{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,2]],"date-time":"2026-07-02T11:09:57Z","timestamp":1782990597660,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":107,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"13","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,10]],"date-time":"2022-12-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1670630400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,10]],"date-time":"2022-12-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1670630400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["71771155"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["71771155"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["72071135"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["72071135"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Appl Intell"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10489-022-04368-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,10]],"date-time":"2022-12-10T10:02:34Z","timestamp":1670666554000},"page":"16540-16559","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["A bibliometric analysis and basic model introduction of opinion dynamics"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"53","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5727-266X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yang","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zeshui","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"4368_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Castellano C, Fortunato S, Loreto V (2009) Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev Mod Phys 81(2):591\u2013646","DOI":"10.1103\/RevModPhys.81.591"},{"key":"4368_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lorenz J (2007) Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: a survey. Int J Mod Phys C 18(12):1819\u20131838","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183107011789"},{"key":"4368_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xia HX, Wang HL, Xuan ZG (2011) Opinion dynamics: a multidisciplinary review and perspective on future research. Int J Knowl Syst Sci 2(4):72\u201391","DOI":"10.4018\/jkss.2011100106"},{"key":"4368_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stauffer D (2013) A biased review of sociophysics. J Stat Phys 151(1\u20132):9\u201320","DOI":"10.1007\/s10955-012-0604-9"},{"key":"4368_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Proskurnikov AV, Tempo R (2017) A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I. Annu Rev Control 43:65\u201379","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arcontrol.2017.03.002"},{"key":"4368_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Proskurnikov AV, Tempo R (2018) A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part II. Annu Rev Control 45:166\u2013190","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arcontrol.2018.03.005"},{"key":"4368_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jalili M, Perc M (2017) Information cascades in complex networks. J Complex Netw 5(5):665\u2013693","DOI":"10.1093\/comnet\/cnx019"},{"key":"4368_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sznajd-Weron K, Sznajd J, Weron T (2021) A review on the Sznajd model-20 years after. Phys A 565:125537","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2020.125537"},{"key":"4368_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sobkowicz P (2020) Whither now, opinion modelers? Front Phys-Lausanne 8:587009","DOI":"10.3389\/fphy.2020.587009"},{"key":"4368_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Patil A, Shah GT (2020) Multi-robot trajectory tracking and rendezvous algorithm. IETE J Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/03772063.2020.1800521","DOI":"10.1080\/03772063.2020.1800521"},{"key":"4368_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aylaj B, Bellomo N, Chouhad N, Knopoff D (2021) On the interaction between soft and hard sciences: the role of mathematical sciences looking ahead to research perspectives. Vietnam J Math 49(1):3\u201320","DOI":"10.1007\/s10013-019-00381-3"},{"key":"4368_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maghenem M, Postoyan R, Loria A, Panteley E (2020) Lyapunov-based synchronization of networked systems: from continuous-time to hybrid dynamics. Annu Rev Control 50:335\u2013342","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arcontrol.2020.06.003"},{"key":"4368_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Proskurnikov AV, Calafiore GC, Cao M (2020) Recurrent averaging inequalities in multi-agent control and social dynamics modeling. Annu Rev Control 49:95\u2013112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arcontrol.2020.04.014"},{"key":"4368_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tena-Sanchez J, Leon-Medina FJ (2019) Models of the dynamics of opinion. A literature review. Rev Int Sociol 77(2):e123","DOI":"10.3989\/ris.2019.77.2.18.049"},{"key":"4368_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anderson BDO, Ye MB (2019) Recent advances in the modelling and analysis of opinion dynamics on influence