{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,3]],"date-time":"2025-10-03T08:18:58Z","timestamp":1759479538296,"version":"3.32.0"},"reference-count":60,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,9,1]],"date-time":"2006-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1157068800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,9,1]],"date-time":"2006-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1157068800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9025-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,1,8]],"date-time":"2007-01-08T12:36:00Z","timestamp":1168259760000},"page":"177-239","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["How to make and defend a proposal in a deliberation dialogue"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Douglas","family":"Walton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,1,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"9025_CR1","unstructured":"Aakhus, M. (2005). The Act and Activity of Proposing in Deliberation, paper presented at the ALTA Conference, August, 2005."},{"key":"9025_CR2","unstructured":"Anonymous (no author given) (2005). Weight Ranking on Schools Can Hurt, The Advertiser, September 21, 2005, p. 17"},{"key":"9025_CR3","unstructured":"Aristotle (1928). Nicomachean Ethics, in The Works of Aristotle Translated into English, ed. Ross, W. D., Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9025_CR4","unstructured":"Aristotle (1939). Topics, trans. E. S. Forster, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press."},{"key":"9025_CR5","unstructured":"Atkinson, K. (2005). What Should We do? Computational Representation of Persuasive Argument in Practical Reasoning. Ph.D. Thesis, Liverpool, University of Liverpool."},{"key":"9025_CR6","unstructured":"Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2004). Justifying Practical Reasoning. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA 2004), 87\u201390. ECAI 2004, Valencia, Spain"},{"key":"9025_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2004a). PARMENIDES: Facilitating Democratic Debate, Electronic Government. In Traunmuller, R. (ed.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), 3183. Third International Conference on eGovernment (EGOV 2004), DEXA 2004, Zaragoza, Spain.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-30078-6_52"},{"key":"9025_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2004b). A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-Agent Argument over Proposals for Action. In Rahwan, I., Moraitis, P., and Reed, C. (eds.), Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 149\u2013161. Springer: Berlin.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-32261-0_10"},{"key":"9025_CR9","unstructured":"Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2005). Agent Decision Making Using Argumentation About Actions, Technical Report ULCS-05\u2013006. Computer Science Department: University of Liverpool."},{"key":"9025_CR10","unstructured":"Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2005a). Persuasive Political Argument. In Grasso, F., Reed, C., and Kibble, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA 2005), 44\u201345. Edinburgh, Scotland"},{"key":"9025_CR11","unstructured":"Bach, K. (1998). Speech Acts. In Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http:\/\/www.online.sfsu.edu\/kbach\/spchacts.html"},{"key":"9025_CR12","first-page":"490","volume":"34","author":"J. Barnes","year":"1980","unstructured":"Barnes J. (1980). Aristotle and the Methods of Ethics. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34:490\u2013511","journal-title":"Revue Internationale de Philosophie"},{"key":"9025_CR13","volume-title":"Intention, Plans and Practical Reason","author":"M. Bratman","year":"1987","unstructured":"Bratman M. (1987). Intention, Plans and Practical Reason. Cambridge Mass, Harvard University Press"},{"key":"9025_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8640.1988.tb00284.x","volume":"4","author":"M. E. Bratman","year":"1988","unstructured":"Bratman M. E., Israel D. J., Pollack M. E. (1988). Plans and Resource-bounded Practical Reasoning. Computational Intelligence 4:349\u2013355","journal-title":"Computational Intelligence"},{"key":"9025_CR15","unstructured":"Burke, N. (2005). Weight Watch Plan to Provide Details of a Child\u2019s Fitness, The Advertiser, September 17, 2005, p. 2."},{"key":"9025_CR16","volume-title":"Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In","author":"R. Fisher","year":"1983","unstructured":"Fisher R., Ury W., Patton B. (1983). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. New York, Penguin Books"},{"key":"9025_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8447-0","volume-title":"The Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice","author":"T. F. Gordon","year":"1995","unstructured":"Gordon T. F. (1995). The Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Dordrecht, Kluwer"},{"key":"9025_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gordon, T. F. and Karacapilidis, N. (1997). The Zeno Argumentation Framework. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 10\u201318. Melbourne, Australia.","DOI":"10.1145\/261618.261622"},{"key":"9025_CR19","first-page":"248","volume-title":"eGovernment: State of the Art and Perspectives (EGOV)","author":"T. F. Gordon","year":"2002","unstructured":"Gordon T. F., Richter G. (2002). Discourse Support Systems for Deliberative Democracy. In: Traunmuller R., Lenk L. (eds), eGovernment: State of the Art and Perspectives (EGOV). Aix-en-Provence, Springer Verlag, pp. 248\u2013255"},{"key":"9025_CR20","unstructured":"Gordon, T. F. and Walton, D. (2005). Critical Questions in Computational Models of Legal Argument, International Workshop on Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence and Law, 103\u2013111. IAAIL Workshop Series, Wolf Legal Publishers."