{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T12:18:15Z","timestamp":1776082695874,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":146,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,1]],"date-time":"2017-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1496275200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-017-9201-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,2]],"date-time":"2017-06-02T08:17:15Z","timestamp":1496391435000},"page":"205-250","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":35,"title":["HYPO\u2019S legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"T. J. M.","family":"Bench-Capon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"9201_CR1","unstructured":"Al-Abdulkarim L (2016) Representation of case law for argumentative reasoning. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool"},{"key":"9201_CR2","unstructured":"Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2013) From oral hearing to opinion in the US Supreme Court. In: Legal knowledge and information systems\u2014JURIX 2013: the twenty-sixth annual conference, pp 1\u201310"},{"key":"9201_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2015a) Evaluating the use of abstract dialectical frameworks to represent case law. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 156\u2013160","DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746111"},{"key":"9201_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2015b) Factors, issues and values: revisiting reasoning with cases. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 3\u201312","DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746103"},{"key":"9201_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2016a) Accommodating change. Artif Intell Law 24(4):409\u2013427","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9190-5"},{"key":"9201_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2016b) Angelic secrets: bridging from factors to facts in US Trade Secrets. In: Legal knowledge and information systems\u2014JURIX 2016: the twenty-ninth annual conference, pp 113\u2013118","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-726-9-113"},{"key":"9201_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2016c) A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using abstract dialectical frameworks. Artif Intell Law 24(1):1\u201349","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9178-1"},{"key":"9201_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2016d) Statement types in legal argument. In: Legal knowledge and information systems\u2014JURIX 2016: the twenty-ninth annual conference, pp 3\u201312","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-726-9-3"},{"key":"9201_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Aletras N, Tsarapatsanis D, Preo\u0163iuc-Pietro D, Lampos V (2016) Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a natural language processing perspective. PeerJ Comput Sci 2. doi: 10.7717\/peerj-cs.93","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj-cs.93"},{"key":"9201_CR10","unstructured":"Aleven V (1997) Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9201_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00105-X","volume":"150","author":"V Aleven","year":"2003","unstructured":"Aleven V (2003) Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: a computational model and an intelligent learning environment. Artif Intell 150(1\u20132):183\u2013237","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9201_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aleven V, Ashley KD (1993) What law students need to know to win. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 152\u2013161","DOI":"10.1145\/158976.158995"},{"key":"9201_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aleven V, Ashley KD (1995) Doing things with factors. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 31\u201341","DOI":"10.1145\/222092.222106"},{"key":"9201_CR14","first-page":"1","volume":"63","author":"L Alexander","year":"1989","unstructured":"Alexander L (1989) Constrained by precedent. South Calif Law Rev 63:1\u201364","journal-title":"South Calif Law Rev"},{"key":"9201_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Allen M, Bench-Capon T, Staniford G (2000) A multi-agent legal argument generator. In: Proceedings of the 11th international workshop on database and expert systems applications, IEEE, pp 1080\u20131084","DOI":"10.1109\/DEXA.2000.875161"},{"key":"9201_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Araszkiewicz M (2011) Analogy, similarity and factors. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 101\u2013105","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018372"},{"key":"9201_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Araszkiewicz M, \u0141opatkiewicz A, Zienkiewicz A, Zurek T (2015) Representation of an actual divorce dispute in the parenting plan support system. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 166\u2013170","DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746119"},{"key":"9201_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ashley KD (1989) Toward a computational theory of arguing with precedents. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 93\u2013102","DOI":"10.1145\/74014.74028"},{"key":"9201_CR19","volume-title":"Modeling legal arguments: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals","author":"KD Ashley","year":"1990","unstructured":"Ashley KD (1990) Modeling legal arguments: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. MIT press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9201_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ashley KD (2009) Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 1\u201310","DOI":"10.1145\/1568234.1568236"},{"issue":"2","key":"9201_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-009-9077-9","volume":"17","author":"KD Ashley","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ashley KD, Br\u00fcninghaus S (2009) Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes. Artif Intell Law 17(2):125\u2013165","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR22","unstructured":"Ashley KD, Rissland EL (1987) But, see, accord: generating blue book citations in hypo. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 67\u201374"},{"key":"9201_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ashley KD, Lynch C, Pinkwart N, Aleven V (2008) A process model of legal argument with hypotheticals. In: Legal knowledge and information systems: JURIX 2015: the twenty-first annual conference, pp 1\u201310","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-58603-952-3-1"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9122-y","volume":"20","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2012","unstructured":"Atkinson K (2012) Introduction to special issue on modelling Popov v. Hayashi. Artif Intell Law 20(1):1\u201314","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9003-3","volume":"13","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2005) Legal case-based reasoning as practical reasoning. Artif Intell Law 13(1):93\u2013131","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2007) Argumentation and standards of proof. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 107\u2013116","DOI":"10.1145\/1276318.1276339"},{"key":"9201_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, Cartwright D, Wyner A (2011) Semantic models for policy deliberation. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 81\u201390","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018369"},{"issue":"4","key":"9201_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9001-5","volume":"14","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, McBurney P (2006) PARMENIDES: facilitating deliberation in democracies. Artif Intell Law 14(4):261\u2013275","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, Prakken H, Wyner A (2013) Argumentation schemes for reasoning about factors with dimensions. In: Legal knowledge and information systems\u2014JURIX 2013: the twenty-sixth annual conference, pp 39\u201348","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-359-9-39"},{"key":"9201_CR30","volume-title":"Sense and sensibilia","author":"JL Austin","year":"1962","unstructured":"Austin JL, Warnock GJ (1962) Sense and sensibilia. Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"key":"9201_CR31","volume-title":"Practical legal expert systems: the relation between a formalisation of law and expert knowledge","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"1991","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (1991) Practical legal expert systems: the relation between a formalisation of law and expert knowledge. Computers, Law and AI, Ablex, New York"},{"key":"9201_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (1993) Neural networks and open texture. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 292\u2013297","DOI":"10.1145\/158976.159012"},{"key":"9201_CR33","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (1997) Arguing with cases. In: Legal knowledge and information systems\u2014JURIX 1997: the tenth annual conference, pp 85\u2013100"},{"key":"9201_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (1999) Some observations on modelling case based reasoning with formal argument models. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 36\u201342","DOI":"10.1145\/323706.323713"},{"issue":"1\u20133","key":"9201_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019501830692","volume":"10","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2002","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2002) The missing link revisited: the role of teleology in representing legal argument. Artif Intell Law 10(1\u20133):79\u201394","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2003a) Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J Log Comput 13(3):429\u2013448","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429"},{"key":"9201_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2003b) Try to see it my way: modelling persuasion in legal discourse. Artif Intell Law 11(4):271\u2013287","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000045997.45038.8f"},{"key":"9201_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2011) Relating values in a series of supreme court decisions. In: Legal knowledge and information systems\u2014JURIX 2011: the twenty-fourth annual conference, pp 13\u201322","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-60750-981-3-13"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9118-7","volume":"20","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2012) Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factors. Artif Intell Law 20(1):15\u201335","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Bex F (2015) Cases and stories, dimensions and scripts. In: Legal knowledge and information systems: JURIX 2015: the twenty-eighth annual conference, vol 279, IOS Press, pp 11\u201320","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-609-5-11"},{"key":"9201_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Gordon T (2015) Two tools for prototyping legal CBR. In: Legal knowledge and information systems\u2014JURIX 2015: the twenty-eighth annual conference, pp 177\u2013178","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-609-5-177"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-017-9194-9","volume":"25","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Modgil S (2017) Norms and value based reasoning: justifying compliance and violation. Artif Intell Law 25(1):1\u201336","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9201_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9094-8","volume":"18","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Prakken H (2010) Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law. Artif Intell Law 18(2):153\u2013174","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR44","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Rissland E (2001) Back to the future: Dimensions revisited. In: Legal knowledge and information systems\u2014JURIX, vol 2001, pp 41\u201352"},{"key":"9201_CR45","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Sartor G (2000) Using values and theories to resolve disagreement in law. In: Legal knowledge and information systems\u2014JURIX 1997: the thirteenth annual conference, pp 73\u201384"},{"key":"9201_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Sartor G (2001) Theory based explanation of case law domains. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 12\u201321","DOI":"10.1145\/383535.383537"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00108-5","volume":"150","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Sartor G (2003) A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artif Intell 150(1):97\u2013143","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"3","key":"9201_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9131-x","volume":"20","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Araszkiewicz M, Ashley K, Atkinson K, Bex F, Borges F, Bourcier D, Bourgine P, Conrad JG, Francesconi E et al (2012) A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law. Artif Intell Law 20(3):215\u2013319","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"6","key":"9201_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1075","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exi058","volume":"15","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K, Chorley A (2005) Persuasion and value in legal argument. J Log Comput 15(6):1075\u20131097","journal-title":"J Log Comput"},{"key":"9201_CR50","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Transactions on large-scale data-and knowledge-centered systems XVIII","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K, Wyner A (2015) Using argumentation to structure e-participation in policy making. In: Hameurlain A, K\u00fcng J, Wagner R, Decker H, Lhotska L, Link S (eds) Transactions on large-scale data-and knowledge-centered systems XVIII. Springer, Berlin, pp 1\u201329"},{"key":"9201_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0431-1_4","volume-title":"Argumentation machines","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Freeman JB, Hohmann H, Prakken H (2003) Computational models, argumentation theories and legal practice. In: Reed C, Norman T (eds) Argumentation machines. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 85\u2013120"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"9201_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008308627745","volume":"8","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2000","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Geldard T, Leng P (2000) A method for the computational modelling of dialectical argument with dialogue games. Artif Intell Law 8(2\u20133):233\u2013254","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Prakken H, Visser W (2011) Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 21\u201330","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018361"},{"key":"9201_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berman DH (1991) Developer\u2019s choice in the legal domain: the Sisyphean journey with CBR or down hill with rules (a working paper for the case-rules panel at the third international conference on artificial intelligence and law). In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 307\u2013309","DOI":"10.1145\/112646.112685"},{"key":"9201_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berman DH, Hafner CD (1991) Incorporating procedural context into a model of case-based legal reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 12\u201320","DOI":"10.1145\/112646.112648"},{"key":"9201_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berman DH, Hafner CD (1993) Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 50\u201359","DOI":"10.1145\/158976.158982"},{"key":"9201_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berman DH, Hafner CD (1995) Understanding precedents in a temporal context of evolving legal doctrine. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 42\u201351","DOI":"10.1145\/222092.222116"},{"key":"9201_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-0140-3","volume-title":"Arguments, stories and criminal evidence: a formal hybrid theory","author":"F Bex","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bex F (2011) Arguments, stories and criminal evidence: a formal hybrid theory, vol 92. Springer, Dordrecht"},{"key":"9201_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Branting LK (1991) Reasoning with portions of precedents. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 145\u2013154","DOI":"10.1145\/112646.112664"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871744","volume":"2","author":"LK Branting","year":"1993","unstructured":"Branting LK (1993) A computational model of ratio decidendi. Artif Intell Law 2(1):1\u201331","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Breuker J, Den\u00a0Haan N (1991) Separating world and regulation knowledge: where is the logic. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 92\u201397","DOI":"10.1145\/112646.112658"},{"key":"9201_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bruninghaus S, Ashley KD (2003a) Predicting outcomes of case based legal arguments. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 233\u2013242","DOI":"10.1145\/1047788.1047838"},{"key":"9201_CR63","unstructured":"Bruninghaus S, Ashley KD (2003b) A predictive role for intermediate legal concepts. In: Legal knowledge and information systems: JURIX 2003: the sixteenth annual conference, ISO Press, pp 153\u2013162"},{"key":"9201_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Callan JP, Croft WB, Harding SM (1992) The INQUERY retrieval system. In: Min Tjoa A, Ramas I (eds) Database and expert systems applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 78\u201383","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-7091-7557-6_14"},{"key":"9201_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chorley A, Bench-Capon T (2005a) Agatha: using heuristic search to automate the construction of case law theories. Artif Intell Law 13(1):9\u201351","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9004-2"},{"key":"9201_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chorley A, Bench-Capon T (2005b) An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application. Artif Intell Law 13(3\u20134):323\u2013371","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9016-y"},{"key":"9201_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-9520-9","volume-title":"The notion of an ideal audience in legal argument","author":"G Christie","year":"2000","unstructured":"Christie G (2000) The notion of an ideal audience in legal argument, vol 45. Springer, Law and Philsophy Library, Dordrecht"},{"key":"9201_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Conrad JG, Zeleznikow J (2015) The role of evaluation in AI and Law: an examination of its different forms in the AI and Law journal. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 181\u2013186","DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746116"},{"key":"9201_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Daniels JJ, Rissland EL (1997) Finding legally relevant passages in case opinions. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 39\u201346","DOI":"10.1145\/261618.261627"},{"issue":"2","key":"9201_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell 77(2):321\u2013357","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9201_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Farley AM, Freeman K (1995) Burden of proof in legal argumentation. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 156\u2013164","DOI":"10.1145\/222092.222227"},{"key":"9201_CR72","volume-title":"An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning","author":"A Gardner","year":"1987","unstructured":"Gardner A (1987) An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning. MIT press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"4","key":"9201_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871972","volume":"2","author":"TF Gordon","year":"1993","unstructured":"Gordon TF (1993) The pleadings game. Artif Intell Law 2(4):239\u2013292","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR74","volume-title":"Argumentation and artificial intelligence","author":"TF Gordon","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Walton D (2009) Proof burdens and standards. In: Rahwan I, Simari G (eds) Argumentation and artificial intelligence. Springer, Dordrecht"},{"key":"9201_CR75","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Walton D (2006) Pierson vs. Post revisited\u2014a reconstruction using the Carneades argumentation framework. In: Computational models of argument: proceedings of COMMA 2006, pp 208\u2013219"},{"key":"9201_CR76","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Walton D (2016) Formalizing balancing arguments. In: Computational models of argument\u2014proceedings of COMMA 2016, pp 327\u2013338"},{"key":"9201_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grabmair M (2017) Predicting trade secret case outcomes using argument schemes and learned quantitative value effect tradeffs. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM (in Press)","DOI":"10.1145\/3086512.3086521"},{"key":"9201_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grabmair M, Ashley KD (2011) Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 161\u2013170","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018382"},{"key":"9201_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grabmair M, Ashley KD (2013) Using event progression to enhance purposive argumentation in the value judgment formalism. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 73\u201382","DOI":"10.1145\/2514601.2514610"},{"issue":"6","key":"9201_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1077","DOI":"10.1006\/ijhc.2000.0429","volume":"53","author":"F Grasso","year":"2000","unstructured":"Grasso F, Cawsey A, Jones R (2000) Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition. Int J Hum Comput Stud 53(6):1077\u20131115","journal-title":"Int J Hum Comput Stud"},{"key":"9201_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Greenwood K, Bench-Capon T, McBurney P (2003) Towards a computational account of persuasion in law. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 22\u201331","DOI":"10.1145\/1047788.1047792"},{"issue":"1\u20133","key":"9201_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019516031847","volume":"10","author":"CD Hafner","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hafner CD, Berman DH (2002) The role of context in case-based legal reasoning: teleological, temporal, and procedural. Artif Intell Law 10(1\u20133):19\u201364","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hage J (1993) Monological reason-based logic: a low level integration of rule-based reasoning and case-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 30\u201339","DOI":"10.1145\/158976.158980"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"9201_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118493","volume":"4","author":"J Hage","year":"1996","unstructured":"Hage J (1996) A theory of legal reasoning and a logic to match. Artif Intell Law 4(3\u20134):199\u2013273","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR85","volume-title":"Fallacies","author":"CL Hamblin","year":"1970","unstructured":"Hamblin CL (1970) Fallacies. Methuen, London"},{"key":"9201_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Henderson J, Bench-Capon T (2001) Dynamic arguments in a case law domain. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 60\u201369","DOI":"10.1145\/383535.383542"},{"key":"9201_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Horty JF (1999) Precedent, deontic logic, and inheritance. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 63\u201372","DOI":"10.1145\/323706.323716"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325204000151","volume":"10","author":"JF Horty","year":"2004","unstructured":"Horty JF (2004) The result model of precedent. Leg Theory 10(1):19\u201331","journal-title":"Leg Theory"},{"key":"9201_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Horty JF (2011a) Reasons and precedent. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 41\u201350","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018363"},{"key":"9201_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Horty JF (2011b) Rules and reasons in the theory of precedent. Leg Theory 17(1):1\u201333","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325211000036"},{"issue":"2","key":"9201_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9125-8","volume":"20","author":"JF Horty","year":"2012","unstructured":"Horty JF, Bench-Capon TJ (2012) A factor-based definition of precedential constraint. Artif Intell Law 20(2):181\u2013214","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnston B, Governatori G (2003) Induction of defeasible logic theories in the legal domain. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 204\u2013213","DOI":"10.1145\/1047788.1047834"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-015-9163-0","volume":"23","author":"M Lauritsen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lauritsen M (2015) On balance. Artif Intell Law 23(1):23\u201342","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"3","key":"9201_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.2307\/1597535","volume":"15","author":"EH Levi","year":"1948","unstructured":"Levi EH (1948) An introduction to legal reasoning. Univ Chic Law Rev 15(3):501\u2013574","journal-title":"Univ Chic Law Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"9201_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jal.2007.06.010","volume":"6","author":"L Lindahl","year":"2008","unstructured":"Lindahl L, Odelstad J (2008) Intermediaries and intervenients in normative systems. J Appl Log 6(2):229\u2013250","journal-title":"J Appl Log"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00258422","volume":"8","author":"JD Mackenzie","year":"1979","unstructured":"Mackenzie JD (1979) Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. J Philos Log 8(1):117\u2013133","journal-title":"J Philos Log"},{"key":"9201_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marshall CC (1989) Representing the structure of a legal argument. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 121\u2013127","DOI":"10.1145\/74014.74031"},{"key":"9201_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McCarty LT (1995) An implementation of Eisner v. Macomber. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 276\u2013286","DOI":"10.1145\/222092.222258"},{"key":"9201_CR99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McLaren B, Ashley K (1999) Case representation, acquisition, and retrieval in sirocco. In: International conference on case-based reasoning, Springer, pp 248\u2013262","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-48508-2_18"},{"key":"9201_CR100","unstructured":"Modgil S, Bench-Capon T (2010) Integrating dialectical and accrual modes of argumentation. In: Computational models of argument: proceedings of COMMA 2010, pp 335\u2013346"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869766","volume":"5","author":"S Modgil","year":"2014","unstructured":"Modgil S, Prakken H (2014) The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial. Argum Comput 5(1):31\u201362","journal-title":"Argum Comput"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9002-4","volume":"13","author":"M Mo\u017eina","year":"2005","unstructured":"Mo\u017eina M, \u017dabkar J, Bench-Capon T, Bratko I (2005) Argument based machine learning applied to law. Artif Intell Law 13(1):53\u201373","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR103","volume-title":"The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation","author":"C Perelman","year":"1971","unstructured":"Perelman C, Olbrechts-Tyteca L (1971) The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame"},{"issue":"1\u20133","key":"9201_CR104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019536206548","volume":"10","author":"H Prakken","year":"2002","unstructured":"Prakken H (2002) An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning. Artif Intell Law 10(1\u20133):113\u2013133","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H (2005) A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on artificial intelligence and Law, ACM, pp 85\u201394","DOI":"10.1145\/1165485.1165500"},{"issue":"02","key":"9201_CR106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888906000865","volume":"21","author":"H Prakken","year":"2006","unstructured":"Prakken H (2006) Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. Knowl Eng Rev 21(02):163\u2013188","journal-title":"Knowl Eng Rev"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"9201_CR107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118496","volume":"4","author":"H Prakken","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (1996) A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artif