networks. Int J Autom Comput 16(2):129\u2013149","DOI":"10.1007\/s11633-019-1169-8"},{"key":"4368_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zha QB, Kou G, Zhang HJ, Liang HM, Chen X, Li CC, Dong YC (2021) Opinion dynamics in finance and business: a literature review and research opportunities. Financ Innov 6(1):44","DOI":"10.1186\/s40854-020-00211-3"},{"key":"4368_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ma SY, Zhang HZ (2021) Opinion expression dynamics in social media chat groups: An integrated Quasi-experimental and agent-based model approach. Complexity 2021:2304754","DOI":"10.1155\/2021\/2304754"},{"key":"4368_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Noorazar H (2020) Recent advances in opinion propagation dynamics: a 2020 survey. Eur Phys J Plus 135(6):521","DOI":"10.1140\/epjp\/s13360-020-00541-2"},{"key":"4368_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Camilleri AR (2020) The importance of online reviews depends on when they are presented. Decis Support Syst 133:113307","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dss.2020.113307"},{"key":"4368_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yu DJ, Xu ZS, Pedrycz W, Wang WR (2017) Information sciences 1968\u20132016: a retrospective analysis with text mining and bibliometric. Inf Sci 418:619\u2013634","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2017.08.031"},{"key":"4368_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang XX, Chang YR, Xu ZS, Wang ZD, Kadirkamanathan V (2021) 50 years of international journal of systems science: a review of the past and trends for the future. Int J Syst Sci 52(8):1515\u20131538","DOI":"10.1080\/00207721.2020.1862937"},{"key":"4368_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Landstrom H, Harirchi G, Astrom F (2012) Entrepreneurship: exploring the knowledge base. Res Policy 41(7):1154\u20131181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2012.03.009"},{"key":"4368_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cancino CA, Merigo JM, Coronado FC (2017) A bibliometric analysis of leading universities in innovation research. J Innov Knowl 2(3):106\u2013124","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jik.2017.03.006"},{"key":"4368_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yu DJ, Xu ZS, Fujita H (2019) Bibliometric analysis on the evolution of applied intelligence. Appl Intell 49(2):449\u2013462","DOI":"10.1007\/s10489-018-1278-z"},{"key":"4368_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Xu ZS, Lei TT, Qin Y (2022) An overview of probabilistic preference decision-making based on bibliometric analysis. Appl Intell. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10489-022-03189-w:19","DOI":"10.1007\/s10489-022-03189-w:19"},{"key":"4368_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cobo MJ, Martinez MA, Gutierrez-Salcedo M, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) 25 years at knowledge-based Systems: a bibliometric analysis. Knowl-Based Syst 80:3\u201313","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knosys.2014.12.035"},{"key":"4368_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li Y, Xu ZS, Wang XX, Filip FG (2019) Studies in Informatics and Control: a bibliometric analysis from 2008 to 2019. Int J Comput Commun 14(6):633\u2013652","DOI":"10.15837\/ijccc.2019.6.3753"},{"key":"4368_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glanzel W, Czerwon HJ (1996) A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics 37(2):195\u2013221","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02093621"},{"key":"4368_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sousa AO, Malarz K, Galam S (2005) Reshuffling spins with short range interactions: when sociophysics produces physical results. Int J Mod Phys C 16(10):1507\u20131517","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183105008102"},{"key":"4368_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stauffer D (2005) Sociophysics simulations II: opinion dynamics. In: 8th Granada Seminar, pp\u00a056\u201368","DOI":"10.1063\/1.2008591"},{"key":"4368_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dall\u2019Asta L, Baronchelli A, Barrat A, Loreto V (2006) Nonequilibrium dynamics of language games on complex networks. Phys Rev E 74(3):036105","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.74.036105"},{"key":"4368_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yang HX, Wu ZX, Zhou CS, Zhou T, Wang BH (2009) Effects of social diversity on the emergence of global consensus in opinion dynamics. Phys Rev E 80(4):046108","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.80.046108"},{"key":"4368_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hu K, Tang Y (2009) Consensus formation in weighted scale-free networks. Int J Mod Phys C 20(5):677\u2013686","DOI":"10.1142\/S012918310901390X"},{"key":"4368_CR34","unstructured":"Hegselmann R, Krause U (2002) Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation. JASSS-J Artif Soc S 5(3):2"},{"key":"4368_CR35","unstructured":"Hegselmann R, Krause U (2006) Truth and cognitive division