{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,20]],"date-time":"2026-05-20T04:02:43Z","timestamp":1779249763558,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,21]],"date-time":"2022-06-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1655769600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,21]],"date-time":"2022-06-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1655769600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100018253","name":"Corvinus University of Budapest","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100018253","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ann Oper Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>A crucial, both from theoretical and practical points of view, problem in preference modelling is the number of questions to ask from the decision maker. We focus on incomplete pairwise comparison matrices based on graphs whose average degree is approximately 3 (or a bit more), i.e., each item is compared to three others in average. In the range of matrix sizes we considered, <jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$$n=5,6,7,8,9,10$$<\/jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mrow>\n                    <mml:mi>n<\/mml:mi>\n                    <mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo>\n                    <mml:mn>5<\/mml:mn>\n                    <mml:mo>,<\/mml:mo>\n                    <mml:mn>6<\/mml:mn>\n                    <mml:mo>,<\/mml:mo>\n                    <mml:mn>7<\/mml:mn>\n                    <mml:mo>,<\/mml:mo>\n                    <mml:mn>8<\/mml:mn>\n                    <mml:mo>,<\/mml:mo>\n                    <mml:mn>9<\/mml:mn>\n                    <mml:mo>,<\/mml:mo>\n                    <mml:mn>10<\/mml:mn>\n                  <\/mml:mrow>\n                <\/mml:math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>, this requires from 1.4<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> to 1.8<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> edges, resulting in completion ratios between 33% (<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$$n=10$$<\/jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mrow>\n                    <mml:mi>n<\/mml:mi>\n                    <mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo>\n                    <mml:mn>10<\/mml:mn>\n                  <\/mml:mrow>\n                <\/mml:math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>) and 80% (<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$$n=5$$<\/jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mrow>\n                    <mml:mi>n<\/mml:mi>\n                    <mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo>\n                    <mml:mn>5<\/mml:mn>\n                  <\/mml:mrow>\n                <\/mml:math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>). We analyze several types of union of two spanning trees (three of them building on additional ordinal information on the ranking), 2-edge-connected random graphs and 3-(quasi-)regular graphs with minimal diameter (the length of the maximal shortest path between any two vertices).  The weight vectors are calculated from the natural extensions, to the incomplete case, of the two most popular weighting methods, the eigenvector method and the logarithmic least squares. These weight vectors are compared to the ones calculated from the complete matrix, and their distances (Euclidean, Chebyshev and Manhattan), rank correlations (Kendall and Spearman) and similarity (Garuti, cosine and dice indices) are computed in order to have cardinal, ordinal and proximity views during the comparisons. Surprisingly enough, only the union of two star graphs centered at the best and the second best items perform well among the graphs using additional ordinal information on the ranking. The union of two edge-disjoint spanning trees is almost always the best among the analyzed graphs.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10479-022-04819-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,21]],"date-time":"2022-06-21T18:07:39Z","timestamp":1655834859000},"page":"783-807","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Incomplete pairwise comparison matrices based on graphs with average degree approximately 3"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"326","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2586-5660","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Zsombor","family":"Sz\u00e1doczki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S\u00e1ndor","family":"Boz\u00f3ki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Patrik","family":"Juh\u00e1sz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sergii V.","family":"Kadenko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vitaliy","family":"Tsyganok","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"4819_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102576","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2021.102576","volume":"108","author":"K. Cs. \u00c1goston","year":"2022","unstructured":"\u00c1goston, K. . Cs. ., & Csat\u00f3, L. (2022). Inconsistency thresholds for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices. Omega, 108, 102576. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.omega.2021.102576.","journal-title":"Omega"},{"issue":"1","key":"4819_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2020.05.048","volume":"288","author":"P Amenta","year":"2021","unstructured":"Amenta, P., Lucadamo, A., & Marcarelli, G. (2021). On the choice of weights for aggregating judgments in non-negotiable ahp group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(1), 294\u2013301. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejor.2020.05.048.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"key":"4819_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boz\u00f3ki, S., & Tsyganok, V. (2019). The (logarithmic) least squares optimality of the arithmetic (geometric) mean of weight vectors calculated from all spanning trees for incomplete additive (multiplicative) pairwise comparison matrices. International Journal of General Systems,48(3\u20134), 362\u2013381 https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/03081079.2019.1585432.","DOI":"10.1080\/03081079.2019.1585432"},{"issue":"1","key":"4819_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2015.06.069","volume":"248","author":"S Boz\u00f3ki","year":"2016","unstructured":"Boz\u00f3ki, S., Csat\u00f3, L., & Temesi, J. (2016). An application of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices for ranking top tennis players. