{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,11]],"date-time":"2023-08-11T07:41:46Z","timestamp":1691739706371},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,16]],"date-time":"2023-05-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1684195200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,16]],"date-time":"2023-05-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1684195200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ann Math Artif Intell"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The Bipolar Argumentation Framework approach is an extension of the Abstract Argumentation Framework. A Bipolar Argumentation Framework considers a support interaction between arguments, besides the attack interaction. As in the Abstract Argumentation Framework, some researches consider that arguments have a degree of uncertainty, which impacts on the degree of uncertainty of the extensions obtained from a Bipolar Argumentation Framework under a semantics. In these approaches, both the uncertainty of the arguments and of the extensions are modeled by means of precise probability values. However, in many real application domains there is a need for aggregating probability values from different sources so it is not suitable to aggregate such probability values in a unique probability distribution. To tackle this challenge, we use credal networks theory for modelling the uncertainty of the degree of belief of arguments in a BAF. We also propose an algorithm for calculating the degree of uncertainty of the extensions inferred by a given argumentation semantics. Moreover, we introduce the idea of modelling the support relation as a causal relation. We formally show that the introduced approach is sound and complete w.r.t the credal networks theory.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10472-023-09851-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,16]],"date-time":"2023-05-16T08:05:42Z","timestamp":1684224342000},"page":"517-536","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Probabilistic causal bipolar abstract argumentation: an approach based on credal networks"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"91","author":[{"given":"Mariela","family":"Morveli-Espinoza","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Juan Carlos","family":"Nieves","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cesar Augusto","family":"Tacla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,16]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"9851_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial intelligence 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artificial intelligence"},{"issue":"10","key":"9851_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20307","volume":"23","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2008","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C., Livet, P.: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 23(10), 1062\u20131093 (2008)","journal-title":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems"},{"issue":"7","key":"9851_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"876","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.03.001","volume":"54","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C.: Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: Towards a better understanding. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 54(7), 876\u2013899 (2013)","journal-title":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"9851_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pearl, J.: Graphical models for probabilistic and causal reasoning. Quantified representation of uncertainty and imprecision, 367\u2013389 (1998)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-1735-9_12"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"9851_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2004.10.003","volume":"39","author":"FG Cozman","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cozman, F.G.: Graphical models for imprecise probabilities. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 39(2\u20133), 167\u2013184 (2005)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approx. Reasoning"},{"issue":"1","key":"9851_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-016-9415-9","volume":"47","author":"RT Stewart","year":"2018","unstructured":"Stewart, R.T., Quintana, I.O.: Probabilistic opinion pooling with imprecise probabilities. Journal of Philosophical Logic 47(1), 17\u201345 (2018)","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9851_CR7","unstructured":"Weatherson, B.: Decision making with imprecise probabilities. Ms., Dept. of Philosophy, University of Michigan (2008)"},{"key":"9851_CR8","unstructured":"Fischer, M.: On the usefulness of imprecise bayesianism in chemical kinetics. In: International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities: Theories and Applications, PMLR. pp. 203\u2013215 (2019)"},{"key":"9851_CR9","volume-title":"Bayes linear analysis of imprecision in computer models, with application to understanding galaxy formation","author":"IR Vernon","year":"2009","unstructured":"Vernon, I.R., Goldstein, M.: Bayes linear analysis of imprecision in computer models, with application to understanding galaxy formation. Theories and Applications, International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities (2009)"},{"key":"9851_CR10","unstructured":"Cicirello, A., Langley, R.S.: An approach to uncertainty in probabilistic assignments with application to vibro-acoustic problems. In: Proceedings of the Eight International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities:Theories and Applications (ISIPTA\u201913), Compiegne, France (2013)"},{"key":"9851_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Furfaro, F.: Probabilistic bipolar abstract argumentation frameworks: complexity results. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 1803\u20131809 (2018)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2018\/249"},{"issue":"2","key":"9851_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.3233\/IA-190029","volume":"13","author":"B Fazzinga","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Furfaro, F., Scala, F.: Efficiently computing extensions\u2019 probabilities over probabilistic bipolar abstract argumentation frameworks. Intelligenza Artificiale. 13(2), 189\u2013200 (2019)","journal-title":"Intelligenza Artificiale."},{"key":"9851_CR13","unstructured":"Proietti, C.: Polarization and bipolar probabilistic argumentation frameworks. In: AI$$^3$$@ AI* IA, pp. 22\u201327 (2017)"},{"key":"9851_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morveli-Espinoza, M., Nieves, J.C., Tacla, C.A.: An imprecise probability approach for abstract argumentation based on credal sets. In: European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches with Uncertainty, Springer. pp. 39\u201349 (2019)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-29765-7_4"},{"key":"9851_CR15","unstructured":"Morveli-Espinoza, M., Nieves, J.C., Tacla, C.: Towards an imprecise probability approach for abstract argumentation. In: 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2020), Virtual, August 29-September 8, 2020, IOS Press. pp. 2921\u20132922 (2020)"},{"key":"9851_CR16","volume-title":"Imprecise abstract argumentation as a support for forensic engineering","author":"F Taillandier","year":"2021","unstructured":"Taillandier, F., Baudrit, C., Carvajal, C., Delhomme, B., Beullac, B.: Imprecise abstract argumentation as a support for forensic engineering. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management (2021)"},{"issue":"2","key":"9851_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888900008122","volume":"10","author":"M Wooldridge","year":"1995","unstructured":"Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The knowledge engineering review 10(2), 115\u2013152 (1995)","journal-title":"The knowledge engineering review"},{"key":"9851_CR18","unstructured":"Hunter, A., Polberg, S., Potyka, N., Rienstra, T., Thimm, M.: Probabilistic argumentation: A survey. Handbook of Formal Argumentation 2 (2021)"},{"key":"9851_CR19","unstructured":"Levi, I.: The enterprise of knowledge: An essay on knowledge, credal probability, and chance (1980)"},{"key":"9851_CR20","unstructured":"Cano, A., G\u00f3mez-Olmedo, M., Moral, S.: Credal nets with probabilities estimated with an extreme imprecise dirichlet model. In: ISIPTA, vol. 7, pp. 57\u201366 (2007)"},{"issue":"1","key":"9851_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2012.08.003","volume":"54","author":"A Hunter","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hunter, A.: A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 54(1), 47\u201381 (2013)","journal-title":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"9851_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pfeifer, N.: On argument strength. Bayesian Argumentation, 185\u2013193 (2013)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5357-0_10"},{"key":"9851_CR23","first-page":"171","volume":"216","author":"PM Dung","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dung, P.M., Thang, P.M.: Towards (probabilistic) argumentation for jury-based dispute resolution. International Conference on Computational Models of Argument 216, 171\u2013182 (2010)","journal-title":"International Conference on Computational Models of Argument"},{"key":"9851_CR24","first-page":"117","volume":"245","author":"A Hunter","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hunter, A.: Some foundations for probabilistic abstract argumentation. International Conference on Computational Models of Argument 245, 117\u2013128 (2012)","journal-title":"International Conference on Computational Models of Argument"},{"key":"9851_CR25","unstructured":"Thimm, M.: A probabilistic semantics for abstract argumentation. In: European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 12, pp. 750\u2013755 (2012)"},{"issue":"2","key":"9851_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.09.002","volume":"55","author":"A Hunter","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hunter, A.: Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 55(2), 607\u2013638 (2014)","journal-title":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning"},{"issue":"3","key":"9851_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1007\/s11787-015-0120-1","volume":"9","author":"DM Gabbay","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gabbay, D.M., Rodrigues, O.: Probabilistic argumentation: An equational approach. Logica Universalis 9(3), 345\u2013382 (2015)","journal-title":"Logica Universalis"},{"issue":"2","key":"9851_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2015.1107134","volume":"6","author":"R Riveret","year":"2015","unstructured":"Riveret, R., Korkinof, D., Draief, M., Pitt, J.: Probabilistic abstract argumentation: an investigation with boltzmann machines. Argument & Computation 6(2), 178\u2013218 (2015)","journal-title":"Argument & Computation"},{"key":"9851_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thimm, M., Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Vicig, P.: Probabilities on extensions in abstract argumentation. In: International Workshop on Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation, Springer. pp. 