{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,19]],"date-time":"2022-11-19T21:54:16Z","timestamp":1668894856394},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,1]],"date-time":"2008-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1228089600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-008-9071-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,3]],"date-time":"2008-12-03T09:00:03Z","timestamp":1228294803000},"page":"389-402","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["An object model for use in oral and written advocacy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Charles","family":"Unwin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"9071_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511610585","volume-title":"Analysis of evidence","author":"T Anderson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Anderson T, Schum D, Twining W (2005) Analysis of evidence, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge","edition":"2"},{"key":"9071_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008308627745","volume":"8","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2000","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Geldard T, Leng P (2000) A method for the computational modelling of dialectical argument with dialogue games. Artif Intell Law 8:233\u2013254","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9071_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2005.05.003","volume":"168","author":"M Berardi","year":"2005","unstructured":"Berardi M, Calvanese D, De Giacomo D (2005) Reasoning on UML class diagrams. Artif Intell 168:70\u2013118","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9071_CR4","unstructured":"Bex F, Prakken H (2004) Reinterpreting arguments in dialogue: an application to evidential reasoning. In: Legal knowledge and information systems JURIX 2004. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 119\u2013129"},{"key":"9071_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046007.11806.9a","volume":"11","author":"F Bex","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bex F, Prakken H, Reed C, Walton D (2003) Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations. Artif Intell Law 11:125\u2013165","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9071_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bex F, Prakken H, Verheij B (2007a) Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 1\u201310","DOI":"10.1145\/1276318.1276320"},{"key":"9071_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/mgm007","volume":"6","author":"F Bex","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bex F, van den Braak S, van Oostenberg H, Prakken H (2007b) Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments? Law Probab Risk 6:145\u2013168","journal-title":"Law Probab Risk"},{"key":"9071_CR8","volume-title":"The unified modeling language user guide","author":"G Booch","year":"1999","unstructured":"Booch G, Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I (1999) The unified modeling language user guide. Addison-Wesley, Reading"},{"key":"9071_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gordon T, Karacapilidis N (1997) The Zeno argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on artificial intelligence and law, Melbourne, pp 10\u201318","DOI":"10.1145\/261618.261622"},{"key":"9071_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.010","volume":"171","author":"T Gordon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gordon T, Prakken H, Walton D (2007) The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artif Intell 171:875\u2013896","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9071_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hepler A, Dawid A, Leucari V (2007) Object-oriented graphical representations of complex patterns of evidence. Law Probab Risk 6(1\u20134):275\u2013293. doi: 10.1093\/lpr\/mgm005","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/mgm005"},{"key":"9071_CR12","unstructured":"Kundera M (1970) The joke. Penguin, Harmondsworth"},{"key":"9071_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lutomski L (1989) The design of an attorney\u2019s statistical consultant. In: Proceedings of the second international conference of artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, New York, pp 224\u2013233","DOI":"10.1145\/74014.74043"},{"key":"9071_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H, Reed C, Walton D (2003) Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evidence. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 32\u201341","DOI":"10.1145\/1047788.1047794"},{"key":"9071_CR15","unstructured":"Reed C, Rowe G (2006) Araucaria version 3.1, user manual, chap 6, Toulmin graphs, chap 7, Working in other styles: Wigmore"},{"key":"9071_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/mgm030","volume":"6","author":"C Reed","year":"2007","unstructured":"Reed C, Rowe G (2007) A pluralist approach to argument diagramming. Law Probab Risk 6:59\u201385","journal-title":"Law Probab Risk"},{"key":"9071_CR17","unstructured":"Roth B, Verheij B (2004) Dialectical arguments and case comparison. In: Gordon T (ed) Legal knowledge and information systems, Jurix 2004: the seventeenth annual conference. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 99\u2013100"},{"key":"9071_CR19","unstructured":"Schum D (2003) Foundations\u2014relevance and causality In: Murphy P (ed) Evidence, proof and facts. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 278"},{"key":"9071_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Toulmin S (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Updated edition, 2003)","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511840005"},{"key":"9071_CR21","volume-title":"Theories of evidence: Bentham and Wigmore","author":"W Twining","year":"1985","unstructured":"Twining W (1985) Theories of evidence: Bentham and Wigmore. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London"},{"key":"9071_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/mgm008","volume":"6","author":"W Twining","year":"2007","unstructured":"Twining W (2007) Argumentation, generalizations and stories (A comment on Prakken et al \u201cSense-Making Software\u201d). Law Probab Risk 6:169\u2013185","journal-title":"Law Probab Risk"},{"key":"9071_CR23","unstructured":"Wahlgren P (1984) A general theory of artificial intelligence and law. In Soeteman A (ed) Legal knowledge based systems JURIX 94. The foundation for legal knowledge systems, Lelystad, Koninklijke Vermande, 1994, pp 79, 83"},{"key":"9071_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walton D (2007) Visualization tools, argumentation schemes and expert opinion evidence in law. Law Probab Risk. doi: 10.1093\/lpr\/mgm033","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/mgm033"},{"key":"9071_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9014-0","volume":"13","author":"D Walton","year":"2005","unstructured":"Walton D, Godden D (2005) Persuasion dialogue in online dispute resolution. Artif Intell Law 13:273\u2013295","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9071_CR26","unstructured":"Wigmore J (1913) The problem of proof. Ill Law Rev 8(2):77"},{"key":"9071_CR27","unstructured":"Wyner A, Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2007) Arguments, values and baseballs: representation of Popov v Hayashi. In: Lodder A, Mommers L (eds) Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX 2007: the twentieth annual conference, pp 151\u2013160. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, vol 165. IOS Press, Amsterdam"},{"key":"9071_CR28","unstructured":"Yates F (1966) The art of memory. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Harlow\u2014the memory theatre of Giulio Camillo (pp 11\u201314) and Robert Fludd (chap 16)"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-008-9071-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10506-008-9071-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-008-9071-7","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,29]],"date-time":"2019-05-29T18:57:16Z","timestamp":1559156236000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10506-008-9071-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]}},"alternative-id":["9071"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-008-9071-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0924-8463","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8382","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]}}}