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(1), 211\u2013218. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejor.2015.06.069.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"key":"4819_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Boz\u00f3ki, S., Dezs\u0151, L., Poesz, A., & Temesi, J. (2013). Analysis of pairwise comparison matrices: an empirical research. Annals of Operations Research, 211, 511\u2013528. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10479-013-1328-1.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10479-013-1328-1"},{"issue":"1","key":"4819_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mcm.2010.02.047","volume":"52","author":"S Boz\u00f3ki","year":"2010","unstructured":"Boz\u00f3ki, S., F\u00fcl\u00f6p, J., & R\u00f3nyai, L. (2010). On optimal completion of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(1), 318\u2013333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.mcm.2010.02.047.","journal-title":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling"},{"key":"4819_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1007\/s10479-016-2166-8","volume":"248","author":"M Brunelli","year":"2017","unstructured":"Brunelli, M. (2017). Studying a set of properties of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons. Annals of Operations Research, 248, 143\u2013161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10479-016-2166-8.","journal-title":"Annals of Operations Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"4819_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1007\/s10479-013-1329-0","volume":"211","author":"M Brunelli","year":"2013","unstructured":"Brunelli, M., Canal, L., & Fedrizzi, M. (2013). Inconsistency indices for pairwise comparison matrices: a numerical study. Annals of Operations Research, 211(1), 493\u2013509. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10479-013-1329-0.","journal-title":"Annals of Operations Research"},{"issue":"4","key":"4819_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-2496(85)90002-1","volume":"29","author":"G Crawford","year":"1985","unstructured":"Crawford, G., & Williams, C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29(4), 387\u2013405. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0022-2496(85)90002-1.","journal-title":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"4819_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/s10479-017-2440-4","volume":"254","author":"L Csat\u00f3","year":"2017","unstructured":"Csat\u00f3, L. (2017). On the ranking of a swiss system chess team tournament. Annals of Operations Research, 254(1\u20132), 17\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10479-017-2440-4.","journal-title":"Annals of Operations Research"},{"key":"4819_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1023\/B:MARK.0000021968.86465.00","volume":"15","author":"E Deutskens","year":"2004","unstructured":"Deutskens, E., de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Oosterveld, P. (2004). Response rate and response quality of internet-based surveys: An experimental study. Marketing Letters, 15, 21\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/B:MARK.0000021968.86465.00.","journal-title":"Marketing Letters"},{"key":"4819_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Duleba, Sz., Alkharabsheh, A., & G\u00fcndo\u011fdu, F. K. (2021). Creating a common priority vector in intuitionistic fuzzy AHP: a comparison of entropy-based and distance-based models. Annals of Operations Research. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10479-021-04491-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s10479-021-04491-5"},{"issue":"5","key":"4819_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1109\/TSMC.1977.4309720","volume":"7","author":"W Edwards","year":"1977","unstructured":"Edwards, W. (1977). How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 7(5), 326\u2013340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TSMC.1977.4309720.","journal-title":"IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics"},{"issue":"3","key":"4819_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1006\/obhd.1994.1087","volume":"60","author":"W Edwards","year":"1994","unstructured":"Edwards, W., & Barron, F. (1994). Smarts and smarter: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(3), 306\u2013325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/obhd.1994.1087.","journal-title":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes"},{"issue":"1","key":"4819_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2006.09.065","volume":"183","author":"M Fedrizzi","year":"2007","unstructured":"Fedrizzi, M., & Giove, S. (2007). Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 183(1), 303\u2013313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejor.2006.09.065.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"issue":"3","key":"4819_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.13033\/ijahp.v9i3.522","volume":"9","author":"CE Garuti","year":"2017","unstructured":"Garuti, C. E. (2017). Reflections on scales of measurement, not measurement of scales. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 9(3), 349\u2013361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13033\/ijahp.v9i3.522.","journal-title":"International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"4819_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1002\/mcda.1667","volume":"27","author":"CE Garuti","year":"2020","unstructured":"Garuti, C. E. (2020). A set theory justification of garuti\u2019s compatibility index. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, 27(1\u20132), 50\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/mcda.1667.","journal-title":"Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis"},{"key":"4819_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gass, S. (1998). Tournaments, transitivity and pairwise comparison matrices. Journal of the Operational Research Society,49(6), 616\u2013624. https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1057\/palgrave.jors.2600572.","DOI":"10.1057\/palgrave.jors.2600572"},{"issue":"11","key":"4819_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.1016\/0270-0255(87)90503-3","volume":"9","author":"PT Harker","year":"1987","unstructured":"Harker, P. T. (1987). Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modelling, 9(11), 837\u2013848. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0270-0255(87)90503-3.","journal-title":"Mathematical Modelling"},{"key":"4819_CR20","unstructured":"Horv\u00e1t, S. (2020). IGraph\/M. package for Wolfram Mathematica, https:\/\/github.com\/szhorvat\/IGraphM\/tree\/v0.4."},{"key":"4819_CR21","unstructured":"Juh\u00e1sz, P. (2021). A comparison of weight vectors calculated from incomplete pairwise comparison matrices (In Hungarian, \u2018Nem teljesen kit\u00f6lt\u00f6tt p\u00e1ros \u00f6sszehasonl\u00edt\u00e1s m\u00e1trixokb\u00f3l sz\u00e1molt s\u00falyvektorok \u00f6sszehasonl\u00edt\u00e1sa\u2019), The Annual Scientific Student Associations\u2019 Conference (\u2018Tudom\u00e1nyos Di\u00e1kk\u00f6ri Konferencia\u2019 - TDK), Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary."},{"key":"4819_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kadenko, S., & Tsyganok, V. (2020). An update on combinatorial method for aggregation of expert judgments in AHP. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, ISAHP-2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13033\/isahp.y2020.012.","DOI":"10.13033\/isahp.y2020.012"},{"issue":"1","key":"4819_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2013.10.019","volume":"235","author":"G Kou","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kou, G., & Lin, C. (2014). A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(1), 225\u2013232. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejor.2013.10.019.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"key":"4819_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2021.107224","volume":"105","author":"G Kou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kou, G., Peng, Y., Chao, X., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Alsaadi, F. E. (2021). A geometrical method for consensus building in gdm with incomplete heterogeneous preference information. Applied Soft Computing, 105, 107224. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asoc.2021.107224.","journal-title":"Applied Soft Computing"},{"key":"4819_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2019.10.002","volume":"115","author":"K Kulakowski","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kulakowski, K., Szybowski, J., & Prusak, A. (2019). Towards quantification of incompleteness in the pairwise comparisons methods. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 115, 221\u2013234. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijar.2019.10.002.","journal-title":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"4819_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2019.102175","volume":"96","author":"F Liang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Liang, F., Brunelli, M., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds. Omega, 96, 102175. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.omega.2019.102175.","journal-title":"Omega"},{"issue":"1","key":"4819_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2016.07.042","volume":"257","author":"M Lundy","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lundy, M., Siraj, S., & Greco, S. (2017). The mathematical equivalence of the \u201cspanning tree\u2019\u2019 and row geometric mean preference vectors and its implications for preference analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(1), 197\u2013208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejor.2016.07.042.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"key":"4819_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsc.2013.09.003","volume":"60","author":"BD McKay","year":"2014","unstructured":"McKay, B. D., & Piperno, A. (2014). Practical graph isomorphism, II. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 60, 94\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsc.2013.09.003.","journal-title":"Journal of Symbolic Computation"},{"key":"4819_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2019.01.009","volume":"87","author":"X Mi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mi, X., Tang, M., Liao, H., Shen, W., & Lev, B. (2019). The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what\u2019s next? Omega, 87, 205\u2013225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.omega.2019.01.009.","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"4819_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102075","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2019.06.001","volume":"96","author":"M Mohammadi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mohammadi, M., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega, 96, 102075. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.omega.2019.06.001.","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"4819_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-5414.2005.00075.x","volume":"36","author":"J Mustajoki","year":"2005","unstructured":"Mustajoki, J., H\u00e4m\u00e4l\u00e4inen, R., & Salo, A. (2005). Decision support by interval smart\/swing - incorporating imprecision in the smart and swing methods. Decision Sciences, 36, 317\u2013339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1540-5414.2005.00075.x.","journal-title":"Decision Sciences"},{"issue":"5","key":"4819_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.2501\/IJMR-2017-039","volume":"59","author":"M Revilla","year":"2017","unstructured":"Revilla, M., & Ochoa, C. (2017). Ideal and maximum length for a web survey. International Journal of Market Research, 59(5), 557\u2013565. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2501\/IJMR-2017-039.","journal-title":"International Journal of Market Research"},{"key":"4819_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2014.11.009","volume":"53","author":"J Rezaei","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.omega.2014.11.009.","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"4819_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2016.06.125","volume":"135","author":"J Rezaei","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rezaei, J., Nispeling, T., Sarkis, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2016). A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 577\u2013588. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclepro.2016.06.125.","journal-title":"Journal of Cleaner Production"},{"issue":"3","key":"4819_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-2496(77)90033-5","volume":"15","author":"TL Saaty","year":"1977","unstructured":"Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234\u2013281. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0022-2496(77)90033-5.","journal-title":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology"},{"key":"4819_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sz\u00e1doczki, Zs., Boz\u00f3ki, S., & Tekile, H.A. (2020). Proposals for the set of pairwise comparisons. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, ISAHP-2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13033\/isahp.y2020.054.","DOI":"10.13033\/isahp.y2020.054"},{"key":"4819_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102557","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2021.102557","volume":"107","author":"Zs Sz\u00e1doczki","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sz\u00e1doczki, Zs., Boz\u00f3ki, S., & Tekile, H. A. (2022). Filling in pattern designs for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices: (Quasi-)regular graphs with minimal diameter. Omega, 107, 102557. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.omega.2021.102557.","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"4819_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mathsocsci.2020.05.002","volume":"108","author":"J Szybowski","year":"2020","unstructured":"Szybowski, J., Ku\u0142akowski, K., & Prusak, A. (2020). New inconsistency indicators for incomplete pairwise comparisons matrices. Mathematical Social Sciences, 108, 138\u2013145. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.mathsocsci.2020.05.002.","journal-title":"Mathematical Social Sciences"},{"issue":"4","key":"4819_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1037\/h0070288","volume":"34","author":"L Thurstone","year":"1927","unstructured":"Thurstone, L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34(4), 273\u2013286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0070288.","journal-title":"Psychological Review"},{"key":"4819_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods. In Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Applied Optimization, vol 44. Springer, Boston, MA. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-1-4757-3157-6_2.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4757-3157-6_2"},{"issue":"6","key":"4819_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1002\/1099-1360(199911)8:6<299::AID-MCDA253>3.0.CO;2-7","volume":"8","author":"E Triantaphyllou","year":"2000","unstructured":"Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Reduction of pairwise comparisons in decision making via a duality approach. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, 8(6), 299\u2013310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/1099-1360(199911)8:6<299::AID-MCDA253>3.0.CO;2-7.","journal-title":"Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis"},{"key":"4819_CR42","first-page":"92","volume":"2","author":"V Tsyganok","year":"2000","unstructured":"Tsyganok, V. (2000). Combinatorial method of pairwise comparisons with feedback (in ukrainian). Data Recording, Storage & Processing, 2, 92\u2013102.","journal-title":"Data Recording, Storage & Processing"},{"issue":"3","key":"4819_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mcm.2010.03.052","volume":"52","author":"V Tsyganok","year":"2010","unstructured":"Tsyganok, V. (2010). Investigation of the aggregation effectiveness of expert estimates obtained by the pairwise comparison method. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(3), 538\u2013544. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.mcm.2010.03.052.","journal-title":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling"},{"issue":"2","key":"4819_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.15807\/jorsj.41.311","volume":"41","author":"K Wang","year":"1998","unstructured":"Wang, K., & Takahashi, I. (1998). How to select paired comparisons in AHP of incomplete information - strongly regular graph design. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 41(2), 311\u2013328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15807\/jorsj.41.311.","journal-title":"Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan"},{"key":"4819_CR45","volume-title":"Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research","author":"D von Winterfeldt","year":"1986","unstructured":"von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"4819_CR46","unstructured":"Wolfram\u00a0Research, I. (2021). Mathematica, Version 12.3. Champaign, IL, 2021. https:\/\/www.wolfram.com\/mathematica."},{"issue":"9","key":"4819_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4466","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apm.2011.11.075","volume":"36","author":"J Ye","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ye, J. (2012). Multicriteria decision-making method using the dice similarity measure based on the reduct intuitionistic fuzzy sets of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(9), 4466\u20134472. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.apm.2011.11.075.","journal-title":"Applied Mathematical Modelling"},{"key":"4819_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.1007\/s10479-018-2769-3","volume":"271","author":"X Zhou","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhou, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., Chan, F. T. S., & Ishizaka, A. (2018). A DEMATEL-based completion method for incomplete pairwise comparison matrix in AHP. Annals of Operations Research, 271, 1045\u20131066. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10479-018-2769-3.","journal-title":"Annals of Operations Research"}],"container-title":["Annals of Operations Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10479-022-04819-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10479-022-04819-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10479-022-04819-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,5]],"date-time":"2023-07-05T09:21:21Z","timestamp":1688548881000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10479-022-04819-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,21]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]}},"alternative-id":["4819"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10479-022-04819-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0254-5330","1572-9338"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0254-5330","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-9338","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"6 June 2022","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 June 2022","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}