of labour first steps towards a computer aided social epistemology. JASSS-J Artif Soc S 9(3):10"},{"key":"4368_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pilyugin SY, Campi MC (2019) Opinion formation in voting processes under bounded confidence. Netw Heterog Media 14(3):617\u2013632","DOI":"10.3934\/nhm.2019024"},{"key":"4368_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bortot S, Pereira RAM, Stamatopoulou A (2020) Consensus dynamics, network interaction, and Shapley indices in the Choquet framework. Soft Comput 24(18):13757\u201313768","DOI":"10.1007\/s00500-019-04512-3"},{"key":"4368_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baum MA, Kernell S (2001) Economic class and popular support for Franklin Roosevelt in war and peace. Public Opin Quart 65(2):198\u2013229","DOI":"10.1086\/322197"},{"key":"4368_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vliegenthart R, Schuck ART, Boomgaarden HG, De Vreese CH (2008) News coverage and support for european integration, 1990\u20132006. Int J Public Opin R 20(4):415\u2013439","DOI":"10.1093\/ijpor\/edn044"},{"key":"4368_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Biondi Y, Giannoccolo P, Galam S (2012) Formation of share market prices under heterogeneous beliefs and common knowledge. Phys A 391(22):5532\u20135545","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2012.06.015"},{"key":"4368_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vaidya T, Murguia C, Piliouras G (2020) Learning agents in Black-Scholes financial markets. Roy Soc Open Sci 7(10):201188","DOI":"10.1098\/rsos.201188"},{"key":"4368_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Patriarca M, Heinsalu E, Singh A, Chakraborti A (2017) Kinetic exchange models as D dimensional systems: A comparison of different approaches. In: International Workshop on Econophysics and Sociophysics - Recent Progress and Future Directions (Econophys), pp\u00a0147\u2013158. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-47705-3_11","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-47705-3_11"},{"key":"4368_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Crokidakis N (2014) A three-state kinetic agent-based model to analyze tax evasion dynamics. Phys A 414:321\u2013328","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2014.07.056"},{"key":"4368_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Vreese CH, Boomgaarden HG (2006) Media message flows and interpersonal communication - the conditional nature of effects on public opinion. Commun Res 33(1):19\u201337","DOI":"10.1177\/0093650205283100"},{"key":"4368_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ali RN, Rubin H, Sarkar S (2021) Countering the potential re-emergence of a deadly infectious disease-information warfare, identifying strategic threats, launching countermeasures. PLoS ONE 16(8):e0256014","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0256014"},{"key":"4368_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kandiah V, Binder AR, Berglund EZ (2017) An empirical agent-based model to simulate the adoption of water reuse using the social amplification of risk framework. Risk Anal 37(10):2005\u20132022","DOI":"10.1111\/risa.12760"},{"key":"4368_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kandiah VK, Berglund EZ, Binder AR (2019) An agent-based modeling approach to project adoption of water reuse and evaluate expansion plans within a sociotechnical water infrastructure system. Sustain Cities Soc 46:101412","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scs.2018.12.040"},{"key":"4368_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Deffuant G, Neau D, Amblard F, Weisbuch G (2000) Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Appl Simul Soc Sci 87\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1142\/S0219525900000078","DOI":"10.1142\/S0219525900000078"},{"key":"4368_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Krapivsky PL, Redner S (2003) Dynamics of majority rule in two-state interacting spin systems. Phys Rev Lett 90(23):238701","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.90.238701"},{"key":"4368_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A (2011) Opinion dynamics and learning in social networks. Dyn Games Appl 1(1):3\u201349","DOI":"10.1007\/s13235-010-0004-1"},{"key":"4368_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Galam S (2008) Sociophysics: a review of Galam models. Int J Mod Phys C 19(3):409\u2013440","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183108012297"},{"key":"4368_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blondel VD, Hendrickx JM, Tsitsiklis JN (2009) On Krause\u2019s multi-agent consensus model with state-dependent connectivity. IEEE T Automat Contr 54(11):2586\u20132597","DOI":"10.1109\/TAC.2009.2031211"},{"key":"4368_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Motsch S, Tadmor E (2014) Heterophilious dynamics enhances consensus. SIAM Rev 56(4):577\u2013621","DOI":"10.1137\/120901866"},{"key":"4368_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Galam S (2004) Contrarian deterministic effects on