{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,4]],"date-time":"2026-06-04T19:20:30Z","timestamp":1780600830215,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":179,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,16]],"date-time":"2020-06-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1592265600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,16]],"date-time":"2020-06-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1592265600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Doug Walton, who died in January 2020, was a prolific author whose work in informal logic and argumentation had a profound influence on Artificial Intelligence, including Artificial Intelligence and Law. He was also very interested in interdisciplinary work, and a frequent and generous collaborator. In this paper seven leading researchers in AI and Law, all past programme chairs of the International Conference on AI and Law who have worked with him, describe his influence on their work.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-020-09272-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,16]],"date-time":"2020-06-16T14:03:42Z","timestamp":1592316222000},"page":"281-326","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["In memoriam Douglas N. Walton: the influence of Doug Walton on AI and law"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Katie","family":"Atkinson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Trevor","family":"Bench-Capon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Floris","family":"Bex","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thomas F.","family":"Gordon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Henry","family":"Prakken","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Sartor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bart","family":"Verheij","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"9272_CR1","unstructured":"Aleven V (1997) Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pittsburgh"},{"key":"9272_CR2","unstructured":"Atkinson K (2005) What should we do? Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool"},{"issue":"1","key":"9272_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9122-y","volume":"20","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2012","unstructured":"Atkinson K (2012) Introduction to special issue on modelling Popov v Hayashi. Artif Intell Law 20(1):1\u201314","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"9272_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.009","volume":"171","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2007) Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artif Intell 171(10\u201315):855\u2013874","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9272_CR5","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2014) Taking the long view: looking ahead in practical reasoning. In: Proceddings of\u00a0 the Fifth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2014), pp 109\u2013120"},{"key":"9272_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2017.09.002","volume":"254","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2018","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2018) Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning. Artif Intell 254:1\u201320","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9272_CR7","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, McBurney P (2004) Justifying practical reasoning. In: Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on computational models of natural argument (CMNA 2004), pp 87\u201390"},{"issue":"4","key":"9272_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9001-5","volume":"14","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, McBurney P (2006) Parmenides: facilitating deliberation in democracies. Artif Intell Law 14(4):261\u2013275","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9272_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-005-3488-2","volume":"152","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon TJM, McBurney P (2006) Computational representation of practical argument. Synthese 152(2):157\u2013206","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9272_CR10","first-page":"39","volume":"2013","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, Prakken H, Wyner A (2013) Argumentation schemes for reasoning about factors with dimensions. Proc JURIX 2013:39\u201348","journal-title":"Proc JURIX"},{"issue":"2","key":"9272_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2012.708670","volume":"4","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, Walton D (2013) Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues. Argument Comput 4(2):105\u2013127","journal-title":"Argument Comput"},{"key":"9272_CR12","unstructured":"Barbuceanu M, Fox MS (1995) Cool: a language for describing coordination in multi agent systems. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on multi-agent systems, pp 17\u201324"},{"key":"9272_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.5465\/apbpp.1998.6122608","volume":"1998","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"1998","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (1998) Specification and implementation of Toulmin dialogue game. Proc JURIX 1998:5\u201320","journal-title":"Proc JURIX"},{"key":"9272_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (1998) Specifying the interaction between information sources. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on database and expert systems applications. Springer, pp 425\u2013434","DOI":"10.1007\/BFb0054501"},{"issue":"3","key":"9272_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429","volume":"13","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2003) Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J Log Comput 13(3):429\u2013448","journal-title":"J Log Comput"},{"key":"9272_CR16","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2012) The long and winding road: forty years of argumentation. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on computational models of argument, pp 3\u201310"},{"issue":"1","key":"9272_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9118-7","volume":"20","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2012) Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factors. Artif Intell Law 20(1):15\u201335","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9272_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-017-9201-1","volume":"25","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2017) HYPO\u2019s legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue. Artif Intell Law 25(2):205\u2013250","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9272_CR19","first-page":"103","volume-title":"Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation: an examination of Douglas Walton\u2019s theories of reasoning and argument","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2010) Argumentation schemes: from informal logic to computational models. In: Reed C, Tindale C (eds) Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation: an examination of Douglas Walton\u2019s theories of reasoning and argument. College Publications, London, pp 103\u2013114"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9272_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00108-5","volume":"150","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Sartor G (2003) A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artif Intell 150(1\u20132):97\u2013143","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9272_CR21","first-page":"38","volume-title":"Computer power and legal language","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"1988","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Sergot M (1988) Towards a rule-based representation of open texture in law. In: Walter C (ed) Computer power and legal language. Quorum Books, New York, pp 38\u201361"},{"issue":"3","key":"9272_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0950-7051(91)90007-O","volume":"4","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"1991","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Lowes D, McEnery A (1991) Argument-based explanation of logic programs. Knowl-Based Syst 4(3):177\u2013183","journal-title":"Knowl-Based Syst"},{"issue":"1","key":"9272_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1080\/13600834.1993.9965668","volume":"2","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"1993","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Coenen F, Orton P (1993) Argument-based explanation of the British Nationality Act as a logic program. Inf Commun Technol Law 2(1):53\u201366","journal-title":"Inf Commun Technol Law"},{"key":"9272_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Prakken H, Visser W (2011) Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, New York, pp 21\u201330","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018361"},{"issue":"1","key":"9272_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-011-9173-6","volume":"25","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K, McBurney P (2012) Using argumentation to model agent decision making in economic experiments. J Auton Agents Multi Agent Syst 25(1):183\u2013208","journal-title":"J Auton Agents Multi Agent Syst"},{"key":"9272_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Prakken H, Wyner A, Atkinson K (2013) Argument schemes for reasoning with legal cases using values. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 13\u201322","DOI":"10.1145\/2514601.2514604"},{"key":"9272_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K, Wyner A (2015) Using argumentation to structure e-participation in policy making. In: Transactions on large-scale data-and knowledge-centered systems XVIII. Springer, pp 1\u201329","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-46485-4_1"},{"key":"9272_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-0140-3","volume-title":"Arguments, stories and criminal evidence: a formal hybrid theory","author":"F Bex","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bex F (2011) Arguments, stories and criminal evidence: a formal hybrid theory. Springer, Berlin"},{"key":"9272_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-011-9257-0","volume":"26","author":"F Bex","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bex F, Verheij B (2012) Solving a murder case by asking critical questions: an approach to fact-finding in terms of argumentation and story schemes. Argumentation 26:325\u2013353","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"#cr-split#-9272_CR30.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bex F, Walton D (2010) Burdens and standards of proof for inference to the best explanation. In: Winkels R","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2038431"},{"key":"#cr-split#-9272_CR30.2","unstructured":"(ed) Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX 2010: the 23rd annual conference. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, vol 223. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 37-46"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"9272_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/mgs003","volume":"11","author":"F Bex","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bex F, Walton D (2012) Burdens and standards of proof for inference to the best explanation: three case studies. Law Probab Risk 11(2\u20133):113\u2013133","journal-title":"Law Probab Risk"},{"issue":"1","key":"9272_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-160001","volume":"7","author":"F Bex","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bex F, Walton D (2016) Combining explanation and argumentation in dialogue. Argument Comput 7(1):55\u201368","journal-title":"Argument Comput"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9272_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1177\/1365712718813795","volume":"23","author":"F Bex","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bex F, Walton D (2019) Taking the dialectical stance in reasoning with evidence and proof. Int J Evid Proof 23(1\u20132):90\u201399","journal-title":"Int J Evid Proof"},{"key":"9272_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046007.11806.9a","volume":"12","author":"F Bex","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bex F, Prakken H, Reed C, Walton D (2003) Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations. Artif Intell Law 12:125\u2013165","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9272_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1093\/llc\/fqu054","volume":"29","author":"F Bex","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bex F, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2014) Arguments as a new perspective on character motive in stories. Literary Linguist Comput 29(4):467\u2013487","journal-title":"Literary Linguist Comput"},{"key":"9272_CR36","unstructured":"Black E, Atkinson K (2009) Dialogues that account for different perspectives in collaborative argumentation. In: Sierra C, Castelfranchi C, Decker KS, Sichman JS (eds) 8th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2009), vol 2. IFAAMAS, Budapest, Hungary, pp 867\u2013874"},{"issue":"2","key":"9272_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-008-9074-5","volume":"19","author":"E Black","year":"2009","unstructured":"Black E, Hunter A (2009) An inquiry dialogue system. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 19(2):173\u2013209","journal-title":"Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst"},{"key":"9272_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bobrow D (ed) (1980) Artificial intelligence, vol 13. Special issue on non-monotonic logic","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(80)90009-0"},{"key":"9272_CR39","volume-title":"Handbook of legal reasoning and argumentation","author":"G Bongiovanni","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bongiovanni G, Postema G, Rotolo A, Sartor G, Valentini C, Walton D (2018) Handbook of legal reasoning and argumentation. Springer, Berlin"},{"issue":"5","key":"9272_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1109\/MIS.2009.104","volume":"24","author":"D Cartwright","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cartwright D, Atkinson K (2009) Using computational argumentation to support e-participation. IEEE Intell Syst 24(5):42\u201352","journal-title":"IEEE Intell Syst"},{"key":"9272_CR41","volume-title":"The intentional stance","author":"DC Dennett","year":"1989","unstructured":"Dennett DC (1989) The intentional stance. MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"2","key":"9272_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell 77(2):321\u2013357","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9272_CR43","unstructured":"Dunne PE, Doutre S, Bench-Capon T (2005) Discovering inconsistency through examination dialogues. In: Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 1680\u20131681"},{"key":"9272_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Finin T, Fritzson R, McKay D, McEntire R (1994) KQML as an agent communication language. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on information and knowledge management, pp 456\u2013463","DOI":"10.1145\/191246.191322"},{"key":"9272_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511609886","volume-title":"Constraint handling rules","author":"T Fr\u00fchwirth","year":"2009","unstructured":"Fr\u00fchwirth T (2009) Constraint handling rules. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9272_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gabbay DM, Ohlbach HJ (eds) (1996) Practical reasoning: proceedings of the first international conference on formal and applied practical reasoning. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1085. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-61313-7"},{"key":"9272_CR47","volume-title":"An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning","author":"A Gardner","year":"1987","unstructured":"Gardner A (1987) An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning. MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9272_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871972","volume":"2","author":"TF Gordon","year":"1994","unstructured":"Gordon TF (1994) The pleadings game: an exercise in computational dialectics. Artif Intell Law 2:239\u2013292","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9272_CR49","volume-title":"The pleadings game; an artificial intelligence model of procedural justice","author":"TF Gordon","year":"1995","unstructured":"Gordon TF (1995) The pleadings game; an artificial intelligence model of procedural justice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston"},{"key":"9272_CR50","unstructured":"Gordon TF (2005) A computational model of argument for legal reasoning support systems. In: Dunne PE, Bench-Capon T (eds) Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law. IAAIL workshop series. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, pp 53\u201364"},{"key":"9272_CR51","unstructured":"Gordon TF (2007) 20 years of ICAIL: reflections on the field of AI and law. In: International conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL 2007). Stanford University. Keynote address"},{"issue":"3","key":"9272_CR52","first-page":"747","volume":"5","author":"TF Gordon","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gordon TF (2018) Defining argument weighing functions. IfCoLog J Log Appl 5(3):747\u2013773","journal-title":"IfCoLog J Log Appl"},{"key":"9272_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Karacapilidis N (1997) The Zeno argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, Melbourne, Australia, pp 10\u201318","DOI":"10.1145\/261618.261622"},{"key":"9272_CR54","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Walton D (2006) Pierson vs. Post revisited\u2014a reconstruction using the Carneades argumentation framework. In: Dunne PE, Bench-Capon TJ (eds) Proceedings of the first international conference on computational models of argument (COMMA 06). IOS Press, Liverpool, pp 208\u2013222"},{"key":"9272_CR55","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Walton D (2006) The Carneades argumentation framework\u2014using presumptions and exceptions to model critical questions. In: Dunne PE, Bench-Capon TJM (eds) Computational models of argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2006. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 195\u2013207"},{"key":"#cr-split#-9272_CR56.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Walton D (2009) Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. In: Hafner CD","DOI":"10.1145\/1568234.1568250"},{"key":"#cr-split#-9272_CR56.2","unstructured":"(ed) 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL 2009). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp 137-146"},{"key":"9272_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_12","volume-title":"Argumentation in artificial intelligence","author":"TF Gordon","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Walton D (2009) Proof burdens and standards. In: Rahwan I, Simari G (eds) Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 239\u2013260"},{"issue":"1","key":"9272_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9120-0","volume":"20","author":"TF Gordon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Walton D (2012) A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi. Artif Intell Law 20(1):37\u201356","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9272_CR59","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Walton D (2016) Formalizing balancing arguments. In: Proceeding of the 2016 conference on computational models of argument (COMMA 2016). IOS Press, pp 327\u2013338"},{"issue":"10\u201311","key":"9272_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.010","volume":"171","author":"TF Gordon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Prakken H, Walton D (2007) The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artif Intell 171(10\u201311):875\u2013896","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"2","key":"9272_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-180039","volume":"9","author":"TF Gordon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Friederich H, Walton D (2017) Representing argumentation schemes with constraint handling rules (CHR). Argument Comput 9(2):91\u2013119","journal-title":"Argument