{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,14]],"date-time":"2026-01-14T01:14:53Z","timestamp":1768353293407,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,30]],"date-time":"2011-08-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1314662400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,11]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-011-9115-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,29]],"date-time":"2011-08-29T11:02:26Z","timestamp":1314615746000},"page":"291-331","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["A framework for the extraction and modeling of fact-finding reasoning from legal decisions: lessons from the Vaccine\/Injury Project Corpus"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Vern R.","family":"Walker","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Nathaniel","family":"Carie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Courtney C.","family":"DeWitt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Eric","family":"Lesh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"9115_CR1","volume-title":"Administrative law","author":"AC Aman Jr","year":"2001","unstructured":"Aman AC Jr, Mayton WT (2001) Administrative law, 2nd edn. West Group, St. Paul","edition":"2"},{"key":"9115_CR2","volume-title":"Analysis of evidence: how to do things with facts based on Wigmore\u2019s Science of judicial proof","author":"T Anderson","year":"1991","unstructured":"Anderson T, Twining W (1991) Analysis of evidence: how to do things with facts based on Wigmore\u2019s Science of judicial proof. Northwestern University Press, Evanston"},{"key":"9115_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ashley KD (2009). Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning. In: Proceedings of 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL-09). ACM, New York, pp 1\u201310","DOI":"10.1145\/1568234.1568236"},{"key":"9115_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-009-9077-9","volume":"17","author":"KD Ashley","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ashley KD, Br\u00fcninghaus S (2009) Automatically classifying texts and predicting outcomes. Artif Intell Law 17:125\u2013165","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9115_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00109-7","volume":"150","author":"KD Ashley","year":"2003","unstructured":"Ashley KD, Rissland EL (2003) Law, learning and representation. Artif Intell 150:17\u201358","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9115_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9092-x","volume":"18","author":"FJ Bex","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bex FJ, van Koppen PJ, Prakken H (2010) A hybrid theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence. Artif Intell Law 18:123\u2013152","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9115_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Biagioli C, Francesconi E, Passerini A, Montemagni S, Soria C (2005). Automatic semantics extraction in law documents. In: Proceedings of tenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL-05). ACM, New York, pp 133\u2013140","DOI":"10.1145\/1165485.1165506"},{"key":"9115_CR8","volume-title":"Knowledge representation and reasoning","author":"RJ Brachman","year":"2004","unstructured":"Brachman RJ, Levesque HJ (2004) Knowledge representation and reasoning. Elsevier, Amsterdam"},{"key":"9115_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-2848-5","volume-title":"Reasoning with rules and precedents: a computational model of legal analysis","author":"LK Branting","year":"2000","unstructured":"Branting LK (2000) Reasoning with rules and precedents: a computational model of legal analysis. Kluwer, Dordrecht"},{"key":"9115_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"923","DOI":"10.2307\/1342258","volume":"109","author":"S Brewer","year":"1996","unstructured":"Brewer S (1996) Exemplary reasoning: semantics, pragmatics, and the rational force of legal argument by analogy. Harv Law Rev 109:923","journal-title":"Harv Law Rev"},{"key":"9115_CR11","volume-title":"Nonmonotonic reasoning: an overview","author":"G Brewka","year":"1997","unstructured":"Brewka G, Dix J, Konolige K (1997) Nonmonotonic reasoning: an overview. CSLI Publications, Stanford"},{"key":"9115_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Br\u00fcninghaus S, Ashley KD (2005). Generating legal arguments and predictions from case texts. In: Proceedings of 10th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL-05). ACM, New York, pp 65\u201374","DOI":"10.1145\/1165485.1165497"},{"key":"9115_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412985642","volume-title":"Reliability and validity assessment","author":"EG Carmines","year":"1979","unstructured":"Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Sage, Newbury Park"},{"key":"9115_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9016-y","volume":"13","author":"A Chorley","year":"2005","unstructured":"Chorley A, Bench-Capon T (2005) An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application. Artif Intell Law 13:323\u2013371","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9115_CR15","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Walton D (2009). Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. In: Proceedings of 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL-09). ACM, New York, pp 137\u2013146"},{"key":"9115_CR16","volume-title":"A probabilistic analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti evidence","author":"JB Kadane","year":"1996","unstructured":"Kadane JB, Schum DA (1996) A probabilistic analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti evidence. Wiley, New York"},{"key":"9115_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511612947","volume-title":"Uncertain inference","author":"HE Kyburg Jr","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kyburg HE Jr, Teng CM (2001) Uncertain inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9115_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mochales R, Moens M-F (2008). Study on the structure of argumentation in case law. In: Legal knowledge and information systems (Jurix 2008). IOS Press, pp 11\u201320","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-58603-952-3-11"},{"key":"9115_CR19","unstructured":"Moens M-F, Boiy E, Palau R, Reed C (2007). Automatic detection of arguments in legal texts. In: Proceedings of 11th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL-07). ACM, New York, pp 