{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,8]],"date-time":"2026-07-08T20:32:49Z","timestamp":1783542769237,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"22","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,14]],"date-time":"2024-08-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1723593600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,14]],"date-time":"2024-08-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1723593600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["Nos.72171002, 71771001, U22A20366, 72271002,72071001, 72201004, 72301003"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Nos.72171002, 71771001, U22A20366, 72271002,72071001, 72201004, 72301003"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Research Funding Project of Academic and technical leaders and reserve candidates in Anhui Province","award":["No.2018H179"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["No.2018H179"]}]},{"name":"Top Talent Academic Foundation for University Discipline of Anhui Province","award":["No. gxbjZD2020056"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["No. gxbjZD2020056"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Appl Intell"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,11]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10489-024-05730-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,14]],"date-time":"2024-08-14T03:36:56Z","timestamp":1723606616000},"page":"11233-11247","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["A two-stage group stochastic preference analysis based on best-worst method"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"54","author":[{"given":"Ning","family":"Dai","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ligang","family":"Zhou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qun","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,14]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"5730_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/0165-0114(86)90014-X","volume":"18","author":"J Kacprzy","year":"1986","unstructured":"Kacprzy J (1986) Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 18(2):105\u2013118","journal-title":"Fuzzy Sets Syst"},{"key":"5730_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.11.070","volume":"619","author":"JD Qin","year":"2023","unstructured":"Qin JD, Ma XY, Liang YY (2023) Building a consensus for the best-worst method in group decision-making with an optimal allocation of information granularity. Information Scieneces 619:630\u2013653","journal-title":"Information Scieneces"},{"key":"5730_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-2496(77)90033-5","volume":"15","author":"TL Saaty","year":"1977","unstructured":"Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234\u2013281","journal-title":"J Math Psychol"},{"issue":"7","key":"5730_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.32.7.841","volume":"32","author":"TL Saaty","year":"1986","unstructured":"Saaty TL (1986) Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Manage Sci 32(7):841\u2013855","journal-title":"Manage Sci"},{"key":"5730_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/0377-2217(90)90057-I","volume":"48","author":"TL Saaty","year":"1990","unstructured":"Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9\u201326","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"key":"5730_CR6","volume-title":"Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Network Process","author":"TL Saaty","year":"2001","unstructured":"Saaty TL (2001) Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh"},{"issue":"8","key":"5730_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"889","DOI":"10.1016\/0305-0548(93)90109-V","volume":"20","author":"CL Hwang","year":"1993","unstructured":"Hwang CL, Lai YJ, Liu TY (1993) A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Computers & Operations Research 20(8):889\u2013899","journal-title":"Computers & Operations Research"},{"key":"5730_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1016\/0377-2217(94)90282-8","volume":"76","author":"YJ Lai","year":"1994","unstructured":"Lai YJ, Liu TY, Hwang CL (1994) TOPSIS for MODM. Eur J Oper Res 76:486\u2013500","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"key":"5730_CR9","first-page":"721","volume":"40","author":"DL Olson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Olson DL (2004) Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Eur J Oper Res 40:721\u2013727","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"5730_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1057\/jors.1987.44","volume":"38","author":"K Yoon","year":"1987","unstructured":"Yoon K (1987) A reconciliation among discrete compromise solutions. J Oper Res Soc 38(3):277\u2013286","journal-title":"J Oper Res Soc"},{"key":"5730_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00134132","volume":"31","author":"B Roy","year":"1991","unstructured":"Roy B (1991) The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theor Decis 31:49\u201373","journal-title":"Theor Decis"},{"key":"5730_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(03)00020-1","volume":"156","author":"S Opricovi","year":"2004","unstructured":"Opricovi S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156:445\u2013455","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"key":"5730_CR13","first-page":"477","volume":"84","author":"JP