{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T00:44:38Z","timestamp":1777337078585,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":86,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,10]],"date-time":"2023-05-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1683676800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,10]],"date-time":"2023-05-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1683676800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100007065","name":"Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Salerno","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100007065","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ann Oper Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) are among the most employed approaches for aggregating performances in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). TOPSIS and SAW are two MCDM methods based on the value function approach and are often used in combination with other MCDM methods in order to produce rankings of alternatives. In this paper, first, we analyse some common features of these two MCDM methods with a specific reference to the additive properties of the value function and to the sensitivity of the value function to trade-off weights. Based on such methodological insights, an experimental comparison of the results provided by these two aggregation methods across a computational test is performed. Specifically, similarities in rankings of alternatives produced by TOPSIS and SAW are evaluated under three different Minkowski distances (namely, the Euclidean, Manhattan and Tchebichev ones). Similarities are measured trough a set of statistical indices. Results show that TOPSIS, when used in combination with a Manhattan distance, produces rankings which are extremely similar to the ones resulting from SAW. Similarities are also Experimental results confirm that rankings produced by TOPSIS methods are closer to SAW ones when similar formal properties are satisfied.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10479-023-05339-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,11]],"date-time":"2023-05-11T07:31:04Z","timestamp":1683790264000},"page":"967-994","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":114,"title":["A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"325","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6304-7979","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Francesco","family":"Ciardiello","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Andrea","family":"Genovese","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,10]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"5339_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1660","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cor.2006.09.026","volume":"35","author":"BS Ahn","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ahn, B. S., & Park, K. S. (2008). Comparing methods for multiattribute decision making with ordinal weights. Computers & Operations Research, 35(5), 1660\u20131670.","journal-title":"Computers & Operations Research"},{"issue":"4","key":"5339_CR2","first-page":"897","volume":"12","author":"V Anandan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Anandan, V., & Uthra, G. (2017). Extension of TOPSIS using $$l^1$$ family of distance measures. Advances in Fuzzy Mathematics, 12(4), 897\u2013908.","journal-title":"Advances in Fuzzy Mathematics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5339_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.3846\/tede.2010.07","volume":"16","author":"J Antuchevi\u010diene","year":"2010","unstructured":"Antuchevi\u010diene, J., Zavadskas, E. K., & Zakarevi\u010dius, A. (2010). Multiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(1), 109\u2013125.","journal-title":"Technological and Economic Development of Economy"},{"issue":"11","key":"5339_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1515","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.42.11.1515","volume":"42","author":"FH Barron","year":"1996","unstructured":"Barron, F. H., & Barrett, B. E. (1996). Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Management Science, 42(11), 1515\u20131523.","journal-title":"Management Science"},{"issue":"17","key":"5339_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13051","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2012.05.056","volume":"39","author":"M Behzadian","year":"2012","unstructured":"Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051\u201313069.","journal-title":"Expert Systems with Applications"},{"issue":"1","key":"5339_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1504\/IJOR.2019.102072","volume":"36","author":"SV Bhaskar","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bhaskar, S. V., & Kudal, H. N. (2019). Multi-criteria decision-making approach to material selection in tribological application. International Journal of Operational Research, 36(1), 92\u2013122.","journal-title":"International Journal of Operational Research"},{"key":"5339_CR7","unstructured":"Brans, J. P. (1982). L\u2019ing\u00e9nierie de la d\u00e9cision: l\u2019\u00e9laboration d\u2019instruments d\u2019aide a la d\u00e9cision. Universit\u00e9 Laval, Facult\u00e9 des sciences de l\u2019administration."},{"issue":"2","key":"5339_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1080\/23270012.2020.1748528","volume":"7","author":"Y \u00c7elikbilek","year":"2020","unstructured":"\u00c7elikbilek, Y., & T\u00fcys\u00fcz, F. (2020). An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis. Journal of Management Analytics, 7(2), 281\u2013300.","journal-title":"Journal of Management Analytics"},{"key":"5339_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chakraborty, S., & Yeh, C. H. (2009). A simulation comparison of normalization procedures for TOPSIS. In 2009 International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering (pp 1815\u20131820). IEEE.","DOI":"10.1109\/ICCIE.2009.5223811"},{"issue":"6","key":"5339_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4642","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2009.12.044","volume":"37","author":"CH Chang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Chang, C. H., Lin, J. J., Lin, J. H., & Chiang, M. C. (2010). Domestic open-end equity mutual fund performance evaluation using extended TOPSIS method with different distance approaches. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(6), 4642\u20134649.","journal-title":"Expert Systems with Applications"},{"issue":"4","key":"5339_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2012.12.009","volume":"13","author":"YH Chang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chang, Y. H., Yeh, C. H., & Chang, Y. W. (2013). A new method selection approach for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 13(4), 2179\u20132187.","journal-title":"Applied Soft Computing"},{"issue":"2","key":"5339_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1848","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2011.08.065","volume":"39","author":"TY Chen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chen, T. Y. (2012). Comparative analysis of SAW and TOPSIS based on interval-valued fuzzy sets: Discussions on score functions and weight constraints. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(2), 1848\u20131861.","journal-title":"Expert Systems with Applications"},{"issue":"4","key":"5339_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1011","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2006.08.026","volume":"33","author":"MT Chu","year":"2007","unstructured":"Chu, M. T., Shyu, J., Tzeng, G. H., & Khosla, R. (2007). Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(4), 1011\u20131024.","journal-title":"Expert Systems with Applications"},{"key":"5339_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cinelli, M., Kadzi\u0144ski, M., Gonzalez, M., & S\u0142owi\u0144ski, R. (2020). How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy. Omega 96.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2020.102261"},{"issue":"4","key":"5339_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-842X.2005.00413.x","volume":"47","author":"J Pinto da Costa","year":"2005","unstructured":"Pinto da Costa, J., & Soares, C. (2005). A weighted rank measure of correlation. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 47(4), 515\u2013529.","journal-title":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics"},{"issue":"4","key":"5339_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.9770\/jesi.2021.8.4(10)","volume":"8","author":"N Dobrovolskiene","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dobrovolskiene, N., & Pozniak, A. (2021). Simple additive weighting versus technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution: Which method is better suited for assessing the sustainability of a real estate project. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(4), 180\u2013196.","journal-title":"Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues"},{"issue":"7","key":"5339_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5491","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2010.02.061","volume":"37","author":"H Doukas","year":"2010","unstructured":"Doukas, H., Karakosta, C., & Psarras, J. (2010). Computing with words to assess the sustainability of renewable energy options. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), 5491\u20135497.","journal-title":"Expert Systems with Applications"},{"key":"5339_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Firgiawan, W., Zulkarnaim, N., & Cokrowibowo, S. (2020). A comparative study using SAW, TOPSIS, SAW-AHP, and TOPSIS-AHP for Tuition Fee (UKT). In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, vol 875.","DOI":"10.1088\/1757-899X\/875\/1\/012088"},{"issue":"5\u20136","key":"5339_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mcm.2011.12.022","volume":"56","author":"MS Garc\u00eda-Cascales","year":"2012","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda-Cascales, M. S., & Lamata, M. T. (2012). On rank reversal and TOPSIS method. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 56(5\u20136), 123\u2013132.","journal-title":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling"},{"issue":"1","key":"5339_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1007\/s10462-018-9668-5","volume":"53","author":"H Garg","year":"2020","unstructured":"Garg, H., & Kumar, K. (2020). A novel exponential distance and its based TOPSIS method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets using connection number of SPA theory. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(1), 595\u2013624.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"5339_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.2307\/3315902","volume":"31","author":"C Genest","year":"2003","unstructured":"Genest, C., & Plante, J. F. (2003). On Blest\u2019s measure of rank correlation. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 31(1), 35\u201352.","journal-title":"Canadian Journal of Statistics"},{"issue":"2","key":"5339_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1016\/0377-2217(84)90214-5","volume":"15","author":"M Gershon","year":"1984","unstructured":"Gershon, M. (1984). The role of weights and scales in the application of multiobjective decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 15(2), 244\u2013250.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"key":"5339_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-50244-6","volume-title":"The Analytic Hierarchy Process","author":"BL Golden","year":"1989","unstructured":"Golden, B. L., Wasil, E. A., & Harker, P. T. (1989). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Applications and studies: Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg."},{"issue":"1","key":"5339_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(00)00167-3","volume":"129","author":"S Greco","year":"2001","unstructured":"Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Slowinski, R. (2001). Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1), 1\u201347.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"key":"5339_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4939-3094-4","volume-title":"Multiple criteria decision analysis,","author":"S Greco","year":"2016","unstructured":"Greco, S., Figueira, J., & Ehrgott, M. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis, (Vol. 37). Springer."},{"issue":"1","key":"5339_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2006.10.045","volume":"184","author":"S Hajkowicz","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hajkowicz, S., & Higgins, A. (2008). A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(1), 255\u2013265.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"key":"5339_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hamdani, & Wardoyo, R. (2016). The complexity calculation for group decision making using TOPSIS algorithm. In AIP conference proceedings, AIP Publishing LLC, vol 1755.","DOI":"10.1063\/1.4958502"},{"key":"5339_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Harris, S., Nino, L., & Claudio, D. (2020). A statistical comparison between different multicriteria scaling and weighting combinations. International Journal of Industrial and Operations Research, 3(1).","DOI":"10.35840\/2633-8947\/6506"},{"key":"5339_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2015.09.028","volume":"444","author":"J Hu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hu, J., Du, Y., Mo, H., Wei, D., & Deng, Y. (2016). A modified weighted TOPSIS to identify influential nodes in complex networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 444, 73\u201385.","journal-title":"Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications"},{"key":"5339_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Huang, J. w., Wang, X. x., & Zhou, Y. h. (2009). Multi-objective decision optimization of construction schedule based on improved TOPSIS. In 2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science (pp 1\u20134). IEEE.","DOI":"10.1109\/ICMSS.2009.5303790"},{"key":"5339_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making (pp. 58\u2013191). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-48318-9_3"},{"issue":"8","key":"5339_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"889","DOI":"10.1016\/0305-0548(93)90109-V","volume":"20","author":"CL Hwang","year":"1993","unstructured":"Hwang, C. L., Lai, Y. J., & Liu, T. Y. (1993). A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Computers & Operations Research, 20(8), 889\u2013899.","journal-title":"Computers & Operations Research"},{"key":"5339_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cor.2016.01.007","volume":"71","author":"M Kadzi\u0144ski","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kadzi\u0144ski, M., & Michalski, M. (2016). Scoring procedures for multiple criteria decision aiding with robust and stochastic ordinal regression. Computers & Operations Research, 71, 54\u201370.","journal-title":"Computers & Operations Research"},{"issue":"4","key":"5339_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2012.10.002","volume":"41","author":"M Kadzinski","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kadzinski, M., Greco, S., & S\u0142owinski, R. (2013). RUTA: A framework for assessing and selecting additive value functions on the basis of rank related requirements. Omega, 41(4), 735\u2013751.","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"5339_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/j.esr.2019.03.003","volume":"24","author":"I Kaya","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kaya, I., Colak, M., & Terzi, F. (2019). A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making. Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 207\u2013228.","journal-title":"Energy Strategy Reviews"},{"key":"5339_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139174084","volume-title":"Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs","author":"RL Keeney","year":"1993","unstructured":"Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H., & Meyer, R. F. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"5339_CR37","volume-title":"Rank correlation methods","author":"MG Kendall","year":"1948","unstructured":"Kendall, M. G. (1948). Rank correlation methods. Griffin."},{"key":"5339_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kizielewicz, B., Wikeckowski, J., & Wkatrobski, J. (2021). A study of different distance metrics in the TOPSIS method. In Intelligent Decision Technologies (pp. 275\u2013284). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-16-2765-1_23"},{"issue":"7","key":"5339_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.3390\/en9070566","volume":"9","author":"A Kolios","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kolios, A., Mytilinou, V., Lozano-Minguez, E., & Salonitis, K. (2016). A comparative study of multiple-criteria decision-making methods under stochastic inputs. Energies, 9(7), 566.","journal-title":"Energies"},{"issue":"1","key":"5339_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2016.11.052","volume":"260","author":"T Kuo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kuo, T. (2017). A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(1), 152\u2013160.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"issue":"3","key":"5339_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1016\/0377-2217(94)90282-8","volume":"76","author":"YJ Lai","year":"1994","unstructured":"Lai, Y. J., Liu, T. Y., & Hwang, C. L. (1994). TOPSIS for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research, 76(3), 486\u2013500.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"issue":"02","key":"5339_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1142\/S0219622009003405","volume":"8","author":"DF Li","year":"2009","unstructured":"Li, D. F. (2009). Relative ratio method for multiple attribute decision making problems. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 8(02), 289\u2013311.","journal-title":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making"},{"key":"5339_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liao, S., Wu, M. J., Huang, C. Y., Kao, Y. S., & Lee, T. H. (2014). Evaluating and enhancing three-dimensional printing service providers for rapid prototyping using the DEMATEL based network process and VIKOR. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014.","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/349348"},{"issue":"2","key":"5339_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1007\/s11269-019-02470-x","volume":"34","author":"SG Meshram","year":"2020","unstructured":"Meshram, S. G., Alvandi, E., Meshram, C., Kahya, E., & Fadhil Al-Quraishi, A. M. (2020). Application of SAW and TOPSIS in prioritizing watersheds. Water Resources Management, 34(2), 715\u2013732.","journal-title":"Water Resources Management"},{"issue":"3","key":"5339_CR45","first-page":"69","volume":"24","author":"MM Mukaka","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mukaka, M. M. (2012). A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Journal, 24(3), 69\u201371.","journal-title":"Malawi Medical Journal"},{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"5339_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mcm.2004.10.003","volume":"40","author":"DL Olson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Olson, D. L. (2004). Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40(7\u20138), 721\u2013727.","journal-title":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling"},{"issue":"2","key":"5339_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(03)00020-1","volume":"156","author":"S Opricovic","year":"2004","unstructured":"Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445\u2013455.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"5339_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2006.01.020","volume":"178","author":"S Opricovic","year":"2007","unstructured":"Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514\u2013529.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"issue":"4","key":"5339_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1080\/002077200291082","volume":"31","author":"C Parkan","year":"2000","unstructured":"Parkan, C., & Wu, M. L. (2000). Comparison of three modern multicriteria decision-making tools. International Journal of Systems Science, 31(4), 497\u2013517.","journal-title":"International Journal of Systems Science"},{"key":"5339_CR50","unstructured":"Ren, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2007). Comparative analysis of a novel M-TOPSIS method and TOPSIS. Applied Mathematics Research eXpress."},{"issue":"8","key":"5339_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1051\/ro\/196802V100571","volume":"2","author":"B Roy","year":"1968","unstructured":"Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en pr\u00e9sence de points de vue multiples. Revue fran\u00e7aise d\u2019informatique et de recherche op\u00e9rationnelle, 2(8), 57\u201375.","journal-title":"Revue fran\u00e7aise d\u2019informatique et de recherche op\u00e9rationnelle"},{"key":"5339_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4757-2500-1","volume-title":"Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding","author":"B Roy","year":"1996","unstructured":"Roy, B. (1996). Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding (Vol. 12). Berlin: Springer."},{"issue":"06","key":"5339_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.1142\/S021962201550025X","volume":"14","author":"TL Saaty","year":"2015","unstructured":"Saaty, T. L., & Ergu, D. (2015). When is a decision-making method trustworthy? criteria for evaluating multi-criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 14(06), 1171\u20131187.","journal-title":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making"},{"key":"5339_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procir.2015.08.086","volume":"37","author":"D Sabaei","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sabaei, D., Erkoyuncu, J., & Roy, R. (2015). A review of multi-criteria decision making methods for enhanced maintenance delivery. Procedia CIRP, 37, 30\u201335.","journal-title":"Procedia CIRP"},{"key":"5339_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sa\u0142abun, W., & Urbaniak, K. (2020). A new coefficient of rankings similarity in decision-making problems. In International Conference on Computational Science (pp. 632\u2013645). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-50417-5_47"},{"key":"5339_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sa\u0142abun, W., Wkatrobski, J., & Shekhovtsov, A. (2020). Are mcda methods benchmarkable? a comparative study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE ii methods. Symmetry 12(9).","DOI":"10.3390\/sym12091549"},{"key":"5339_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2020.113399","volume":"154","author":"R Sarraf","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sarraf, R., & McGuire, M. P. (2020). Integration and comparison of multi-criteria decision making methods in safe route planner. Expert Systems with Applications, 154, 113399.","journal-title":"Expert Systems with Applications"},{"key":"5339_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Savitha, K., & Chandrasekar, C. (2011). Trusted network selection using SAW and TOPSIS algorithms for heterogeneous wireless networks. International Journal of Computer Applications, 26(8).","DOI":"10.5120\/3125-4300"},{"key":"5339_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scholten, L., Maurer, M., & Lienert, J. (2017). Comparing multi-criteria decision analysis and integrated assessment to support long-term water supply planning. PLoS One, 