{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,2]],"date-time":"2022-04-02T03:24:30Z","timestamp":1648869870825},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,31]],"date-time":"2018-03-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1522454400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-018-9226-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,30]],"date-time":"2018-03-30T23:33:17Z","timestamp":1522452797000},"page":"307-314","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"T. J. M.","family":"Bench-Capon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"9226_CR1","volume-title":"A theory of legal argumentation: the theory of rational discourses as a theory of legal justification","author":"R Alexy","year":"1989","unstructured":"Alexy R (1989) A theory of legal argumentation: the theory of rational discourses as a theory of legal justification. Clarendon Press, Wotton-under-Edge"},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"9226_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.009","volume":"171","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2007) Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artif Intell 171(10\u201315):855\u2013874","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"2","key":"9226_CR3","first-page":"105127","volume":"4","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, Walton D (2013) Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues. Argum Comput 4(2):105127","journal-title":"Argum Comput"},{"key":"9226_CR4","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (1998) Specification and implementation of Toulmin Dialogue Game. In: Proceedings of JURIX 1998, pp 5\u201320"},{"key":"9226_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-017-9198-5","volume":"25","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2017) Hypo\u2019s legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue. Artif Intell Law 25:1\u201346","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9226_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00108-5","volume":"150","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Sartor G (2003) A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artif Intell 150(1\u20132):97\u2013143","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"3","key":"9226_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0950-7051(91)90007-O","volume":"4","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"1991","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Lowes D, McEnery A (1991) Argument-based explanation of logic programs. Knowl Based Syst 4(3):177\u2013183","journal-title":"Knowl Based Syst"},{"issue":"6","key":"9226_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1075","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exi058","volume":"15","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K, Chorley A (2005) Persuasion and value in legal argument. J Logic Comput 15(6):1075\u20131097","journal-title":"J Logic Comput"},{"key":"9226_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berman DH, Hafner CD (1993) Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp 50\u201359","DOI":"10.1145\/158976.158982"},{"issue":"2","key":"9226_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell 77(2):321\u2013357","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9226_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Feteris E T (1996) The analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation from a pragma-dialectical perspective. In: International conference on formal and applied practical reasoning, pp 151\u2013166","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-61313-7_70"},{"issue":"2","key":"9226_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01816603","volume":"7","author":"ET Feteris","year":"1994","unstructured":"Feteris ET (1994) Recent developments in legal argumentation theory: dialectical approaches to legal argumentation. Rev Int Semiot Jurid 7(2):133\u2013153","journal-title":"Rev Int Semiot Jurid"},{"issue":"3","key":"9226_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007794830151","volume":"11","author":"ET Feteris","year":"1997","unstructured":"Feteris ET (1997) A survey of 25 years of research on legal argumentation. Argumentation 11(3):355\u2013376","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"2","key":"9226_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008344203269","volume":"8","author":"ET Feteris","year":"2000","unstructured":"Feteris ET (2000) A dialogical theory of legal discussions: Pragma-dialectical analysis and evaluation of legalargumentation. Artif Intell Law 8(2):115\u2013135","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"3","key":"9226_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349367","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019999606665","volume":"16","author":"ET Feteris","year":"2002","unstructured":"Feteris ET (2002) A pragma-dialectical approach of the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation in a legal context. Argumentation 16(3):349367","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"4","key":"9226_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-005-0512-0","volume":"19","author":"ET Feteris","year":"2005","unstructured":"Feteris ET (2005) The rational reconstruction of argumentation referring to consequences and purposes in the application of legal rules: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation 19(4):459\u2013470","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"4","key":"9226_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-008-9083-1","volume":"22","author":"ET Feteris","year":"2008","unstructured":"Feteris ET (2008) The pragma-dialectical analysis and evaluation of teleological argumentation in a legal context. Argumentation 22(4):489\u2013506","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"1","key":"9226_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-015-9376-0","volume":"30","author":"ET Feteris","year":"2016","unstructured":"Feteris ET (2016) Prototypical argumentative patterns in a legal context: the role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions. Argumentation 30(1):61\u201379","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"2","key":"9226_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008379702360","volume":"8","author":"ET Feteris","year":"2000","unstructured":"Feteris ET, Prakken H (2000) Introduction: dialectical legal argument: formal and informal models. Artif Intell Law 8(2):107\u2013113","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9226_CR20","unstructured":"Gordon TF (2012) The Carneades web service. In: Proceedings of COMMA 2012, IOS Press, pp 517\u2013518"},{"issue":"4","key":"9226_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871972","volume":"2","author":"TF