L.: On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms. Artif. Intell. 171(5\u20136), 286\u2013310 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"9484_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C.: On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. 8th European Conference, ECSQARU 2005, Barcelona, Spain, July 6-8, 2005. Proceedings, pp 378\u2013389. Springer, Berlin \/ Heidelberg (2005)","DOI":"10.1007\/11518655_33"},{"key":"9484_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C.: Bipolar abstract argumentation systems. In: Rahwan, I., Simari, G. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp 65\u201384. Springer, Dordrecht, New York (2009)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_4"},{"issue":"4","key":"9484_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1145\/371578.371581","volume":"32","author":"IC Carlos","year":"2000","unstructured":"Carlos, I.C., Maguitman, A.G., Loui, R.P.: Logical models of argument. ACM Comput. Surv. 32(4), 337\u2013383 (2000)","journal-title":"ACM Comput. Surv."},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"9484_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.012","volume":"171","author":"S Coste-Marquis","year":"2007","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Konieczny, S., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C., Marquis, P.: On the merging of Dung\u2019s argumentation systems. Artif. Intell. 171 (10\u201315), 730\u2013753 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"9484_CR23","unstructured":"De ArgumentenFabriek: Argument map shale gas production in EU member states. Technical report, De ArgumentenFabriek, 2012. http:\/\/www.argumentenfabriek.nl\/argument-map-shale-gas-production-eu-member-states http:\/\/www.argumentenfabriek.nl\/argument-map-shale-gas-production-eu-member-states"},{"issue":"2","key":"9484_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"9484_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511628719","volume-title":"Scientific Controversies: Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology","author":"HT Engelhardt","year":"1987","unstructured":"Engelhardt, H.T., Caplan, A.L.: Scientific Controversies: Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)"},{"issue":"2","key":"9484_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-011-9753-y","volume":"162","author":"J Friedman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Friedman, J.: Suspended judgment. Philos. Stud. 162(2), 165\u2013181 (2013)","journal-title":"Philos. Stud."},{"issue":"1","key":"9484_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2012.661766","volume":"3","author":"BV Gijzel","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gijzel, B.V., Prakken, H.: Relating Carneades with abstract argumentation via the ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation. Argument Comput. 3(1), 21\u201347 (2012)","journal-title":"Argument Comput."},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"9484_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.010","volume":"171","author":"TF Gordon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gordon, T.F., Prakken, H., Walton, D.: The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artif. Intell. 171(10\u201315), 875\u2013896 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"9484_CR29","volume-title":"Knowledge in Flux : Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States","author":"P G\u00e4rdenfors","year":"1988","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux : Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1988)"},{"key":"9484_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-0814-3","volume-title":"A Textbook of Belief Dynamics: Theory Change and Database Updating, vol. 11 of Applied Logic Series","author":"SO Hansson","year":"1999","unstructured":"Hansson, S.O.: A Textbook of Belief Dynamics: Theory Change and Database Updating, vol. 11 of Applied Logic Series. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999)"},{"key":"9484_CR31","unstructured":"Hansson, S.O.: Logic of belief revision. In: Zalta, E.N (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2009 edition (2009)"},{"key":"9484_CR32","volume-title":"Mapping Great Debates: Can Computers Think? 7 Maps and Handbook","author":"R Horn","year":"1998","unstructured":"Horn, R.: Mapping Great Debates: Can Computers Think? 7 Maps and Handbook. Macro VU, Bainbridge Island (1998)"},{"key":"9484_CR33","volume-title":"The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions","author":"P Kitcher","year":"1993","unstructured":"Kitcher, P.: The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford University Press, New York (1993)"},{"issue":"3","key":"9484_CR34","first-page":"213","volume":"25","author":"C Lumer","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lumer, C.: The epistemological theory of argument - how and why? Inf. Log. 25 (3), 213\u2013242 (2005)","journal-title":"Inf. Log."},{"key":"9484_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195119879.001.0001","volume-title":"Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives","author":"P Machamer","year":"2000","unstructured":"Machamer, P., Pera, M., Baltas, A.: Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York (2000)"},{"key":"9484_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2012.10.008","volume":"195","author":"S Modgil","year":"2013","unstructured":"Modgil, S., Prakken, H.: A general account of argumentation with preferences. Artif. Intell. 195, 361\u2013397 (2013)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"4","key":"9484_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4","volume":"11","author":"Pollock. J.L.","year":"1987","unstructured":"Pollock. J.L.: Defeasible reasoning. Cogn. Sci. 11(4), 481\u2013518 (1987)","journal-title":"Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"9484_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001","volume-title":"Cognitive Carpentry. A Blueprint for How to Build A Person","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1995","unstructured":"Pollock, J.L.: Cognitive Carpentry. A Blueprint for How to Build A Person. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1995)"},{"issue":"2","key":"9484_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592","volume":"1","author":"H Prakken","year":"2011","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument Comput. 1(2), 93\u2013124 (2011)","journal-title":"Argument Comput."},{"issue":"1","key":"9484_CR40","first-page":"65","volume":"4","author":"H Prakken","year":"2011","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: An overview of formal models of argumentation and their application in philosophy. Stud. Log. 4(1), 65\u201386 (2011)","journal-title":"Stud. Log."},{"issue":"1","key":"9484_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9117-8","volume":"20","author":"H Prakken","year":"2012","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Artif. Intell. Law 20(1), 57\u201382 (2012)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell. Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9484_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2012.663409","volume":"3","author":"H Prakken","year":"2012","unstructured":"Prakken, H., Horty, J.: An appreciation of John Pollock\u2019s work on the computational study of argument. Argument Comput. 3(1), 1\u201319 (2012)","journal-title":"Argument Comput."},{"key":"9484_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: Logics for defeasible argumentation. In: Gabbay, D.M., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 4, pp 219\u2013318. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2nd edn. (2001)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0456-4_3"},{"key":"9484_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rahwan, I., Larson, K.: Argumentation and game theory. In: Rahwan, I., Simari, G. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp 321\u2013339. Springer, Dordrecht, New York (2009)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_16"},{"key":"9484_CR45","volume-title":"Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence","author":"I Rahwan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rahwan, I., Simari, G.: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Dordrecht, New York (2009)"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9484_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(80)90014-4","volume":"13","author":"R Reiter","year":"1980","unstructured":"Reiter, R.: A logic for default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 13(1\u20132), 81\u2013132 (1980)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"9484_CR47","volume-title":"The Coherency Theory of Truth","author":"N Rescher","year":"1973","unstructured":"Rescher, N.: The Coherency Theory of Truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1973)"},{"key":"9484_CR48","volume-title":"Dialectics. A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge","author":"N Rescher","year":"1977","unstructured":"Rescher, N.: Dialectics. A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. State University of New York Press, Albany (1977)"},{"issue":"2","key":"9484_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00154005","volume":"1","author":"N Rescher","year":"1970","unstructured":"Rescher, N., Manor, R.: On inference from inconsistent premisses. Theory Decis. 1(2), 179\u2013217 (1970)","journal-title":"Theory Decis."},{"key":"9484_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226731001.001.0001","volume-title":"The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge Among Gentlemanly Specialists","author":"MJS Rudwick","year":"1985","unstructured":"Rudwick, M.J.S.: The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge Among Gentlemanly Specialists. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1985)"},{"key":"9484_CR51","volume-title":"Pros and Cons: A Debater\u2019s Handbook","author":"T Sather","year":"1999","unstructured":"Sather, T.: Pros and Cons: A Debater\u2019s Handbook. Routledge, London, New York (1999)"},{"issue":"12","key":"9484_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2195","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-011-9964-y","volume":"190","author":"D Seselja","year":"2013","unstructured":"Seselja, D., Stra \u03b2er, C.: Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates. Synthese 190(12), 2195\u20132217 (2013)","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9484_CR53","volume-title":"Models of Bounded Rationality","author":"HA Simon","year":"1982","unstructured":"Simon, H.A.: Models of Bounded Rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1982)"},{"issue":"1","key":"9484_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1015004212541","volume":"131","author":"W Spohn","year":"2002","unstructured":"Spohn, W.: A brief comparison of Pollock\u2019s defeasible reasoning and ranking functions. Synthese 131(1), 39\u201356 (2002)","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9484_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199697502.001.0001","volume-title":"The Laws of Belief : Ranking Theory and Its Philosophical Applications","author":"W Spohn","year":"2012","unstructured":"Spohn, W.: The Laws of Belief : Ranking Theory and Its Philosophical Applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)"}],"container-title":["Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10472-015-9484-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10472-015-9484-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10472-015-9484-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10472-015-9484-4","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,11]],"date-time":"2024-06-11T15:55:48Z","timestamp":1718121348000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10472-015-9484-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,6]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3-4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]}},"alternative-id":["9484"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10472-015-9484-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1012-2443","1573-7470"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1012-2443","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7470","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,6]]}}}