Comput"},{"key":"9272_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Greenwood K, Bench-Capon T, McBurney P (2003) Towards a computational account of persuasion in law. In: Zeleznikow J, Sartor G (eds) Proceedings of the 9th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL 2003. ACM, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, pp 22\u201331","DOI":"10.1145\/1047788.1047792"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"9272_CR63","first-page":"171","volume":"3","author":"JC Hage","year":"1994","unstructured":"Hage JC, Verheij B (1994) Reason-based logic: a logic for reasoning with rules and reasons. Law Comput Artif Intell 3(2\u20133):171\u2013209","journal-title":"Law Comput Artif Intell"},{"key":"9272_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871759","volume":"2","author":"J Hage","year":"1993","unstructured":"Hage J, Leenes R, Lodder A (1993) Hard cases: a procedural approach. Artif Intell Law 2:113\u2013166","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9272_CR65","volume-title":"Fallacies","author":"CL Hamblin","year":"1970","unstructured":"Hamblin CL (1970) Fallacies. Methuen, London"},{"key":"9272_CR66","unstructured":"Hastings AC (1963) A reformulation of the modes of reasoning in argumentation. Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois"},{"key":"9272_CR67","volume-title":"Logic: a concise introduction","author":"P Hurley","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hurley P (2003) Logic: a concise introduction. Wadsworth, Belmont"},{"key":"9272_CR68","unstructured":"Huygen P (2002) Use of Bayesian belief networks in legal reasoning. In: 17th BILETA annual conference, Amsterdam, pp 2\u201314"},{"key":"9272_CR69","volume-title":"Abductive inference: computation, philosophy, technology","author":"JR Josephson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Josephson JR, Josephson SG (1996) Abductive inference: computation, philosophy, technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9272_CR70","volume-title":"A probabilistic analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti evidence","author":"JB Kadane","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kadane JB, Schum DA (2011) A probabilistic analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti evidence, vol 773. Wiley, New York"},{"key":"9272_CR71","unstructured":"Kenny AJP (1978) Practical reasoning and rational appetite. In: Raz J (eds) Practical reasoning. Oxford University Press, pp 63\u201380"},{"key":"9272_CR72","volume-title":"Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern","author":"M Kienpointner","year":"1992","unstructured":"Kienpointner M (1992) Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Fromman-Holzboog, Stuttgart"},{"key":"9272_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kirchev Y, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2019) Demonstrating the distinctions between persuasion and deliberation dialogues. In: Bramer M, Petridis M (eds) Artificial intelligence XXXVI\u201439th SGAI international conference on artificial intelligence. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 11927. Springer, pp 93\u2013106","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-34885-4_7"},{"key":"9272_CR74","first-page":"161","volume":"51","author":"B Kurtuldu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kurtuldu B (2019) Douglas Walton\u2019\u0131n arg\u00fcman bi\u00e7imleri yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131. Felsefe Arkivi 51:161\u2013178","journal-title":"Felsefe Arkivi"},{"key":"9272_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Labrou Y, Finin T (1994) A semantics approach for KQML\u2014a general purpose communication language for software agents. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on information and knowledge management, pp 447\u2013455","DOI":"10.1145\/191246.191320"},{"key":"9272_CR76","unstructured":"Lodder A, Herczog A (1995) A dialogical framework for modeling legal reasoning. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, New York, pp 146\u2013155"},{"key":"9272_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8640.1987.tb00178.x","volume":"2","author":"R Loui","year":"1987","unstructured":"Loui R (1987) Defeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inference. Comput Intell 2:100\u2013106","journal-title":"Comput Intell"},{"issue":"2","key":"9272_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888997002026","volume":"12","author":"P Lucas","year":"1997","unstructured":"Lucas P (1997) Symbolic diagnosis and its formalisation. Knowl Eng Rev 12(2):109\u2013146","journal-title":"Knowl Eng Rev"},{"key":"9272_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lutomski LS (1989) The design of an attorney\u2019s statistical consultant. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM, pp 224\u2013233","DOI":"10.1145\/74014.74043"},{"key":"9272_CR80","unstructured":"Macagno F, Walton D, Sartor G (2014) Argumentation schemes for statutory interpretation. In: Araszkiewicz M (ed) International conference on alternative methods of argumentation in law, Brno, pp 61\u201375"},{"issue":"8","key":"9272_CR81","first-page":"2493","volume":"4","author":"F Macagno","year":"2017","unstructured":"Macagno F, Walton D, Reed C (2017) Argumentation schemes. History, classifications, and computational applications. J Appl Log IfCoLoG J Log Appl 4(8):2493\u20132556","journal-title":"J Appl Log IfCoLoG J Log Appl"},{"key":"9272_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1007\/s10982-017-9306-4","volume":"37","author":"F Macagno","year":"2018","unstructured":"Macagno F, Walton D, Sartor G (2018) Pragmatic maxims and presumptions in legal interpretation. Law Philos 37:69\u2013115","journal-title":"Law Philos"},{"key":"9272_CR83","first-page":"511","volume-title":"Interpreting statutes: a comparative study","author":"DN MacCormick","year":"1991","unstructured":"MacCormick DN, Summers RS (1991) Interpretation and justification. In: MacCormick DN, Summers RS (eds) Interpreting statutes: a comparative study. Darthmouth, Hanover, pp 511\u201344"},{"key":"9272_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00258422","volume":"8","author":"JD Mackenzie","year":"1979","unstructured":"Mackenzie JD (1979) Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. J Philos Log 8:117\u2013133","journal-title":"J Philos Log"},{"key":"9272_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marshall CC (1989) Representing the structure of a legal argument. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM, pp 121\u2013127","DOI":"10.1145\/74014.74031"},{"key":"9272_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2018.07.007","volume":"267","author":"T Miller","year":"2019","unstructured":"Miller T (2019) Explanation in artificial intelligence: insights from the social sciences. Artif Intell 267:1\u201338","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9272_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869766","volume":"5","author":"S Modgil","year":"2014","unstructured":"Modgil S, Prakken H (2014) The ASPIC$$^{+}$$ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial. Argument Comput 5:31\u201362","journal-title":"Argument Comput"},{"key":"9272_CR88","first-page":"286","volume-title":"Handbook of formal argumentation","author":"S Modgil","year":"2018","unstructured":"Modgil S, Prakken H (2018) Abstract rule-based argumentation. In: Baroni P, Gabbay D, Giacomin M, van der Torre L (eds) Handbook of formal argumentation, vol 1. College Publications, London, pp 286\u2013361"},{"key":"9272_CR89","volume-title":"The story model for juror decision making","author":"N Pennington","year":"1993","unstructured":"Pennington N, Hastie R (1993) The story model for juror decision making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9272_CR90","volume-title":"The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation, trans","author":"C Perelman","year":"1969","unstructured":"Perelman C, Olbrechts-Tyteca L (1969) The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation, trans. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame"},{"key":"9272_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4","volume":"11","author":"J Pollock","year":"1987","unstructured":"Pollock J (1987) Defeasible reasoning. Cogn Sci 11:481\u2013518","journal-title":"Cogn Sci"},{"key":"9272_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)90057-4","volume":"67","author":"J Pollock","year":"1994","unstructured":"Pollock J (1994) Justification and defeat. Artif Intell 67:377\u2013408","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9272_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001","volume-title":"Cognitive carpentry. A blueprint for how to build a person","author":"J Pollock","year":"1995","unstructured":"Pollock J (1995) Cognitive carpentry. A blueprint for how to build a person. MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9272_CR94","unstructured":"Poole D (1985) On the comparison of theories: preferring the most specific explanation. In: Proceedings of the 9th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 144\u2013147"},{"key":"9272_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H (1991) A tool in modelling disagreement in law: preferring the most specific argument. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, New York, pp 165\u2013174","DOI":"10.1145\/112646.112666"},{"key":"9272_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exi046","volume":"15","author":"H Prakken","year":"2005","unstructured":"Prakken H (2005) Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. J Log Comput 15:1009\u20131040","journal-title":"J Log Comput"},{"key":"9272_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H (2005) A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. In: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, New York, pp 85\u201394","DOI":"10.1145\/1165485.1165500"},{"issue":"2","key":"9272_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888906000865","volume":"21","author":"H Prakken","year":"2006","unstructured":"Prakken H (2006) Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. Knowl Eng Rev 21(2):163\u2013188","journal-title":"Knowl Eng Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"9272_CR99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-008-9066-4","volume":"16","author":"H Prakken","year":"2008","unstructured":"Prakken H (2008) A formal model of adjudication dialogues. Artif Intell Law 16(3):305\u2013328","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9272_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592","volume":"1","author":"H Prakken","year":"2010","unstructured":"Prakken H (2010) An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument Comput 1:93\u2013124","journal-title":"Argument Comput"},{"key":"9272_CR101","first-page":"167","volume-title":"Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation. An examination of Douglas Walton\u2019s theories of reasoning and argument","author":"H Prakken","year":"2010","unstructured":"Prakken H (2010) On the nature of argument schemes. In: Reed C, Tindale C (eds) Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation. An examination of Douglas Walton\u2019s theories of reasoning and argument. College Publications, London, pp 167\u2013185"},{"key":"9272_CR102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-19575-9_11","volume-title":"Logic in the theory and practice of lawmaking","author":"H Prakken","year":"2015","unstructured":"Prakken H (2015) Formalising debates about law-making proposals as practical reasoning. In: Araszkiewicz M, P\u0142eszka K (eds) Logic in the theory and practice of lawmaking. Springer, Berlin, pp 301\u2013321"},{"key":"9272_CR103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H (2019) Modelling accrual of arguments in ASPIC$$^+$$. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 103\u2013112","DOI":"10.1145\/3322640.3326703"},{"key":"9272_CR104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118496","volume":"4","author":"H Prakken","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (1996) A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artif Intell Law 4:331\u2013368","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9272_CR105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1080\/11663081.1997.10510900","volume":"7","author":"H Prakken","year":"1997","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (1997) Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. J Appl Non-class Log 7:25\u201375","journal-title":"J Appl Non-class Log"},{"key":"9272_CR106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (2007) Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion. In: Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, New York, pp 97\u2013106","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.998206"},{"key":"9272_CR107","first-page":"223","volume-title":"Legal evidence and proof: statistics, stories, logic","author":"H Prakken","year":"2009","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (2009) A logical analysis of burdens of proof. In: Kaptein H, Prakken H, Verheij B (eds) Legal evidence and proof: statistics, stories, logic. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham, pp 223\u2013253"},{"key":"9272_CR108","unstructured":"Prakken H, Reed C, Walton D (2004) Argumentation schemes and burden of proof. In: Proceedings of the ECAI-2004 workshop on computational models of natural argument, pp 81\u201386"},{"key":"9272_CR109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H, Reed C, Walton D (2005) Dialogues about the burden of proof. In: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, New York, pp 115\u2013124","DOI":"10.1145\/1165485.1165503"},{"issue":"5","key":"9272_CR110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1141","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/ext010","volume":"25","author":"H Prakken","year":"2015","unstructured":"Prakken H, Wyner A, Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2015) A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC$$^{+}$$. J Log Comput 25(5):1141\u20131166","journal-title":"J Log Comput"},{"key":"9272_CR111","series-title":"Argumentation library","volume-title":"Argumentation machines. New frontiers in argument and computation","year":"2003","unstructured":"Reed C, Norman T (eds) (2003) Argumentation machines. New frontiers in argument and computation, vol 9. Argumentation library. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London"},{"issue":"4","key":"9272_CR112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218213004001922","volume":"13","author":"C Reed","year":"2004","unstructured":"Reed C, Rowe G (2004) Araucaria: software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. Int J AI Tools 13(4):961\u2013980","journal-title":"Int J AI Tools"},{"key":"9272_CR113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Ashley KD (1987) A case-based system for trade secrets law. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, New York, pp 60\u201366","DOI":"10.1145\/41735.41743"},{"issue":"2","key":"9272_CR114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.5840\/teachphil200629217","volume":"29","author":"G Rowe","year":"2006","unstructured":"Rowe G, Macagno F, Reed C, Walton D (2006) Araucaria as a tool for diagramming arguments in teaching and studying philosophy. Teach Philos 29(2):111\u2013124","journal-title":"Teach Philos"},{"key":"9272_CR115","unstructured":"Sartor G, Walton D, Macagno F, Rotolo A (2014) Argumentation schemes for statutory interpretation: a logical analysis. In: Hoekstra R (ed) Legal knowledge and information system: Jurix-2014. IOS, pp 11\u201320"},{"key":"9272_CR116","volume-title":"Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures","author":"RC Schank","year":"1977","unstructured":"Schank RC, Abelson RP (1977) Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Psychology Press, London"},{"key":"9272_CR117","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139173438","volume-title":"Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language","author":"JR Searle","year":"1969","unstructured":"Searle JR (1969) Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language, vol 626. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9272_CR118","volume-title":"Rule-based expert systems: the MYCIN experiments of the Stanford heuristic programming project","author":"EH Shortliffe","year":"1985","unstructured":"Shortliffe EH, Buchanan BG (1985) Rule-based expert systems: the MYCIN experiments of the Stanford heuristic programming project. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston"},{"key":"9272_CR119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1007\/10722777_3","volume-title":"Issues in agent communication","author":"MP Singh","year":"2000","unstructured":"Singh MP (2000) A social semantics for agent communication languages. In: Dignum F, Greaves M (eds) Issues in agent communication. Springer, Berlin, pp 31\u201345"},{"key":"9272_CR120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1163\/9789004320994","volume-title":"Aristotle\u2019s topics","author":"P Slomkowski","year":"1997","unstructured":"Slomkowski P (1997) Aristotle\u2019s topics, vol 74. Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden"},{"key":"9272_CR121","unstructured":"Smith IA, Cohen PR (1996) Toward a semantics for an agent communications language based on speech-acts. In: AAAI\/IAAI, vol 1. Citeseer, pp 24\u201331"},{"issue":"2","key":"9272_CR122","first-page":"79","volume":"19","author":"KP Sycara","year":"1998","unstructured":"Sycara KP (1998) Multiagent systems: special issue on agents. AI Mag 19(2):79\u201392","journal-title":"AI Mag"},{"key":"9272_CR123","volume-title":"L\u2019interpretazione della legge","author":"G Tarello","year":"1980","unstructured":"Tarello G (1980) L\u2019interpretazione della legge. Giuffr\u00e8, Milano"},{"issue":"2","key":"9272_CR124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-011-9174-5","volume":"25","author":"P Tolchinsky","year":"2012","unstructured":"Tolchinsky P, Modgil S, Atkinson K, McBurney P, Cort\u00e9s U (2012) Deliberation dialogues for reasoning about safety critical actions. Auton Agents Multi Agent Syst 25(2):209\u2013259","journal-title":"Auton Agents Multi Agent Syst"},{"issue":"1","key":"9272_CR125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869878","volume":"5","author":"F Toni","year":"2014","unstructured":"Toni F (2014) A tutorial on assumption-based argumentation. Argument Comput 5(1):89\u2013117","journal-title":"Argument Comput"},{"key":"9272_CR126","volume-title":"The uses of argument","author":"SE Toulmin","year":"1958","unstructured":"Toulmin SE (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"1","key":"9272_CR127","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-006-9072-6","volume":"156","author":"W van der Hoek","year":"2007","unstructured":"van der Hoek W, Roberts M, Wooldridge MJ (2007) Social laws in alternating time: effectiveness, feasibility, and synthesis. Synthese 156(1):1\u201319","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9272_CR128","volume-title":"Argumentation, communication and fallacies","author":"FH van Eemeren","year":"1992","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R (1992) Argumentation, communication and fallacies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah"},{"key":"9272_CR129","volume-title":"Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: a pragma-dialectical perspective","author":"FH van Eemeren","year":"2016","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R (2016) Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: a pragma-dialectical perspective. Routledge, London"},{"key":"9272_CR130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1013803600690","volume":"9","author":"B Verheij","year":"2001","unstructured":"Verheij B (2001) Book review of D. Walton\u2019s \u2018the new dialectic\u2019, \u2018ad hominem arguments\u2019 and \u2018one-sided arguments\u2019. Artif Intell Law 9:305\u2013313","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9272_CR131","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Verheij B (2001) Legal decision making as dialectical theory construction with argumentation schemes. In: The 8th international conference on artificial intelligence and law. Proceedings of the conference. ACM, New York, NY, pp 225\u2013226","DOI":"10.1145\/383535.383565"},{"key":"9272_CR132","unstructured":"Verheij B (2001) Logic, context and valid inference. Or: can there be a logic of law? In: van den Herik HJ, Moens MF, Bing J, van Buggenhout B, Zeleznikow J, Gr\u00fctters CAFM (eds) Legal knowledge based systems. JURIX 1999: the twelfth conference. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 55\u201384"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9272_CR133","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00107-3","volume":"150","author":"B Verheij","year":"2003","unstructured":"Verheij B (2003) Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation. Artif Intell 150(1\u20132):291\u2013324","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"3","key":"9272_CR134","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.319","volume":"13","author":"B Verheij","year":"2003","unstructured":"Verheij B (2003) DefLog: on the logical interpretation of prima facie justified assumptions. J Log Comput 13(3):319\u2013346","journal-title":"J Log Comput"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"9272_CR135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046008.49443.36","volume":"11","author":"B Verheij","year":"2003","unstructured":"Verheij B (2003) Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: an approach to legal logic. Artif Intell Law 11(2\u20133):167\u2013195","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9272_CR136","volume-title":"Virtual arguments. On the design of argument assistants for lawyers and other arguers","author":"B Verheij","year":"2005","unstructured":"Verheij B (2005) Virtual arguments. On the design of argument assistants for lawyers and other arguers. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague"},{"key":"9272_CR137","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1093\/lpr\/mgm017","volume":"6","author":"B Verheij","year":"2007","unstructured":"Verheij B (2007) Argumentation support software: boxes-and-arrows and beyond. Law Probab Risk 6:187\u2013208","journal-title":"Law Probab Risk"},{"key":"9272_CR138","first-page":"161","volume-title":"Legal evidence and proof: statistics, stories, logic","author":"B Verheij","year":"2009","unstructured":"Verheij B, Bex F (2009) Accepting the truth of a story about the facts of a criminal case. In: Kaptein H, Prakken H, Verheij B (eds) Legal evidence and proof: statistics, stories, logic. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 161\u2013193"},{"key":"9272_CR139","volume-title":"Topics and law: a contribution to basic research in law","author":"T Viehweg","year":"1993","unstructured":"Viehweg T (1993) Topics and law: a contribution to basic research in law. Lang, Bern"},{"key":"9272_CR140","unstructured":"Vreeswijk G (1993) Studies in defeasible argumentation. Doctoral dissertation, Free University Amsterdam"},{"key":"9272_CR141","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(96)00041-0","volume":"90","author":"G Vreeswijk","year":"1997","unstructured":"Vreeswijk G (1997) Abstract argumentation systems. Artif Intell 90:225\u2013279","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9272_CR142","volume-title":"Anchored narratives. The psychology of criminal evidence","author":"WA Wagenaar","year":"1993","unstructured":"Wagenaar WA, van Koppen PJ, Crombag HFM (1993) Anchored narratives. The psychology of criminal evidence. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London"},{"key":"9272_CR143","volume-title":"Informal logic: a handbook for critical argument","author":"D Walton","year":"1989","unstructured":"Walton D (1989) Informal logic: a handbook for critical argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9272_CR144","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton D (1996) Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah"},{"key":"9272_CR145","volume-title":"Ad hominem arguments","author":"D Walton","year":"1998","unstructured":"Walton D (1998) Ad hominem arguments. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscalooso"},{"key":"9272_CR146","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3138\/9781442681859","volume-title":"The new dialectic: conversational contexts of argument","author":"D Walton","year":"1998","unstructured":"Walton D (1998) The new dialectic: conversational contexts of argument. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Buffalo"},{"key":"9272_CR147","volume-title":"One-sided arguments. A dialectical analysis of bias","author":"D Walton","year":"1999","unstructured":"Walton D (1999) One-sided arguments. A dialectical analysis of bias. State University of New York Press, Albany"},{"key":"9272_CR148","volume-title":"Legal argumentation and evidence","author":"D Walton","year":"2002","unstructured":"Walton D (2002) Legal argumentation and evidence. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park"},{"key":"9272_CR149","volume-title":"Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law","author":"D Walton","year":"2005","unstructured":"Walton D (2005) Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law. Springer, Berlin"},{"key":"9272_CR150","volume-title":"Character evidence\u2014an abductive theory","author":"D Walton","year":"2006","unstructured":"Walton D (2006) Character evidence\u2014an abductive theory. Springer, Berlin"},{"key":"9272_CR151","volume-title":"Fundamentals of critical argumentation","author":"D Walton","year":"2006","unstructured":"Walton D (2006) Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9272_CR152","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1075\/cvs.5","volume-title":"Dialog theory for critical argumentation","author":"D Walton","year":"2007","unstructured":"Walton D (2007) Dialog theory for critical argumentation. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam"},{"key":"9272_CR153","volume-title":"Witness Testimony evidence\u2014argumentation, artificial intelligence and law","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton D (2008) Witness Testimony evidence\u2014argumentation, artificial intelligence and law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"1","key":"9272_CR154","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903494576","volume":"1","author":"D Walton","year":"2010","unstructured":"Walton D (2010) A dialogue model of belief. Argument Comput 1(1):23\u201346","journal-title":"Argument Comput"},{"key":"9272_CR155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781107110311","volume-title":"Burden of proof, presumption and argumentation","author":"D Walton","year":"2014","unstructured":"Walton D (2014) Burden of proof, presumption and argumentation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9272_CR156","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-19626-8","volume-title":"Argument evaluation and evidence","author":"D Walton","year":"2016","unstructured":"Walton D (2016) Argument evaluation and evidence. Springer, Berlin"},{"issue":"3","key":"9272_CR157","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-190480","volume":"10","author":"D Walton","year":"2019","unstructured":"Walton D (2019) Using argumentation schemes to find motives and intentions of a rational agent. Argument Comput 10(3):233\u2013275","journal-title":"Argument Comput"},{"key":"9272_CR158","first-page":"476","volume-title":"The uses of argument","author":"D Walton","year":"2005","unstructured":"Walton D, Godden D (2005) The nature of critical questions in argumentation schemes. In: Hitchcock D (ed) The uses of argument. McMaster University, Hamilton, pp 476\u2013484"},{"key":"9272_CR159","unstructured":"Walton D, Gordon TF (2005) Critical questions in computational models of legal argument. In: Dunne PE, Bench-Capon T (eds) Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law. IAAIL workshop series. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, pp 103\u2013111"},{"issue":"1","key":"9272_CR160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1075\/pc.20.1.01wal","volume":"20","author":"D Walton","year":"2012","unstructured":"Walton D, Gordon TF (2012) The Carneades model of argument invention. Pragmat Cognit 20(1):1\u201331","journal-title":"Pragmat Cognit"},{"issue":"4","key":"9272_CR161","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v35i4.4335","volume":"35","author":"D Walton","year":"2015","unstructured":"Walton D, Gordon TF (2015) Formalizing informal logic. Informal Log 35(4):508\u2013538","journal-title":"Informal Log"},{"issue":"2","key":"9272_CR162","first-page":"168","volume":"14","author":"D Walton","year":"2017","unstructured":"Walton D, Gordon TF (2017) Argument invention with the Carneades argumentation system. Scr-Ed 14(2):168\u2013207","journal-title":"Scr-Ed"},{"key":"9272_CR163","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-017-9439-5","volume":"33","author":"D Walton","year":"2018","unstructured":"Walton D, Gordon TF (2018) How computational tools can help rhetoric and informal logic with argument invention. Argumentation 33:269\u2013295","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9272_CR164","volume-title":"Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton D, Krabbe E (1995) Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. SUNY Press, Albany"},{"key":"9272_CR165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton D, Reed C, Macagno F (2008) Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"1","key":"9272_CR166","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-013-9306-y","volume":"28","author":"D Walton","year":"2014","unstructured":"Walton D, Tindale C, Gordon TF (2014) Applying recent argumentation methods to some ancient examples of plausible reasoning. Argumentation 28(1):85\u2013119","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9272_CR167","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9179-0","volume":"24","author":"D Walton","year":"2016","unstructured":"Walton D, Sartor G, Macagno F (2016) An argumentation framework for contested cases of statutory interpretation. Artif Intell Law 24:51\u201391","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9272_CR168","first-page":"519","volume-title":"Handbook of legal reasoning and argumentation","author":"D Walton","year":"2018","unstructured":"Walton D, Sartor G, Macagno F (2018) Statutory interpretation as argumentation. In: Bongiovanni G, Postema G, Rotolo A, Sartor G, Valentini C, Walton D (eds) Handbook of legal reasoning and argumentation. Springer, Berlin, pp 519\u2013560"},{"key":"9272_CR169","unstructured":"Wardeh M (2010) Arguing from experience: persuasive dialogue based on association rules. Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool"},{"key":"9272_CR170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wardeh M, Bench-Capon T, Coenen F (2007) Padua protocol: strategies and tactics. In: European conference on symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning and uncertainty. Springer, pp 465\u2013476","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-75256-1_42"},{"issue":"3","key":"9272_CR171","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-009-9078-8","volume":"17","author":"M Wardeh","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wardeh M, Bench-Capon T, Coenen F (2009) Padua: a protocol for argumentation dialogue using association rules. Artif Intell Law 17(3):183\u2013215","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9272_CR172","volume-title":"The science of judicial proof, as given by logic, psychology, and general experience, and illustrated in judicial trials","author":"JH Wigmore","year":"1937","unstructured":"Wigmore JH (1937) The science of judicial proof, as given by logic, psychology, and general experience, and illustrated in judicial trials. Little, Brown, Boston"},{"key":"9272_CR173","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00245921","volume":"7","author":"J Woods","year":"1978","unstructured":"Woods J, Walton D (1978) Arresting circles in formal dialogues. J Philos Log 7:73\u201390","journal-title":"J Philos Log"},{"key":"9272_CR174","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wooldridge M, Parsons S (2000) Issues in the design of negotiation protocols for logic-based agent communication languages. In: International workshop on agent-mediated electronic commerce. Springer, pp 70\u201383","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-44723-7_5"},{"key":"9272_CR175","unstructured":"Wyner A, Bench-Capon T (2007) Argument schemes for legal case-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of JURIX 2007. Citeseer, pp 139\u2013149"},{"key":"9272_CR176","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wyner A, Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2011) Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 1\u201310","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018359"},{"key":"9272_CR177","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wyner A, Wardeh M, Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2012) A model-based critique tool for policy deliberation. In: JURIX, pp 167\u2013176","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-33250-0_11"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-020-09272-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10506-020-09272-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-020-09272-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,15]],"date-time":"2021-06-15T23:21:58Z","timestamp":1623799318000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10506-020-09272-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,16]]},"references-count":179,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]}},"alternative-id":["9272"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-020-09272-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0924-8463","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8382","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 June 2020","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}