Intell Law 4(3\u20134):331\u2013368","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"9201_CR108","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008278309945","volume":"6","author":"H Prakken","year":"1998","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (1998) Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. Artif Intell Law 6(3\u20134):231\u2013287","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"5","key":"9201_CR109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1141","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/ext010","volume":"25","author":"H Prakken","year":"2015","unstructured":"Prakken H, Wyner A, Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2015) A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+. J Log Comput 25(5):1141\u20131166","journal-title":"J Log Comput"},{"issue":"2","key":"9201_CR110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-015-9166-x","volume":"23","author":"A Rigoni","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rigoni A (2015) An improved factor based approach to precedential constraint. Artif Intell Law 23(2):133\u2013160","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR111","unstructured":"Rissland EL (1980) Example generation. In: Third biennial conference of the canadian society for computational studies of intelligence, pp 280\u2013288"},{"key":"9201_CR112","unstructured":"Rissland EL (1983) Examples in legal reasoning: legal hypotheticals. In: Proceedings of the 8th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 90\u201393"},{"key":"9201_CR113","unstructured":"Rissland EL (1984) The ubiquitous dialectic. In: Proceedings of the sixth European conference on artificial intelligence, pp 367\u2013372"},{"key":"9201_CR114","unstructured":"Rissland EL (1985) AI and legal reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 9th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, vol 2, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., pp 1254\u20131260"},{"key":"9201_CR115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rissland EL (1989) Dimension-based analysis of hypotheticals from supreme court oral argument. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 111\u2013120","DOI":"10.1145\/74014.74030"},{"key":"9201_CR116","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Ashley KD (1987) A case-based system for trade secrets law. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 60\u201366","DOI":"10.1145\/41735.41743"},{"issue":"1\u20133","key":"9201_CR117","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019543817123","volume":"10","author":"EL Rissland","year":"2002","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Ashley KD (2002) A note on dimensions and factors. Artif Intell Law 10(1\u20133):65\u201377","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR118","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Daniels JJ (1995) A hybrid CBR-IR approach to legal information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 52\u201361","DOI":"10.1145\/222092.222125"},{"issue":"5\u20136","key":"9201_CR119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00130694","volume":"10","author":"EL Rissland","year":"1996","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Daniels JJ (1996) The synergistic application of CBR to IR. Artif Intell Rev 10(5\u20136):441\u2013475","journal-title":"Artif Intell Rev"},{"key":"9201_CR120","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Skalak DB (1989a) Combining case-based and rule-based reasoning: a heuristic approach. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 524\u2013530"},{"key":"9201_CR121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Skalak DB (1989b) Interpreting statutory predicates. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 46\u201353","DOI":"10.1145\/74014.74021"},{"issue":"6","key":"9201_CR122","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7373(91)90013-W","volume":"34","author":"EL Rissland","year":"1991","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Skalak DB (1991) Cabaret: rule interpretation in a hybrid architecture. Int J Man Mach Stud 34(6):839\u2013887","journal-title":"Int J Man Mach Stud"},{"key":"9201_CR123","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Soloway E (1980) Overview of an example generation system. In: Proceedings of the 1st annual national conference on artificial intelligence, pp 256\u2013258"},{"key":"9201_CR124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rissland E.\u00a0L, Xu X (2011) Catching gray cygnets: an initial exploration. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 151\u2013160","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018381"},{"key":"9201_CR125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Skalak DB, Friedman MT (1993) Bankxx: a program to generate argument through case-base research. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 117\u2013124","DOI":"10.1145\/158976.158991"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00123994","volume":"4","author":"EL Rissland","year":"1996","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Skalak DB, Friedman MT (1996) Bankxx: supporting legal arguments through heuristic retrieval. Artif Intell Law 4(1):1\u201371","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9201_CR127","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008215000938","volume":"5","author":"EL Rissland","year":"1997","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Skalak DB, Friedman MT (1997) Evaluating a legal argument program: the bankxx experiments. Artif Intell Law 5(1\u20132):1\u201374","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR128","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Valcarce EM, Ashley KD (1984) Explaining and arguing with