},{"key":"9025_CR21","volume-title":"Fallacies","author":"C. L. Hamblin","year":"1970","unstructured":"Hamblin C. L. (1970). Fallacies. London, Methuen"},{"key":"9025_CR22","volume-title":"Imperatives","author":"C. L. Hamblin","year":"1987","unstructured":"Hamblin C. L. (1987). Imperatives. Oxford, Blackwell"},{"key":"9025_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v22i2.2581","volume":"22","author":"D. Hitchcock","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hitchcock D. (2002). Pollock on Practical Reasoning. Informal Logic 22:247\u2013256","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"9025_CR24","unstructured":"Hitchcock, D., McBurney, P., and Parsons, P. (2005). A Framework for Deliberation Dialogues, Argument and Its Applications. In Hansen, H. V., Tindale, C. W., Blair, J. A., and Johnson, R. H. (eds.) (2001), Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA 2001). Also available on Peter McBurney\u2019s web page (2005) at the University of Liverpool, Department of Computer Science: http:\/\/www.csc.liv.ac.uk\/peter\/"},{"key":"9025_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01306968","volume":"24","author":"J. Horty","year":"1995","unstructured":"Horty J., Belnap N. D. (1995). The Deliberative Stit: A Study of Action, Omission, Ability, and Obligation, Journal of Philosophical Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 24:583\u2013644","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9025_CR26","unstructured":"Hulstijn, J. (2000). Dialogue Models for Inquiry and Transaction. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands."},{"key":"9025_CR27","volume-title":"The Abuse of Casuistry","author":"A. R. Jonsen","year":"1989","unstructured":"Jonsen A. R., Toulmin S. (1989). The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley, University of California Press"},{"key":"9025_CR28","unstructured":"Kauffeld, F. J. (1995). The Persuasive Force of Arguments on Behalf of Proposals, Amsterdam, SicSat, Analysis and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol. 2."},{"key":"9025_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007704116379","volume":"12","author":"F. J. Kauffeld","year":"1998","unstructured":"Kauffeld F. J. (1998). Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing. Argumentation 12:245\u2013266","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9025_CR30","first-page":"25","volume-title":"JFAK: Essays Dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday","author":"E. C. W. Krabbe","year":"1999","unstructured":"Krabbe E. C. W. (1999). Profiles of Dialogue. In: Gerbrandy J., Marx M., de Rijke M., Venema Yde (eds), JFAK: Essays Dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, pp. 25\u201336"},{"key":"9025_CR31","first-page":"286","volume-title":"The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University 18\u201321 May, 2005","author":"E. C. W. Krabbe","year":"2005","unstructured":"Krabbe E. C. W. (2005). Fundamental Circularities in the Theory of Argumentation. In: Hitchcock D. (eds), The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University 18\u201321 May, 2005. Hamilton, Ontario, pp. 286\u2013294"},{"key":"9025_CR32","volume-title":"The Politics of Automobile Insurance Reform: Ideas, Institutions, and Public Policy in North America","author":"E. L. Lascher","year":"1999","unstructured":"Lascher E. L. (1999). The Politics of Automobile Insurance Reform: Ideas, Institutions, and Public Policy in North America. Washington, Georgetown University Press"},{"key":"9025_CR33","first-page":"356","volume-title":"The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University 18\u201321 May, 2005","author":"F. Paglieri","year":"2005","unstructured":"Paglieri F., Castelfranchi C. (2005). Arguments as Belief Structures. In: Hitchcock D. (eds), The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University 18\u201321 May, 2005. Hamilton, Ontario, pp. 356\u2013367"},{"key":"9025_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)90057-4","volume":"67","author":"J. L. Pollock","year":"1994","unstructured":"Pollock J. L. (1994). Justification and defeat. Artificial Intelligence 67: 377\u2013407","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9025_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001","volume-title":"Cognitive Carpentry","author":"J. L. Pollock","year":"1995","unstructured":"Pollock J. L. (1995). Cognitive Carpentry. Cambridge, Mass, The MIT Press"},{"key":"9025_CR36","unstructured":"Prakken, H., Reed, C., and Walton D. (2005). Dialogues about the Burden of Proof. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 115\u2013124, Held June 6\u201311, 2005. The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM): Bologna, Italy, New York."},{"key":"9025_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reed, C. (1998). Dialogue Frames in Agent Communication. In Demazeau, Y. (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, 246\u2013253. IEEE Press.","DOI":"10.1109\/ICMAS.1998.699056"},{"key":"9025_CR38","volume-title":"Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation","author":"C. Reed","year":"2003","unstructured":"Reed C., Norman T. J. (2003). Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation. Dordrecht, Kluwer"},{"key":"9025_CR39","unstructured":"Reed, C. and Rowe, G. (2002). Araucaria: Software for Puzzles in Argument Diagramming and XML, Technical Report, Department of Applied Computing, University of Dundee. Available at http:\/\/www.computing.dundee.ac.uk\/staff\/creed\/araucaria\/"},{"key":"9025_CR40","unstructured":"Reed, C. and Rowe, G. (2002). Araucaria, Version 3, User Manual. Available at http:\/\/www.computing.dundee.ac.uk\/staff\/creed\/araucaria\/"},{"key":"9025_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reed, C. and Walton, D. (2003). Diagramming Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions. In van Eemeren, F. H., Blair, A.J., Willard C. A., and Henkemans, F. S. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, 881\u2013885. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-1078-8_16"},{"key":"9025_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139173438","volume-title":"Speech Acts","author":"J. Searle","year":"1969","unstructured":"Searle J. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press"},{"key":"9025_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/5759.001.0001","volume-title":"Rationality in Action","author":"J. Searle","year":"2001","unstructured":"Searle J. (2001). Rationality in Action. Cambridge, Mass, The MIT Press"},{"key":"9025_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00136122","volume":"3","author":"K. Segerberg","year":"1984","unstructured":"Segerberg K. (1984). Towards an Exact Philosophy of Action. Topoi 3:75\u201383","journal-title":"Topoi"},{"key":"9025_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02451549","volume":"8","author":"M. P. Singh","year":"1999","unstructured":"Singh M. P. (1999). A Semantics for Speech Acts. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 8:47\u201371","journal-title":"Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9025_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-62686-7_29","volume-title":"Intelligent Agents Systems: Theoretical and Practical Issues","author":"M. P. Singh","year":"1997","unstructured":"Singh M. P. (1997). Commitments in the Architecture of a Limited, Rational Agent. In: Cavedon L. (eds), Intelligent Agents Systems: Theoretical and Practical Issues. Berlin, Springer, pp. 72\u201387"},{"key":"9025_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(96)00041-0","volume":"90","author":"G. A. W. Vreeswijk","year":"1997","unstructured":"Vreeswijk G. A. W. (1997). Abstract Argumentation Systems. Artificial Intelligence 90:225\u2013279","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9025_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1177\/000169937201500104","volume":"15","author":"G. H. von Wright","year":"1972","unstructured":"von Wright G. H. (1972). On So-Called Practical Inference. Acta Sociologica 15:39\u201353","journal-title":"Acta Sociologica"},{"key":"9025_CR49","unstructured":"Walton, D. (1990). Practical Reasoning: Goal-Driven, Knowledge-Based, Action-Guiding Argumentation. Rowman & Littlefield: Savage, Maryland."},{"key":"9025_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.2307\/2026735","volume":"87","author":"D. Walton","year":"1990a","unstructured":"Walton D. (1990a). What is Reasoning? What is an Argument?. Journal of Philosophy 87:399\u2013419","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"9025_CR51","unstructured":"Walton, D. (1996) Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, N.J"},{"key":"9025_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walton D. (1998). The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument. University of Toronto Press: Toronto","DOI":"10.3138\/9781442681859"},{"key":"9025_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000013333.96215.a9","volume":"11","author":"D. Walton","year":"2003","unstructured":"Walton D. (2003). Is There a Burden of Questioning?. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11:1\u201343","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"9025_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walton, D. (2004). Criteria of Rationality for Evaluating Democratic Public Rhetoric. In Fontana, B., Nederman, C. J., and Reimer, G. (eds.), Talking Democracy University Park, 295\u2013330. Penn Sate Press.","DOI":"10.5325\/j.ctv14gp65b.15"},{"key":"9025_CR55","unstructured":"Walton, D. (2005). Evaluating Practical Reasoning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Norms, Knowledge and Reasoning in Technology Held at Huis Elzendaal, Boxmeer, the Netherlands, June 3\u20134, 2005. Eindhoven, Technical University of Eindhoven."},{"key":"9025_CR56","unstructured":"Walton, D. and Godden, D. (2005). The Nature and Status of Critical Questions in Argumentation Schemes, The Uses of Argument. In Hitchcock, D. and Farr, D. (eds.), Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University, 476\u2013484. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation."},{"key":"9025_CR57","volume-title":"Commitment in Dialogue","author":"D. Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton D., Krabbe E. (1995). Commitment in Dialogue. Albany, State University of New York Press"},{"key":"9025_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/5804.001.0001","volume-title":"Reasoning about Rational Agents","author":"M. Wooldridge","year":"2000","unstructured":"Wooldridge M. (2000). Reasoning about Rational Agents. Cambridge Mass, The MIT Press"},{"key":"9025_CR59","volume-title":"An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems","author":"M. Wooldridge","year":"2002","unstructured":"Wooldridge M. (2002). MultiAgent Systems. Chichester, Wiley"},{"key":"9025_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yankelovich, D. (1992). A Widening Expert\/Public Opinion Gap, 20\u201327, Challenge, May\u2013June, 1992.","DOI":"10.1080\/05775132.1992.11471587"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-006-9025-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10506-006-9025-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-006-9025-x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-006-9025-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,12]],"date-time":"2025-01-12T21:31:24Z","timestamp":1736717484000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10506-006-9025-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,9]]},"references-count":60,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,9]]}},"alternative-id":["9025"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-006-9025-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0924-8463"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1572-8382"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"21 February 2006","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 July 2006","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 January 2007","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}