102\u2013119 (2017)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-75553-3_7"},{"key":"9851_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li, H., Oren, N., Norman, T.J.: Probabilistic argumentation frameworks. In: International Workshop on Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation, Springer. pp. 1\u201316 (2011)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-29184-5_1"},{"key":"9851_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2018.08.001","volume":"264","author":"D Baumeister","year":"2018","unstructured":"Baumeister, D., Neugebauer, D., Rothe, J., Schadrack, H.: Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence 264, 1\u201326 (2018)","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9851_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alfano, G., Greco, S., Parisi, F., Trubitsyna, I.: Incomplete argumentation frameworks: Properties and complexity. In: Amrican Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2022)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v36i5.20483"},{"key":"9851_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility Theory: an Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty. Springer, ??? (2012)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4614-1800-9_139"},{"key":"9851_CR34","unstructured":"Smets, P.: Practical uses of belief functions. arXiv:1301.6741 (2013)"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"9851_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/S0888-613X(00)00032-3","volume":"24","author":"K Weichselberger","year":"2000","unstructured":"Weichselberger, K.: The theory of interval-probability as a unifying concept for uncertainty. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 24(2\u20133), 149\u2013170 (2000)","journal-title":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"9851_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., Wooldridge, M.: Complexity of abstract argumentation. In: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 85\u2013104. Springer, ??? (2009)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_5"},{"key":"9851_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kr\u00f6ll, M., Pichler, R., Woltran, S.: On the complexity of enumerating the extensions of abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1145\u20131152 (2017)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/159"},{"key":"9851_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2020.08.009","volume":"126","author":"DD Mau\u00e1","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mau\u00e1, D.D., Cozman, F.G.: Thirty years of credal networks: Specification, algorithms and complexity. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 126, 133\u2013157 (2020)","journal-title":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"9851_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Geffner, H.: Model-free, model-based, and general intelligence. arXiv:1806.02308 (2018)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2018\/2"},{"key":"9851_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yun, B., Vesic, S.: Gradual semantics for weighted bipolar setafs. In: European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches with Uncertainty, Springer. pp. 201\u2013214 (2021)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_15"},{"key":"9851_CR41","unstructured":"Cocarascu, O., Toni, F.: Argumentation for machine learning: A survey. In: International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), pp. 219\u2013230 (2016)"},{"issue":"2","key":"9851_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-014-9256-2","volume":"29","author":"S Onta\u00f1\u00f3n","year":"2015","unstructured":"Onta\u00f1\u00f3n, S., Plaza, E.: Coordinated inductive learning using argumentation-based communication. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 29(2), 266\u2013304 (2015)","journal-title":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems"},{"issue":"3","key":"9851_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3017679","volume":"17","author":"L Carstens","year":"2017","unstructured":"Carstens, L., Toni, F.: Using argumentation to improve classification in natural language problems. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) 17(3), 1\u201323 (2017)","journal-title":"ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT)"},{"key":"9851_CR44","unstructured":"G\u00f3mez, S.A., Chesnevar, C.I.: A hybrid approach to pattern classification using neural networks and defeasible argumentation. In: Flairs Conference, pp. 393\u2013398 (2004)"}],"container-title":["Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10472-023-09851-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10472-023-09851-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10472-023-09851-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,11]],"date-time":"2023-08-11T07:16:01Z","timestamp":1691738161000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10472-023-09851-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,16]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,8]]}},"alternative-id":["9851"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10472-023-09851-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1012-2443","1573-7470"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1012-2443","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7470","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 March 2023","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 May 2023","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare they have no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}