opinion dynamics: \u201cthe hung elections scenario\u201d. Phys A 333:453\u2013460","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2003.10.041"},{"key":"4368_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kiesling E, Gunther M, Stummer C, Wakolbinger LM (2012) Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review. Cent Eur J Oper Res 20(2):183\u2013230","DOI":"10.1007\/s10100-011-0210-y"},{"key":"4368_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van der Linden S, Leiserowitz A, Rosenthal S, Maibach E (2017) Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Glob Chall 1(2):1600008","DOI":"10.1002\/gch2.201600008"},{"key":"4368_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weidlich W (1971) The statistical description of polarization phenomena in society. Br J Math & Stat Psychol 24(2):251\u2013266","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2044-8317.1971.tb00470.x"},{"key":"4368_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Xie ZP, Song X, Li QY (2016) A review of opinion dynamics. In: Joint Conference of the 16th Asia Simulation Conference \/ SCS International Autumn Simulation Multi-Conference (AsiaSim\/SCS AutumnSim), pp\u00a0349\u2013357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-981-10-2672-0_36","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-10-2672-0_36"},{"key":"4368_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shukla P (2018) Hysteresis in the zero-temperature random-field ising model on directed random graphs. Phys Rev E 98(3):032144","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.98.032144"},{"key":"4368_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li LB, Fan Y, Zeng A, Di ZR (2019) Binary opinion dynamics on signed networks based on Ising model. Phys A 525:433\u2013442","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2019.03.011"},{"key":"4368_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smug D, Sornette D, Ashwin P (2018) A generalized 2D-dynamical mean-field ising model with a rich set of bifurcations (inspired and applied to financial crises). Int J Bifurcat Chaos 28(4):1830010","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218127418300100"},{"key":"4368_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"des Mesnards NG, Hunter DS, el Hjouji Z, Zaman T (2022) Detecting bots and assessing their impact in social networks. Oper Res 70(1):1\u201322","DOI":"10.1287\/opre.2021.2118"},{"key":"4368_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tiwari M, Yang XG, Sen S (2021) Modeling the nonlinear effects of opinion kinematics in elections: a simple ising model with random field based study. Phys A 582:126287","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2021.126287"},{"key":"4368_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clifford P, Sudbury A (1973) A model for spatial conflict. Biometrika 60(3):581\u2013588","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/60.3.581"},{"key":"4368_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holley RA, Liggett TM (1975) Ergodic theorems for weakly interacting infinite systems and voter model. Ann Probab 3(4):643\u2013663","DOI":"10.1214\/aop\/1176996306"},{"key":"4368_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zschaler G (2012) Adaptive-network models of collective dynamics. Eur Phys J-Spec Top 211(1):1\u2013101","DOI":"10.1140\/epjst\/e2012-01648-5"},{"key":"4368_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Klamser PP, Wiedermann M, Donges JF, Donner RV (2017) Zealotry effects on opinion dynamics in the adaptive voter model. Phys Rev E 96(5):052315","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.96.052315"},{"key":"4368_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Majmudar JR, Krone SM, Baumgaertner BO, Tyson RC (2020) Voter models and external influence. J Math Sociol 44(1):1\u201311","DOI":"10.1080\/0022250X.2019.1625349"},{"key":"4368_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Khalil N, Toral R (2019) The noisy voter model under the influence of contrarians. Phys A 515:81\u201392","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2018.09.178"},{"key":"4368_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kononovicius A (2021) Supportive interactions in the noisy voter model. Chaos Soliton Fract 143:110627","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chaos.2020.110627"},{"key":"4368_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Khalil N, Galla T (2021) Zealots in multistate noisy voter models. Phys Rev E 103(1):012311","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.103.012311"},{"key":"4368_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ma WK, Liu XS, Guan JY (2021) Consensus time in a concealed voter model with heterogeneous activity of voters. Int J Mod Phys C 32(11):2150151","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183121501515"},{"key":"4368_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jedrzejewski A, Sznajd-Weron K (2022) Pair approximation for the q-voter models with quenched disorder on networks. Phys Rev E 