{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,29]],"date-time":"2026-05-29T10:06:04Z","timestamp":1780049164887,"version":"3.53.1"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,8]],"date-time":"2016-06-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1465344000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"NWO","award":["727.011.009"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["727.011.009"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9183-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,8]],"date-time":"2016-06-08T17:40:50Z","timestamp":1465407650000},"page":"285-324","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":53,"title":["A method for explaining Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenarios"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Charlotte S.","family":"Vlek","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Henry","family":"Prakken","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Silja","family":"Renooij","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bart","family":"Verheij","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"9183_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Association of Forensic Science Providers (2009) Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion. Sci Justice 49(3):161\u2013164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scijus.2009.07.004"},{"key":"9183_CR2","volume-title":"Reconstructing reality in the courtroom: justice and judgment in American culture","author":"W Bennett","year":"1981","unstructured":"Bennett W, Feldman M (1981) Reconstructing reality in the courtroom: justice and judgment in American culture. Methuen-Tavistock, London"},{"key":"9183_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-0140-3","volume-title":"Arguments, stories and criminal evidence, a formal hybrid theory","author":"F Bex","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bex F (2011) Arguments, stories and criminal evidence, a formal hybrid theory. Springer, Dordrecht"},{"key":"9183_CR4","first-page":"59","volume":"6","author":"A Dawid","year":"2009","unstructured":"Dawid A (2009) Beware of the DAG. J Mach Learn Res Workshop Conf Proc 6:59\u201386","journal-title":"J Mach Learn Res Workshop Conf Proc"},{"key":"9183_CR5","unstructured":"Druzdzel M (1990) Using scenarios to explain probabilistic inference. In: Eorking notes of the AAAI-90 Workshop on Explanation, pp 133\u2013141"},{"key":"9183_CR6","first-page":"114","volume":"36","author":"N Fenton","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fenton N, Neil M (2011) Avoiding probabilistic reasoning fallacies in legal practice using Bayesian networks. Aust J Leg Philos 36:114\u2013151","journal-title":"Aust J Leg Philos"},{"key":"9183_CR7","unstructured":"Fenton N, Neil M, Lagnado D (2011) Modelling mutually exclusive causes in Bayesian networks. Available online: www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk\/~norman\/papers\/mutual_IEEE_format_version"},{"key":"9183_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1111\/cogs.12004","volume":"37","author":"N Fenton","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fenton N, Neil M, Lagnado D (2013) A general structure for legal arguments using Bayesian networks. Cogn Sci 37:61\u2013102","journal-title":"Cogn Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"9183_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scijus.2013.07.002","volume":"54","author":"N Fenton","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fenton N, Berger D, Lagnado D, Neil M, Hsu A (2014) When \u2018neutral\u2019 evidence still has probative value (with implications from the Barry George Case). Sci Justice 54(4):274\u2013287","journal-title":"Sci Justice"},{"key":"9183_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/mgm005","volume":"6","author":"A Hepler","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hepler A, Dawid A, Leucari V (2004) Object-oriented graphical representations of complex patterns of evidence. Law Probab Risk 6:275\u2013293","journal-title":"Law Probab Risk"},{"key":"9183_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-68282-2","volume-title":"Bayesian networks and decision graphs","author":"F Jensen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Jensen F, Nielsen T (2007) Bayesian networks and decision graphs. Springer, New York"},{"key":"9183_CR12","volume-title":"A probabilistic analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti evidence","author":"J Kadane","year":"1996","unstructured":"Kadane J, Schum D (1996) A probabilistic analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti evidence. Wiley, New York"},{"issue":"2","key":"9183_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9121-z","volume":"20","author":"J Keppens","year":"2012","unstructured":"Keppens J (2012) Argument diagram extraction from evidential Bayesian networks. Artif Intell Law 20(2):109\u2013143","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9183_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1017\/S026988890200019X","volume":"17","author":"C Lacave","year":"2002","unstructured":"Lacave C, D\u00edez F (2002) A review of explanation methods for Bayesian networks. Knowl Eng Rev 17(2):107\u2013127","journal-title":"Knowl Eng Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"9183_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/mgr020","volume":"11","author":"A Nordgaard","year":"2012","unstructured":"Nordgaard A, Ansell R, Drotz W, Jaeger L (2012) Scale of conclusions for the value of evidence. Law Probab Risk 11(1):1\u201324","journal-title":"Law Probab Risk"},{"key":"9183_CR16","unstructured":"Pennington N, Hastie R (1993) Inside the juror. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, chap The Story Model for Juror Decision Making, pp 192\u2013221"},{"issue":"3","key":"9183_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888901000145","volume":"16","author":"S Renooij","year":"2001","unstructured":"Renooij S (2001) Probability elicitation for belief networks: issues to consider. Knowl Eng Rev 16(3):255\u2013269","journal-title":"Knowl Eng Rev"},{"key":"9183_CR18","volume-title":"Scripts, plans, goals and understanding, an inquiry into human knowledge structures","author":"R Schank","year":"1977","unstructured":"Schank R, Abelson R (1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding, an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale"},{"key":"9183_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/0470091754","volume-title":"Bayesian networks and probabilistic inference in forensic science","author":"F Taroni","year":"2006","unstructured":"Taroni F, Aitken C, Garbolino P, Biedermann A (2006) Bayesian networks and probabilistic inference in forensic science. Wiley, Chichester"},{"key":"9183_CR20","first-page":"71","volume-title":"The 27th international conference on legal knowledge and information systems (JURIX) 2014","author":"S Timmer","year":"2014","unstructured":"Timmer S, Meyer J, Prakken H, Renooij S, Verheij B (2014) Extracting legal arguments from forensic Bayesian networks. In: Hoekstra R (ed) The 27th international conference on legal knowledge and information systems (JURIX) 2014. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 71\u201380"},{"key":"9183_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Timmer S, Meyer J, Prakken H, Renooij S, Verheij B (2015) A structure-guided approach to capturing Bayesian reasoning about legal evidence in argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, New York, pp 109\u2013118","DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746093"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"9183_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/mgu011","volume":"13","author":"B Verheij","year":"2014","unstructured":"Verheij B (2014) To catch a thief with and without numbers: arguments, scenarios and probabilities. Law Probab Risk 13(3\u20134):307\u2013325","journal-title":"Law Probab Risk"},{"issue":"1","key":"9183_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/mgv013","volume":"15","author":"B Verheij","year":"2015","unstructured":"Verheij B, Bex FJ, Timmer ST, Vlek CS, Meyer J-J, Renooij S, Prakken H (2015) Arguments, scenarios and probabilities: connections between three normative frameworks for evidential reasoning. Law Probab Risk 15(1):35\u201370","journal-title":"Law Probab Risk"},{"issue":"4","key":"9183_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-014-9161-7","volume":"22","author":"C Vlek","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vlek C, Prakken H, Renooij S, Verheij B (2014) Building Bayesian networks for legal evidence with narratives: a case study evaluation. Artif Intell Law 22(4):375\u2013421","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9183_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vlek C, Prakken H, Renooij S, Verheij B (2015a) Constructing and understanding Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenario schemes. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, New York, pp 128\u2013137","DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746097"},{"key":"9183_CR26","unstructured":"Vlek C, Prakken H, Renooij S, Verheij B (2015b) Representing the quality of crime scenarios in a Bayesian network. In: Rotolo A (ed) The 28th international conference on legal knowledge and information systems (JURIX) 2015, IOS Press, Amsterdam (in press)"},{"key":"9183_CR27","unstructured":"Wagenaar W, van Koppen P, Crombag H (1993) Anchored narratives: the psychology of criminal evidence. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead"},{"issue":"3","key":"9183_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1109\/34.204911","volume":"15","author":"P Wellman","year":"1993","unstructured":"Wellman P, Henrion M (1993) Explaining \u2018explaining away\u2019. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 15(3):287\u2013292","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-016-9183-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10506-016-9183-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-016-9183-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,24]],"date-time":"2017-06-24T15:58:43Z","timestamp":1498319923000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10506-016-9183-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,8]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]}},"alternative-id":["9183"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-016-9183-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0924-8463","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8382","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,8]]}}}