12(5).","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0176663"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"5339_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1504\/IJOR.2016.078462","volume":"27","author":"M Selmi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Selmi, M., Kormi, T., & Ali, N. B. H. (2016). Comparison of multi-criteria decision methods through a ranking stability index. International Journal of Operational Research, 27(1\u20132), 165\u2013183.","journal-title":"International Journal of Operational Research"},{"key":"5339_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1016\/j.comnet.2016.04.012","volume":"107","author":"MA Senouci","year":"2016","unstructured":"Senouci, M. A., Mushtaq, M. S., Hoceini, S., & Mellouk, A. (2016). TOPSIS-based dynamic approach for mobile network interface selection. Computer Networks, 107, 304\u2013314.","journal-title":"Computer Networks"},{"key":"5339_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geoderma.2017.09.012","volume":"310","author":"J Seyedmohammadi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Seyedmohammadi, J., Sarmadian, F., Jafarzadeh, A. A., Ghorbani, M. A., & Shahbazi, F. (2018). Application of SAW, TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS models in cultivation priority planning for maize, rapeseed and soybean crops. Geoderma, 310, 178\u2013190.","journal-title":"Geoderma"},{"key":"5339_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4570","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2021.09.235","volume":"192","author":"A Shekhovtsov","year":"2021","unstructured":"Shekhovtsov, A. (2021). How strongly do rank similarity coefficients differ used in decision making problems? Procedia Computer Science, 192, 4570\u20134577.","journal-title":"Procedia Computer Science"},{"key":"5339_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3730","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2020.09.014","volume":"176","author":"A Shekhovtsov","year":"2020","unstructured":"Shekhovtsov, A., & Sa\u0142abun, W. (2020). A comparative case study of the VIKOR and TOPSIS rankings similarity. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 3730\u20133740.","journal-title":"Procedia Computer Science"},{"key":"5339_CR65","volume-title":"Towards Reliable Decision-Making in the green urban transport domain","author":"A Shekhovtsov","year":"2021","unstructured":"Shekhovtsov, A., Wikeckowski, J., Kizielewicz, B., & Sa\u0142abun, W. (2021). Towards Reliable Decision-Making in the green urban transport domain. Mechanical Engineering: Facta Universitatis, Series."},{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"5339_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mcm.2005.04.018","volume":"44","author":"HJ Shyur","year":"2006","unstructured":"Shyur, H. J., & Shih, H. S. (2006). A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 44(7\u20138), 749\u2013761.","journal-title":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling"},{"issue":"4","key":"5339_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1515\/fcds-2015-0017","volume":"40","author":"HJ Shyur","year":"2015","unstructured":"Shyur, H. J., Yin, L., Shih, H. S., & Cheng, C. B. (2015). A multiple criteria decision making method based on relative value distances. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 40(4), 299\u2013315.","journal-title":"Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences"},{"key":"5339_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/j.orp.2018.01.005","volume":"5","author":"P Sureeyatanapas","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sureeyatanapas, P., Sriwattananusart, K., Niyamosoth, T., Sessomboon, W., & Arunyanart, S. (2018). Supplier selection towards uncertain and unavailable information: An extension of TOPSIS method. Operations Research Perspectives, 5, 69\u201379.","journal-title":"Operations Research Perspectives"},{"issue":"4","key":"5339_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1028","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2006.02.004","volume":"32","author":"GH Tzeng","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028\u20131044.","journal-title":"Expert Systems with Applications"},{"key":"5339_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vakilipour, S., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., Ghodousi, M., & Choi, S. M. (2021). Comparison between multi-criteria decision-making methods and evaluating the quality of life at different spatial levels. Sustainability, 13(7).","DOI":"10.3390\/su13074067"},{"key":"5339_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vassoney, E., Mammoliti\u00a0Mochet, A., Desiderio, E., Negro, G., Pilloni, M. G., & Comoglio, C. (2021). Comparing multi-criteria decision-making methods for the assessment of flow release scenarios from small hydropower plants in the alpine area. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9.","DOI":"10.3389\/fenvs.2021.635100"},{"key":"5339_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2014.05.273","volume":"31","author":"A Vega","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vega, A., Aguar\u00f3n, J., Garc\u00eda-Alcaraz, J., & Moreno-Jim\u00e9nez, J. M. (2014). Notes on dependent attributes in TOPSIS. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 308\u2013317.","journal-title":"Procedia Computer Science"},{"issue":"2","key":"5339_CR73","first-page":"56","volume":"10","author":"M Velasquez","year":"2013","unstructured":"Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56\u201366.","journal-title":"International Journal of Operations Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"5339_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.24003\/emitter.v7i2.423","volume":"8","author":"B Wardana","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wardana, B., Habibi, R., & Saputra, M. H. K. (2020). Comparation of SAW method and TOPSIS in assesing the best area using HSE standards. EMITTER International Journal of Engineering Technology, 8(1), 126\u2013139.","journal-title":"EMITTER International Journal of Engineering Technology"},{"key":"5339_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2018.07.004","volume":"86","author":"J Wkatrobski","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wkatrobski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., & Zio\u0142o, M. (2019). Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega, 86, 107\u2013124.","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"5339_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dib.2018.12.015","volume":"22","author":"J Wkatrobski","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wkatrobski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., & Zio\u0142o, M. (2019). Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection: Rule set database and exemplary decision support system implementation blueprints. Data in Brief, 22, 639\u2013642.","journal-title":"Data in Brief"},{"issue":"4","key":"5339_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtte.2020.05.005","volume":"7","author":"G Yannis","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yannis, G., Kopsacheili, A., Dragomanovits, A., & Petraki, V. (2020). State-of-the-art review on multi-criteria decision-making in the transport sector. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English edition), 7(4), 413\u2013431.","journal-title":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English edition)"},{"issue":"3","key":"5339_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1057\/jors.1987.44","volume":"38","author":"K Yoon","year":"1987","unstructured":"Yoon, K. (1987). A reconciliation among discrete compromise solutions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 38(3), 277\u2013286.","journal-title":"Journal of the Operational Research Society"},{"key":"5339_CR79","unstructured":"Zak, J. (2005). The comparison of multiobjective ranking methods applied to solve the mass transit systems\u2019 decision problems. In Proceedings of the 10th Jubilee Meeting of the EURO Working Group on Transportation, Poznan, September (pp. 13\u201316)."},{"key":"5339_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1016\/j.orp.2016.11.001","volume":"3","author":"H Zamani-Sabzi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zamani-Sabzi, H., King, J. P., Gard, C. C., & Abudu, S. (2016). Statistical and analytical comparison of multi-criteria decision-making techniques under fuzzy environment. Operations Research Perspectives, 3, 92\u2013117.","journal-title":"Operations Research Perspectives"},{"issue":"3","key":"5339_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(97)00147-1","volume":"107","author":"SH Zanakis","year":"1998","unstructured":"Zanakis, S. H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N., & Dublish, S. (1998). Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 107(3), 507\u2013529.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"issue":"339","key":"5339_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1972.10481251","volume":"67","author":"JH Zar","year":"1972","unstructured":"Zar, J. H. (1972). Significance testing of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67(339), 578\u2013580.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Statistical Association"},{"key":"5339_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-12586-2","volume-title":"Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcomes in water resources management","author":"NH Zardari","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zardari, N. H., Ahmed, K., Shirazi, S. M., & Yusop, Z. B. (2015). Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcomes in water resources management. Springer."},{"issue":"3","key":"5339_CR84","first-page":"131","volume":"1","author":"EK Zavadskas","year":"1994","unstructured":"Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., & Sarka, V. (1994). The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 1(3), 131\u2013139.","journal-title":"Technological and Economic Development of Economy"},{"issue":"4","key":"5339_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.15388\/Informatica.2006.158","volume":"17","author":"EK Zavadskas","year":"2006","unstructured":"Zavadskas, E. K., Zakarevicius, A., & Antucheviciene, J. (2006). Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions. Informatica, 17(4), 601\u2013618.","journal-title":"Informatica"},{"issue":"1","key":"5339_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1080\/1331677X.2016.1237302","volume":"29","author":"EK Zavadskas","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zavadskas, E. K., Govindan, K., Antucheviciene, J., & Turskis, Z. (2016). Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications for sustainability issues. Economic research-Ekonomska istra\u017eivanja, 29(1), 857\u2013887.","journal-title":"Economic research-Ekonomska istra\u017eivanja"}],"container-title":["Annals of Operations Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10479-023-05339-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10479-023-05339-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10479-023-05339-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T17:33:59Z","timestamp":1685640839000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10479-023-05339-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,10]]},"references-count":86,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]}},"alternative-id":["5339"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10479-023-05339-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0254-5330","1572-9338"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0254-5330","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-9338","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 April 2023","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 May 2023","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}