examples. In: Proceedings of the fourth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI Press, pp 288\u2013294"},{"issue":"1\u20133","key":"9201_CR129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019589831118","volume":"10","author":"G Sartor","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sartor G (2002) Teleological arguments and theory-based dialectics. Artif Intell Law 10(1\u20133):95\u2013112","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9201_CR130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9095-7","volume":"18","author":"G Sartor","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sartor G (2010) Doing justice to rights and values: teleological reasoning and proportionality. Artif Intell Law 18(2):175\u2013215","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR131","volume-title":"Scripts, plans, goals and understanding, an inquiry into human knowledge structures","author":"R Schank","year":"1977","unstructured":"Schank R, Abelson R (1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding, an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale"},{"issue":"5","key":"9201_CR132","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.1145\/5689.5920","volume":"29","author":"MJ Sergot","year":"1986","unstructured":"Sergot MJ, Sadri F, Kowalski RA, Kriwaczek F, Hammond P, Cory HT (1986) The British Nationality Act as a logic program. Commun ACM 29(5):370\u2013386","journal-title":"Commun ACM"},{"key":"9201_CR133","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Skalak DB, Rissland EL (1991) Argument moves in a rule-guided domain. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 1\u201311","DOI":"10.1145\/112646.112647"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR134","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118477","volume":"1","author":"DB Skalak","year":"1992","unstructured":"Skalak DB, Rissland EL (1992) Arguments and cases: an inevitable intertwining. Artif Intell Law 1(1):3\u201344","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR135","unstructured":"Smith J, Deedman C (1987) The application of expert systems technology to case-based law. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, New York, pp 84\u201393"},{"key":"9201_CR136","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Timmer ST, Meyer J.-J.C., Prakken H, Renooij S, Verheij B (2015) A structure-guided approach to capturing bayesian reasoning about legal evidence in argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 109\u2013118","DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746093"},{"key":"9201_CR137","volume-title":"The uses of argument","author":"S Toulmin","year":"1958","unstructured":"Toulmin S (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9201_CR138","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Verheij B (1995) Arguments and defeat in argument-based nonmonotonic reasoning. In: Portuguese conference on artificial intelligence, Springer, pp 213\u2013224","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-60428-6_18"},{"issue":"4","key":"9201_CR139","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9189-y","volume":"24","author":"B Verheij","year":"2016","unstructured":"Verheij B (2016) Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems design. Artif Intell Law 24(4):387\u2013407","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9201_CR140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008247812801","volume":"6","author":"B Verheij","year":"1998","unstructured":"Verheij B, Hage JC, Van Den Herik HJ (1998) An integrated view on rules and principles. Artif Intell Law 6(1):3\u201326","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR141","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton D (1996) Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah"},{"key":"9201_CR142","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton D, Reed C, Macagno F (2008) Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"3","key":"9201_CR143","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-009-9078-8","volume":"17","author":"M Wardeh","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wardeh M, Bench-Capon T, Coenen F (2009) Padua: a protocol for argumentation dialogue using association rules. Artif Intell Law 17(3):183\u2013215","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9201_CR144","unstructured":"Wyner A, Bench-Capon T (2007) Argument schemes for legal case-based reasoning. In: Legal knowledge and information systems\u2014JURIX 2013: the twentieth annual conference, pp 139\u2013149,"},{"key":"9201_CR145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wyner A, Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2011) Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 1\u201310","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018359"},{"issue":"3","key":"9201_CR146","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1016\/S0019-9958(65)90241-X","volume":"8","author":"L Zadeh","year":"1965","unstructured":"Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338\u2013353","journal-title":"Inf Control"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10506-017-9201-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-017-9201-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-017-9201-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T22:49:31Z","timestamp":1750286971000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10506-017-9201-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"references-count":146,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]}},"alternative-id":["9201"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-017-9201-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0924-8463","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8382","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]}}}