105(6):064306","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.105.064306"},{"key":"4368_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abramiuk A, Sznajd-Weron K (2020) Generalized independence in the q-Voter Model: how do parameters influence the phase transition? Entropy-Switz 22(1):120","DOI":"10.3390\/e22010120"},{"key":"4368_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abramiuk A, Pawlowski J, Sznajd-Weron K (2019) Is independence necessary for a discontinuous phase transition within the q-voter model? Entropy-Switz 21(5):521","DOI":"10.3390\/e21050521"},{"key":"4368_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jedrzejewski A, Sznajd-Weron K (2019) Statistical physics of opinion formation: is it a SPOOF? Cr Phys 20(4):244\u2013261","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crhy.2019.05.002"},{"key":"4368_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chmiel A, Sienkiewicz J, Fronczak A, Fronczak P (2020) A veritable zoology of successive phase transitions in the ssymmetric q-voter model on multiplex networks. Entropy-Switz 22(9):1018","DOI":"10.3390\/e22091018"},{"key":"4368_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vieira AR, Anteneodo C (2018) Threshold q-voter model. Phys Rev E 97(5):052106","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.97.052106"},{"key":"4368_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chiyomaru K, Takemoto K (2022) Adversarial attacks on voter model dynamics in complex networks. Phys Rev E 106(1):014301","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.106.014301"},{"key":"4368_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nowak B, Ston B, Sznajd-Weron K (2021) Discontinuous phase transitions in the multi-state noisy q-voter model: quenched vs. annealed disorder. Sci Rep-Uk 11(1):6098","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-85361-9"},{"key":"4368_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Moreno GR, Manino E, Long TT, Brede M (2020) Zealotry and Influence Maximization in the Voter Model: When to Target Partial Zealots? In: 11th International Conference on Complex Networks (CompleNet), pp\u00a0107\u2013118. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-40943-2_10","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-40943-2_10"},{"key":"4368_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jedrzejewski A, Sznajd-Weron K (2018) Impact of memory on opinion dynamics. Phys A 505:306\u2013315","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2018.03.077"},{"key":"4368_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Galam S (2002) Minority opinion spreading in random geometry. Eur Phys J B 25(4):403\u2013406","DOI":"10.1140\/epjb\/e20020045"},{"key":"4368_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen P, Redner S (2005) Majority rule dynamics in finite dimensions. Phys Rev E 71(3):036101","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.71.036101"},{"key":"4368_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mobilia M, Redner S (2003) Majority versus minority dynamics: phase transition in an interacting two-state spin system. Phys Rev E 68(4):046106","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.68.046106"},{"key":"4368_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Campos PRA, de Oliveira VM, Moreira FGB (2003) Small-world effects in the majority-vote model. Phys Rev E 67(2):026104","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.67.026104"},{"key":"4368_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mukhopadhyay A, Mazumdar RR, Roy R (2016) Binary opinion dynamics with biased agents and agents with different degrees of stubbornness. In: 28th International Teletraffic Congress (ITC), pp\u00a0261\u2013269","DOI":"10.1109\/ITC-28.2016.143"},{"key":"4368_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mukhopadhyay A, Mazumdar RR, Roy R (2020) Voter and majority dynamics with biased and stubborn agents. J Stat Phys 181(4):1239\u20131265","DOI":"10.1007\/s10955-020-02625-w"},{"key":"4368_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shekatkar SM (2020) Do zealots increase or decrease the polarization of social networks? J Complex Netw 8(4):cnz036","DOI":"10.1093\/comnet\/cnz036"},{"key":"4368_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Martinez FG, Balankin A (2021) Majority rule dynamics between a double coalition and a third opinion: coalition profit models and majority coalition ties. Adapt Behav 29(4):333\u2013347","DOI":"10.1177\/1059712319895486"},{"key":"4368_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sznajd-Weron K, Sznajd J (2000) Opinion evolution in closed community. Int J Mod Phys C 11(6):1157\u20131165","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183100000936"},{"key":"4368_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stauffer D, Sousa AO, De Oliveira SM (2000) Generalization to square lattice of Sznajd sociophysics model. Int J Mod Phys C 11(6):1239\u20131245","DOI":"10.1142\/S012918310000105X"},{"key":"4368_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Behera L, Schweitzer F (2003) On spatial consensus formation: is the Sznajd model