{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,2]],"date-time":"2025-11-02T16:41:46Z","timestamp":1762101706955,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":73,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,10]],"date-time":"2015-05-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1431216000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-015-9166-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,9]],"date-time":"2015-05-09T13:29:26Z","timestamp":1431178166000},"page":"133-160","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"title":["An improved factor based approach to precedential constraint"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"23","author":[{"given":"Adam","family":"Rigoni","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"9166_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2014) Abstract dialectical frameworks for legal reasoning. In: Hoekstra R (ed) Proceedings of 27th international conference on legal knowledge and information systems (JURIX 2014). IOS Press, Amesterdam, Netherlands, pp 61\u201370","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-468-8-61"},{"issue":"4","key":"9166_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9337.1996.tb00250.x","volume":"9","author":"CE Alchourron","year":"1996","unstructured":"Alchourron CE (1996) On law and logic. Ratio Juris 9(4):331\u2013348","journal-title":"Ratio Juris"},{"key":"9166_CR3","volume-title":"Teaching cased-based argumentation through a model and examples","author":"V Aleven","year":"1997","unstructured":"Aleven V (1997) Teaching cased-based argumentation through a model and examples. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh"},{"key":"9166_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139167420","volume-title":"Demystifying legal reasoning","author":"L Alexander","year":"2008","unstructured":"Alexander L, Sherwin E (2008) Demystifying legal reasoning. Cambridge University Press, New York"},{"key":"9166_CR80","unstructured":"American Law Institute (1979) Restatement (second) of torts"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9166_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(99)00014-4","volume":"109","author":"G Antonelli","year":"1999","unstructured":"Antonelli G (1999) A directly cautious theory of defeasible consequence for default logic via the notion of general extension. Artif Intell 109(1\u20132):71\u2013109","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9166_CR29","unstructured":"Arizona v. Johnson 555 US 323 (2009)"},{"key":"9166_CR6","volume-title":"Molding legal argument: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals","author":"KD Ashley","year":"1990","unstructured":"Ashley KD (1990) Molding legal argument: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. The MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9166_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7373(91)90011-U","volume":"34","author":"KD Ashley","year":"1991","unstructured":"Ashley KD (1991) Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals in hypo. Int J Man Mach Stud 34:753\u2013796","journal-title":"Int J Man Mach Stud"},{"key":"9166_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, Prakken H, Wyner A, Wyner A, Peters W, Katz D (2013) Argumentation schemes for reasoning about factors with dimensions. In: Ashley K (ed) Proceedings of 26th international conference on legal knowledge and information systems (JURIX 2013). IOS Press, Amesterdam, Netherlands, pp 39\u201348","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-359-9-39"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9166_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00108-5","volume":"150","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Sartor G (2003) A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artif Intell 150(1\u20132):97\u2013143","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9166_CR10","unstructured":"Bex F, Bench-Capon TJM, Verheij B (2011) What makes a story plausible? The need for precedents. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2011: the twenty-fourth annual conference, 23\u201332"},{"key":"9166_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Board of Ed. Of Central School Dist. 1 v. Allen 392 U.S. 236 (1968)","DOI":"10.1017\/S0008938900014990"},{"key":"9166_CR12","unstructured":"Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. v. Grumet 512 U.S. 687 (1994)"},{"key":"9166_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Branting K (1991) Reasoning with portions of precedents. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on AI and Law, 145\u2013154","DOI":"10.1145\/112646.112664"},{"key":"9166_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Branting K (1993) A reduction-graph model of ratio decidendi. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on AI and Law, 40\u201349","DOI":"10.1145\/158976.158981"},{"issue":"5","key":"9166_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"923","DOI":"10.2307\/1342258","volume":"109","author":"S Brewer","year":"1996","unstructured":"Brewer S (1996) Exemplary reasoning: semantics, pragmatics, and the rational force of legal argument by analogy. Harv Law Rev 109(5):923\u20131028","journal-title":"Harv Law Rev"},{"key":"9166_CR16","volume-title":"Nonmonotonic reasoning: logical foundations of commonsense","author":"G Brewka","year":"1991","unstructured":"Brewka G (1991) Nonmonotonic reasoning: logical foundations of commonsense. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9166_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bruninghaus S, Ashley K (2003) Predicting outcomes of case based legal arguments. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, 233\u201342","DOI":"10.1145\/1047788.1047838"},{"key":"9166_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.2307\/3480570","volume":"75","author":"JH Choper","year":"1987","unstructured":"Choper JH (1987) The establishment clause and aid to parochial schools\u2014an update. Calif Law Rev 75:5\u201315","journal-title":"Calif Law Rev"},{"key":"9166_CR19","first-page":"1176","volume":"37","author":"KM Cox","year":"1984","unstructured":"Cox KM (1984) The Lemon test soured: the supreme court\u2019s new establishment clause analysis. Vanderbilt Law Rev 37:1176\u20131205","journal-title":"Vanderbilt Law Rev"},{"key":"9166_CR63","unstructured":"Cutter v. Wilkinson 544 US 709 (2005)"},{"key":"9166_CR20","volume-title":"Law\u2019s empire","author":"R Dworkin","year":"1986","unstructured":"Dworkin R (1986) Law\u2019s empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9166_CR81","unstructured":"Ernst D (2009) Pierson v. post: the protagonists. Retrieved from http:\/\/legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com\/2009\/07\/pierson-v-post-protagonists.html on 1 Jan 2015"},{"key":"9166_CR21","first-page":"513","volume":"4","author":"CH Esbeck","year":"1989","unstructured":"Esbeck CH (1989) The Lemon test: should it be retained, reformulated or rejected. Notre Dame J Leg Ethics Pub Policy 4:513","journal-title":"Notre Dame J Leg Ethics Pub Policy"},{"key":"9166_CR22","volume-title":"Black\u2019s law dictionary","year":"2004","unstructured":"Garner BA (ed) (2004) Black\u2019s law dictionary, 8th edn. West, St. Paul","edition":"8"},{"key":"9166_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1086\/scr.1971.3108778","volume":"1971","author":"DA Giannella","year":"1971","unstructured":"Giannella DA (1971) Lemon and Tilton: the bitter and the sweet of church-state entanglement. Supreme Court Rev 1971:147\u2013200","journal-title":"Supreme Court Rev"},{"key":"9166_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Goodhart AL (1930) Determining the ratio decidendi of a case. Yale Law J, 161\u2013183","DOI":"10.2307\/790205"},{"key":"9166_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1093\/aristotelian\/49.1.171","volume":"49","author":"HLA Hart","year":"1948","unstructured":"Hart HLA (1948) The ascription of responsibility and rights. Proc Aristot Soc 49:171\u2013194","journal-title":"Proc Aristot Soc"},{"key":"9166_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hart HLA (1958) Positivism and the separation of law and morals. Harv Law Rev 71(4):593\u2013629","DOI":"10.2307\/1338225"},{"key":"9166_CR83","unstructured":"Hart HLA (1961) The concept of law. Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"key":"9166_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325204000151","volume":"10","author":"JF Horty","year":"2004","unstructured":"Horty JF (2004) The result model of precedent. Leg Theory 10:19\u201331","journal-title":"Leg Theory"},{"key":"9166_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Horty JF (2011) Rules and reasons in the theory of precedent. Legal Theory 17(01):1\u201333","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325211000036"},{"key":"9166_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199744077.001.0001","volume-title":"Reasons as defaults","author":"JF Horty","year":"2012","unstructured":"Horty JF (2012) Reasons as defaults. Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"issue":"2","key":"9166_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9125-8","volume":"20","author":"JF Horty","year":"2012","unstructured":"Horty JF, Bench-Capon TJM (2012) A factor-based definition of precedential constraint. Art Intell Law 20(2):181\u2013214","journal-title":"Art Intell Law"},{"key":"9166_CR30","first-page":"349","volume":"42","author":"LM Kahle","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kahle LM (2005) Making Lemon-aid from the supreme court\u2019s Lemon: why current establishment clause juriprudence should be replaced by a modified coercion test. S Diego Law Rev 42:349","journal-title":"S Diego Law Rev"},{"key":"9166_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kelsen H (1967) Pure theory of law. (Knight M, Trans.). University of California Press, Berkeley","DOI":"10.1525\/9780520312296"},{"key":"9166_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kritzer HM, Richards MJ (2003) Jurisprudential regimes and supreme court decision making: the lemon regime and establishment clause cases. Law Soc Rev 37(4):827\u2013840","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0023-9216.2003.03704005.x"},{"issue":"01","key":"9166_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325205050019","volume":"11","author":"G Lamond","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lamond G (2005) Do precedents create rules? Leg Theory 11(01):1\u201326","journal-title":"Leg Theory"},{"key":"9166_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee v. Weisman 505 U.S. 577 (1992)","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-444-89465-6.50052-1"},{"key":"9166_CR34","unstructured":"Lemon v. Kurtzman 403 U.S. 602 (1971)"},{"key":"9166_CR35","first-page":"671","volume":"65","author":"JM Lewis","year":"1989","unstructured":"Lewis JM, Vild ML (1989) Controversial twist of lemon: the endorsement test as the new establishment clause standard. Notre Dame Law Rev 65:671","journal-title":"Notre Dame Law Rev"},{"key":"9166_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lindahl L, Odelstad J (2006) Intermediate concepts in normative systems. In: Deontic logic and artificial normative systems, 8th international workshop on deontic logic in computer science, pp. 187\u2013200","DOI":"10.1007\/11786849_16"},{"key":"9166_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lucas JD (1983) The direct and collateral estoppel effects of alternative holdings. Univ Chic Law Rev 50(2):701\u2013730","DOI":"10.2307\/1599508"},{"key":"9166_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(80)90011-9","volume":"13","author":"J McCarthy","year":"1980","unstructured":"McCarthy J (1980) Circumscription\u2014a form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artif Intell 13:27\u201339","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9166_CR38","first-page":"231","volume":"34","author":"PJ Meyers","year":"1999","unstructured":"Meyers PJ (1999) Lemon is alive and kicking: using the lemon test to determine the constitutionality of prayer at high school graduation ceremonies. Valpso Univ Law Rev 34:231","journal-title":"Valpso Univ Law Rev"},{"key":"9166_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Miller v. California 413 U.S. 15 (1973)","DOI":"10.1016\/0008-8749(73)90132-9"},{"key":"9166_CR40","unstructured":"New York v. Ferber 458 U.S. 747 (1982)"},{"key":"9166_CR87","unstructured":"Nijboer JF (2007) The criminal justice system. In: Hondius E, Chorus J, Gerver P-H (eds) Introduction to Dutch law, 4th edn. Kluwer Law International"},{"key":"9166_CR41","first-page":"795","volume":"43","author":"MS Paulsen","year":"1992","unstructured":"Paulsen MS (1992) Lemon is dead. Case West Law Rev 43:795","journal-title":"Case West Law Rev"},{"key":"9166_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pennsylvania v. Mimms 434 U.S. 106 (1977)","DOI":"10.1016\/0014-4827(77)90197-5"},{"key":"9166_CR43","unstructured":"Police Department v. Mosley 408 U.S. 92 (1972)"},{"key":"9166_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118496","volume":"4","author":"H Prakken","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (1996) A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artif Intell Law 4:331\u2013368","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9166_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008278309945","volume":"6","author":"H Prakken","year":"1998","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (1998) Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. Artif Intell Law 6:231\u2013287","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9166_CR46","volume-title":"The authority of law","author":"J Raz","year":"1979","unstructured":"Raz J (1979) The authority of law. Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"issue":"02","key":"9166_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325214000044","volume":"20","author":"A Rigoni","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rigoni A (2014a) Common-law judicial reasoning and analogy. Leg Theory 20(02):133\u2013156","journal-title":"Leg Theory"},{"key":"9166_CR48","volume-title":"Legal rules, legal reasoning, and nonmonotonic logic","author":"A Rigoni","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rigoni A (2014b) Legal rules, legal reasoning, and nonmonotonic logic. University of Michigan, Michigan"},{"issue":"5","key":"9166_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"812","DOI":"10.2307\/1337744","volume":"70","author":"A Ross","year":"1957","unstructured":"Ross A (1957) T\u00fb-T\u00fb. Harv Law Rev 70(5):812\u2013825","journal-title":"Harv Law Rev"},{"key":"9166_CR50","volume-title":"Case-based reasoning in the law: a formal theory of reasoning by case comparison","author":"B Roth","year":"2003","unstructured":"Roth B (2003) Case-based reasoning in the law: a formal theory of reasoning by case comparison. Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht"},{"key":"9166_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schauer F (2006) Do cases make bad law? Univ Chic Law Rev 73:883\u2013918","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.668486"},{"issue":"6","key":"9166_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-6924.2008.00090.x","volume":"3","author":"F Schauer","year":"2008","unstructured":"Schauer F (2008) Why precedent in law (and elsewhere) is not totally (or even substantially) about analogy. Perspect Psychol Sci 3(6):454\u2013460","journal-title":"Perspect Psychol Sci"},{"key":"9166_CR52","first-page":"123","volume-title":"Routledge companion to philosophy of law","author":"F Schauer","year":"2012","unstructured":"Schauer F (2012) Precedent. In: Marmor A (ed) Routledge companion to philosophy of law. Routledge, New York, pp 123\u2013136"},{"key":"9166_CR53","unstructured":"School Dist. of Abington Twp., Pa. v. Schempp 374 U.S. 203 (1963)"},{"key":"9166_CR54","volume-title":"Legality","author":"SJ Shapiro","year":"2013","unstructured":"Shapiro SJ (2013) Legality. Belknap Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9166_CR89","unstructured":"Siegler A (1984) Alternative grounds in collateral estoppel. Loyola Los Angel Law Rev 17:1085\u20131124"},{"key":"9166_CR55","first-page":"148","volume-title":"Oxford essys in jurisprudence: a collaborative work","author":"AWB Simpson","year":"1961","unstructured":"Simpson AWB (1961) The ratio decidendi of a case and the doctrine of binding precedent. In: Guest AG (ed) Oxford essys in jurisprudence: a collaborative work. Oxford University Press, London, pp 148\u2013175"},{"key":"9166_CR56","unstructured":"Stencel Aero Engingering Corp v. U.S. 431 U.S. 666 (1977)"},{"key":"9166_CR57","unstructured":"Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. 1 (1968)"},{"key":"9166_CR58","unstructured":"The Newport Yacht Basin Ass\u2019n v. Supreme Northwest Inc. 168 Wn. App. 56 (2012)"},{"key":"9166_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-45596-5_3","volume-title":"Challenges for action theories","author":"M Thielscher","year":"2000","unstructured":"Thielscher M (2000) The qualification problem. Challenges for action theories. Springer, Berlin, pp 85\u2013118"},{"key":"9166_CR60","unstructured":"Walz v. Tax Comm\u2019n of N.Y. 397 U.S. 664 (1970)"},{"issue":"5","key":"9166_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1867","DOI":"10.2307\/3479339","volume":"54","author":"SA Weiner","year":"1966","unstructured":"Weiner SA (1966) The civil jury trial and the law-fact distinction law-fact distinction. Calif Law Rev 54(5):1867","journal-title":"Calif Law Rev"},{"key":"9166_CR62","volume-title":"Earl warren: a public life","author":"EG White","year":"1987","unstructured":"White EG (1987) Earl warren: a public life. Oxford University Press, Oxford"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-015-9166-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10506-015-9166-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-015-9166-x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,27]],"date-time":"2025-05-27T22:37:29Z","timestamp":1748385449000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10506-015-9166-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,10]]},"references-count":73,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]}},"alternative-id":["9166"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-015-9166-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0924-8463"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1572-8382"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,10]]}}}