Brans","year":"1984","unstructured":"Brans JP, Mareschal B, Vincke P (1984) PROMETHEE: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. Oper Res Int Journal 84:477\u2013490","journal-title":"Oper Res Int Journal"},{"key":"5730_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.31.6.647","volume":"31","author":"JP Brans","year":"1985","unstructured":"Brans JP, Vincke P (1985) Note-a preference ranking organisation method (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Manage Sci 31:647\u2013656","journal-title":"Manage Sci"},{"key":"5730_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/0377-2217(86)90044-5","volume":"24","author":"JP Brans","year":"1986","unstructured":"Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24:228\u2013238","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"key":"5730_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2014.11.009","volume":"53","author":"J Rezaei","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rezaei J (2015) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53:49\u201357","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"5730_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102075","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2019.06.001","volume":"96","author":"M Mohammadi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mohammadi M, Rezaei J (2020) Bayesian best-worst method: a probabilistic group decision making model. Omega 96:102075","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"5730_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2021.115088","volume":"181","author":"S Faizi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Faizi S, Salabun W, Nawaz S, Rehman AU, Watrobski J (2021) Best-Worst method and Hamacher aggregation operations for intuitionistic 2-tuple linguistic sets. Expert Syst Appl 181:102075","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"key":"5730_CR19","volume":"198","author":"SJH Dehshiri","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dehshiri SJH, Emamat MSMM, Amiri M (2022) A novel group BWM approach to evaluate the implementation criteria of blockchain technology in the automotive industry supply chain. Expert Syst Appl 198:116826","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"key":"5730_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2023.03.110","volume":"635","author":"JC Tu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tu JC, Wu ZB, Pedryc W (2023) Priority ranking for the best-worst method. Inf Sci 635:42\u201355","journal-title":"Inf Sci"},{"key":"5730_CR21","volume":"123","author":"Q Wu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wu Q, Liu XW, Zhou LG, Qin JD, Rezaei J (2024) An analytical framework for the bestworst method. Omega 123:102974","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"5730_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120665","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2023.120665","volume":"230","author":"C Zhang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhang C, Hu ZK, Qin Y, Song WY (2023) Performance evaluation of technological service platform: a rough Z-number-based BWM-TODIM method. Expert Syst Appl 230:120665","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"key":"5730_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2022.11.070","volume":"619","author":"JD Qin","year":"2023","unstructured":"Qin JD, Ma XY, Liang YY (2023) Building a consensus for the best-worst method in group decision-making with an optimal allocation of information granularity. Info Sci 619:630\u2013653","journal-title":"Info Sci"},{"key":"5730_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119332","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2022.119332","volume":"215","author":"MSMM Emamat","year":"2023","unstructured":"Emamat MSMM, Amiri M, Mehregan MR, Taghavifard MT (2023) A novel hybrid simplified group BWM and multi-criteria sorting approach for stock portfolio selection. Expert Syst Appl 215:119332","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"key":"5730_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116013","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2021.116013","volume":"188","author":"ZC Wang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Wang ZC, Ran Y, Chen YF, Yang X, Zhang GB (2022) Group risk assessment in failure mode and effects analysis using a hybrid probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic MCDM method. Expert Syst Appl 188:116013","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"key":"5730_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2023.03.125","volume":"634","author":"J Huang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Huang J, Xu YJ, Wen XW, Zhu XT, Herrera-Viedma E (2023) Deriving priorities from the fuzzy best-worst method matrix and its applications: a perspective of incomplete reciprocal preference relation. Inf Sci 634:761\u2013778","journal-title":"Inf Sci"},{"key":"5730_CR27","volume":"236","author":"JY Dong","year":"2023","unstructured":"Dong JY, Wan SP (2023) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy best-worst method with additive consistency. Expert Syst Appl 236:121213","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"key":"5730_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2023.110856","volume":"148","author":"N Goldani","year":"2023","unstructured":"Goldani N, Kazemi M, Naji-Azimi Z, Alidadi H (2023) An interval type-2 fuzzy best-worst method and likelihood-based multi-criteria method in group decision-making. Appl Soft Comput 148:110856","journal-title":"Appl Soft Comput"},{"issue":"4","key":"5730_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6923","DOI":"10.3233\/JIFS-232272","volume":"45","author":"YP Lin","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lin YP, Wang WX, Chen YL, Li F (2023) Novel evaluation model of teaching quality based on the improved IVIF-BWM and IVIFWMSM. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 45(4):6923\u20136941","journal-title":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems"},{"issue":"2","key":"5730_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13148","DOI":"10.1111\/exsy.13148","volume":"40","author":"A Aleksic","year":"2023","unstructured":"Aleksic A, Milanovic DD, Komatina N, Tadic D (2023) Evaluation and ranking of failures in manufacturing process by combining best-worst method and VIKOR under type-2 fuzzy environment. Expert Syst 40(2):13148","journal-title":"Expert Syst"},{"key":"5730_CR31","volume":"101","author":"YJ Xu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Xu YJ, Zhu XT, Wen XW, Herrera-Viedma E (2021) Fuzzy best-worst method and its application in initial water rights allocation. Appl Soft Comput 101:107007","journal-title":"Appl Soft Comput"},{"issue":"2","key":"5730_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2014.01.068","volume":"237","author":"B Zhu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Zhu B, Xu ZS (2014) Stochastic preference analysis in numericalpreference relations. Eur J Oper Res 237(2):628\u2013633","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"key":"5730_CR33","volume":"117","author":"JM Song","year":"2022","unstructured":"Song JM, Wu P, Liu JP, Chen HY (2022) Group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations based on multiplicative DEA cross-effeciency and stochastic acceptability analysis. Eng Appl Artif Intell 117:105595","journal-title":"Eng Appl Artif Intell"},{"issue":"3","key":"5730_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.22190\/FUME230901034M","volume":"21","author":"AR Mishra","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mishra AR, Rani P, Cavallaro F, Alrasheedi AF (2023) Assessment of sustainable wastewater treatment technologies using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy distance measure-based MAIRCA method. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering 21(3):359\u2013386","journal-title":"Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering"},{"issue":"2","key":"5730_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.22190\/FUME220223013Z","volume":"20","author":"B Zhou","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhou B, Chen J, Wu Q, Pamu\u010dar D, Wang WZ, Zhou LG (2023) Risk priority evaluation of power transformer parts based on hybrid FMEA framework under hesitant fuzzy environment. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering 20(2):399\u2013420","journal-title":"Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering"},{"issue":"3","key":"5730_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.22190\/FUME230824036R","volume":"21","author":"M Radovanovi\u0107","year":"2023","unstructured":"Radovanovi\u0107 M, Bo\u017eani\u0107 D, Te\u015bi\u0107 D, Pu\u015bka A, Hezam IM, Jana C (2023) Application of hybrid DIBR-FUCOM-LMAW-Bonferroni-grey-EDAS model in multicriteria decision-making. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering 21(3):387\u2013403","journal-title":"Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering"},{"key":"5730_CR37","volume":"175","author":"P Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li P, Xu ZW, Liu J, Wei CP (2023) Social network group decision-making for probabilistic linguistic information based on GRA. Computers & Industrial Engineering 175:108861","journal-title":"Computers & Industrial Engineering"},{"issue":"2","key":"5730_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1007\/s10700-022-09394-z","volume":"22","author":"JP Liu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Liu JP, Qiang ZJ, Wu P, Du PC (2023) Multiple stage optimization driven group decision making method with interval linguistic fuzzy preference relations based on ordinal consistency and DEA cross-effeciency. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 22(2):309\u2013336","journal-title":"Fuzzy Optim Decis Making"},{"issue":"2","key":"5730_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2023.05.007","volume":"311","author":"ZC Ru","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ru ZC, Liu JP, Kadzinski M, Liao XW (2023) Probabilistic ordinal regression methods for multiple criteria sorting admitting certain and uncertain preferences. Journal of Operational Research 311(2):596\u2013616","journal-title":"Journal of Operational Research"},{"key":"5730_CR40","volume-title":"Introduction to Interval Computation","author":"G Alefeld","year":"1983","unstructured":"Alefeld G, Herzberger J (1983) Introduction to Interval Computation. Academic Press, New York"},{"key":"5730_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2015.12.001","volume":"64","author":"J Rezaei","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rezaei J (2016) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega 64:126\u2013130","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"5730_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-2496(84)90003-8","volume":"28","author":"RE Jensen","year":"1984","unstructured":"Jensen RE (1984) An alternative scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 28:317\u2013332","journal-title":"J Math Psychol"},{"key":"5730_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10700-023-09410-w","author":"YJ Xu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Xu YJ, Wnag DY (2023) Some methods to derive the priority weights from the best-worst method matrix and weight effeciency test in view of incomplete pairwise comparison matrix. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10700-023-09410-w","journal-title":"Fuzzy Optim Decis Making"},{"key":"5730_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(97)00163-X","volume":"106","author":"R Lahdelma","year":"1998","unstructured":"Lahdelma R, Hokkanen J, Salminen P (1998) SMAA - Stochastic multiobjective acceptability anlysis. Eur J Oper Res 106:137\u2013143","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"key":"5730_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(02)00267-9","volume":"147","author":"R Lahdelma","year":"2003","unstructured":"Lahdelma R, Miettinen K, Salminen P (2003) Ordinal criteria in stochastic multicriteria accept- ability analysis (SMAA). Eur J Oper Res 147:117\u2013127","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"key":"5730_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(02)00267-9","volume":"147","author":"R Lahdelma","year":"2003","unstructured":"Lahdelma R, Miettinen K, Salminen P (2003) Group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations based on DEA and stochastic simulation. Eur J Oper Res 147:117\u2013127","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"key":"5730_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knosys.2018.01.001","volume":"145","author":"F Liu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Liu F, Yu Q, Pedrycz W, Zhang WG (2018) A group decision making model based on an incon- sistency index of interval multiplicative reciprocal matrices. Knowl-Based Syst 145:67\u2013176","journal-title":"Knowl-Based Syst"},{"key":"5730_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang K, Zhou LG, Dai XC, Li H (2024) Stochastic group preference acceptability analysis for interval-valued multiplicative preference relations based on TODIM method. Appl Soft Comput 151:111140","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2023.111140"},{"key":"5730_CR49","volume":"254","author":"JB Li","year":"2024","unstructured":"Li JB, Zhou LG, Mart\u00ednez L, Deveci M, Wu Q (2024) A two-stage stochastic preference anal- ysis on group decision making with interval additive preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 254:124357","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"key":"5730_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1004617102663","volume":"107","author":"ZS Xu","year":"2000","unstructured":"Xu ZS (2000) Generalized chi square method for the estimation of weights. J Optim Theory Appl 107:183\u2013192","journal-title":"J Optim Theory Appl"},{"issue":"10","key":"5730_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2165","DOI":"10.1080\/01605682.2022.2129482","volume":"74","author":"J Xiao","year":"2023","unstructured":"Xiao J, Wang XL, Zhang BW, Zhang HJ (2023) Consensus-driven methodology to managing diversity and complex linguistic ratings in quality function deployment: an optimization-based approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society 74(10):2165\u20132186","journal-title":"Journal of the Operational Research Society"},{"key":"5730_CR52","volume":"187","author":"J Xiao","year":"2024","unstructured":"Xiao J, Wang XL (2024) An optimization method for handling incomplete and conflicting opinions in quality function deployment based on consistency and consensus reaching process. Computers & Industrial Engineering 187:109779","journal-title":"Computers & Industrial Engineering"}],"container-title":["Applied Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10489-024-05730-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10489-024-05730-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10489-024-05730-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,18]],"date-time":"2024-09-18T15:22:57Z","timestamp":1726672977000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10489-024-05730-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,14]]},"references-count":52,"journal-issue":{"issue":"22","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,11]]}},"alternative-id":["5730"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10489-024-05730-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-669X","1573-7497"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0924-669X","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7497","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 August 2024","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 August 2024","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing Interests"}},{"value":"The data used in this paper is from examples in the references and the ethical and informed consent was obtained from all authors.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical and Informed Consent for Data Used"}}]}}