different from a voter model? Int J Mod Phys C 14(10):1331\u20131354","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183103005467"},{"key":"4368_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Calvelli M, Crokidakis N, Penna TJP (2019) Phase transitions and universality in the Sznajd model with anticonformity. Phys A 513:518\u2013523","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2018.09.023"},{"key":"4368_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Muslim R, Anugraha R, Sholihun S, Rosyid MF (2020) Phase transition of the Sznajd model with anticonformity for two different agent configurations. Int J Mod Phys C 31(4):2050052","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183120500527"},{"key":"4368_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schneider JJ, Hirtreiter C (2005) The impact of election results on the member numbers of the large parties in Bavaria and Germany. Int J Mod Phys C 16(8):1165\u20131215","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183105007820"},{"key":"4368_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vannucchi FS, Prado CPC (2009) Sznajd model and proportional elections: the role of the topology of the network. Int J Mod Phys C 20(6):979\u2013990","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183109014102"},{"key":"4368_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Luo Y, Li YK, Sun CD, Cheng C (2022) Adapted Deffuant-Weisbuch model with implicit and explicit opinions. Phys A 596:127095","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2022.127095"},{"key":"4368_CR99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang JB, Zhao YY (2018) The robust consensus of a noisy Deffuant-Weisbuch model. Math Probl Eng 2018:1065451","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/1065451"},{"key":"4368_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Su W, Chen XZ, Yu YG, Chen G (2022) Noise-based control of opinion dynamics. IEEE T Automat Contr 67(6):3134\u20133140","DOI":"10.1109\/TAC.2021.3095455"},{"key":"4368_CR101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Piccoli B, Rossi F (2021) Generalized solutions to bounded-confidence models. Math Mod Meth Appl S 31(06):1237\u20131276","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218202521400054"},{"key":"4368_CR102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vasca F, Bernardo C, Iervolino R (2021) Practical consensus in bounded confidence opinion dynamics. Automatica 129:109683","DOI":"10.1016\/j.automatica.2021.109683"},{"key":"4368_CR103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hou J, Li WS, Jiang MY (2021) Opinion dynamics in modified expressed and private model with bounded confidence. Phys A 574:125968","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2021.125968"},{"key":"4368_CR104","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zou F, Li YP, Huang JH (2020) Group interaction and evolution of customer reviews based on opinion dynamics towards product redesign. Electron Commer Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10660-020-09447-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s10660-020-09447-8"},{"key":"4368_CR105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen G, Su W, Mei WJ, Bullo F (2020) Convergence properties of the heterogeneous deffuant-weisbuch model. Automatica 114:108825","DOI":"10.1016\/j.automatica.2020.108825"},{"key":"4368_CR106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Douven I (2019) Optimizing group learning: an evolutionary computing approach. Artif Intell 275:235\u2013251","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2019.06.002"},{"key":"4368_CR107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Almeida R, Girejko E, Machado L, Malinowska AB, Martins N (2018) Application of predictive control to the Hegselmann-Krause model. Math Method Appl Sci 41(18):9191\u20139202","DOI":"10.1002\/mma.5132"}],"container-title":["Applied Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10489-022-04368-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10489-022-04368-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10489-022-04368-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,1]],"date-time":"2023-07-01T05:07:07Z","timestamp":1688188027000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10489-022-04368-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,10]]},"references-count":107,"journal-issue":{"issue":"13","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]}},"alternative-id":["4368"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10489-022-04368-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-669X","1573-7497"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0924-669X","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7497","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 April 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 November 2022","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 November 2022","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 December 2022","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}