225\u2013230"},{"key":"9115_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Palau RM, Moens M-F (2009) Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in text. In: Proceedings of 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL-09). ACM, New York, pp 98\u2013107","DOI":"10.1145\/1568234.1568246"},{"key":"9115_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195060133.001.0001","volume-title":"Nomic probability and the foundations of induction","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1990","unstructured":"Pollock JL (1990) Nomic probability and the foundations of induction. Oxford University Press, New York"},{"issue":"1","key":"9115_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/3.1.33","volume":"3","author":"H Prakken","year":"2004","unstructured":"Prakken H (2004) Analysing reasoning about evidence with formal models of argumentation. Law Probab Risk 3(1):33\u201350","journal-title":"Law Probab Risk"},{"key":"9115_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-008-9069-1","volume":"16","author":"H Prakken","year":"2008","unstructured":"Prakken H (2008) Formalising ordinary legal disputes: a case study. Artif Intell Law 16:333\u2013359","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9115_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0952-1917.2004.00259.x","volume":"17","author":"H Prakken","year":"2004","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (2004) The three faces of defeasibility in the law. Ratio Juris 17(1):118\u2013139","journal-title":"Ratio Juris"},{"key":"9115_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H, Reed C, Walton D (2003) Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evidence. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference of artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL-03). ACM, New York, pp 32\u201341","DOI":"10.1145\/1047788.1047794"},{"key":"9115_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00122-X","volume":"150","author":"EL Rissland","year":"2003","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Ashley KD, Loui RP (2003) AI and law: a fruitful synergy. Artif Intell 150:1\u201315","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9115_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9087-7","volume":"18","author":"M Saravanan","year":"2010","unstructured":"Saravanan M, Ravindran B (2010) Identification of rhetorical roles for segmentation and summarization of a legal judgment. Artif Intell Law 18:45\u201376","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9115_CR28","volume-title":"Evidential foundations of probabilistic reasoning","author":"DA Schum","year":"1994","unstructured":"Schum DA (1994) Evidential foundations of probabilistic reasoning. Wiley, New York"},{"key":"9115_CR29","volume-title":"An introduction to reasoning","author":"S Toulmin","year":"1984","unstructured":"Toulmin S, Rieke R, Janik A (1984) An introduction to reasoning. Macmillan, New York"},{"key":"9115_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-6704-661-9","volume-title":"Virtual arguments: on the design of argument assistants for lawyers and other arguers","author":"B Verheij","year":"2005","unstructured":"Verheij B (2005) Virtual arguments: on the design of argument assistants for lawyers and other arguers. TMC Asser Press, The Hague"},{"issue":"1","key":"9115_CR31","first-page":"132","volume":"3","author":"VR Walker","year":"2003","unstructured":"Walker VR (2003) Epistemic and non-epistemic aspects of the factfinding process in law. Am Phil Assoc Newsl Law Phil 3(1):132\u2013136","journal-title":"Am Phil Assoc Newsl Law Phil"},{"issue":"2","key":"9115_CR32","first-page":"381","volume":"56","author":"VR Walker","year":"2004","unstructured":"Walker VR (2004) Restoring the individual plaintiff to tort law by rejecting \u201cJunk Logic\u201d about specific causation. Ala Law Rev 56(2):381\u2013481","journal-title":"Ala Law Rev"},{"key":"9115_CR33","first-page":"193","volume":"47","author":"VR Walker","year":"2007","unstructured":"Walker VR (2007a) A default-logic paradigm for legal fact-finding. Jurimetrics 47:193\u2013243","journal-title":"Jurimetrics"},{"issue":"1\u20134","key":"9115_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/mgm015","volume":"6","author":"VR Walker","year":"2007","unstructured":"Walker VR (2007b) Visualizing the dynamics around the rule-evidence interface in legal reasoning. Law Probab Risk 6(1\u20134):5\u201322","journal-title":"Law Probab Risk"},{"key":"9115_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.4018\/978-1-60566-236-7.ch021","volume-title":"Handbook of research on agent-based societies: social and cultural interactions","author":"VR Walker","year":"2009","unstructured":"Walker VR (2009a) Emergent reasoning structures in law. In: Trajkovski G, Collins SG (eds) Handbook of research on agent-based societies: social and cultural interactions. Information Science Reference, Hershey, pp 305\u2013324"},{"issue":"1","key":"9115_CR36","first-page":"1","volume":"3","author":"VR Walker","year":"2009","unstructured":"Walker VR (2009b) Designing factfinding for cross-border healthcare. Opinio Juris in Comparatione 3(1):1\u201340","journal-title":"Opinio Juris in Comparatione"},{"key":"9115_CR37","volume-title":"Argument schemes for presumptive reasoning","author":"DN Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton DN (1996) Argument schemes for presumptive reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah"},{"key":"9115_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton D, Reed C, Macagno F (2008) Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9115_CR39","unstructured":"Wyner A, Peters W (2010) Lexical semantics and expert legal knowledge towards the identification of legal case factors. In: Legal knowledge and information systems (Jurix 2010). IOS Press"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-011-9115-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10506-011-9115-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-011-9115-2","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,9]],"date-time":"2025-03-09T11:09:04Z","timestamp":1741518544000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10506-011-9115-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,30]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,11]]}},"alternative-id":["9115"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-011-9115-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0924-8463","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8382","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,30]]}}}