Gordon","year":"1993","unstructured":"Gordon TF (1993) The pleadings game. Artif Intell Law 2(4):239\u2013292","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"10","key":"9226_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.010","volume":"171","author":"TF Gordon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Prakken H, Walton D (2007) The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artif Intell 171(10):875\u2013896","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9226_CR23","first-page":"43","volume-title":"Syntax and semantics vol 3, speech acts","author":"HP Grice","year":"1975","unstructured":"Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan J (eds) Syntax and semantics vol 3, speech acts. Academic Press, New York, pp 43\u201358"},{"key":"9226_CR24","volume-title":"Fallacies","author":"CL Hamlin","year":"1970","unstructured":"Hamlin CL (1970) Fallacies. Methuen, London"},{"issue":"2","key":"9226_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9125-8","volume":"20","author":"JF Horty","year":"2012","unstructured":"Horty JF, Bench-Capon T (2012) A factor-based definition of precedential constraint. Artif Intell Law 20(2):181\u2013214","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9226_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00258422","volume":"8","author":"JD Mackenzie","year":"1979","unstructured":"Mackenzie JD (1979) Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. J Philos Logic 8(1):117\u2013133","journal-title":"J Philos Logic"},{"key":"9226_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marshall CC (1989) Representing the structure of a legal argument. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp 121\u2013127","DOI":"10.1145\/74014.74031"},{"key":"9226_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.2307\/1340132","volume":"90","author":"LT McCarty","year":"1976","unstructured":"McCarty LT (1976) Reflections on TAXMAN: an experiment in artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Harv Law Rev 90:837","journal-title":"Harv Law Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"9226_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869766","volume":"5","author":"S Modgil","year":"2014","unstructured":"Modgil S, Prakken H (2014) The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial. Argum Comput 5(1):31\u201362","journal-title":"Argum Comput"},{"key":"9226_CR30","volume-title":"The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation","author":"C Perelman","year":"1980","unstructured":"Perelman C, Olbrechts-Tyteca L (1980) The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame"},{"issue":"1","key":"9226_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1010322504453","volume":"127","author":"H Prakken","year":"2001","unstructured":"Prakken H (2001) Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation. Synthese 127(1):187\u2013219","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"9226_CR32","first-page":"331368","volume":"4","author":"H Prakken","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (1996) A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artif Intell Law 4(3\u20134):331368","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9226_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2015.06.005","volume":"227","author":"H Prakken","year":"2015","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (2015) Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective. Artif Intell 227:214\u2013245","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"5","key":"9226_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1141","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/ext010","volume":"25","author":"H Prakken","year":"2013","unstructured":"Prakken H, Wyner A, Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2013) A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+. J Logic Comput 25(5):1141\u20131166","journal-title":"J Logic Comput"},{"issue":"2","key":"9226_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-015-9166-x","volume":"23","author":"A Rigoni","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rigoni A (2015) An improved factor based approach to precedential constraint. Artif Intell Law 23(2):133\u2013160","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9226_CR36","volume-title":"The uses ofargument","author":"S Toulmin","year":"1958","unstructured":"Toulmin S (1958) The uses ofargument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9226_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_11","volume-title":"Argumentation in artificial intelligence","author":"B Verheij","year":"2009","unstructured":"Verheij B (2009) The Toulmin argument model in artificial intelligence. In: Simari G, Rahwan I (eds) Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 219\u2013238"},{"key":"9226_CR38","volume-title":"Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts ofinterpersonal reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton D, Krabbe EC (1995) Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts ofinterpersonal reasoning. SUNY press, Albany"},{"key":"9226_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton D, Reed C, Macagno F (2008) Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"1","key":"9226_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9179-0","volume":"24","author":"D Walton","year":"2016","unstructured":"Walton D, Sartor G, Macagno F (2016) An argumentation framework for contested cases of statutory interpretation. Artif Intell Law 24(1):51\u201391","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9226_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zeleznikow J, Stranieri A (1995) The split-up system: integrating neural networks and rule-based reasoning in the legal domain. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp 185\u2013194","DOI":"10.1145\/222092.222235"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10506-018-9226-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-018-9226-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-018-9226-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,30]],"date-time":"2019-03-30T20:04:57Z","timestamp":1553976297000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10506-018-9226-0"}},"subtitle":["Springer, 2017, 2nd edn, pp. 363"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,31]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]}},"alternative-id":["9226"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-018-9226-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0924-8463","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8382","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 March 2018","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}